Skip to main content
British Journal of Cancer logoLink to British Journal of Cancer
. 2001 Sep 1;85(9):1273–1279. doi: 10.1054/bjoc.2001.2073

Promoting patient participation and shortening cancer consultations: a randomised trial

R F Brown 1, P N Butow 1,2, S M Dunn 1,2, M H N Tattersall 1,3
PMCID: PMC2375236  PMID: 11720460

Abstract

Patient participation in medical consultations has been demonstrated to benefit their subsequent psychological well being. Question asking is one way in which patients can be active. We investigated 2 means of promoting cancer patient question asking. One was the provision of a question prompt sheet to patients prior to their initial consultation with their oncologist. The second was the active endorsement and systematic review of the question prompt sheet by their oncologist. 318 patients with heterogeneous cancers, seeing one of 5 medical and 4 radiation oncologists for the first time, were randomised to either receive or not receive a question prompt sheet. Doctors were randomised to either proactively address or passively respond to the question prompt sheet in the subsequent consultation. Anxiety was assessed prior to the consultation. Consultations were audiotaped and content analysed. Anxiety was assessed again immediately following the consultation. Within the next 10 days patients completed questionnaires assessing information needs, anxiety and satisfaction and were given a structured telephone interview assessing information recall. Patients provided with a question prompt sheet asked more questions about prognosis compared with controls and oncologists gave significantly more prognostic information to these patients. Provision of the question prompt sheet prolonged consultations and increased patient anxiety; however, when oncologists specifically addressed the prompt sheet, anxiety levels were significantly reduced, consultation duration was decreased and recall was significantly improved. A patient question prompt sheet, used proactively by the doctor, is a powerful addition to the oncology consultation. © 2001 Cancer Research Campaign

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (64.3 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Barry C. A., Bradley C. P., Britten N., Stevenson F. A., Barber N. Patients' unvoiced agendas in general practice consultations: qualitative study. BMJ. 2000 May 6;320(7244):1246–1250. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7244.1246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Blanchard C. G., Labrecque M. S., Ruckdeschel J. C., Blanchard E. B. Physician behaviors, patient perceptions, and patient characteristics as predictors of satisfaction of hospitalized adult cancer patients. Cancer. 1990 Jan 1;65(1):186–192. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19900101)65:1<186::aid-cncr2820650136>3.0.co;2-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brody H. Autonomy revisited: progress in medical ethics: discussion paper. J R Soc Med. 1985 May;78(5):380–387. doi: 10.1177/014107688507800507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Brown R., Butow P. N., Boyer M. J., Tattersall M. H. Promoting patient participation in the cancer consultation: evaluation of a prompt sheet and coaching in question-asking. Br J Cancer. 1999 Apr;80(1-2):242–248. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6690346. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Butow P. N., Dunn S. M., Tattersall M. H., Jones Q. J. Patient participation in the cancer consultation: evaluation of a question prompt sheet. Ann Oncol. 1994 Mar;5(3):199–204. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.annonc.a058793. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Butow P. N., Kazemi J. N., Beeney L. J., Griffin A. M., Dunn S. M., Tattersall M. H. When the diagnosis is cancer: patient communication experiences and preferences. Cancer. 1996 Jun 15;77(12):2630–2637. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19960615)77:12<2630::AID-CNCR29>3.0.CO;2-S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cassileth B. R., Zupkis R. V., Sutton-Smith K., March V. Information and participation preferences among cancer patients. Ann Intern Med. 1980 Jun;92(6):832–836. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-92-6-832. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Dunn S. M., Butow P. N., Tattersall M. H., Jones Q. J., Sheldon J. S., Taylor J. J., Sumich M. D. General information tapes inhibit recall of the cancer consultation. J Clin Oncol. 1993 Nov;11(11):2279–2285. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1993.11.11.2279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gattellari M., Butow P. N., Tattersall M. H. Informed consent: what did the doctor say? Lancet. 1999 May 15;353(9165):1713–1713. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)77027-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kaplan S. H., Greenfield S., Gandek B., Rogers W. H., Ware J. E., Jr Characteristics of physicians with participatory decision-making styles. Ann Intern Med. 1996 Mar 1;124(5):497–504. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-124-5-199603010-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Korsch B. M., Gozzi E. K., Francis V. Gaps in doctor-patient communication. 1. Doctor-patient interaction and patient satisfaction. Pediatrics. 1968 Nov;42(5):855–871. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Levinson W., Stiles W. B., Inui T. S., Engle R. Physician frustration in communicating with patients. Med Care. 1993 Apr;31(4):285–295. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199304000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Roter D. L. Patient participation in the patient-provider interaction: the effects of patient question asking on the quality of interaction, satisfaction and compliance. Health Educ Monogr. 1977 Winter;5(4):281–315. doi: 10.1177/109019817700500402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Smith C. K., Polis E., Hadac R. R. Characteristics of the initial medical interview associated with patient satisfaction and understanding. J Fam Pract. 1981 Feb;12(2):283–288. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Stiles W. B., Putnam S. M., Wolf M. H., James S. A. Interaction exchange structure and patient satisfaction with medical interviews. Med Care. 1979 Jun;17(6):667–681. doi: 10.1097/00005650-197906000-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Street R. L., Jr Information-giving in medical consultations: the influence of patients' communicative styles and personal characteristics. Soc Sci Med. 1991;32(5):541–548. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(91)90288-n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Sutherland H. J., Llewellyn-Thomas H. A., Lockwood G. A., Tritchler D. L., Till J. E. Cancer patients: their desire for information and participation in treatment decisions. J R Soc Med. 1989 May;82(5):260–263. doi: 10.1177/014107688908200506. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Tattersall M. H., Butow P. N., Griffin A. M., Dunn S. M. The take-home message: patients prefer consultation audiotapes to summary letters. J Clin Oncol. 1994 Jun;12(6):1305–1311. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1994.12.6.1305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Wriglesworth J. M., Williams J. T. The construction of an objective test to measure patient satisfaction. Int J Nurs Stud. 1975;12(3):123–132. doi: 10.1016/0020-7489(75)90009-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Journal of Cancer are provided here courtesy of Cancer Research UK

RESOURCES