Skip to main content
British Journal of Cancer logoLink to British Journal of Cancer
. 2001 Sep 1;85(9):1289–1294. doi: 10.1054/bjoc.2001.2047

Routine breast screening for women aged 65–69: results from evaluation of the demonstration sites

S M Moss 1, J Brown 2, L Garvican 3, D A Coleman 1, L E Johns 1, R G Blanks 1, G Rubin 4, J Oswald 4, A Page 4, A Evans 5, P Gamble 5, R Wilson 5, L Lee 5, J Liston 6, L Sturdy 6, G Sutton 7, G Wardman 8, J Patnick 9, R Winder 9
PMCID: PMC2375256  PMID: 11720462

Abstract

Routine programme data and specially designed surveys from 3 demonstration sites were analysed to determine the implications of extending the NHS Breast Screening Programme (NHSBSP), to include routine invitations for women up to 69 years. All women aged 65–69 and registered with GPs in these areas received routine invitations for breast screening along with those aged 50–64. Overall uptake was 71% in women aged 65–69 compared with 78% in younger women, but was ≥ 90% in both groups who had previously attended within 5 years. Recall rates were lower for older women, but with a higher positive predictive value for cancer. The percentages of invasive cancer in different prognostic categories were similar in the 2 age groups. Older women took no longer to screen than younger women. The costs per woman invited or per woman screened were also similar to those for women aged 50–64, whilst the cost per cancer detected was some 34% lower in older women. Breast screening is as cost effective for women aged 65–69 as for those aged 50–64, with a higher cancer detection rate balancing shorter life expectancy. The proposed extension to the national programme will have considerable workforce implications for the NHSBSP and require additional resources. © 2001 Cancer Research Campaign

Keywords: breast cancer, screening, older women

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (56.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Chen H. H., Tabar L., Fagerberg G., Duffy S. W. Effect of breast cancer screening after age 65. J Med Screen. 1995;2(1):10–14. doi: 10.1177/096914139500200104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Fracheboud J., de Koning H. J., Beemsterboer P. M., Boer R., Hendriks J. H., Verbeek A. L., van Ineveld B. M., de Bruyn A. E., van der Maas P. J. Nation-wide breast cancer screening in The Netherlands: results of initial and subsequent screening 1990-1995. National Evaluation Team for Breast Cancer Screening. Int J Cancer. 1998 Mar 2;75(5):694–698. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0215(19980302)75:5<694::aid-ijc6>3.0.co;2-u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Galea M. H., Blamey R. W., Elston C. E., Ellis I. O. The Nottingham Prognostic Index in primary breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1992;22(3):207–219. doi: 10.1007/BF01840834. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hendry P. J., Entwistle C. Effect of issuing an invitation for breast cancer screening to women aged 65 to 69. J Med Screen. 1996;3(2):88–89. doi: 10.1177/096914139600300209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hobbs P., Kay C., Friedman E. H., St Leger A. S., Lambert C., Boggis C. R., Howard T. M., Owen A. W., Asbury D. L. Response by women aged 65-79 to invitation for screening for breast cancer by mammography: a pilot study. BMJ. 1990 Dec 8;301(6764):1314–1316. doi: 10.1136/bmj.301.6764.1314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Horton Taylor D., McPherson K., Parbhoo S., Perry N. Response of women aged 65-74 to invitation for screening for breast cancer by mammography: a pilot study in London, UK. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1996 Feb;50(1):77–80. doi: 10.1136/jech.50.1.77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Johnston K., Gerard K., Brown J. Generalizing costs from trials. Analyzing center selection bias in a breast screening trial. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1998 Summer;14(3):494–504. doi: 10.1017/s0266462300011478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Rubin G., Garvican L., Moss S. Routine invitation of women aged 65-69 for breast cancer screening: results of first year of pilot study. BMJ. 1998 Aug 8;317(7155):388–389. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7155.388. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Shapiro S., Coleman E. A., Broeders M., Codd M., de Koning H., Fracheboud J., Moss S., Paci E., Stachenko S., Ballard-Barbash R. Breast cancer screening programmes in 22 countries: current policies, administration and guidelines. International Breast Cancer Screening Network (IBSN) and the European Network of Pilot Projects for Breast Cancer Screening. Int J Epidemiol. 1998 Oct;27(5):735–742. doi: 10.1093/ije/27.5.735. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. van Dijck J., Verbeek A., Hendriks J., Holland R., Mravunac M. Mammographic screening after the age of 65 years: early outcomes in the Nijmegen programme. Br J Cancer. 1996 Dec;74(11):1838–1842. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1996.640. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Journal of Cancer are provided here courtesy of Cancer Research UK

RESOURCES