Skip to main content
British Journal of Cancer logoLink to British Journal of Cancer
. 2002 Feb 12;86(4):558–563. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6600130

A high vascular count and overexpression of vascular endothelial growth factor are associated with unfavourable prognosis in operated small cell lung carcinoma

G Fontanini 1, P Faviana 3, M Lucchi 2, L Boldrini 1, A Mussi 2, T Camacci 3, M A Mariani 2, C A Angeletti 2, F Basolo 1, R Pingitore 3
PMCID: PMC2375289  PMID: 11870537

Abstract

It has been widely demonstrated that neo-angiogenesis and its mediators (i.e. vascular endothelial growth factor), represent useful indicators of poor prognosis in non small cell lung carcinoma. In order to verify whether neovascularization and vascular endothelial growth factor may be considered useful markers of clinical outcome also in the small cell lung cancer subgroup, we retrospectively investigated a series of 75 patients with small cell lung carcinoma treated by surgery between 1980 and 1990. Immunohistochemically-detected microvessels and vascular endothelial growth factor expressing cells were significantly associated with poor prognosis, as well as with nodal status and pathological stage. In fact, patients whose tumours had vascular count and vascular endothelial growth factor expression higher than median value of the entire series (59 vessels per 0.74 mm2 and 50% of positive cells, respectively), showed a shorter overall and disease-free survival (P=0.001, P=0.001; P=0.008, P=0.03). Moreover, the presence of hilar and/or mediastinal nodal metastasis and advanced stage significantly affected overall and disease-free interval (P=0.00009, P=0.00001; P=0.0001, P=0.00001). At multivariate analysis, only vascular endothelial growth factor expression retained its influence on overall survival (P=0.001), suggesting that angiogenic phenomenon may have an important role in the clinical behaviour of this lung cancer subgroup.

British Journal of Cancer (2002) 86, 558–563. DOI: 10.1038/sj/bjc/6600130 www.bjcancer.com

© 2002 Cancer Research UK

Keywords: angiogenesis, VEGF, small cell lung cancer

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) represents one of the most aggressive subgroups of lung cancer, and, despite its initial sensitivity to chemotherapy, most patients with this type of cancer die of metastatic disease in less than 2 years from diagnosis (Brigham et al, 1978). In the last two decades a large number of clinical studies have indicated that the angiogenic pattern may be a useful indicator of clinical outcome of tumours, including lung cancer (Weidner, 2000). In fact, much data has shown that the number of microvessels in the tumour area, as an index of neo-angiogenesis, correlates to an increased risk of metastatic disease and a worse overall survival (OS) (Macchiarini et al, 1992; Apolinario et al, 1997; Fontanini et al, 1997a). A number of factors are known to stimulate new vessel formation, of which vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is the most commonly expressed in human tumours (Ferrara, 1995). VEGF has been shown to increase tumour growth and angiogenesis in vivo in a nude mice model (Ferrara et al, 1993; Zhang et al, 1995). Similarly, anti-VEGF antibodies have the ability to inhibit the growth and dissemination of several tumour cell lines in nude mice (Kim et al, 1993).

Recent studies in NSCLC have shown that both vascular count and VEGF expression may influence progression and clinical outcome of the tumours (Fontanini et al, 1997a,b, 1999). Moreover, some interesting data indicate a putative genetic control of neo-angiogenesis by genes involved in the proliferative/apoptotic balance (i.e. p53 and bcl-2) (Bouck, 1996; Fontanini et al, 1997c). There is also evidence that inhibition of angiogenesis limits tumour growth by promoting apoptosis (Holmgreen et al, 1995).

SCLC is rarely treated by surgery, and, as a consequence, not enough data are available for an exhaustive biological characterization of this type of cancer. Recent analysis has correlated the clinical outcome of SCLC series to vascular count and VEGF serum levels, although discrepancies have been observed in the results obtained in these studies (Salven et al, 1998; Eerola et al, 2000).

In order to investigate the role of neo-angiogenesis in the outcome of SCLC, we analyzed vascular count, VEGF expression and p53 pattern in a series of resected SCLC, with interesting results from a prognostic point of view. The association we found in our study between VEGF protein expression and outcome is very suggestive of a putative role of this factor in the development and progression of the SCLC subgroup, although no confirmatory data are now available. Despite progression in surgery and chemotherapy, prognosis of SCLC remains unfortunately extremely bad, and new therapeutic approaches would be hoped for. In this sense, the finding of new biologic factors related to progression and poor outcome may represent a useful target of innovative therapeutic tools, such as anti-angiogenic therapies. In this respect, SCLC may be an ideal field in which to test new anti-angiogenic therapies in association with conventional chemotherapies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients

Seventy-five SCLC patients who had undergone curative surgical resection at the Service of Thoracic Surgery, University of Pisa, between 1980 and 1990, were analyzed. There were 72 males and three females (mean age 61.7 years, median 62 years, range 34–75 years). All the patients underwent a complete preoperative staging. This included: a detailed history and a physical examination, the evaluation of the Performance Status according to Karnofsky, a complete blood count and biochemical profile, cardiac and pulmonary function tests, chest X-ray, bronchoscopy, computed tomography of chest, the upper abdomen and brain, abdominal ultrasonography, bone scan, Gallium-67 scan, bilateral bone marrow biopsy and aspiration. Preoperative mediastinoscopy was not routinely performed where there was an absence of Gallium up-take on the mediastinum and no bulky mediastinal lymph-node involvement was evident. All the patients received surgery as their first line therapy, followed by adjuvant chemotherapy and, in the cases of hilar or mediastinal involvement, also by radiotherapy. According to Tumour-status, there were 16 T1, 48 T2, and 11 T3; 41 patients did not show nodal metastasis at the moment of diagnosis, whereas 34 showed hilar and/or mediastinal metastatic involvement. Data on clinical behaviour were available in all of the 75 cases (median follow-up 109.6 months, range 25–222). Twenty-nine of the patients were alive at the moment of analysis, whereas 46 were dead. Tumours were classified in accordance with the World Health Organization (WHO, 1982) classification and within the guidelines of the American Joint Committee for Cancer Staging (AJCCS, 1992).

Immunohistochemistry

Microvessel detection and counting

The method of microvessel detection and counting (MVC) has been described previously (Fontanini et al, 1997a). Briefly, intratumour microvessels were highlighted with anti-CD34 Mab (QB-END 10, Novocastra Laboratories, Newcastle, UK) diluted 1 : 100, after heating the sections in a microwave oven twice for 5 min at 700 W in citrate buffer (pH 7.6). Biotinylated anti-mouse IgG (Vector, Burlingame, CA, USA) was applied for immunoreaction, followed by detection using the ABC method. In all cases, MVC was determined independently by two pathologists. Each pathologist evaluated the slides without any knowledge of the counts made by the other pathologist and of the clinical outcome of the patients. No significant differences in MVC were found between the two observers. In fact, the counts from the two pathologists showed a very good correlation (r=0.98; two-sided P=0.0001). When conflicting data were obtained, we used mean values. A single microvessel was defined as any brown, immunostained endothelial cell that was separated from adjacent microvessels, tumour cells, and connective tissue elements. Each sample was examined by each pathologist, who identified the three most intense regions of neovascularization under low microscopic power (×10 objective lens and ×10 ocular lens). An ×250 field (×25 objective lens and ×10 ocular lens; 0.74 mm2 per field) in each of these three areas was then counted, and the average count of the three fields was recorded. Large vessels with thick, muscular walls were excluded from the counts. The presence of a lumen was not required to identify a microvessel. MVCs were categorized as a dichotomous variable (low vs high MVC). In the dichotomous categorization a count of 59 microvessels (the median value obtained in this series) was used as the cut-off point to distinguish a low MVC from a high MVC.

VEGF expression

In 53 out of 75 of the cases, according to the availability of the tumoural material, immunostaining for VEGF was performed using the ABC method in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue samples. Sections were dewaxed in xylen, taken through ethanol, and then incubated with 0.3% hydrogen peroxidase in methanol for 10 min to block the endogenous peroxidase activity. After washing with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and incubation for 30 min with 10% normal goat serum, the sections were incubated overnight with anti-VEGF monoclonal antibodies (SantaCruz Biotechnology, Inc., Santa Cruz, CA, USA, dilution 1 : 50). Anti-VEGF is raised against a synthetic peptide corresponding to amino acid residues 1 to 191 of human VEGF; it recognizes the 165, 189 and 121 amino splicing variants of VEGF. After the primary antibodies, biotynilated anti-rabbit IgG (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA) were applied and followed by detection using the ABC method (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA). Light counterstaining was performed with haematoxylin. Normal rabbit immunoglobulin G substituted the primary antibody as negative controls. VEGF expression was evaluated as percentage of positive cells in a total of at least 1000 tumour cells. Tumour sections with no VEGF immunoreactive cells were considered as negative. The median values of the series (50% of positive) was used as cut-off values to distinguish low from high VEGF expressing tumours.

P53 expression

As well as VEGF expression, the p53 protein immunostaining was assessed in formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissue samples using immunohistochemistry. NCL-DO7 anti-p53 monoclonal antibody (Novocastra Laboratories, New Castle, UK) was used to detect the p53-altered protein (1 : 250 of dilution). The avidin-biotin peroxidase method was used by developing immunoreaction with Diaminobenzidine. Simultaneous staining of a known p53 positive case was employed as positive control for p53. Incubation of parallel slides omitting the first antibody was performed as negative control. The count of p53 immunoreactive cells was made by scoring a minimum of five high – power fields (HPFs) (40× objective lens) and counting the number of immunoreactive cells out of the total of epithelial cells analyzed in each field. The 5% of positive cells was used as cut-off value to distinguish negative from positive tumours.

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were carried out using the Statistica and SPSS softwares. Univariate analysis was performed by modelling Kaplan–Meier survival curves. The Log-rank test was used to evaluate the statistical significance of differences in survival distributions among prognostic groups. Multivariate analysis was carried out by use of the Cox proportional-hazard model. The Cox model was first used to select from among variables that significantly affected survival in univariate analysis, and then from among those variables whose prognostic role was independent.

RESULTS

Clinico-pathological parameters and OS

Among the clinico-pathological parameters, metastatic nodal-involvement (P=0.00009), and advanced stage (P=0.0001) were significantly associated with a worse overall survival. No association was found between bad prognosis and tumour-status ( Table 1 ). A similar statistically-significant association was observed between these characteristics and disease-free survival (data not shown). Figure 1 shows Kaplan–Meier survival plots generated on the basis of nodal status (Figure 1A), and stage (Figure 1B).

Table 1. Univariate survival analysis.

graphic file with name 86-6600130t1.jpg

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Kaplan–Meier OS estimates in relation to Nodal Status (A) and Stage (B).

Vascular count and outcome in SCLC

The number of microvessels, evaluated as mean in the three areas of each tumour with most intense vascularization, showed a mean of 63.4 vessels and a median value of 59 vessels (range 14–170 vessels). MVC, analyzed as a dichotomous variable (using the median value of 59 microvessels as the cut-off point), was a highly significant predictor of both overall survival (Table 1; P=0.001) and of disease-free survival (data not shown). Figure 2 shows Kaplan–Meier survival plots generated on the basis of low and high vascular count (Figure 2A).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Kaplan–Meier OS estimates in relation to MVC (A) and VEGF expression (B). A MVC of 59 microvessels was the median cut-off in the series of 75 SCLC patients for considering low or high tumour angiogenesis.

VEGF and p53 expression and outcome in SCLC

VEGF protein expression, evaluated as low and high on the basis of median value of the series (mean 40.1, range 0–90%), significantly affected overall (P=0.0008) and disease-free survival. Figure 2 shows Kaplan–Meier survival plots generated on the basis of low and high VEGF expression (Figure 2B). No statistical association was found between p53 alterations and overall survival. In fact, tumours expressing p53 protein failed to influence the clinical behaviour of the disease (P=0.1). Furthermore, no association was found between p53 alterations, vascular count and VEGF expression (P=0.6; P=0.8) (data not shown).

Vascular count, VEGF expression and clinico-pathological parameters

When we analyzed the relationship between vascular count and VEGF expression, clinico-pathological parameters such as sex and age of patients, tumour-status, nodal-status and stage, we were unable to find any statistical association among these variables (data not shown). Moreover, no significant differences were found between MVC and VEGF expression and site of tumours.

Multivariate analysis

A multivariate analysis was performed to evaluate the independent prognostic role of MVC after adjusting for other significant covariates. All variables that significantly affected survival in univariate analysis were introduced into a Cox proportional-hazard model ( Table 2 ). At the end of the stepwise process, only VEGF expression maintained its independent prognostic influence on overall survival (P=0.01). In this analysis, vascular count failed to show any independent influence on overall survival (OS).

Table 2. Cox-proportional regression model of overall survival.

graphic file with name 86-6600130t2.jpg

DISCUSSION

The importance of tumour angiogenesis in tumour development and progression has been revealed in recent years. Several studies (revised in Weidner and Folkman, 1996) have suggested that MVC (as a measure of tumour angiogenesis) is a significant predictor of increased risk of metastatic disease and worse OS in several types of human cancer, including lung cancer. However, relatively few, and no conclusive reports have been published on the prognostic significance of MVC in lung cancers (Macchiarini et al, 1992; Harpole et al, 1996; Giatromanolaki et al, 1996), although in the NSCLC subgroup some important results have been obtained (Fontanini et al, 1997a). Neo-angiogenesis is under the control of several growth factors and cytokines (Bicknell and Harris, 1991), and the imbalance between stimulating and inhibiting factors is responsible for activating the angiogenic potential of the tumours. VEGF plays a crucial role in the control of angiogenesis both in physiological and pathological situations (Shibuya, 1995), including tumour development and progression. It is mitogenic and angiogenic for endothelial cells, and it can also increase vascular permeability.

A number of tumour cells in humans have been seen to express higher levels of VEGF mRNA compared to normal tissue (Brown et al, 1993; Plate et al, 1993; Abu-Jawdeh et al, 1996; Yoshiji et al, 1996), suggesting an association of VEGF with a malignant phenotype; furthermore, an elevated VEGF expression has also been correlated to a worse prognosis in cancers such as gastric (Maeda et al, 1996; Takahashi et al, 1996), colonic (Takahashi et al, 1995) and lung carcinomas (Mattern et al, 1995; Ohta et al, 1996; Fontanini et al, 1997b, 1999).

Small cell lung carcinomas represent a subgroup of lung cancer which substantially differ from the non-small cell subtype. In fact, the behaviour of this group of cancers is extremely bad, despite its initial sensitivity to chemotherapy. An exhaustive biological characterization of SCLC is difficult because of the different therapeutic approach usually employed in this type of tumour: SCLC is rarely treated by surgery, and most centres have few specimens on which to perform a biological characterization. Previously, we published our surgical experience and our policy in the clinical selection of patients for a multimodality treatment including surgery in SCLC-limited disease (Lucchi et al, 1997). Surgery can be applied as part of a combined treatment in patients with limited SCLC, selected on the basis of TNM staging. Moreover, despite conventional imaging and invasive procedures (mediastinoscopy etc.), the clinical prediction of lymphnodal involvement is unsatisfactory, with about 40% of more advanced disease at operation. This is the major obstacle in the correct planning of the multimodality treatment of limited-disease SCLC, and the reason for it's being inappropriate to compare the results of surgical treatments with the chemo-radiotherapy and neoadjuvant treatments. In order to verify the role of angiogenic phenomenon also in SCLC, as we had previously performed in a large series of non-small cell lung tumours (Fontanini et al, 1997a,b,c), a series of 75 SCLC was investigated, with particular reference to vascular count, VEGF and p53 expression. In our series we observed that nodal metastasis and tumour stage were important predictors of poor prognosis, as already reported in previous studies (Shepherd et al, 1993).

As regards vascular count, we observed that a higher number of microvessels (higher than median value of the series) in the most intense area of neovascularization significantly affected overall and disease-free survival. However, although exciting, these findings are in contrast with results recently presented by Eerola et al (2000). In a series of 56 SCLC they failed, in fact, to demonstrate any significant association between outcome and microvessel density. This discrepancy may be mostly due to a different methodology used for detecting microvessels in tumour areas. Eerola et al (2000) in fact, immunostained their samples by an anti-FVIII polyclonal antibody, that, although very specific, may be a bit less sensitive than the anti-CD34 monoclonal antibody we used, and thus causing a misinterpretation of the number of microvessels. A median value of nine microvessels per HPF was used by the authors for distinguishing a low from a high vascular density, dramatically far from the median value we found using CD34 monoclonal antibody in our series of cancers. However, also from our observations we believe that vascular density in SCLC has a different prognostic impact in comparison with vascular density in NSCLC. Indeed, in multivariate analysis, vascular count did not retain its influence on OS also in our study. However, an interesting aspect of our paper is related to the expression of VEGF, which represents one of the most important factors of vascular development and growth. Previous results of ours demonstrated that both protein and mRNA VEGF expression were strictly associated with prognosis in the NSCLC subgroup (Fontanini et al, 1997b, 1999). In our current study we observed that a high VEGF expression was significantly associated with poor prognosis and, most important, that in multivariate analysis VEGF expression retained its prognostic significance on OS. Interestingly, recent data from Salven et al (1998) in SCLC showed that pre-treatment serum levels of VEGF were associated with poor response to treatment and unfavourable survival in patients treated with combination chemotherapy with or without interferon. VEGF is an important mediator of tumour-induced angiogenesis and represents a potential target for innovative anticancer therapies. Starting from this concept, and with it's having recently been demonstrated in experimental models that anti-VEGF treatment augments tumour radiation response and the efficacy of cancer immunotherapy (Gabrilovich et al, 1999; Lee et al, 2000), the evaluation of VEGF and its receptors may represent a useful aim in drawing up a correct therapeutic profile of SCLC patients. In several animal models, neutralizing anti-VEGF antibodies have shown encouraging inhibitory effects on solid tumour growth, ascites formation and metastatic dissemination. Several of these anti-VEGF therapies are currently being tested in clinical trials in cancer patients. For these specific reasons a careful assessment of the anti-angiogenic profile of a tumour seems very interesting, particularly in those cases in which pharmacological approaches represent an important modality of treatment.

As regards p53 protein alterations, we did not observe in 51 of the cases analyzed any association between these alterations and vascular count and/or VEGF expression, although a high percentage of p53 mutations have been reported to be very frequent also in SCLC (Takahashi et al, 1991; Levin et al, 1994). Probably in this type of cancer, the genetic regulation of neo-angiogenesis is different from what we observed in the NSCLC subgroup, suggesting the possibility of more complex mechanisms and multiple interactions of several mediators.

Taken together, these data suggest the essentiality of further analyzing the complex phenomenon of neo-angiogenesis also in SCLC, in order to determine if in this model the vascular network and/or its regulators may modify in some way the behaviour of this type of cancer, and whether, in SCLC, neo-angiogenesis may represent an ideal field in which to test new anti-angiogenic drugs in association with chemotherapy.

Acknowledgments

This work has been supported by grants from the Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro.

References

  1. Abu-JawdehGMFaixJDNiloffJTognazziKManseauEDvorakHFBrownLF1996Strong expression of vascular endothelial permeability factor (vascular endothelial growth factor) and its receptors in ovarian borderline and malignant neoplasms Lab Invest 611051115 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. American Joint Committee on Cancer1992Manual for a staging of cancer4th edn,pp115122
  3. ApolinarioRMvan der ValkPde JongJSDevilleWvan Ark-OtteJDingemansAMvan MourikJCPostmusPEPinedoHMGiacconeG1997Prognostic value of p53, bcl-2, and bax oncoprotein and neovascularization in patients with radically-resected non-small cell lung cancer J Clin Oncol 1524562466 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. BicknellRHarrisAL1991Novel growth regulatory factors and tumor angiogenesis Eur J Cancer 27781785 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. BouckN1996p53 and angiogenesis Biochem Biophys Acta 12876366 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. BrighamBABunnPAJMinnaJDCohenMHIhdeDCShackneySE1978Growth rates of small cell broncogenic carcinomas Cancer 4228802886 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. BrownLFBerseBJackmanRWTognazziKManseauEJDvorakHFSengerDR1993Increased expression of vascular permeability factor (vascular endothelial growth factor) and its receptors in kidney and bladder carcinomas Am J Pathol 14312551262 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. EerolaA-KSoiniYPääkkoP2000A high number of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes are associated with a small tumor size, low tumor stage, and favorable prognosis in operated small cell lung carcinoma C Cancer Res 618751881 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. FerraraNWinerJBurtonTRowlandASiegelMPhillipsHSTierrelTKellerGALevinsonAD1993Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor does not promote transformation but confers a growth advantage in-vivo to Chinese-hamster ovary cells J Clin Invest 91160170 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. FerraraN1995The role of vascular endothelial growth factor in pathological angiogenesis Breast Cancer Res Treat 36127137 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. FontaniniGBoldriniLChinèSPisaturoFBasoloFCalcinaiALucchiMMussiAAngelettiCABevilacquaG1999Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor mRNA in non-small-cell lung carcinomas Br J Cancer 79363369 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. FontaniniGLucchiMVignatiSMussiACiardielloFde LaurentiisMde PlacidoSBasoloFAngelettiCABevilacquaG1997aAngiogenesis as a prognostic indicator of survival in non-small cell lung carcinoma: a prospective study J Natl Cancer Inst 89881886 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. FontaniniGVignatiSBoldriniLChinéSSilvestriVLucchiMMussiAAngelettiCABevilacquaG1997bVascular endothelial growth factor is associated with neovascularization and influences progression of non-small cell lung carcinoma 1997Cancer Res 3861865 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. FontaniniGVignatiSLucchiMMussiACalcinaiABoldriniLChinéSSilvestriVAngelettiCABasoloFBevilacquaG1997cNeoangiogenesis and p53 protein in lung cancer: their prognostic role and their relation with vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression Br J Cancer 7512961301 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. GabrilovichDIIshidaTNadafSOhmJECarboneDP1999Antibodies to vascular endothelial growth factor enhance the efficacy of cancer immunotherapy by improving endogenous dendritic cell function Clin Cancer Res 529632970 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. GiatromanolakiAKoukourakisMO'ByrneKFoxSWhitehouseRTalbotDCHarrisALGatterKC1996Prognostic value of angiogenesis in operable non-small cell lung cancer J Pathol 1798088 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. HarpoleDHRichardsWGHerndonJESugarbakerDJ1996Angiogenesis and molecular biological substaging in patients with Stage I non-small cell lung cancer Ann Thorac Surg 6114701476 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. HolmgreenLO'ReillyMSFolkmanJ1995Dormancy of micrometastases: balanced proliferation and apoptosis in the presence of angiogenesis suppression Nat Med 1149155 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. KimHJLiBWinerJArmaniniMGillettNPhillipsHSFerraraN1993Inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor induced angiogenesis suppresses tumor growth in-vivo Nature (Lond) 362841844 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. LeeCGHeijnMdi TomasoEGriffon-EtienneGAneukiewiczMKoikeCParkKRFerraraNJainRKSuitHDBoucherY2000Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment augments tumor radiation response under normoxic or hypoxic conditions Cancer Res 6055655570 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. LevinNABrzoskaPGuptaNMinnaJDGrayJWChristmanMF1994Identification of frequent novel genetic alterations in small cell lung carcinoma Cancer Res 5450865091 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. LucchiMMussiAChellaAJanniARibechiniAMenconiGFAngelettiCA1997Surgery in management of small cell lung cancer Eur J Cardio-Thorac Surg 12689693 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. MacchiariniPFontaniniGSquartiniFHardinMAngelettiCA1992Relation of neovascularization to metastasis of non-small cell lung cancer Lancet 34045461351613 [Google Scholar]
  24. MaedaKChungYOgawaYTakatsukaSKangS-MOgawaMSawadaTSowaM1996Prognostic value of vascular endothelial growth factor expression in gastric carcinoma Cancer 77858863 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. MatternJKoomagiRVolmM1995Vascular endothelial growth factor expression and angiogenesis in non-small cell lung carcinomas Int J Oncol 610591062 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. OhtaYEndoYTanakaMShimizuJOdaMHayashiYWatanabeYSasakiT1996Significance of vascular endothelial growth factor messenger RNA expression in primary lung cancer Cancer Res 214111416 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. PlateKHBreierGMillauerBUllrichARisauW1993Up-regulation of vascular endothelial growth factor and its cognate receptors in a rat glioma model of tumor angiogenesisis Cancer Res 5358225827 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. SalvenPRuotsalainenTMattsonKJoensuuH1998High pre-treatment serum level of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is associated with poor outcome in small-cell lung cancer Int J Cancer 79144146 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. ShepherdFAGinsbergRJHaddadRFeldRSagmanUEvansWKDeboerGMakiE1993Importance of clinical staging in limited small-cell lung cancer: a valuable system to separate prognostic subgroups. The Toronto lung oncology group J Clin Oncol 1115921597 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. ShibuyaM1995Role of VEGF-FLT receptor system in normal and tumor angiogenesis Adv Cancer Res 67281316 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. TakahashiTTakahashiTSuzukiHHidaTSekidoYAryoshiYUedaR1991The p53 is very frequently mutated in small cell lung cancer with distinct nucleotide substitution pattern Oncogene 617751778 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. TakahashiYClearyKRMaiMKitadaiYBucanaCEllisLM1996Significance of vessel count and vascular endothelial growth factor and its receptor (KDR) in intestinal type gastric cancer Cancer Res 216791684 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. TakahashiYMaiMKitadaiYBucanaCClearyKREllisLM1995Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor and its receptor, KDR, correlates with vascularity, metastasis and proliferation of human colon cancer Cancer Res 5539643968 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. WeidnerN2000Angiogenesis as a predictor of clinical outcome in cancer patients Hum Pathol 31403405 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. WeidnerNFolkmanJ1996Tumoral vascularity as a prognostic factor in cancerInImportant Advances in OncologyDeVita Jr VT, Hellman S, Rosemberg SA (eds)pp167190Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. World Health Organization1982Histological typing of lung tumors Am J Clin Pathol 77123136 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. YoshijiHGomezDEShibuyaMThorgeirssonUP1996Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor, its receptor, and other angiogenic factors in human breast cancer Cancer Res 5620132016 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. ZhangHTCraftPScottPAZicheMWelchHAHarrisALBicknellR1995Enhancement of tumor growth and vascular density by transfection of vascular endothelial cell growth factor into MCF-7 human breast carcinoma cells Int J Cancer 87213219 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Journal of Cancer are provided here courtesy of Cancer Research UK

RESOURCES