Skip to main content
British Journal of Cancer logoLink to British Journal of Cancer
. 2002 Jun 17;86(12):1905–1908. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6600325

Tumour microvessel density as predictor of chemotherapy response in breast cancer patients

O Tynninen 1,3, J Sjöström 2, K von Boguslawski 3, N O Bengtsson 4, R Heikkilä 5, P Malmström 6, B Østenstad 7, E Wist 8, V Valvere 9, E Saksela 1,3, T Paavonen 1,3, C Blomqvist 10
PMCID: PMC2375425  PMID: 12085184

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the predictive value of intratumoural microvessel density in breast cancer. We studied immunohistochemically primary tumours of 104 patients with metastasised breast cancer who took part in a randomised multicentre trial comparing docetaxel to sequential methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil. Vessels were highlighted with factor VIII staining and counted microscopically. Microvessel density was compared with clinical response to chemotherapy and patient survival. The microvessel density of the primary tumour was not significantly associated with patient's response to chemotherapy, time to progression or overall survival in the whole patient population or in the docetaxel or methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil groups. However, disease-free survival was longer in patients with low microvessel density (P=0.01). These findings suggest that microvessel density of the primary tumour cannot be used as a predictive marker for chemotherapy response in advanced breast cancer.

British Journal of Cancer (2002) 86, 1905–1908. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6600325 www.bjcancer.com

© 2002 Cancer Research UK

Keywords: microvessel density, chemotherapy, metastatic breast cancer, predictive factor

Currently most breast cancer patients suffering from metastatic disease receive chemotherapy and/or hormone therapy. Curative treatment is not yet available for metastatic breast cancer and its management is palliative in almost all cases. Chemotherapy is frequently toxic and only half of the patients with metastatic disease usually respond to the treatment. There is a need for predictive markers for chemoresistant tumours in order to avoid unnecessary side effects of chemotherapy.

Hormonal receptor status and tumour cell proliferation have been evaluated as potential predictive factors for chemotherapy (Corle et al, 1984; Willsher et al, 1998; Zambetti et al, 1999), but these tumour properties have so far shown little clinical utility. Recently many proteins including c-erbB-2, p53 and the bcl-2 family have been investigated as predictors for chemosensitivity (Jacquemier et al, 1994; Muss et al, 1994; Sjöström et al, 2000; Sjöström, 2002a,b). However, none of these markers have shown clinical utility in predicting response for chemotherapy in advanced breast cancer.

Immunohistochemically measured microvessel density (MVD) has been applied to quantitate the angiogenesis in breast cancer. Results from most studies suggest that tumour microvessel density is associated with lymph node metastasis and worse outcome (Weidner et al, 1991; Bosari et al, 1992; Gasparini et al, 1994; Toi et al, 1995; Jacquemier et al, 1998; Hansen et al, 2000) although in some studies no association was seen (Van Hoef et al, 1993; Axelsson et al, 1995; Tynninen et al, 1999; Vincent-Salomon et al, 2001). It has also been suggested that MVD may be associated to endocrine treatment response in breast cancer (Gasparini et al, 1996).

In this study we investigated whether intratumoural microvessel density is associated with response to chemotherapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Earlier reports on MVD as a predictive marker for chemotherapy response in advanced breast cancer have not been published.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The patient population of the present study was a subgroup of 283 patients participating in a multicentre randomised trial comparing docetaxel with sequential methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil (MF) in advanced breast cancer (Sjöström et al, 1999). To enter the randomised study, patients were required to have histologically proven primary breast cancer that had progressed during or after first line anthracycline therapy for advanced disease or relapsed during or within 12 months after discontinuation of adjuvant anthracycline therapy. Ethical committees of all participating centres approved the study. Paraffin blocks were available for 134 patients. There was enough tumour tissue left in the blocks of 109 patients. Five patients were excluded because of excessive background staining with factor VIII antibody leaving 104 patients for final analysis (Table 1).

Table 1. Characteristics of the primary tumour at the time of diagnosis and treatment related characteristics of the 104 investigated patients.

graphic file with name 86-6600325t1.jpg

Formalin fixed tissue samples were embedded in paraffin. For immunohistochemistry 5 μm thick sections were cut on coated slides. The slides were pretreated with 0.5% Trypsin and endogenous peroxidase was blocked. After rinsing the slides were incubated overnight at room temperature with diluted (1 : 10 000) polyclonal antibody against factor VIII related antigen (von Willebrand Factor, DAKO, Glostrup, Denmark) to stain capillary endothelium. Immunoperoxidase stainings were performed using a commercial avidin-biotin detection kit (Vectastain® Elite ABC Kit, Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA) following the manufacturer's instructions. Bound peroxidase was visualised with 3-amino-9-ethylcarbazole. Finally the sections were counterstained in Mayer's haematoxylin.

Tumour microvessel density was determined from areas of highest vascularisation within invasive carcinoma. Microscopic slides were screened at low magnification (×20, ×40) to identify the most vascularised areas. Vessels were counted from the three most vascularised areas by one investigator (O Tynninen) at a magnification of ×200 (microscopic field area 0.785 mm2). An average of three counts reported in vessels per mm2 was used as the microvessel density of the tumour. The criteria introduced by Weidner et al (1991) were used to identify microvessels.

Response evaluation was performed according to the WHO recommendations (Miller et al, 1981). For statistical analysis clinical response was divided into two categories: response (complete and partial response) and non-response (stable disease and progression). Differences in treatment response were evaluated with the χ2 test in the whole patient population, and in the docetaxel and MF treated groups separately.

Disease free interval (DFI) was measured from the date of the primary diagnosis until the first recurrence of cancer, time to progression (TTP) from the date of randomisation till disease progression and overall survival (OS) from the date of randomisation till death. Kaplan–Meier plots were calculated for overall survival, disease free survival and time to progression. Differences in survival were tested with Cox logistic regression analysis with microvessel density as a continuous variable. Spearman correlation coefficients were calculated for MVD and several other previously assessed tumour related biological factors based on the same patient material and described elsewhere (Sjöström et al, 2000; Sjöström, 2002a,b). These factors included histological grade, MIB-1, expression of oestrogen receptor (ER), tumour suppressor protein p53, p21, mdm-2, the apoptosis related proteins bcl-2, bax, bcl-xL, bag-1, fas, fasL and the oncoprotein c-erbB-2. P values less than 0.01 for the correlation coefficients were considered significant. In the correlative analyses the significance level was set lower than the usual 0.05 because of the multiple comparisons.

RESULTS

The median microvessel density of the tumours was 95.1 vessels per mm2 (range 32.3–247.9, 25th and 75th percentile 74.7 and 132.4, respectively. MVD was not significantly associated with response to chemotherapy when tested in the whole patient population (P=0.88) nor in separate groups of docetaxel (P=0.13) or MF (P=0.24) treated patients. However, low microvessel density showed a trend towards better response rate in the docetaxel arm (RR 68% vs 40%, Table 2). Overall survival or time to tumour progression were not associated with MVD in univariate analysis neither in the whole patient population (P=0.75) nor in docetaxel (P=0.64) or MF (P=0.88) groups. However, disease free interval from primary diagnosis to the appearance of first metastases was shorter in patients with tumour MVD above median (P=0.01, Figure 1).

Table 2. Association of microvessel density and clinical response to chemotherapy in 101 patients with evaluable response to treatment.

graphic file with name 86-6600325t2.jpg

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Kaplan–Meier plot showing disease free interval in 104 breast cancer patients. Disease free interval was shorter in patients with MVD above median 95 vessel per mm2 (P=0.01).

We also assessed the correlation between MVD and other tumour biological factors previously studied in the same population (Table 3). MVD was inversely correlated with MIB-1 proliferation index (P=0.007). Tumour grade did not correlate with MVD. Expression of fas ligand (fasL) was positively correlated with MVD (P=0.002) but no correlation was found with any other biological factor investigated (Table 3).

Table 3. Correlation between tumour microvessel density and other biological factors (n=104).

graphic file with name 86-6600325t3.jpg

DISCUSSION

We studied intratumoural microvessel density in 104 patients with advanced breast cancer to evaluate its predictive value for chemotherapy. We could not demonstrate any difference in response to chemotherapy, overall survival or time to progression between the patient groups according to vascular density either in the whole patient material or in the docetaxel arm. However, in the MF arm there was a trend towards better chemotherapy response in the low microvessel density group but the difference was not statistically significant. High MVD was associated with short disease free interval which is in line with several previous studies (Weidner et al, 1992; Toi et al, 1993; Hansen et al, 2000).

Preclinical studies suggest that chemoresistance might be associated with tumour vascularity (Gasparini et al, 1996). Instead of facilitating the access of chemotherapeutic agents into the tumour neovascularisation has been proposed to inhibit penetration of cytotoxic drugs into tumour tissue due to increased interstitial pressure (Folkman, 1995). Consequently, one would expect that response to chemotherapy in more vascularised tumours would be weaker compared to those with low MVD which is in accordance with our findings in the docetaxel group.

Against our expectations response to docetaxel was not related to microvessel density. Previous reports suggest that taxanes including docetaxel used in this study also harbour an anti-angiogenic effect themselves (Belotti et al, 1996; Sweeney et al, 2001). However, in the present study, the methodology to test the predictive value of MVD for response to taxanes was not optimal. MVD and other parameters were counted in the primary tumour and the measured outcome was clinical response after disease recurrence which may be a source of error because the biological properties of metastases may differ from the primary tumour.

To the best of our knowledge there are no previous report on the predictive utility of MVD for chemotherapy in advanced breast cancer. Two studies have investigated microvessel density in breast cancer patients receiving either adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy. In one study Protopapa et al (1993) demonstrated that the patients who survived longer after mastectomy and chemotherapy had higher MVD. In the other study Paulsen et al (1997) did not find any difference in the outcome according to MVD in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

We also tested correlations between microvessel density and several other tumour biological factors (histological grade, MIB-1, ER, p53, p21, mdm-2, bcl-2, bax, bcl-xL, bag-1, fas, fasL and c-erbB-2). Only two significant correlations were seen. We noted an inverse correlation between MVD and MIB-1 proliferation which is in line with the recent findings by another group (Medri et al, 2000). However, most studies have not found significant association between MVD and MIB-1 proliferation index (Weidner et al, 1992; Vartanian and Weidner, 1994; Jacquemier et al, 1998; Tynninen et al, 1999).

The positive correlation between vascular density and fas ligand expression was particularly interesting. The fas receptor belongs to the family of tumour necrosis factor related death receptors and fasL is its corresponding ligand. Binding of a death ligand to its receptor activates one major apoptotic pathway. Results from some preclinical studies suggest that classic anticancer drugs may need fas and fasL to induce apoptosis. Interestingly, stimulation of fas receptor by agonistic anti-fas monoclonal antibodies also promotes angiogenesis in murine model (Biancone et al, 1997). Thus, fas receptor stimulation by fasL might induce angiogenesis in breast cancer as well. These findings may explain why fasL expression was correlated with angiogenesis in our material. Further studies are required to confirm the possible role of apoptotic fas/fasL system in tumour neovascularisation.

In conclusion the results of this study suggest that microvessel density of primary tumour is not useful in predicting response to taxane or 5-fluorouracil based chemotherapy in advanced breast cancer.

Acknowledgments

We thank the departments of pathology of the participating institutions for providing us with tumour specimens and Ms Elina Laitinen for expert technical assistance. This study was supported by State Subsidy for University Hospitals, a research grant from Helsinki University Central Hospital (O Tynninen, T Paavonen) and Cancer Organizations of Finland (O Tynninen, T Paavonen).

References

  1. AxelssonKLjungBEMooreIIDThorADChewKLEdgertonSMSmithHSMayallBH1995Tumor angiogenesis as a prognostic assay for invasive ductal breast carcinoma J Natl Cancer Inst 879971008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. BelottiDVerganiVDrudisTBorsottiPPitelliMRVialeGGiavazziRTarabolettiG1996The microtubule-affecting drug paclitaxel has antiangiogenic activity Clin Cancer Res 218431849 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. BianconeLMartinoADOrlandiVConaldiPGTonioloACamussiG1997Development of inflammatory angiogenesis by local stimulation of Fas in vivo J Exp Med 186147152 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. BosariSLeeAKDeLellisRAWileyBDHeatleyGJSilvermanML1992Microvessel quantitation and prognosis in invasive breast carcinoma Hum Pathol 23755761 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. CorleDKSearsMEOlsonKB1984Relationship of quantitative estrogen-receptor level and clinical response to cytotoxic chemotherapy in advanced breast cancer. An extramural analysis Cancer 5415541561 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. FolkmanJ1995The influence of angiogenesis research on management of patients with breast cancer Breast Cancer Res Treat 36109118 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. GaspariniGFoxSBVerderioPBonoldiEBevilacquaPBoracchiPDanteSMarubiniEHarrisAL1996Determination of angiogenesis adds information to estrogen receptor status in predicting the efficacy of adjuvant tamoxifen in node-positive breast cancer patients Clin Cancer Res 211911198 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. GaspariniGWeidnerNBevilacquaPMalutaSDalla-PalmaPCaffoOBarbareschiMBoracchiPMarubiniEPozzaF1994Tumor microvessel density, p53 expression, tumor size, and peritumoral lymphatic vessel invasion are relevant prognostic markers in node-negative breast carcinoma J Clin Oncol 12454466 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. HansenSGrabauDASørensenFBBakMVachWRoseC2000The prognostic value of angiogenesis by Chalkley counting in a confirmatory study design on 836 breast cancer patients Clin Cancer Res 6139146 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. JacquemierJPenault-LlorcaFViensPHouvenaeghelGHassounJTorrenteMAdelaideJBirnbaumD1994Breast cancer response to adjuvant chemotherapy in correlation with erbB2 and p53 expression Anticancer Res 1427732778 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. JacquemierJDPenault-LlorcaFMBertucciFSunZZHouvenaeghelGFGeneixJAPuigBDBardouVJHassounJABirnbaumDViensPJ1998Angiogenesis as a prognostic marker in breast carcinoma with conventional adjuvant chemotherapy: a multiparametric and immunohistochemical analysis J Pathol 184130135 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. MedriLNanniOVolpiAScarpiEDubiniARiccobonABeccioliniABianchiSAmadoriD2000Tumor microvessel density and prognosis in node-negative breast cancer Int J Cancer 897480 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. MillerABHoogstratenBStaquetMWinklerA1981Reporting results of cancer treatment Cancer 47207214 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. MussHBThorADBerryDAKuteTLiuETKoernerFCirrincioneCTBudmanDRWoodWCBarcosMHendersonIC1994c-erbB-2 expression and response to adjuvant therapy in women with node-positive early breast cancer N Engl J Med 33012601266 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. PaulsenTAasTBørresenALVarhaugJELønningPEAkslenLA1997Angiogenesis does not predict clinical response to doxorubicin monotherapy in patients with locally advanced breast cancer Int J Cancer 74138140 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. ProtopapaEDelidesGSRévészL1993Vascular density and the response of breast carcinomas to mastectomy and adjuvant chemotherapy Eur J Cancer 29A13911393 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. SjöströmJBlomqvistCHeikkiläPvon BoguslawskiKRäisänen-SokolowskiABengtssonNOMjaalandIMalmströmPOstenstadtBBerghJWistEValvereVSakselaE2000Predictive value of p53, mdm-2, p21, and mib-1 for chemotherapy response in advanced breast cancer Clin Cancer Res 631033110 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. SjöströmJBlomqvistCMouridsenHPluzanskaAOttosson-LönnSBengtssonNOØstenstadBMjaalandIPalm-SjövallMWistEValvereVAndersonHBerghJ1999Docetaxel compared with sequential methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil in patients with advanced breast cancer after anthracycline failure: a randomised phase III study with crossover on progression by the Scandinavian Breast Group Eur J Cancer 3511941201 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. SjöströmJBlomqvistCvon BoguslawskiKBengtssonN-OMjaalandIMalmstömPØstenstadtBWistEValvereVTakayamaSReedJCSakselaE2002aThe predictive value of bcl-2, bax, bcl-xl, bag-1, fas and fasL for chemotherapy response in advanced breast cancer Clin Cancer Res 8811816 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. SjöströmJCollanJvon BoguslawskiKFranssilaKBengtssonN-OMjaalandIMalmströmPØstenstadtBWistEValvereVBerghJSkiöld-PettersonDSakselaEBlomqvistC2002bC-erbB-2 expression does not predict response to docetaxel or sequential methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil in advanced breast cancer Eur J Cancer 38535542 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. SweeneyCJMillerKDSissonsSENozakiSHeilmanDKShenJSledgeJrGW2001The antiangiogenic property of docetaxel is synergistic with a recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody against vascular endothelial growth factor or 2-methoxyestradiol but antagonized by endothelial growth factors Cancer Res 6133693372 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. ToiMInadaKSuzukiHTominagaT1995Tumor angiogenesis in breast cancer: its importance as a prognostic indicator and the association with vascular endothelial growth factor expression Breast Cancer Res Treat 36193204 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. ToiMKashitaniJTominagaT1993Tumor angiogenesis is an independent prognostic indicator in primary breast carcinoma Int J Cancer 55371374 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. TynninenOvon BoguslawskiKAronenHJPaavonenT1999Prognostic value of vascular density and cell proliferation in breast cancer patients Pathol Res Pract 1953137 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Van HoefMEKnoxWFDhesiSSHowellASchorAM1993Assessment of tumour vascularity as a prognostic factor in lymph node negative invasive breast cancer Eur J Cancer 29A11411145 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. VartanianRKWeidnerN1994Correlation of intratumoral endothelial cell proliferation with microvessel density (tumor angiogenesis) and tumor cell proliferation in breast carcinoma Am J Pathol 14411881194 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Vincent-SalomonACartonMZafraniBFreneauxPNicolasAMasseminBFourquetACloughKPouillartPSastre-GarauX2001Long term outcome of small size invasive breast carcinomas independent from angiogenesis in a series of 685 cases Cancer 92249256 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. WeidnerNFolkmanJPozzaFBevilacquaPAllredENMooreDMeliSGaspariniG1992Tumor angiogenesis: a new significant and independent prognostic indicator in early-stage breast carcinoma J Natl Cancer Inst 8418751887 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. WeidnerNSempleJPWelchWRFolkmanJ1991Tumor angiogenesis and metastasis – correlation in invasive breast carcinoma N Engl J Med 32418 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. WillsherPCPinderSEGeeJMEllisIOChanSYNicholsonRIBlameyRWRobertsonJF1998C-erbB2 expression predicts response to preoperative chemotherapy for locally advanced breast cancer Anticancer Res 1836953698 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. ZambettiMOrianaSQuattronePVerderioPTerenzianiMZucaliRValagussaPBonadonnaG1999Combined sequential approach in locally advanced breast cancer Ann Oncol 10305310 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Journal of Cancer are provided here courtesy of Cancer Research UK

RESOURCES