Skip to main content
PMC home page
British Journal of Cancer logoLink to British Journal of Cancer
. 2003 Apr 1;88(7):1095–1100. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6600870

Reactivity to human papillomavirus type 16 L1 virus-like particles in sera from patients with genital cancer and patients with carcinomas at five different extragenital sites

G J J Van Doornum 1,2,4,*, C M Korse 2, J C G M Buning-Kager 2, J M G Bonfrer 2, S Horenblas 2, B G Taal 2, J Dillner 3,5
PMCID: PMC2376370  PMID: 12671710

Abstract

A retrospective seroepidemiologic study was performed to examine the association between human papillomaviruses (HPV) 16 infection and carcinomas of the oropharynx, the oesophagus, penis and vagina. Sera were selected from the serum bank from the Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital (Netherlands Cancer Institute) and the Slotervaart Hospital in Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Presence of HPV 16 specific antibody was assessed using HPV 16 L1 capsids. Sera positive for HPV 16 capsid antibody were further tested for antibody against HPV 16 E7 peptides. Prevalence of antibody against HPV 16 L1 capsids among both the negative control group without cancer and the negative control group with gastric cancer was 18%, while seroprevalence among the control group of patients with HPV-associated cervical squamous cell carcinoma was 47% (P<0.001). Among the patients with penile squamous cell carcinoma seroprevalence was 38% (P<0.001), among patients with oropharyngeal carcinoma 33% (P=0.04) and among patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma 14% (P=0.7). The serological evidence for association between HPV 16 infection and both oropharyngeal carcinoma and penile carcinoma was established. The conclusion that no association was found between the presence of antibody against HPV 16 L1 capsids and oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma was in accordance with results of other studies carried out in the Netherlands using HPV DNA technology. In the subjects with HPV 16 L1 capsid antibody, no association was found between the antibody against HPV 16 E7 and clinical outcome.

Keywords: HPV 16 serology, oropharyngeal carcinoma, oesophageal carcinoma, cervical cancer, vaginal and vulvar cancer, penile carcinoma

The causative association between infection with oncogenic human papillomaviruses (HPV) and cervical squamous cell carcinoma has been established by molecular and epidemiological studies (Muñoz and Bosch, 1989; zur Hausen, 1994). Current infection by HPV can be detected by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) or hybrization techniques. Human papillomavirus serology can be applied to determine past or present HPV infection (de Villiers, 1992; Kirnbauer et al, 1994). Serological assays based on HPV capsids, which represent conformational viral epitopes, can detect HPV-type restricted antibodies. These assays have been validated as useful tools for seroepidemiologic studies among various cohorts (Van Doornum et al, 1994,1998; Dillner, 1995; Nonnenmacher et al, 1995,1996; Wideroff et al, 1995,1996a; Wikström et al, 1995a,1995b; Lehtinen et al, 1996).

Results of some studies suggest that HPV infection may be a risk factor for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck or encompasses a distinct entity with an increased sensitivity to radiotherapy (Gillison et al, 2000; Forastiere et al, 2001; Lindel et al, 2001; Mork et al, 2001). Squamous cell oesophageal cancer shows wide regional variation in incidence and causal association (Sur and Cooper, 1998). With regard to the association between HPV infection and oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma, contradictory molecular and serological findings are reported (Dillner et al, 1995; Bjørge et al, 1997b; Kok et al, 1997; Miller et al, 1997; Saegusa et al, 1997; de Villiers et al, 1999; Lagergren et al, 1999; Lavergne et al, 1999). For the Netherlands, that are reported to be a low-risk area for squamous cell cancer of the oesophagus, using HPV DNA technology no evidence was found for a role of HPV as a causative agent (Kok et al, 1997). However, while detection of HPV DNA determines only current infection, an advantage of serological studies is that they can give insight into exposure to papillomaviruses in the past.

Presence of HPV DNA in carcinomas of the penis is observed in a proportion of the specimens analysed (Grussendorf-Cronen, 1997; Tornesello et al, 1997; Dianzani et al, 1998; Levi et al, 1998; Poblet et al, 1999; Dillner et al, 2000; Rubin et al, 2001). Some serological studies relative to HPV infection in individuals with penile carcinoma were carried out in relatively small groups of patients (Wideroff et al, 1996b; Strickler et al, 1998; Carter et al, 2001).

With regard to vaginal and vulvar cancer, little is known about the prevalence of antibody against HPV among patients with these cancers, although HPV infection is considered as a risk factor for vaginal cancer (Daling et al, 2002).

The objective of this retrospective study was to determine the seroprevalence of antibody against HPV 16 viral-like particles (VLP) containing L1 proteins among Dutch patients with carcinomas in the oropharyngeal region, tongue and larynx, patients with oesophageal carcinoma, women with vaginal carcinoma and men with penile carcinoma. Sera positive for antibody against HPV 16 L1 were tested for the presence of antibody to E7.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Serum specimens were taken from the serum bank at the Antoni van Leeuwenhoek (AvL) Hospital and Netherlands Cancer Institute in Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Cases were selected over a period of 10 years, 1989–1999, based on the diagnosis as stated in the anonymised medical records. The inclusion criterion was the site of the cancer: penis, cervix, vagina, the upper aerodigestive tract (larynx, oropharynx, tongue), oesophagus and stomach. The anatomical sites were defined according to the codes of the International Classification of Diseases (WHO, 1979). Sera from patients with cervical squamous cell carcinoma were considered as HPV-positive cancer control sera. Sera from patients with gastric carcinoma were considered as HPV-negative cancer control sera. For the HPV-negative control group without cancer, serum specimens were selected from the serum bank in the Slotervaart (SL) hospital. These serum specimens were obtained from patients referred to the gastroenterology clinic for gastric ulcer complaints during 1999. The control group was matched on gender and age with the gastric carcinoma cases.

The sera from the AvL patients were obtained at the first visit to the hospital during the period wherein the diagnosis was made. The sera from the SL hospital patients were also taken at the first visit to the gastroenterology clinic. The specimens were stored at −20°C and transported on dry ice to the Karolinska Institute, where the assays were performed by CM Korse and JCGM Buning-Kager.

The pathological diagnosis was made at the Department of Pathology of the AvL hospital and the SL hospital, respectively, using standard methods, and coded according to international standards (WHO, 1979).

First, all sera were screened on the presence of IgG antibody against HPV 16 capsids containing L1 proteins. The positive sera were further tested on the presence of IgG antibody against HPV 16 E7 peptides.

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays

Baculovirus-expressed HPV16 capsids containing both the L1 proteins were diluted in cold phosphate-buffered solution (PBS) to 1 μg ml−1, coated overnight at 4°C onto microtiter plates and subsequently blocked with 10% horse serum in PBS (HS-PBS). Sera were diluted 1 : 30 with HS-PBS and added to the plates for 2 h at room temperature (RT). A mouse monoclonal antibody to human IgG, diluted 1 : 800, was added and incubated for 90 min at room temperature, followed by a horseradish peroxidase-conjugated antibody to mouse IgG. Before every addition, the plates had been washed with PBS-0.1% Tween. For each sample the absorbency of the same sample obtained from a well coated with disrupted bovine papilloma virus (BPV) was subtracted from the absorbency obtained for the corresponding well coated with HPV 16 capsids.

The assays included two internal positive and one negative control specimens on each ELISA plate. Three pools of sera from patients with cervical carcinoma, from patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and from healthy blood donors were used for this purpose. The absorbencies read from each plate were normalised relative to the results of the internal standard. The internal standard was measured in a plate with negative control sera obtained from sexually inexperienced women. Cutoff level was defined as the mean value of the absorbencies of the plate with the negative controls plus three standard deviations.

For the measurement of E7 peptides the same protocol was used. The only difference was that the peptide was diluted to 1 mg ml−1 in Tris buffer and coated overnight at room temperature. As negative control another plate was coated with Tris buffer only. The E7 peptide has the designation E7-2 and has the amino-acid sequence PETTDLYCYEQLNDSSEEED (Dillner, 1990).

Data analysis

The data were analysed using the Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS/PC Version 10.0.5) and Epi Info Version 6.0 (Dean et al, 1994). To compare the proportions the χ2 method was used, and Fisher's exact test when appropriate. A two-tailed P-value of less than 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance.

RESULTS

The characteristics such as gender and age of the patients from whom the serum specimens were obtained are presented according to pathological diagnosis in Table 1. The seroprevalence of antibody to HPV 16 L1 capsids among the various groups is shown in Table 2. The sera positive for antibody against HPV 16 L1 capsid were further tested for the presence of antibody to HPV 16 E7 peptides; the results are also shown in Table 2. The seroprevalence found in the negative control groups was 18% both in the stomach cancer control group (10 out of 54) and in the noncancer gastric ulcer group (18 out of 100). The seroprevalence in the cervical squamous cell cancer group was 47% (24 out of 51); the difference with the negative control group was statistically significant (P<0.001). A total of 46 of the 122 (38%) individuals with penile cancer were positive for HPV 16 L1 antibody (P<0.001). The proportion of individuals with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma with antibody against HPV 16 L1 capsids was only 14% (8/56), whereas 11 of the 48 (23%) sera from patients with oesophageal adenocarcinoma were positive for HPV 16 L1 antibody. In the group of patients with oropharyngeal carcinoma, 16 out of 48 (33%) individuals were positive for antibody against HPV 16 L1 antibody (P=0.04). The seroprevalence found in the patients with tongue carcinoma or laryngeal cancer was 12 out of 56 (21%) and 25 out of 127 (20%), respectively. A total of 8 out of 31 (26%) of the patients with vaginal carcinoma were positive (P=0.47). In the negative control sera that were positive for HPV 16 L1 antibody, two of 27 (7%) sera were also positive for antibody against HPV 16 E7 peptides, and seven of the 24 (29%) of the sera from patients with cervical squamous cell carcinoma, who were considered as positive control group (P=0.07, Fisher's exact two-tailed). No statistically significant difference was observed for the presence of HPV 16 E7 antibody in any of the other groups studied.

Table 1. Characteristics of 606 patients with various carcinomas and 100 patients selected as negative control group.

  N Mean age (years) Male Mean age (male) Female Mean age (female)
Negative control (no cancer) 100 61.8 50 61.3 50 62.4
Negative control (stomach carcinoma) 54 61.5 37 61.2 17 62.3
Cervical squamous carcinoma 51 63.7     51 63.7
Tongue carcinoma 56 58.7 30 59.1 26 58.3
Oropharyngeal carcinoma 48 56.1 33 57.2 15 53.8
Oesophageal carcinoma 117 64.5 86 63.8 31 66.5
 Squamous cell carcinoma 56 64.9 34 64.6 22 65.5
 Adenocarcinoma 48 64.4 41 63.1 7 71.6
 Others 13 63.2 11 63.7 2 60.6
Laryngeal carcinoma 127 62.1 111 62.7 16 58.0
Vaginal carcinoma 31 71.5     31 71.5
Penile carcinoma 122 60.9 122 60.9    
             
Total 706 61.9 417 61.3 228 62.9
Open in a new tab

Table 2. Results of antibody testing against HPV 16 L1 capsids in 606 patients with various carcinomas and results of antibody testing against HPV 16 E7 peptides assay carried out in the HPV 16 L1 capsid antibody positive samples.

  N HPV 16 pos Pos/N (%) P-valuea ORb E7 Pos/N (%)
Negative control (no cancer) 100 18/100 (18)     2/18 (11)
Negative control (stomach carcinoma) 54 10/54 (18)     0/9 (0)
Cervical squamous carcinoma 51 24/51 (47) <0.001 4.00 7/24 (29)
        (1.9–8.4)  
Tongue carcinoma 56 12/56 (21) 0.741   3/12 (25)
Oropharyngeal carcinoma 48 16/48 (33) 0.043 2.25 2/16 (12)
        (1.0–4.9)  
Laryngeal carcinoma 127 25/127 (20) 0.876   3/25 (12)
Oesophageal carcinoma 117 20/117(17)     0/20 (0)
 Squamous cell 56 8/56 (14) 0.649    
 Adenocarcinoma 48 11/48 (23)      
 Others 13 1/13 (8)      
           
Vaginal carcinoma 31 8/31 (26) 0.466   0/8 (0)
Penile carcinoma 122 46/122 (38) <0.001 2.72 5/45 (11)
        (1.5–4.9)  
Total 706 align="center"179/706(25)     22/177(12)
Open in a new tab
a

Yates corrected.

b

Odds ratio (95% confidence limits).

In the group of patients with cervical carcinoma and penile carcinoma, the possible association between clinical outcome and presence of antibody both against L1 capsids and E7 peptide was analysed. As clinical outcome the following categories were chosen: alive with or without tumour and died with or without tumour. For 21 of the 24 subjects with cervical carcinoma, who were positive for HPV 16 L1 antibodies and in whose serum samples antibody against E7 was determined, the follow-up data were available. There were no statistical differences between the subjects with or without antibodies against E7 with regard to survival (P=0.21, Fisher's exact test, two-sided). The same analysis was executed for the subjects with penile carcinoma, again no differences could be found (P=1.0, Fisher's exact test, two-sided).

DISCUSSION

In this study, we analysed the prevalence of HPV 16 specific antibody in patients with a variety of cancers. As HPV seropositive cancer control subjects were included patients with cervical squamous cell carcinoma, and patients with gastric ulcer or stomach carcinoma as HPV negative control patients without and with cancer, respectively.

We realise that a retrospective, seroepidemiological study using hospital-based negative control subjects has some limitations in comparison with a nationwide seroepidemiological case–control study or prospective studies as carried out in the Nordic countries to study the association between oesophageal carcinoma and HPV antibody positivity (Dillner et al, 1995; Bjørge et al, 1997a,1997b; Lagergren et al, 1999). Nevertheless, results of a retrospective case–control study can be used to determine disease aetiology. Furthermore, the number of case subjects in the various subgroups in our study was relatively large. A problem arises in the selection of the control subjects, as these were taken from the hospital population on practical considerations. Therefore, we included a negative control group without cancer as well as a control group with cancer that is not considered to be caused by an HPV infection.

The seroprevalence of 18% for HPV 16 antibody in the HPV-negative control groups in our study seemed rather high, but could be considered consistent with figures reported previously from The Netherlands. In Dutch patients who were HPV DNA negative and participated in Amsterdam, The Netherlands, in a nonintervention study relative to cervical dysplasia a seroprevalence of 14.6% was reported (Bontkes et al, 1999). In studies on HPV seroprevalence among heterosexuals with multiple partners, we found previously a frequency of 23 and 20% of IgG antibody against HPV 16 L1 peptides and HPV 16 L1 VLP, respectively (Van Doornum et al, 1994,1998).

Seroprevalences must be compared with local or regional figures as the values can differ in different groups of subjects living in various countries. In a study described by Wideroff et al (1999) seroprevalence for HPV 16 IgG antibody among cases with squamous intraepithelial lesions (SIL) was 51.3% and for the random control group the seroprevalence for HPV 16 was 15.9%. On the other hand, among high-risk populations in Greenland and Denmark, 56.2% of the Greenlander women and 41.1% of the Danish women were found positive for antibody to HPV 16 (Nonnenmacher et al, 1996). And in another study carried out in South Africa among San people, also known as Bushmen, seroreactivity to HPV 16 was 16.1% among adults (Marais et al, 2000).

Oropharyngeal carcinoma

The seroprevalence for patients with oropharyngeal cancer of 33% (16 out of 48) in the present study is comparable with the prevalence of 38% (10 out of 26) vs 10% (14 out of 137) among control subjects reported in a recently published nested case–control study among patients with head and neck cancers in the Nordic countries (Mork et al, 2001). In that study a significant relation was also found between seropositivity for HPV 16 antibody and cancers originating from mucosal stratified squamous cell epithelium in the head and neck region. In another study, the authors suggested a causative association between HPV and a subset of squamous cell cancers of head and neck, more case–control studies were considered to be needed to assess that interaction (Franceschi et al, 2000; Gillison et al, 2000).

Tongue and laryngeal carcinomas

Although the prevalence of 21% for positivity of HPV 16 antibody among patients with tongue cancer found in the present study was greater than the 16% found in the study of Mork, we could not conclude that there was an association between presence of HPV antibody and tongue cancer because the proportion of HPV 16 seropositive control subjects was higher in the present study than among the control patients studied by Mork, 18 vs 7% (Mork et al, 2001). The same goes for the figures found for the HPV 16 seroprevalence among the patients with laryngeal cancers.

Oesophageal carcinoma

In the present study conducted among Dutch patients, we did not find an association between positivity for HPV 16 antibody and oesophageal carcinoma. This is in accordance with other studies as reported by Lagergren et al (1999). In the past, prospective seroepidemiological evidence had been brought forward that HPV 16 infection might be a risk factor for oesophageal carcinoma in Norway and Finland (Dillner et al, 1995; Bjørge et al, 1997a,1997b). Contrary to these findings, the seroepidemiologic case–control study later performed by Lagergren et al (1999) in Sweden could not support the conclusions from the above-mentioned studies. It must be noted that in various studies, the seroprevalence among the control subjects differ. For example, in the study in which Bjørge reported an association between HPV 16 seropositivity and oesophageal cancer, the seroprevalence for HPV 16 in patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma was 12 vs 5% in the controls. In the study reported by Dillner (1995) among Finnish patients with oesophageal carcinoma, the seroprevalence of antibody against HPV 16 was 21 vs 3% among matched controls. In the study of Lagergren, seroprevalence of HPV 16 antibody was 11.6% in the case subjects with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma, and 10.9% in the control subjects, while in the present study, the seroprevalence among cases with oesophageal carcinoma was 14 vs 18% among the negative control group.

It must be also taken into account that the role of HPV infection in squamous cell oesophageal cancer shows geographic variation (Sur and Cooper, 1998). This variation may be because of the fact that oesophageal carcinogenesis is a complex multistep process. For instance, in a study among Japanese patients, it was concluded that HPV was not likely to be involved in oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma, and in only 10 of 22 Alaska native patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagus HPV DNA was detected (Miller et al, 1997; Saegusa et al, 1997). In Chinese patients originating from a high-incidence area, HPV DNA was demonstrated in 20 out of 117 (17%) of the cases (De Villiers et al, 1999). However, only 3 out of 117 (3%) was of the high-risk HPV type. In a study performed in The Netherlands, no evidence could be found for a role of HPV in squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagus (Smits et al, 1995; Kok et al, 1997). In two other West European studies performed in Belgium and France, the role of HPV infection in the pathogenesis of oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma could also not be demonstrated (Benamouzig et al, 1995; Lambot et al, 2000).

The suggestion was put forward that there might be a difference between the results from studies executed in high-risk and low-risk areas for oesophageal carcinoma because of the differing time of diagnosis of the cancer. Another explanation might be that the tissue of an early diagnosed oesophageal carcinoma or premalignant papilloma might contain HPV DNA and/or HPV antigens, and not the specimens obtained from advanced oesophageal carcinoma. This is by analogy with bovine oesophageal carcinoma and the association with bovine papillomavirus (BPV) type 4. BPV 4 DNA and antigens can be found in high copy numbers in the premalignant oesophageal papillomas, but not in the carcinomas. Cattle infected with BPV 4, which feed on bracken fern, have a high risk of oesophageal cancer, but the BPV 4 viral genome is not present in frank cancers or fully transformed cells (Campo, 1992). If this phenomenon holds true for human oesophageal carcinoma, we should predict a high seroprevalence for antibody against HPV. In fact, we did not find a greater prevalence of antibody against HPV 16 capsids among patients with oesophageal cancer than in control patients.

Penile carcinoma

Only a few studies are reported on penile cancer and the role of HPV; a review is given by Griffiths and Mellon (1999) and later by Dillner et al (2000). The prevalence of subclinical or latent penile HPV infections among young, sexually active and healthy individuals is reported between 20 and 50%, while the incidence of penile carcinoma is relatively low (Van Doornum et al, 1994; Wikström et al, 2000). In penile carcinoma patients from Argentina, HPV DNA was detected in 27 out of 38 (71%) of the cases using single-stranded conformational polymorphism; 10 of the 38 (26.3%) patients were found positive for HPV 16 (Picconi et al, 2000). The difference with the prevalence of HPV 16 specific antibody found in the present study might be attributed to geographical distribution or a specific subtype of penile cancer. In a study on formalin-embedded tissue samples collected from the USA and Paraguay using the sensitive SPF 10 primers HPV DNA was detected in 80% of basaloid and 100% of warty tumour subtypes, whereas keratinising squamous cell carcinomas and verruccous carcinomas were positive for HPV DNA in 34.9 and 33.3% of the cases, respectively (Rubin et al, 2001). With regard to antibody against HPV, one study on the seroprevalence of HPV 16 antibody among Chinese patients with penile cancer reported that no antibodies against HPV 16 VLPs were detected in serum specimens of 55 Chinese patients with penile cancer, nor in the sera of 60 controls (Wideroff et al, 1996b). In an HPV 16 serosurvey of cancer patients, a small subset of eight patients with penile squamous carcinoma was described with five of them positive for HPV 16 antibody (Strickler et al, 1998). In a study from Seattle, a seroprevalence of HPV 16 antibody for in situ penile cancer of 20.3% was found, and 28.5% for invasive penile cancer (Carter et al, 2001). Thus, the findings of our study are in accordance with the latter studies indicating a relation between HPV infection and penile carcinoma.

Vaginal carcinoma

The elevated HPV 16 seroprevalence among patients with vaginal cancer was not statistically significant compared to the control women. This is in contrast to the results of a recently published report that antibodies to HPV 16 L1 were strongly related to the risk of vaginal cancer (Daling et al, 2002). Approximately 44% of both the in situ and the invasive case subjects had antibodies to HPV 16 L1 compared to 15% of the control women.

Antibody against E7

Presence of antibodies against papillomavirus might be used as prognostic marker in cervical cancer patients (Heim et al, 2002). If expression of transforming proteins as E6 and E7 is implicated in the carcinogenesis of epithelial carcinoma, it might be hypothesised that development of antibody against either of these oncoproteins is related with clinical outcome. Antibody responses against E6 and E7 proteins have been shown to be associated with clinical stage of cervical carcinoma (Zumbach et al, 2002). In control groups of that study a prevalence of 2% was found, whereas 26 of 95 (27%) patients with cervical carcinoma showed antibody against HPV 16 E6 or E7. Antibody against HPV 16 E6 was dominant among patients with HPV 16 specific antibody (23 out of 27, 85%) over that to E7 (9 out of 27, 33%). E6 and/or E7 antibody prevalence increased from 21% in FIGO stage-I patients to 42% in stage-II patients and reached 52% in stage-III patients. However, in the present study, among patients with cervical carcinoma who were HPV 16 L1 antibody positive, a prevalence of 7 out of 24 (29%) was found for antibody against HPV 16 E7 peptides. Analysis of the association between the presence of E7 antibody and the clinical outcome yielded no significant result, indicating that E7 antibody does not improve clinical outcome. This finding is in accordance with the conclusion drawn in a study from Sweden, in which antibodies to HPV 16 capsids and to the oncoproteins E6 and E7 did not appear to be prognostic indicators of cervical cancer prognosis (Sillins et al, 2002).

In conclusion, we found evidence for a strong association between the presence of HPV 16 L1 antibody and both cervical squamous cell carcinoma and penile squamous cell carcinoma. A relation between the presence of HPV 16 antibody and oropharyngeal cancer was also found. No serological evidence was demonstrated for an association between HPV 16 antibody and oesophageal, tongue, laryngeal and vaginal carcinoma.

Acknowledgments

We thank the Amsterdam Microbiological Foundation for financial support for CM Korse and JCGM Buning-Kager to execute the serological assays in Stockholm, Sweden.

References

  1. Benamouzig R, Jullina E, Chang F, Robaskiewicz M, Flejou JF, Raoul JL, Coste T, Couturier D, Pompidou A, Rautureau J (1995) Absence of human papillomavirus DNA detected by polymerase chain reaction in French patients with esophageal carcinoma. Gastroenterology 109: 1876–1881 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bjørge T, Dillner J, Anttila T, Engeland A, Hakulinen T, Jellum E, Lehtinen M, Luostarinen T, Paavonen J, Pukkala E, Sapp M, Schiller J, Youngman L, Thoresen S (1997a) Prospective seroepidemiological study of role of human papilloma virus in non-cervical anogenital cancers. BMJ 315: 646–649 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bjørge T, Hakulinen T, Engeland A, Jellum E, Koskela P, Lehtinen M, Luostarinen T, Paavonen J, Sapp M, Schiller J, Thoresen S, Wang Z, Youngman L, Dillner J (1997b) A prospective, seroepidemiologic study on the role of human papillomavirus in esophageal cancer in Norway. Cancer Res 57: 3989–3992 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bontkes HJ, De Gruijl TD, Walboomers JMM, Schiller JT, Dillner J, Helmerhorst TJM, Verheyen RHM, Scheper RJ, Meijer CJLM (1999) Immune responses against human papillomavirus (HPV) type 16 virus-like particles in a cohort study of women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. II. Systemic but not local IgA responses correlate with clearance of HPV-16. J Gen Virol 80: 409–417 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Campo MS (1992) Cell transformation by animal papillomaviruses. J Gen Virol 73: 217–222 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Carter JJ, Madelein MM, Shera K, Schwarz SM, Cushing-Haugen KL, Wipf GC, Porter P, Daling JR, McDougal JK, Galloway DA (2001) Human papillomavirus 16 and 18 L1 serology compared across anogenital cancer sites. Cancer Res 61: 1934–1940 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Daling JR, Madeleine MM, Schwartz SM, Shera KA, Carter JJ, McKnight B, Porter PL, Galloway DA, McDougall JK, Tamini H (2002) A population-based study of squamous cell vaginal cancer: HPV and cofactors. Gynecol Oncol 84: 263–270 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Dean AG, Dean JA, Coulombier D, Brendel KA, Smith DC, Burton AH, Dicker RC, Sullivan K, Fagan RF, Arner TG (1994) Epi Info, Version 6: A Word Processing, Databases, and Statistics Program for Epidemiology on Microcomputers. Atlanta, GA, USA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [Google Scholar]
  9. De Villiers EM (1992) Laboratory techniques in the investigation of human papillomavirus infection. Genitourinary Med 68: 50–54 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. De Villiers EM, Lavergne D, Chang F, Syrjanen K, Tosi P, Cintorino M, Santopietro R, Syrjanen S (1999) An interlaboratory study to determine the presence of human papillomavirus DNA in esophageal carcinoma from China. Int J Cancer 81: 225–228 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Dianzani C, Bucci M, Pierangeli A, Calvieri S, Degener AM (1998) Association of human papillomavirus type 11 with carcinoma of the penis. Urology 51: 1046–1048 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Dillner J (1990) Mapping of linear epitopes of the human papillomavirus type 16. The E1, E2, E4, E5, E6 and E7 open reading frames. Int J Cancer 46: 703–711 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Dillner J (1995) Serology of human papillomavirus. Cancer J 8: 264–269 [Google Scholar]
  14. Dillner J, Knekt P, Schiller JT, Hakulinen T (1995) Prospective sero-epidemiological evidence that human papilloma-virus type 16 infection is a risk factor for oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Br Med J 311: 1346. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Dillner J, Von Krogh G, Horenblas S, Meijer CJ (2000) Etiology of squamous cell carcinoma of the penis. Scand J Urol Nephrol 205(Suppl): 189–193 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Forastiere A, Koch W, Trotti A, Sidranski D (2001) Head and neck cancer. N Engl J Med 345: 1890–1900 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Franceschi S, Muñoz N, Snijders PJF (2000) How strong and how wide is the link between HPV and oropharyngeal cancer? Lancet 356: 871–872 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Gillison ML, Koch WM, Capone RB, Spafford M, Westra WH, Wu L, Zahurak ML, Daniel RW, Viglione M, Symer DE, Shah KV, Sidransky D (2000) Evidence for a causal association between human papillomavirus and a subset of head and neck cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst 92: 709–720 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Griffiths TR, Mellon JK (1999) Human papillomavirus and urological tumours: I. Basic science and role in penile cancer. Br J Urol Int 84: 579–586 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Grussendorf-Cronen EI (1997) Anogenital premalignant and malignant tumors (including Buschke–Lowenstein tumors). Clin Dermatol 15: 377–388 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Heim K, Widschwendter A, Pirschner G, Wieland U, Awerkiew S, Christensen ND, Bergant A, Marth C, Höpfl R (2002) Antibodies to human papillomavirus 16 L1 virus-like particles as an independent prognostic marker in cervical cancer. Am J Obstetr Gynecol 186: 705–711 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. WHO (1979) International Classification of Disease. 9th rev. Geneva: World Health Organization [Google Scholar]
  23. Kirnbauer R, Hubbert NL, Wheeler CM, Becker TM, Lowy DR, Schiller JT (1994) A virus-like particle ELISA detects serum antibodies in a majority of women infected with human papillomavirus type 16. J Natl Cancer Inst 86: 494–498 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Kok TC, Nooter K, Tjong-A-Hung SP, Smits HL, ter Schegget J (1997) No evidence of known types of human papillomavirus in squamous cell cancer of the oesophagus in a low-risk area. Eur J Cancer 33: 1865–1868 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Lagergren J, Wang Z, Bergström R, Dillner J, Nyren O (1999) Human papillomavirus infection and esophageal cancer: a nation-wide seroepidemiologic case–control study. J Natl Cancer Inst 91: 156–162 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Lambot MA, Haot J, Peny MO, Fayt I, Noel JC (2000) Evaluation of the role of human papillomvirus in oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma in Belgium. Acta Gastroenterol Belg 63: 154–156 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Lavergne D, De Villiers EM (1999) Papillomavirus in esophageal papillomas and carcinomas. Int J Cancer 80: 681–684 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Lehtinen M, Dillner J, Knekt P, Luostarinen T, Aomaa A, Kirnbauer R, Koskela P, Paavonen P, Peto R, Schiller JT, Hakama M (1996) Serologically diagnosed infection with human papillomavirus type 16 and risk for subsequent development of cervical carcinoma: nested case–control study. BMJ 312: 537–539 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Levi JE, Rahal P, Sarkis AS, Villa L (1998) Human papillomavirus DNA and p53 status in penile carcinomas. Int J Cancer 76: 779–783 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Lindel KK, Beer KT, Laisssue J, Greiner RH, Aebersold DM (2001) Human papillomavirus positive squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx. Cancer 92: 805–813 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Marais DJ, Rose RC, Lane C, Kay P, Nevin J, Denny L, Soeters R, Dehaeck CMC, Williamson AL (2000) Seroreactivity to human papillomavirus types 16, 18, 31, 33, and 45 virus-like in South African women with cervical cancer and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. J Med Virol, 60: 403–410 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Miller BA, Davidson M, Myerso D, Icenogle J, Lanier AP, Tan J, Beckmann AM (1997) Human papillomavirus type 16 DNA in esophageal carcinomas from Alaska Natives. Int J Cancer 71: 218–222 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Mork J, Lie AK, Glattre E, Clark S, Hallmans G, Jellum E, Koskela P, Moller B, Pukkala E, Schiller JT, Wang Z, Youngman L, Lehtinen M, Dillner J (2001) Human papillomavirus infection as a risk factor for squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck. N Engl J Med 344: 1125–1131 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Muñoz N, Bosch FX (1989) Epidemiology of cervical cancer. In Human Papillomavirus and Cervical Cancer, Muñoz N, Bosch FX, Jensen OM (eds). pp 9–39. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer [Google Scholar]
  35. Nonnenmacher B, Hubbert NL, Kirnbauer R, Shah KV, Muñoz N, Bosch FX, De Sanjosé S, Viscidi R, Lowy DR, Schiller JT (1995) Serologic responses to human papillomavirus type 16 (HPV-16) virus-like particles in HPV-16 DNA-positive invasive cervical cancer and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade III patients and controls from Columbia and Spain. J Infect Dis 172: 19–24 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Nonnenmacher B, Kruger Kjaer S, Svare EI, Scott JD, Hubbert N, Van den Brule AJC, Kirnbauer R, Walboomers JMM, Lowy R, Schiller JT (1996) Seroreactivity to HPV 16 virus-like particles as a marker for cervical cancer risk in high-risk populations. Int J Cancer 68: 704–709 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Picconi M, Eiján AM, Distéfano AL, Puyeo S, Alonio LV, Gorostidi S, Teyssié AR, Casabé A (2000) Human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA in penile carcinomas in Argentina: analysis of primary tumors and lymph nodes. J Med Virol 61: 65–69 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Poblet E, Alfar L, Fernander-Segoviano P, Jimenez-Reyes J, Salido EC (1999) Human papillomavirus-associated penile squamous cell carcinoma in HIV-positive patients. Am J Surg Pathol 23: 1119–1123 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Rubin MA, Kleter B, Zhou M, Ayala G, Cubilla AL, Quint WG, Pirog EC (2001) Detection and typing of human papillomavirus DNA in penile carcinoma: evidence for multiple independent pathways of penile carcionogenesis. Am J Pathol 159: 1211–1218 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Saegusa M, Hashimura M, Takaano Y, Ohbu M, Okayasu L (1997) Absence of human papillomavirus genomic sequences detected by the polymerase chain reaction in oesophageal and gastric carcinomas in Japan. Mol Pathol 50: 101–104 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Sillins I, Avall-Lundqvist E, Tadesse A, Jansen KU, Stendahl U, Lenner P, Zumbach K, Pawlita M, Dillner J, Frankendal B (2002) Evaluation of antibodies to human papillomavirus as prognostic markers in cervical cancer patients. Gynaecol Oncol 85: 333–338 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Smits HL, Tjong-A-Hung SP, Ter Schegget J, Nooter K, Kok T (1995) Absence of human papillomavirus DNA from esophageal carcinoma as determined by multiple broad spectrum polymerase chain reactions. J Med Virol 46: 213–215 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Strickler HD, Schiffman MH, Shah KV, Rabkin CS, Schiller JT, Wacholder S, Clayman B, Viscidi RP (1998) A survey of human papillomavirus 16 antibodies in patients with epithelial cancers. Eur J Cancer Prev 7: 305–313 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Sur M, Cooper K (1998) The role of human papilloma virus in esophageal cancer. Pathology 30: 348–354 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Tornesello ML, Buonaguro FM, Meglio A, Buonaguro L, Beth-Giraldo E, Giraldo G (1997) Sequence variations and viral genomic state of human papillomavirus type 16 in penile carcinomas from Ugandan patients. J Gen Virol 78: 2199–2208 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Van Doornum G, Prins M, Andersson-Ellström A, Dillner J (1998) Immunoglobulin A, G, and M responses to L1 and L2 capsids of human papillomavirus types 6, 11, 16, 18, and 33 after newly acquired infection. Sexually Transmitted Infect 74: 354–360 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Van Doornum GJJ, Prins M, Pronk L, Coutinho RA, Dillner J (1994) A prospective study of antibody responses to defined epitopes of human papillomavirus (HPV) type 16 in relationship to genital and anorectal presence of HPV DNA. J Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 1: 633–639 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Wideroff L, Schiffman M, Haderer P, Armstrong A, Greer CE, Manos MM, Burk RD, Scott DR, Sherman ME, Schiller JT, Hoover RN, Tarone RE, Kirnbauer R (1999) Seroreactivity to human papillomavirus types 16, 18, 31, and 45 virus-like particles in a case–control study of cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions. J Infect Dis 180: 1424–1428 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Wideroff L, Schiffman M, Hubbert N, Kirnbauer R, Schiller J, Greer C, Manos MM, Dawsey SM, Li Jun-Yao, Brinton L (1996b) Serum antibodies to HPV 16 virus-like particles are not associated with penile cancer in Chinese males. Viral Immunol 9: 23–25 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Wideroff L, Schiffmann MH, Hoover R, Tarone RE, Nonnenmacher B, Hubbert N, Kirnbauer R, Greer CE, Lorincz AT, Manos MM, Glass AG, Scott DR, Sherman ME, Buckland J, Lowy D, Schiller JT (1996a) Epidemiological determinants of seroreactivity to human papillomavirus (HPV) type 16 virus-like particles in cervical HPV-16 DNA-positive and -negative women. J Infect Dis 174: 937–943 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Wideroff L, Schiffman MH, Nonnemacher B, Hubert N, Kirnbauer R, Greer CE, Lowy D, Lorincz AT, Manos MM, Glass AG, Scott DR, Sherman ME, Kurman RJ, Buckland J, Tarone RE, Schiller J (1995) Evaluation of seroreactivity to human papillomavirus type 16 virus-like particles in an incident case–control study of cervical neoplasia. J Infect Dis 172: 1425–1430 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Wikström A, Popescu C, Forslund O (2000) Asymptomatic penile HPV infection: a prospective study. Int J STD & AIDS 11: 80–84 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Wikström A, Van Doornum GJJ, Kirnbauer R, Quint WGV, Dillner J (1995a) Prospective study on the development of antibodies against human papillomavirus type 6 among patients with condylomata acuminata or new asymptomatic infection. J Med Virol 46: 368–374 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Wikström A, Van Doornum GJJ, Schiller JT, Dillner J (1995b) Identification of HPV seroconversions. J Gen Virol 76: 529–539 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Zumbach K, Kisseljov F, Sacharova S, Shaichaev G, Semjonova L, Pavlova L, Pawlita M (2002) Antibodies against oncoproteins E6 an E7 of human papillomavirus types 16 and 18 in cervical carcinoma patients from Russia. Int J Cancer 85: 313–318 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Zur Hausen H (1994) Molecular pathogenesis of cancer of the cervix and its causation by specific human papillomavirus types. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 186: 131–156 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Journal of Cancer are provided here courtesy of Cancer Research UK

RESOURCES