Abstract
Correction to: British Journal of Cancer (2003) 88, 1361–1369. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6600841
A couple of errors have been noted as follows:
In Table 6 (on p 1366), the significance value for Xai-Xai should be shown as a single minus and in its footnote as ‘observed less than expected value at −P<0.05’.
Similarly in Table 7 (on p 1367), the significance value for Pondoland should be shown as a single plus and in its footnote as ‘high at +P<0.05’.
The Publisher would like to apologise for any inconvenience this may have caused.