Skip to main content
PMC home page
Canadian Family Physician logoLink to Canadian Family Physician
editorial
. 1994 Jul;40:1239-42, 1244, 1246-51.

Rethinking risk.

P F Hall
PMCID: PMC2380167  PMID: 8086835

Full text

PDF
1239

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Barrett J. F., Jarvis G. J., Macdonald H. N., Buchan P. C., Tyrrell S. N., Lilford R. J. Inconsistencies in clinical decisions in obstetrics. Lancet. 1990 Sep 1;336(8714):549–551. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(90)92097-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Barrett J. F., Jarvis G. J., Macdonald H. N., Buchan P. C., Tyrrell S. N., Lilford R. J. Inconsistencies in clinical decisions in obstetrics. Lancet. 1990 Sep 1;336(8714):549–551. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(90)92097-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Davies B. L., Niday P. A., Nimrod C. A., Drake E. R., Sprague A. E., Trépanier M. J. Electronic fetal monitoring: a Canadian survey. CMAJ. 1993 May 15;148(10):1737–1742. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Davies B. L., Niday P. A., Nimrod C. A., Drake E. R., Sprague A. E., Trépanier M. J. Electronic fetal monitoring: a Canadian survey. CMAJ. 1993 May 15;148(10):1737–1742. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Morgan M. G. Risk analysis and management. Sci Am. 1993 Jul;269(1):32-5, 38-41. doi: 10.1038/scientificamerican0793-32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Morgan M. G. Risk analysis and management. Sci Am. 1993 Jul;269(1):32-5, 38-41. doi: 10.1038/scientificamerican0793-32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Nesbitt R. E., Jr, Aubry R. H. High-risk obstetrics. II. Value of semiobjective grading system in identifying the vulnerable group. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1969 Apr 1;103(7):972–985. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(16)34448-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Nesbitt R. E., Jr, Aubry R. H. High-risk obstetrics. II. Value of semiobjective grading system in identifying the vulnerable group. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1969 Apr 1;103(7):972–985. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(16)34448-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Parboosingh I. J. The role of standardized risk assessment in the provision of prenatal care. Can Fam Physician. 1986 Oct;32:2115–2120. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Stewart P. J., Dulberg C., Arnill A. C., Elmslie T., Hall P. F. Diagnosis of dystocia and management with cesarean section among primiparous women in Ottawa-Carleton. CMAJ. 1990 Mar 1;142(5):459–463. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Stewart P. J., Dulberg C., Arnill A. C., Elmslie T., Hall P. F. Diagnosis of dystocia and management with cesarean section among primiparous women in Ottawa-Carleton. CMAJ. 1990 Mar 1;142(5):459–463. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Wall E. M. Assessing obstetric risk. A review of obstetric risk-scoring systems. J Fam Pract. 1988 Aug;27(2):153–163. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Wall E. M. Assessing obstetric risk. A review of obstetric risk-scoring systems. J Fam Pract. 1988 Aug;27(2):153–163. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Woolf S. H., Kamerow D. B. Testing for uncommon conditions. The heroic search for positive test results. Arch Intern Med. 1990 Dec;150(12):2451–2458. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Woolf S. H., Kamerow D. B. Testing for uncommon conditions. The heroic search for positive test results. Arch Intern Med. 1990 Dec;150(12):2451–2458. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Canadian Family Physician are provided here courtesy of College of Family Physicians of Canada

RESOURCES