Skip to main content
Applied and Environmental Microbiology logoLink to Applied and Environmental Microbiology
. 1985 Jan;49(1):253–255. doi: 10.1128/aem.49.1.253-255.1985

Cytochemical Localization of Urease in a Rumen Staphylococcus sp. by Electron Microscopy

R J C McLean 3, K-J Cheng 3,*, W D Gould 3, J W Costerton 3
PMCID: PMC238384  PMID: 16346704

Abstract

We describe a technique whereby intracellular urease activity can be localized by transmission electron microscopy. The ammonia produced from the enzymatic hydrolysis of urea is first precipitated with sodium tetraphenylboron and then replaced with silver to produce electron-dense silver tetraphenylboron. This direct reaction product deposition procedure was used to demonstrate the presence of membrane-bound urease of Staphylococcus sp. H3-22, a gram-positive ruminal bacterium.

Full text

PDF
253

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Cook A. R. Urease activity in the rumen of sheep and the isolation of ureolytic bacteria. J Gen Microbiol. 1976 Jan;92(1):32–48. doi: 10.1099/00221287-92-1-32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Delluva A. M., Markley K., Davies R. E. The absence of gastric urease in germ-free animals. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1968 Mar 25;151(3):646–650. doi: 10.1016/0005-2744(68)90011-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Granick S. UREASE DISTRIBUTION IN PLANTS: GENERAL METHODS. Plant Physiol. 1937 Apr;12(2):471–486. doi: 10.1104/pp.12.2.471. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Griffith D. P. Struvite stones. Kidney Int. 1978 May;13(5):372–382. doi: 10.1038/ki.1978.55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. HUNGATE R. E. The anaerobic mesophilic cellulolytic bacteria. Bacteriol Rev. 1950 Mar;14(1):1–49. doi: 10.1128/br.14.1.1-49.1950. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Murray D. R., Knox R. B. Immunofluorescent localization of urease in the cotyledons of jack bean, Canavalia ensiformis. J Cell Sci. 1977 Aug;26:9–18. doi: 10.1242/jcs.26.1.9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. SCOTT H. W., DEHORITY B. A. VITAMIN REQUIREMENTS OF SEVERAL CELLULOLYTIC RUMEN BACTERIA. J Bacteriol. 1965 May;89:1169–1175. doi: 10.1128/jb.89.5.1169-1175.1965. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Spurr A. R. A low-viscosity epoxy resin embedding medium for electron microscopy. J Ultrastruct Res. 1969 Jan;26(1):31–43. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5320(69)90033-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Varel V. H., Bryant M. P., Holdeman L. V., Moore W. E. Isolation of ureolytic Peptostreptococcus productus from feces using defined medium; failure of common urease tests. Appl Microbiol. 1974 Oct;28(4):594–599. doi: 10.1128/am.28.4.594-599.1974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Vinther O. Localization of urease activity in Ureaplasma urealyticum cells. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand B. 1976 Aug;84(4):217–224. doi: 10.1111/j.1699-0463.1976.tb01928.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Wozny M. A., Bryant M. P., Holdeman L. V., Moore W. E. Urease assay and urease-producing species of anaerobes in the bovine rumen and human feces. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1977 May;33(5):1097–1104. doi: 10.1128/aem.33.5.1097-1104.1977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Applied and Environmental Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES