Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Applied and Environmental Microbiology logoLink to Applied and Environmental Microbiology
. 1985 Aug;50(2):356–363. doi: 10.1128/aem.50.2.356-363.1985

Microbiology and ration digestibility in the hindgut of the ovine.

S M Lewis, B A Dehority
PMCID: PMC238628  PMID: 4051484

Abstract

Contents of the terminal ilea, ceca-proximal colons, and terminal recta were obtained from nine sheep, three of which were fed 100% orchardgrass hay, three of which were fed 60% cracked corn-40% orchardgrass hay, and three of which were fed 80% cracked corn-20% orchardgrass hay. The digestibility of dry matter in the ceca was greatest when the all-hay diet was fed, whereas the percentage of cellulose digestion in the ceca increased with increasing levels of concentrate. For all diets, the total volatile fatty acid concentrations were higher in the ceca than in the other two sites. The cecal pH levels decreased with increased corn levels in the diet. The total microbiol numbers per gram of ileal and cecal contents increased in response to feeding of concentrate; however, across all diets, the ileal counts were 8% or less of the cecal counts. In contrast, the cellulolytic microbial numbers in the ilea were 50% or more of those in the ceca and were highest with the all-hay diet. Both bacterial and end product concentrations in the ceca were equivalent to those occurring in rumina. A total of 16 cellulolytic cultures were isolated and characterized from ileal and cecal contents of animals fed all three diets. Seven gram-negative-rod-shaped organisms were identified as Butyrivibrio fibrisolvens, whose capacity to digest cellulose exceeded that of several rumen strains. The guanine-plus-cytosine content of the DNA of one strain of B. fibrisolvens was 38.8 mol%, compared with the only previously reported value for this species of 41.2 mol%.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Full text

PDF
356

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Allison M. J., Robinson I. M., Dougherty R. W., Bucklin J. A. Grain overload in cattle and sheep: changes in microbial populations in the cecum and rumen. Am J Vet Res. 1975 Feb;36(2):181–185. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. BRYANT M. P., SMALL N., BOUMA C., ROBINSON I. M. Characteristics of ruminal anaerobic celluloytic cocci and Cillobacterium cellulosolvens n. sp. J Bacteriol. 1958 Nov;76(5):529–537. doi: 10.1128/jb.76.5.529-537.1958. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. BRYANT M. P., SMALL N. The anaerobic monotrichous butyric acid-producing curved rod-shaped bacteria of the rumen. J Bacteriol. 1956 Jul;72(1):16–21. doi: 10.1128/jb.72.1.16-21.1956. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. DeGregorio R. M., Tucker R. E., Mitchell G. E., Jr, Gill W. W. Carbohydrate fermentation in the large intestine of lambs. J Anim Sci. 1982 Apr;54(4):855–862. doi: 10.2527/jas1982.544855x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Dehority B. A. Cellulolytic cocci isolated from the cecum of guinea pigs (Cavia porcellus). Appl Environ Microbiol. 1977 Jun;33(6):1278–1283. doi: 10.1128/aem.33.6.1278-1283.1977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dehority B. A. Characterization of several bovine rumen bacteria isolated with a xylan medium. J Bacteriol. 1966 May;91(5):1724–1729. doi: 10.1128/jb.91.5.1724-1729.1966. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dehority B. A., Grubb J. A. Characterization of the predominant bacteria occurring in the rumen of goats (Capra hircus). Appl Environ Microbiol. 1977 May;33(5):1030–1036. doi: 10.1128/aem.33.5.1030-1036.1977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Dehority B. A. Pectin-fermenting bacteria isolated from the bovine rumen. J Bacteriol. 1969 Jul;99(1):189–196. doi: 10.1128/jb.99.1.189-196.1969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Grubb J. A., Dehority B. A. Variation in colony counts of total viable anaerobic rumen bacteria as influenced by media and cultural methods. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1976 Feb;31(2):262–267. doi: 10.1128/aem.31.2.262-267.1976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. HALL E. R. Investigations on the microbiology of cellulose utilization in domestic rabbits. J Gen Microbiol. 1952 Nov;7(3-4):350–357. doi: 10.1099/00221287-7-3-4-350. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hiltner P., Dehority B. A. Effect of soluble carbohydrates on digestion of cellulose by pure cultures of rumen bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1983 Sep;46(3):642–648. doi: 10.1128/aem.46.3.642-648.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Jarvis B. D., Annison E. F. Isolation, classification and nutritional requirements of cellulolytic cocci in the sheep rumen. J Gen Microbiol. 1967 May;47(2):295–307. doi: 10.1099/00221287-47-2-295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kern D. L., Slyter L. L., Leffel E. C., Weaver J. M., Oltjen R. R. Ponies vs. steers: microbial and chemical characteristics of intestinal ingesta. J Anim Sci. 1974 Mar;38(3):559–564. doi: 10.2527/jas1974.383559x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Leatherwood J. M., Sharma M. P. Novel anaerobic cellulolytic bacterium. J Bacteriol. 1972 May;110(2):751–753. doi: 10.1128/jb.110.2.751-753.1972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. MARGHERITA S. S., HUNGATE R. E. SEROLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF BUTYRIVIBRIO FROM THE BOVINE RUMEN. J Bacteriol. 1963 Oct;86:855–860. doi: 10.1128/jb.86.4.855-860.1963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Macrae J. C., Armstrong D. G. Studies on intestinal digestion in the sheep. 2. Digestion of some carbohydrate constituents in hay, cereal and hay-cereal rations. Br J Nutr. 1969 Jun;23(2):377–387. doi: 10.1079/bjn19690044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Mann S. O., Orskov E. R. The effect of rumen and post-rumen feeding of carbohydrates on the caecal microflora of sheep. J Appl Bacteriol. 1973 Sep;36(3):475–484. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1973.tb04130.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Montgomery L., Macy J. M. Characterization of rat cecum cellulolytic bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1982 Dec;44(6):1435–1443. doi: 10.1128/aem.44.6.1435-1443.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Orskov E. R., Fraser C., Mason V. C., Mann S. O. Influence of starch digestion in the large intestine of sheep on caecal fermentation, caecal microflora and faecal nitrogen excretion. Br J Nutr. 1970 Sep;24(3):671–682. doi: 10.1079/bjn19700068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Robinson I. M., Allison M. J., Bucklin J. A. Characterization of the cecal bacteria of normal pigs. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1981 Apr;41(4):950–955. doi: 10.1128/aem.41.4.950-955.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Russell J. B., Dombrowski D. B. Effect of pH on the efficiency of growth by pure cultures of rumen bacteria in continuous culture. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1980 Mar;39(3):604–610. doi: 10.1128/aem.39.3.604-610.1980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. SCHILDKRAUT C. L., MARMUR J., DOTY P. Determination of the base composition of deoxyribonucleic acid from its buoyant density in CsCl. J Mol Biol. 1962 Jun;4:430–443. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(62)80100-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Shane B. S., Gouws L., Kistner A. Cellulolytic bacteria occurring in the rumen of sheep conditioned to low-protein teff hay. J Gen Microbiol. 1969 Mar;55(3):445–457. doi: 10.1099/00221287-55-3-445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Vidal H. M., Hogue D. E., Elliot J. M., Walker E. F., Jr Digesta of sheep fed different hay-grain ratios. J Anim Sci. 1969 Jul;29(1):62–68. doi: 10.2527/jas1969.29162x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Applied and Environmental Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES