Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2008 May 21;3(5):e2237. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002237

Kinetics and Ligand-Binding Preferences of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Thymidylate Synthases, ThyA and ThyX

Joshua H Hunter 1, Ramesh Gujjar 1, Cullen K T Pang 1, Pradipsinh K Rathod 1,2,*
Editor: Edathara Abraham3
PMCID: PMC2386288  PMID: 18493582

Abstract

Background

Mycobacterium tuberculosis kills approximately 2 million people each year and presents an urgent need to identify new targets and new antitubercular drugs. Thymidylate synthase (TS) enzymes from other species offer good targets for drug development and the M. tuberculosis genome contains two putative TS enzymes, a conventional ThyA and a flavin-based ThyX. In M. tuberculosis, both TS enzymes have been implicated as essential for growth, either based on drug-resistance studies or genome-wide mutagenesis screens. To facilitate future small molecule inhibitors against these proteins, a detailed enzymatic characterization was necessary.

Methodology/Principal Findings

After cloning, overexpression, and purification, the thymidylate-synthesizing ability of ThyA and ThyX gene products were directly confirmed by HPLC analysis of reaction products and substrate saturation kinetics were established. 5-Fluoro-2′-deoxyuridine 5′-monophosphate (FdUMP) was a potent inhibitor of both ThyA and ThyX, offering important clues to double-targeting strategies. In contrast, the folate-based 1843U89 was a potent inhibitor of ThyA but not ThyX suggesting that it should be possible to find ThyX-specific antifolates. A turnover-dependent kinetic assay, combined with the active-site titration approach of Ackermann and Potter, revealed that both M. tuberculosis enzymes had very low k cat values. One possible explanation for the low catalytic activity of M. tuberculosis ThyX is that its true biological substrates remain to be identified. Alternatively, this slow-growing pathogen, with low demands for TMP, may have evolved to down-regulate TS activities by altering the turnover rate of individual enzyme molecules, perhaps to preserve total protein quantities for other purposes. In many organisms, TS is often used as a part of larger complexes of macromolecules that control replication and DNA repair.

Conclusions/Significance

Thus, the present enzymatic characterization of ThyA and ThyX from M. tuberculosis provides a framework for future development of cell-active inhibitors and the biological roles of these TS enzymes in M. tuberculosis.

Introduction

An estimated 2 million deaths occur annually due to infections of Mycobacterium tuberculosis, the causative agent of tuberculosis [1]. Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis, the recently discovered extensively drug-resistant form of the disease, and the numerous side effects of current drugs during the long course of drug treatment are ongoing problems [2][4]. Rifampicin, the newest first line antitubercular drug was introduced nearly 45 years ago [5]. Consequently there is an urgent need for identifying new drug targets and inhibitors that can effectively combat this disease.

In other human diseases, the enzyme thymidylate synthase (ThyA) is an attractive target for drug development [6]. ThyA catalyzes the reductive methylation of 2′-deoxyuridine-5′-monophosphate (dUMP) to thymidine-5′-monophosphate (TMP) while utilizing N 5,N 10-methylene-5,6,7,8-tetrahydrofolate (mTHF) as the methyl donor and reductant in the reaction, yielding dihydrofolate (DHF) as a by-product (Fig. 1A) [7]. Even partial inhibition of ThyA causes an accumulation of 2′-deoxyuridine-5′-triphosphate (dUTP) and a cascade of events leading to “thymine-less” cell death [8], [9]. Many established and experimental anticancer drugs, such as 5-fluorouracil, Nolatrexed (AG337), Pemetrexed, and Raltitrexed (ZD1694), act through this enzyme [10]. Prior understanding of this general target in pharmacology, along with the vast number of potent lead inhibitors already available, should facilitate drug development against other indications including antibacterials [11]. It has recently been postulated that p-aminosalicylic acid, a commonly used antitubercular drug, involves M. tuberculosis ThyA, suggesting that inhibition of ThyA activity may be detrimental to M. tuberculosis growth and survival [12]. The M. tuberculosis genome sequence also lacks thymidine kinase, underscoring the essentiality of de novo TMP synthesis in this pathogen [13]. On this basis, selective inhibition of M. tuberculosis growth by ThyA inhibitors might not even require inhibitors selective for M. tuberculosis ThyA, as shown for the experimental treatment of malaria by inhibition of ThyA [14], [15].

Figure 1. Different reaction complexities of ThyA and ThyX.

Figure 1

(A) ThyA converts dUMP to TMP using mTHF as a cofactor. mTHF is regenerated by dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) and serine hydroxymethyltransferase (SHMT). (B) ThyX converts dUMP to TMP using mTHF, NADPH, and FAD as cofactors. mTHF is regenerated by SHMT.

In addition to the conventional ThyA, M. tuberculosis also appears to carry a flavin-dependent thymidylate synthase (FDTS or ThyX) [16]. Based on sequence and structural similarities to related enzymes in Helicobacter pylori and Thermotoga maritima, M. tuberculosis ThyX is expected to catalyze the reductive methylation of dUMP to afford TMP using mTHF as the methyl donor in the reaction (Fig. 1B) [13], [16], [17]. In other species, ThyX utilizes NADPH and a bound FAD chromophore as the reductant for the reaction. Indeed, crystal structure and sequence analysis have found that M. tuberculosis ThyX binds NADP+ and FAD and has no direct similarity to ThyA [13]. In addition, site directed mutagenesis studies have identified several amino acid residues, including a conserved “ThyX motif” that are necessary for M. tuberculosis ThyX tritium-release activity [18]. Direct confirmation of full thymidylate synthase activity and its kinetic properties are still necessary because of the low sequence homology of the ThyX family of enzymes across species [13]. There is pharmacological interest in this enzyme because the thyX gene is absent in humans and transposon site hybridization (TraSH) experiments indicate that Mycobacterium thyX is an essential gene for optimal growth of the pathogen [19], [20].

Despite the genomic, crystallographic, and mutagenesis studies, many of the fundamental enzymatic properties, such as the substrate and inhibitor binding abilities, of M. tuberculosis ThyA and ThyX remain unknown. Understanding the biochemistry of these enzymes is a necessary foundation needed for prioritizing drug development strategies and assigning biological function with confidence. In this study, we report on the expression, purification, kinetic properties, and inhibitor-binding preferences of both M. tuberculosis ThyA and ThyX. While the kinetic constants for substrate binding are not unusual, both enzymes had surprisingly low turnover rates. This evolutionary strategy raises important questions about possible alternate or additional roles of these enzymes in microbial functions. Regarding drug development, given that individual cell types may be specifically targeted using selective transport and selective drug activation properties of the cell, our initial results suggest that fluorinated pyrimidines may be used to inhibit both thymidylate synthase enzymes simultaneously. In contrast different folate analogues may be customized to selectively inhibit one enzyme over another.

Results and Discussion

Expression and purification

Histidine-tagged M. tuberculosis ThyA was overexpressed from BL21(DE3) pLysS E. coli. Purification by nickel affinity, ion-exchange, and size exclusion chromatography afforded pure protein (Fig. 2A). A total of 18.5 mg of pure protein was obtained from 1 L of bacterial culture. Size exclusion chromatography (Fig. 2B) suggested that the protein had an apparent mass of 57 kDa, which is within 10% of the predicted mass of a dimer (61.4 kDa). This is the first purification of ThyA from Mycobacteria. Similarly, histidine-tagged M. tuberculosis ThyX was overexpressed from BL21(DE3) pLysS E. coli. Again, purification by nickel affinity and ion-exchange chromatography afforded pure protein (Fig. 2A). A total of 8 mg of pure protein was obtained from 1 L of bacterial culture (more recent protein preparations have routinely yielded 20 mg of ThyX per liter of culture). Size exclusion chromatography (Fig. 2B) suggested that this protein had an apparent mass of 104 kDa, which is within 10% of the predicted mass of a tetramer (114.8 kDa). This agrees with the previously reported crystal structure, which shows that the enzyme exists as a tetramer when crystallized [16].

Figure 2. Analysis of M. tuberculosis ThyA and ThyX by SDS-PAGE and size exclusion chromatography.

Figure 2

(A) Purification of ThyA and ThyX analyzed by SDS-PAGE (Lanes: 1, Molecular weight markers (see materials and methods); 2, 15 µg soluble lysate fraction; 3, 2 µg M. tuberculosis ThyA after Ni2+ column; 4, 2 µg M. tuberculosis ThyA after Q-sepharose column; 5, 2 µg M. tuberculosis ThyA after size exclusion; 6, Same as 1; 7, 15 µg soluble lysate fraction from ThyX expression; 8, 2 µg M. tuberculosis ThyX after Ni2+ column; 9, 2 µg M. tuberculosis ThyX after Q-sepharose column. (B) Analysis of ThyA and ThyX by size exclusion chromatography. Protein standards (•) eluted at 47.79, 53.74, 59.69, 67.64, 72.62, 80.56, 94.80, and 102.65 mL (see materials and methods). ThyA (○) eluted at 84.35 mL. ThyX (□) eluted at 76.83 mL.

Lack of autologous RNA binding

Autologous RNA binding by the classical thymidylate synthase, ThyA, can play an important role in pharmacology. Whether a protein binds its own RNA, and whether the resulting autologous translational inhibition can be reversed with enzyme inhibitors, can be important contributing variables to species-specific drug action [21], [22]. Human and P. falciparum ThyA have been shown to bind their cognate mRNA coding sequence and to inhibit their own translation [21][23]. The mRNA binding abilities of M. tuberculosis ThyA and ThyX were probed using a gel-shift assay (Fig. 3). Neither ThyA nor ThyX were found to bind their own mRNA. These initial results suggest that the expression levels of M. tuberculosis ThyA and ThyX are not regulated by classic autologous translational feedback loops and instead may be dominated by regulation of RNA transcription.

Figure 3. RNA binding by M. tuberculosis ThyA and ThyX.

Figure 3

M. tuberculosis thymidylate synthases do not bind to their cognate mRNA. 0.35 nM of 32P labeled M. tuberculosis ThyX mRNA (lanes 1 and 2), M. tuberculosis ThyA mRNA (lanes 3 and 4), or P. falciparum DHFR-TS mRNA (lanes 5 and 6) was incubated in the presence or absence (lanes 1, 3, and 5) of purified M. tuberculosis ThyX (3.5 µM, lane 2), M. tuberculosis ThyA (3.5 µM, lane 4), or P. falciparum DHFR-TS (500 nM, lane 6). Unbound RNA was digested with 3 units of RNase T1 prior to electrophoresis [22].

Activity and substrate binding

The thymidylate-synthesizing abilities of M. tuberculosis ThyA and ThyX were confirmed by reversed phase HPLC (Fig. 4). The products of the enzymatic reactions were loaded onto a C18 column and decreases in dUMP and increases in TMP were confirmed using known standards. This simple experiment was necessary, particularly for ThyX. ThyA genes are very highly conserved across species [11]. M. tuberculosis ThyA and the well studied human ThyA (PDB # 1HZW) have a 53% sequence identity, including several essential catalytic residues [7], [24], thus creating high confidence that M. tuberculosis ThyA would indeed catalyze synthesis of thymidylate. In contrast, while the M. tuberculosis thyX gene product contains certain sequence motifs and structural elements identifying it as a TS [16], overall homology between ThyX sequences is low [13] and there was no direct proof of its ability to synthesize thymidylate.

Figure 4. HPLC analysis of M. tuberculosis ThyA and ThyX products.

Figure 4

(A) M. tuberculosis ThyA reaction products. Based on absorbance at 260 nm, the peak corresponding to dUMP (tr = 8.8 min) decreases while the peak corresponding to TMP (tr = 11.1 min) increases over a 120 minute time course (0, 30, 60, and 120 minute time points). (B) M. tuberculosis ThyX reaction products. The peak corresponding to dUMP (tr = 8.8 min) decreases while the peak corresponding to TMP (tr = 11.1 min) increases over a 120 minute time course (0, 30, 60, and 120 minute time points).

Thymidylate synthase activities of the isolated proteins were also verified using a tritium-release assay which depends on deprotonation at the 5-position of the pyrimidine ring. ThyA and ThyX produced 210 nmol and 9 nmol of tritiated water per minute per mg of protein, respectively (Table 1). ThyX activity was also verified by NADPH oxidation assay (data not shown). To examine substrate binding, the purified enzymes were assayed with increasing concentrations of either dUMP or mTHF, with varying concentrations of the second substrate. Similarly, ThyX was assayed with NADPH, with varying dUMP or mTHF. The enzymes displayed standard Michaelis-Menten curves for all substrates tested (Fig. 5 and 6). Fitting of the data to the appropriate equation revealed K m values of 4±0.7 µM for dUMP and 70±30 µM for mTHF for M. tuberculosis ThyA (Table 2). These values are similar to the experimentally determined values for human ThyA (1.8 or 2.5 µM for dUMP and 12 or 31 µM for mTHF) [25], [26]. The kinetic constants calculated for M. tuberculosis ThyX were 3±0.7 µM for dUMP, 4.0±1 µM for mTHF, and 47±10 µM for NADPH (Table 2). These values were also similar to experimentally determined values for other ThyX enzymes, 6–65 µM for dUMP, 20–24 µM for mTHF, and 26 µM–4 mM for NADPH [27][31].

Table 1. Purification of M. tuberculosis ThyA and ThyX.

Enzyme and Purification step Total amount of protein (mg) Total activity (nmol/min) Sp. activity (nmol/min/mg) Purification factor Yield (%)
M. tuberculosis ThyA
Cell lysate 490 18,620 38 1 100
Purified protein 18.5 3,885 210 5.5 21
M. tuberculosis ThyX
Cell lysate 340 782 2.3 1 100
Purified protein 8 72 9 4 9

Figure 5. Steady-state kinetics of M. tuberculosis ThyA.

Figure 5

(A) Titrations of mTHF (29, 143, 571, 1143 µM) with varying concentrations of dUMP (•, 1.875 µM; ▾, 3.75 µM; ▪, 7.5 µM; ♦, 15 µM). (B) Double reciprocal plot of data from plot A showing a sequential reaction mechanism. (C) Titrations of dUMP (1.875 µM, 3.75 µM, 7.5 µM, 15 µM) with varying concentrations of mTHF (•, 29 µM; ▾, 143 µM; ▪, 571 µM; ♦, 1143 µM). (D) Double reciprocal plot of data from plot C showing a sequential reaction mechanism. Lines in A and C are plots of Michaelis-Menten equations with calculated constants. Lines in B and D are linear regressions. Error bars are propagation of standard deviations.

Figure 6. Steady-state kinetics of M. tuberculosis ThyX.

Figure 6

(A) Titrations of mTHF (1.25, 2.5, 5, 10, 20 µM) with varying concentrations of dUMP (•, 1.25 µM; ▾, 2.5 µM; ▪, 5 µM; ♦, 10 µM; ▴, 20 µM). (B) Double reciprocal plot of data from plot A showing a sequential reaction mechanism. (C) Titrations of dUMP (1.25, 2.5, 5, 10, 20 µM) with varying concentrations of mTHF (•, 1.25 µM; ▾, 2.5 µM; ▪, 5 µM; ♦, 10 µM; ▴, 20 µM). (D) Double reciprocal plot of data from plot C showing a sequential reaction mechanism. (E) Titrations of NADPH (12.5, 25, 50, 100, 200 µM) with varying concentrations of mTHF (•, 1.25 µM; ▾, 2.5 µM; ▪, 5 µM; ♦, 10 µM; ▴, 20 µM) in the presence of 2.86 µM dUMP. (F) Double reciprocal plot of data from plot E showing a sequential reaction mechanism. Lines in A, C, and E are plots of Michaelis-Menten equations with calculated constants. Lines in B, D, and F are linear regressions. Error bars are propagation of standard deviations.

Table 2. Comparison of kinetics of Human ThyA to M. tuberculosis ThyA and ThyX.

K m (µM) K i (nM)
Enzyme dUMP mTHF NADPH k cat (min−1) FdUMP 1843U89
M. tuberculosis
ThyA 4±0.7 70±30 - 18 2±0.2 18±1.0
ThyX 3±0.7 4±1 47±10 0.4 100±10 11,200±900
Human
ThyA 2.5a, 1.8b 12a, 31b - 150c 1.7b 0.09d
a

From Dev et al. [46].

b

From Dolnick and Cheng [25].

c

From Davisson et al. [26].

d

From Pendergast et al. [44].

Inhibitor binding

Many folate and nucleotide analogs target TS enzymes [10]. One interesting challenge in M. tuberculosis pharmacology is to determine which compound class will inhibit which TS enzyme. Inhibition of M. tuberculosis ThyA and ThyX by the potent nucleotide-based inhibitor FdUMP, and the folate-based inhibitor 1843U89, were analyzed using the tritium-release assay. Based on similarity between substrates and inhibitors, FdUMP was analyzed with respect to dUMP, and 1843U89 was probed with respect to mTHF. Titrating the enzyme with increasing concentrations of substrate with various concentrations of the inhibitors revealed standard Michaelis-Menten curves (Fig. 7 and 8). Fitting of the data to the appropriate equation, based on double reciprocal plots, provided the K i values.

Figure 7. Inhibition of M. tuberculosis ThyA by 1843U89 and FdUMP.

Figure 7

(A) Titrations of mTHF (50, 150, 300, 600, 1200 µM) with varying concentrations of 1843U89 (•, 0 nM; ▾, 12.5 nM; ▪, 25 nM; ♦, 50 nM; ▴, 75 nM) in the presence of 3.75 µM dUMP. (B) Double reciprocal plot of data from plot A showing a noncompetitive inhibition mechanism. (C) Titrations of dUMP (1.25, 2.5, 5, 10 µM) with varying concentrations of FdUMP (•, 0 nM; ▾, 2.5 nM; ▪, 5 nM; ♦, 10 nM) in the presence of 142.9 µM mTHF. (D) Double reciprocal plot of data from plot C showing a noncompetitive inhibition mechanism. Lines in A and C are plots of Michaelis-Menten equations with calculated constants. Lines in B and D are linear regressions. Error bars are propagation of standard deviations.

Figure 8. Inhibition of M. tuberculosis ThyX by 1843U89 and FdUMP.

Figure 8

(A) Titrations of mTHF (1.25, 2.5, 10, 20 µM) with varying concentrations of 1843U89 (•, 0 µM; ▾, 25 µM; ▪, 50 µM; ♦, 100 µM; ▴, 400 µM) in the presence of 2.86 µM dUMP. (B) Double reciprocal plot of data from plot A showing a noncompetitive inhibition mechanism. (C) Titrations of dUMP (1.25, 2.5, 5, 7.5, 10 µM) with varying concentrations of FdUMP (•, 0 nM; ▾, 250 nM; ▪, 500 nM; ♦, 750 nM; ▴, 1000 nM) in the presence of 8 µM mTHF. (D) Double reciprocal plot of data from plot C showing a mixed inhibition mechanism. Lines in A and C are plots of Michaelis-Menten equations with calculated constants. Lines in B and D are linear regressions. Error bars are propagation of standard deviations.

FdUMP inhibited both ThyA and ThyX (Table 2). While this nucleotide-based inhibitor is a more potent inhibitor of ThyA (K i, 2 nM), it still shows mid-nanomolar level inhibition of ThyX (K i, 100 nM). This implies that fluorinated pyrimidine analogs could be used to inhibit both enzymes simultaneously. Again, specificity may be achieved from selection of appropriate fluorinated nucleotide, as is the case in experimental malaria chemotherapy [15], [32], [33].

While 1843U89 inhibited ThyA with a K i of 18 nM, it displaying a 600-fold weaker binding to ThyX (Table 2). This compound was originally designed to inhibit human ThyA which is very similar in amino acid sequence to M. tuberculosis ThyA and quite dissimilar to M. tuberculosis ThyX. Just as 1843U89 is highly selective for ThyA over ThyX, basic thermodynamic principles suggest that reciprocal inhibitors for M. tuberculosis ThyX should exist. Such is the case in the selective inhibition of P. falciparum dihydroorotate dehydrogenase (DHODH) over human DHODH. Initially, it was shown that common DHODH inhibitors were approximately 2,000–5,000-fold selective for the human enzyme over the P. falciparum enzyme [34]. A subsequent high-throughput screen identified inhibitors up to 12,500-fold selective for P. falciparum DHODH over human DHODH [35], [36]. In addition to implications for future drug development strategies, TS-selective folate inhibitors should play an important role in untangling the biological roles of these two enzymes in M. tuberculosis biology.

Low turnover

The present kinetic experiments revealed that M. tuberculosis ThyA and ThyX have very low catalytic rates for the synthesis of TMP. Initially, Vmax with known protein amounts in the reactions, we obtained apparent k cat values of 6 min−1 and 0.25 min−1 for ThyA and ThyX respectively. To rule out potential artifacts due to misfolded or inactive protein, the method of Ackermann and Potter was applied to determine the absolute k cat values of catalytically active ThyA and ThyX protein molecules [37][39]. Activity was determined with varying amounts of the purified enzymes titrated with increasing concentrations of FdUMP (Fig. 9).

Figure 9. Ackermann-Potter plots of ThyA and ThyX activity.

Figure 9

(A) Graph of x-intercepts from primary plot lines (inset) versus FdUMP concentration (0, 10, 20, 30, 40 nM). Inset plot: titrations of M. tuberculosis ThyA with varying concentrations of FdUMP in the presence of 1200 µM mTHF and 20 µM dUMP. •, 0 nM FdUMP (20, 35, 50, 65, 80 ng ThyA); ▾, 10 nM FdUMP (50, 65, 80, 95, 110 ng ThyA); ▪, 20 nM FdUMP (80, 95, 110, 125 ng ThyA); ♦, 30 nM FdUMP (110, 125, 140, 155 ng ThyA); ▴, 40 nM FdUMP (155, 170, 185, 200 ng ThyA). (B) Graph of x-intercepts from primary plot lines (inset) versus FdUMP concentration (0, 125, 250, 375, 500 nM). Inset plot: titrations of M. tuberculosis ThyX with varying concentrations of FdUMP in the presence of 20 µM mTHF, 20 µM dUMP, 1 mM NADPH, and 10 µM FAD. •, 0 nM FdUMP (1.25, 1.5, 1.75, 2, 2.25 µg ThyX); ▾, 125 nM FdUMP (1.25, 1.5, 1.75, 2 µg ThyX); ▪, 250 nM FdUMP (1.5, 1.75, 2, 2.25, 2.5 µg ThyX); ♦, 375 nM FdUMP (2, 2.25, 2.5, 2.75 µg ThyX); ▴, 500 nM FdUMP (2, 2.25, 2.5, 2.75 µg ThyX). Error bars were omitted to simplify the graphs.

The slopes from the primary and secondary Ackermann-Potter plots revealed a k cat value of 18 min−1 for M. tuberculosis ThyA. This is still an order of magnitude lower than the values for human and P. falciparum ThyA (150 min−1 and 120 min−1, respectively [26], [40]). The rate of turnover by M. tuberculosis ThyX was even slower, with a k cat value of 0.4 min−1. This too was determined using the Ackermann-Potter method. Of all the ThyX enzymes studied from other microorganisms, which show as much as 100-fold variations in specific activity for ThyX [27], [28], [30], [31], the M. tuberculosis ThyX enzyme is the slowest. The ThyA and ThyX turnover numbers raise some important biological questions relevant to TB pharmacology. Due to the low turnover rates of ThyX enzymes in general, several studies have questioned whether the true biological substrates for this enzyme have been identified [31], [41], [42]. While the substrates used in the present work were able to catalyze turnover in vitro, it is possible that they do not provide an accurate measure of in vivo activity. Alternatively, the low turnover rate may be related to an important evolutionary characteristic of M. tuberculosis. It is a very slow growing pathogen, presumably with limited needs for TMP. Normally, one would assume that such an organism would evolve to down-regulate thymidylate synthesizing protein expression, compared to rapidly proliferating cells. The present chemical data raises the possibility that this slow-growing pathogen may have evolved to decrease the catalytic activity of individual enzyme molecules, perhaps to preserve total protein quantities for other purposes. Cellular role of TS proteins can extend beyond generating TMP. ThyA is often found as a part of a larger complex of proteins and RNA that are involved in control of cell replication as well as DNA repair [43]. If ThyA levels and ThyX levels are not low, development of pathogen inhibitors will have to rely on selectivity mechanism other than low target levels.

Concluding remarks

The present chemical studies help to set the initial foundation to further evaluate M. tuberculosis ThyA and ThyX as chemotherapeutic targets against tuberculosis. Even though M. tuberculosis carries two genes for thymidylate synthesis, both of which have been implicated as important in growth and survival of this major human pathogen, the biological data available to date do not define the detailed metabolic role and the vulnerability of M. tuberculosis to inhibitors of these enzymes. If detailed genetic manipulations of individual genes formally show that both genes are essential, chemical genetic approaches based on the present enzymatic studies will follow. These should facilitate an understanding of whether target inhibition of one or both enzymes is needed to kill M. tuberculosis in its growth phase, whether target inhibition of one or both enzymes is needed to kill M. tuberculosis in its latent phase, whether the bacteria can upregulate each of the proteins in the presence of inhibitors to overcome drug action, whether one gene can facilitate resistance to inhibitors directed at the other TS, and whether selective dual targeting may be required to successfully shut off TMP synthesis.

Materials and Methods

Reagents

FAD, NADPH, tetrahydrofolic acid, Pefabloc SC, DNAseI, FdUMP, dUMP, TMP and protein standards for size-exclusion chromatography were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). [5-3H]-dUMP was purchased from Moravek Biochemicals (Brea, CA). His GraviTrap columns, DEAE Sepharose Fast Flow, Q Sepharose Fast Flow, and Superdex 200 were purchased from GE Healthcare (Piscataway, NJ). Protein concentrations were measured using the Protein Assay kit from Bio-Rad Laboratories (Hercules, CA). Low-range protein molecular weight markers were obtained from Bio-Rad Laboratories (Hercules, CA) (phosphorylase b, 97,400; serum albumin, 66,200; ovalbumin, 45,000; carbonic anhydrase, 31,000; trypsin inhibitor, 21,500; lysozyme, 14,400). The T7 Riboprope in vitro transcription system was obtained from Promega (Madison, WI). RNasin and RNase T1 were purchased from Ambion (Foster City, CA). Uridine 5′-triphosphate [α-32P] was purchased from American Radiolabeled Chemicals (St. Louis, MO). To prepare a 20 mM stock solution of methylene tetrahydrofolate (mTHF), solid tetrahydrofolic acid was dissolved in a buffer containing 125 mM TES, 60 mM MgCl2, 2.5 mM EDTA (pH 8.0), 190 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, and 16 mM formaldehyde. All, more dilute, mTHF solutions were made from this stock solution. mTHF solutions were stored under argon at −20°C. 1843U89 was synthesized as previously reported [44].

Expression and purification of M. tuberculosis ThyA

The thyA gene was cloned from a pET24d(+) vector with a C-terminal His-Tag into a pET23d(+) vector with an N-terminal His-Tag using the forward primer (TTA CCA GCT AGC CTC GAG ATG CAC CAC CAC CAC CAC CAC ACG CCA TAC GAG GAC CTG CTG) and the reverse primer (GTT ATT GAG CTC CCC GGG TCA TAC CGC GAC TGG AGC TTT GAT C) including NheI and SacI restriction sites (underlined) and the plasmid construct was confirmed by sequencing. The protein was expressed in BL21(DE3) pLysS E. coli in 100 mL LB media containing 50 µg/mL ampicillin and 35 µg/mL chloramphenicol at 37°C overnight. About 50 mL of the overnight culture was added to 1 L of LB with the appropriate antibiotics. The 1 L culture was grown to an OD600 nm of 0.6 and IPTG was added to give a final IPTG concentration of 1 mM. After 6 hours, the cells were harvested by centrifugation at 10,000×g at 4°C and the cells were resuspended, on ice, in 20 mM sodium phosphate (pH 7.4), 500 mM sodium chloride, 15 mM magnesium chloride, 20 mM imidazole, 20 µg/mL DNAseI, 1 mM Pefabloc SC, and 0.2 mg/mL lysozyme and lysed by sonication. Cell debris was removed by centrifugation at 10,000×g at 4°C and the cleared lysate was purified on a His GraviTrap column as specified by the manufacturer. The crudely purified protein was dialyzed against 75 mM potassium phosphate (pH 7.8), 0.1 mM EDTA, and 1 mM DTT and bound to a DEAE Sepharose Fast Flow column. The protein was eluted with a 0–250 mM NaCl gradient. Fractions containing ThyA were pooled, concentrated, and purified on a Superdex 200 size exclusion column with elution by 20 mM Tris (pH 7.8), 150 mM KCl, 1 mM DTT, and 0.1 mM EDTA. The enzyme was frozen at −20°C in the same buffer containing 20% glycerol.

Expression and purification of M. tuberculosis ThyX

The gene for M. tuberculosis thyX with a C-terminal His-Tag was expressed as above [16]. ThyX bound the Ni2+ column tightly and was eluted with 20 mM sodium phosphate (pH 7.4), 1M NaCl, and 1M imidazole. The crudely purified protein was dialyzed, against 10 mM Tris HCl (pH 7.2), 50 mM NaCl, and 2 mM DTT, and bound to a Q Sepharose Fast Flow column. The protein was eluted with a 50–500 mM NaCl gradient. Fractions containing ThyX were pooled, dialyzed against 50 mM Tris HCl (pH 7.5), 200 mM NaCl, and 10% glycerol, and frozen at −20°C.

Protein size

The approximate masses of ThyA and ThyX, in solution, were determined using size-exclusion chromatography. A mixture of protein standards consisting of: Blue Dextran (void volume marker), thyroglobulin (669 kDa), apoferritin (443 kDa), b-amylase (200 kDa), alcohol dehydrogenase (150 kDa), bovine serum albumin (66 kDa), carbonic anhydrase (29 kDa), and cytochrome C (12.4 kDa), was loaded onto a Superdex 200 size-exclusion column with a bed volume of 120 mL (the concentration of the standards was 1–2 mg/mL for each protein). The standards were eluted with 20 mM potassium phosphate (pH 7.8), 150 mM KCl, 1 mM DTT, and 0.1 mM EDTA with a flow rate of 0.7 mL/min. Samples of ThyA and ThyX were loaded onto the column at a concentration of approximately 1.5 mg/mL and eluted with the same buffer and flow rate. A plot of elution volume/void volume versus log of the molecular weight standards gave a linear data set whose regression line was used to calculate thymidylate synthase molecular weight from enzyme elution volumes [45].

RNA binding assay

RNA binding experiments was measured as previously described [21], [22]. ThyA and ThyX mRNA was generated using the T7 Riboprobe in vitro transcription system (Promega) following the manufacturers protocol. The RNA was purified by phenol/chloroform extraction followed by ethanol precipitation. The amount of RNA transcribed was determined by measuring the OD260 nm of the solution. Electrophoresis using 1% formamide agarose was used to determine the size and integrity of the RNA. Radiolabeled RNA was made by using 12 µM rUTP and adding 50 µCi of [α-32P] UTP. Labeled RNA was quantified by the 32P-incorporation assay following the protocol from Promega. RNA (0.35 nM labeled with 100,000 cpm 32P) was incubated with varying concentrations of purified enzyme in 10 mM HEPES pH 7.5, 3 mM MgCl2, 40 mM KCl, 5% glycerol, 200 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, and 1 unit of RNasin at 37°C for 15 minutes. The unbound RNA was digested by addition of 3 units of RNase T1 and incubation at 25°C for 10 minutes. Non-specific interactions were reduced by addition of 5 mg/ml heparin and incubation at 25°C for 10 minutes. The RNA-protein complexes were resolved on a 5% TBE polyacrylamide gel and visualized by autoradiography.

TMP synthesis

Approximately 150 ng of M. tuberculosis ThyA, or 3 µg of M. tuberculosis ThyX, was added to a mixture of 60 µL mTHF (final mTHF concentrations were 143 µM for ThyA assay or 20 µM for ThyX assay), 15 µL of 140 µM dUMP, 3 µL of 350 µM FAD (for ThyX assay only), and 1 µL of 35 mM NADPH (for ThyX assay only) and water to give reaction volume of 105 µL. The reaction times varied from 30 to 120 minutes. To isolate the products, the reaction mixture was spun through a Microcon YM-10 centrifugal filter (MWCO = 10,000) at 13,000×g for 5 minutes. An additional 100 µL of water was added and the spin was repeated. The deproteinized reaction mixture was run on an HPLC using a Beckman reversed phase Ultrasphere ODS 5 µm C-18 column (4.6 mm ID, 150 mm length) with isocratic flow with 5 mM potassium phosphate (pH 7.0), 5 mM tetrabutylammonium dihydrogen phosphate, and 5% (v/v) acetonitrile, while monitoring elution at 260 nm. Standard solutions of dUMP, TMP, and mTHF were also run to assign the elution positions of reactants and products.

Thymidylate synthase assay

In a standard tritium-release assay, 50 ng of M. tuberculosis ThyA or 1 µg of M. tuberculosis ThyX, in 1 µL, was added to 20 µL mTHF (mTHF concentrations in the reactions ranged from 5.7 µM–1143 µM for ThyA assay or 1.25 µM–20 µM for ThyX assay), 1 µL of 200 µM FAD (for ThyX assay only), and 1 µL of 2 mM NADPH (for ThyX assay only). The total reaction volume was brought to 30 µL with the addition of water. To initiate the reaction, 5 µL of 13.1 µM–140 µM [5-3H]-dUMP (0.4 Ci/mmol) was added. After a 25 minute reaction period, at room temperature, the reaction was terminated by the addition of 20 µL of a stop solution (a 3∶1 ratio of 2 N TCA∶4.3 mM dUMP). To remove unreacted substrates, 200 µL 10% (w/v) activated charcoal in water was added to the reaction mixture. The reaction tubes were incubated on ice for 15 minutes then spun at 13,000×g at 4°C for 10 minutes. A 100 µL aliquot of the supernatant was assayed by liquid scintillation counting to determine the amount of tritium-containing water produced by the reaction. Specific activities and Vmax values were determined in the presence of saturating concentrations of substrates.

Kinetic properties

The tritium release, at fixed time points, revealed initial reaction velocities needed to calculate the K m values of dUMP, mTHF, and NADPH and the k cat values of thymidylate synthase activity. See the legends for Fig. 5, 6, and 9 for substrate concentrations. Plots of reaction velocity (v) versus substrate concentration (A and/or B) were fit, using SigmaPlot 9.0, to the Michaelis-Menten equation for a sequential mechanism: v = (Vmax[A][B])/([A][B]+K m A[B]+K m B[A]+K m B K s A). k cat values were determined from Ackermann-Potter plots using the equation, Slope = (k cat[S])/([S]+K m) [37][39]. See the legend for Fig. 9 for enzyme and inhibitor concentrations.

Inhibitory constants

The tritium-release assay was also used to determine the K i values of the inhibitors for the ThyA and ThyX enzymes. Inhibitor and corresponding substrate concentrations were varied as listed in the legends of Fig. 7 and 8 (dUMP was varied against changing FdUMP in the reactions and mTHF was varied against changing 1843U89 in the reactions). The data yielded double reciprocal plots that were fit to linear regression lines. Plots of reaction velocity versus substrate concentration were fit, using SigmaPlot 9.0, to the appropriate Michaelis-Menten equation for an inhibition by a non-competitive: v = (Vmax[B])/((1+[I]/K i)(K m B+[B])), competitive: v = (Vmax[B])/(K m B(1+[I]/K i+[B]), or mixed inhibitor: v = (Vmax[B])/(K s A(1+[I]/K i)+[B](1+[I]/K is)).

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Carol Hopkins Sibley and Jonathan E. Ulmer (Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington) for DNA templates used to construct the Mycobacterium tuberculosis ThyA and ThyX expression vectors for this paper.

Footnotes

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Funding: This work was supported by NIH grants AI26912 and AI60360 and a Senior Scholar Award in Global Infectious Diseases from the Ellison Medical Foundation (PKR).

References

  • 1.Keeler E, Perkins MD, Small P, Hanson C, Reed S, et al. Reducing the global burden of tuberculosis: the contribution of improved diagnostics. Nature. 2006;444(Suppl 1):49–57. doi: 10.1038/nature05446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Shah NS, Wright A, Bai GH, Barrera L, Boulahbal F, et al. Worldwide emergence of extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis. Emerg Infect Dis. 2007;13:380–387. doi: 10.3201/eid1303.061400. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.du Toit LC, Pillay V, Danckwerts MP. Tuberculosis chemotherapy: current drug delivery approaches. Respir Res. 2006;7:118. doi: 10.1186/1465-9921-7-118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Munro SA, Lewin SA, Smith HJ, Engel ME, Fretheim A, et al. Patient adherence to tuberculosis treatment: a systematic review of qualitative research. PLoS Med. 2007;4:e238. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Harper C. Tuberculosis, a neglected opportunity? Nat Med. 2007;13:309–312. doi: 10.1038/nm0307-309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hardy LW, Finer-Moore JS, Montfort WR, Jones MO, Santi DV, et al. Atomic structure of thymidylate synthase: target for rational drug design. Science. 1987;235:448–455. doi: 10.1126/science.3099389. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Carreras CW, Santi DV. The catalytic mechanism and structure of thymidylate synthase. Annu Rev Biochem. 1995;64:721–762. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.64.070195.003445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ingraham HA, Dickey L, Goulian M. DNA fragmentation and cytotoxicity from increased cellular deoxyuridylate. Biochemistry. 1986;25:3225–3230. doi: 10.1021/bi00359a022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Curtin NJ, Harris AL, Aherne GW. Mechanism of cell death following thymidylate synthase inhibition: 2′-deoxyuridine-5′-triphosphate accumulation, DNA damage, and growth inhibition following exposure to CB3717 and dipyridamole. Cancer Res. 1991;51:2346–2352. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Touroutoglou N, Pazdur R. Thymidylate synthase inhibitors. Clin Cancer Res. 1996;2:227–243. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Stout TJ, Tondi D, Rinaldi M, Barlocco D, Pecorari P, et al. Structure-based design of inhibitors specific for bacterial thymidylate synthase. Biochemistry. 1999;38:1607–1617. doi: 10.1021/bi9815896. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Rengarajan J, Sassetti CM, Naroditskaya V, Sloutsky A, Bloom BR, et al. The folate pathway is a target for resistance to the drug para-aminosalicylic acid (PAS) in mycobacteria. Mol Microbiol. 2004;53:275–282. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.04120.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Myllykallio H, Lipowski G, Leduc D, Filee J, Forterre P, et al. An alternative flavin-dependent mechanism for thymidylate synthesis. Science. 2002;297:105–107. doi: 10.1126/science.1072113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Jiang L, Lee PC, White J, Rathod PK. Potent and selective activity of a combination of thymidine and 1843U89, a folate-based thymidylate synthase inhibitor, against Plasmodium falciparum. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2000;44:1047–1050. doi: 10.1128/aac.44.4.1047-1050.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Rathod PK, Leffers NP, Young RD. Molecular targets of 5-fluoroorotate in the human malaria parasite, Plasmodium falciparum. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1992;36:704–711. doi: 10.1128/aac.36.4.704. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Sampathkumar P, Turley S, Ulmer JE, Rhie HG, Sibley CH, et al. Structure of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis flavin dependent thymidylate synthase (MtbThyX) at 2.0A resolution. J Mol Biol. 2005;352:1091–1104. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2005.07.071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kuhn P, Lesley SA, Mathews II, Canaves JM, Brinen LS, et al. Crystal structure of thy1, a thymidylate synthase complementing protein from Thermotoga maritima at 2.25 A resolution. Proteins. 2002;49:142–145. doi: 10.1002/prot.10202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ulmer JE, Boum Y, Thouvenel CD, Myllykallio H, Sibley CH. Functional analysis of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis FAD-dependent thymidylate synthase, ThyX, reveals new amino acid residues contributing to an extended ThyX motif. J Bacteriol. 2008;190:2056–2064. doi: 10.1128/JB.01094-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Sassetti CM, Boyd DH, Rubin EJ. Genes required for mycobacterial growth defined by high density mutagenesis. Mol Microbiol. 2003;48:77–84. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03425.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Sassetti CM, Rubin EJ. Genetic requirements for mycobacterial survival during infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100:12989–12994. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2134250100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Chu E, Koeller DM, Casey JL, Drake JC, Chabner BA, et al. Autoregulation of human thymidylate synthase messenger RNA translation by thymidylate synthase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991;88:8977–8981. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.20.8977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Zhang K, Rathod PK. Divergent regulation of dihydrofolate reductase between malaria parasite and human host. Science. 2002;296:545–547. doi: 10.1126/science.1068274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Chu E, Voeller D, Koeller DM, Drake JC, Takimoto CH, et al. Identification of an RNA binding site for human thymidylate synthase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993;90:517–521. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.2.517. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Chenna R, Sugawara H, Koike T, Lopez R, Gibson TJ, et al. Multiple sequence alignment with the Clustal series of programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003;31:3497–3500. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkg500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Dolnick BJ, Cheng Y. Human thymidylate synthetase derived from blast cells of patients with acture myelocytic leukemia. Purification and chracterization. J Biol Chem. 1977;252:7697–7703. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Davisson VJ, Sirawaraporn W, Santi DV. Expression of human thymidylate synthase in Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem. 1989;264:9145–9148. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Graziani S, Xia Y, Gurnon JR, Van Etten JL, Leduc D, et al. Functional analysis of FAD-dependent thymidylate synthase ThyX from Paramecium bursaria Chlorella virus-1. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:54340–54347. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M409121200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Leduc D, Graziani S, Lipowski G, Marchand C, Le Marechal P, et al. Functional evidence for active site location of tetrameric thymidylate synthase X at the interphase of three monomers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:7252–7257. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0401365101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Graziani S, Bernauer J, Skouloubris S, Graille M, Zhou CZ, et al. Catalytic mechanism and structure of viral flavin-dependent thymidylate synthase ThyX. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:24048–24057. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M600745200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Griffin J, Roshick C, Iliffe-Lee E, McClarty G. Catalytic mechanism of Chlamydia trachomatis flavin-dependent thymidylate synthase. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:5456–5467. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M412415200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Agrawal N, Lesley SA, Kuhn P, Kohen A. Mechanistic studies of a flavin-dependent thymidylate synthase. Biochemistry. 2004;43:10295–10301. doi: 10.1021/bi0490439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Gomez ZM, Rathod PK. Antimalarial activity of a combination of 5-fluoroorotate and uridine in mice. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1990;34:1371–1375. doi: 10.1128/aac.34.7.1371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Rathod PK, Khatri A, Hubbert T, Milhous WK. Selective activity of 5-fluoroorotic acid against Plasmodium falciparum in vitro. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1989;33:1090–1094. doi: 10.1128/aac.33.7.1090. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Baldwin J, Farajallah AM, Malmquist NA, Rathod PK, Phillips MA. Malarial dihydroorotate dehydrogenase. Substrate and inhibitor specificity. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:41827–41834. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M206854200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Baldwin J, Michnoff CH, Malmquist NA, White J, Roth MG, et al. High-throughput screening for potent and selective inhibitors of Plasmodium falciparum dihydroorotate dehydrogenase. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:21847–21853. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M501100200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Phillips MA, Gujjar R, Malmquist NA, White J, El Mazouni F, et al. Triazolopyrimidine-based dihydroorotate dehydrogenase inhibitors with potent and selective activity against the malaria parasite, Plasmodium falciparum. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry: In press. 2008 doi: 10.1021/jm8001026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Ackermann WW, Potter VR. Enzyme inhibition in relation to chemotherapy. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1949;72:1–9. doi: 10.3181/00379727-72-17313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Cha S, Agarwal RP, Parks RE., Jr Tight-binding inhibitors-II. Non-steady state nature of inhibition of milk xanthine oxidase by allopurinol and alloxanthine and of human erythrocytic adenosine deaminase by coformycin. Biochem Pharmacol. 1975;24:2187–2197. doi: 10.1016/0006-2952(75)90051-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Cha S. Tight-binding inhibitors-I. Kinetic behavior. Biochem Pharmacol. 1975;24:2177–2185. doi: 10.1016/0006-2952(75)90050-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Hekmat-Nejad M, Rathod PK. Kinetics of Plasmodium falciparum thymidylate synthase: interactions with high-affinity metabolites of 5-fluoroorotate and D1694. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1996;40:1628–1632. doi: 10.1128/aac.40.7.1628. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Gattis SG, Palfey BA. Direct observation of the participation of flavin in product formation by thyX-encoded thymidylate synthase. J Am Chem Soc. 2005;127:832–833. doi: 10.1021/ja0432214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Sampathkumar P, Turley S, Sibley CH, Hol WG. NADP+ expels both the co-factor and a substrate analog from the Mycobacterium tuberculosis ThyX active site: opportunities for anti-bacterial drug design. J Mol Biol. 2006;360:1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2006.04.061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Van Triest B, Pinedo HM, Giaccone G, Peters GJ. Downstream molecular determinants of response to 5-fluorouracil and antifolate thymidylate synthase inhibitors. Ann Oncol. 2000;11:385–391. doi: 10.1023/a:1008351221345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Pendergast W, Dickerson SH, Dev IK, Ferone R, Duch DS, et al. Benzo[f]quinazoline inhibitors of thymidylate synthase: methyleneamino-linked aroylglutamate derivatives. J Med Chem. 1994;37:838–844. doi: 10.1021/jm00032a019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Whitaker JR. Determination of Molecular Weights of Proteins by Gel Filtration of Sephadex. Anal Chem. 1963;35:1950–1953. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Dev IK, Dallas WS, Ferone R, Hanlon M, McKee DD, et al. Mode of binding of folate analogs to thymidylate synthase. Evidence for two asymmetric but interactive substrate binding sites. J Biol Chem. 1994;269:1873–1882. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES