Skip to main content
Applied and Environmental Microbiology logoLink to Applied and Environmental Microbiology
. 1985 Nov;50(5):1132–1136. doi: 10.1128/aem.50.5.1132-1136.1985

Effect of bacterial density and substrate concentration on yield coefficients.

M Seto, M Alexander
PMCID: PMC238712  PMID: 4091549

Abstract

Measurements were made of the yield coefficient during the aerobic metabolism of glucose by a heterogeneous bacterial mixture. Expressed in terms of carbon, the coefficient was approximately 0.48. The value did not vary with initial bacterial densities ranging from 0.4 pg to 40 micrograms of cell carbon per ml and with glucose concentrations ranging from 43 pg to 100 micrograms of carbon per ml. Under all these circumstances, about 44% of the glucose carbon was converted to CO2, and 7.4% was excreted as organic products. The significance of uncharacterized organic substrates contaminating the medium to the coefficients calculated for low glucose concentrations is discussed.

Full text

PDF
1132

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BAUCHOP T., ELSDEN S. R. The growth of micro-organisms in relation to their energy supply. J Gen Microbiol. 1960 Dec;23:457–469. doi: 10.1099/00221287-23-3-457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Geller A. Growth of bacteria in inorganic medium at different levels of airborne organic substances. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1983 Dec;46(6):1258–1262. doi: 10.1128/aem.46.6.1258-1262.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Nagai S., Nishizawa Y., Onodera M., Aiba S. Effect of dissolved oxygen on growth yield and aldolase activity in chemostat culture of Azotobacter vinelandii. J Gen Microbiol. 1971 May;66(2):197–203. doi: 10.1099/00221287-66-2-197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Payne W. J. Energy yields and growth of heterotrophs. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1970;24:17–52. doi: 10.1146/annurev.mi.24.100170.000313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Pedrós-Alió C., Brock T. D. Assessing biomass and production of bacteria in eutrophic lake mendota, wisconsin. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1982 Jul;44(1):203–218. doi: 10.1128/aem.44.1.203-218.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Pirt S. J. The maintenance energy of bacteria in growing cultures. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1965 Oct 12;163(991):224–231. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1965.0069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. SENEZ J. C. Some considerations on the energetics of bacterial growth. Bacteriol Rev. 1962 Jun;26:95–107. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Simkins S., Alexander M. Models for mineralization kinetics with the variables of substrate concentration and population density. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1984 Jun;47(6):1299–1306. doi: 10.1128/aem.47.6.1299-1306.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Stouthamer A. H., Bettenhaussen C. Utilization of energy for growth and maintenance in continuous and batch cultures of microorganisms. A reevaluation of the method for the determination of ATP production by measuring molar growth yields. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1973 Feb 12;301(1):53–70. doi: 10.1016/0304-4173(73)90012-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Subba-Rao R. V., Rubin H. E., Alexander M. Kinetics and extent of mineralization of organic chemicals at trace levels in freshwater and sewage. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1982 May;43(5):1139–1150. doi: 10.1128/aem.43.5.1139-1150.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Applied and Environmental Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES