Skip to main content
Applied and Environmental Microbiology logoLink to Applied and Environmental Microbiology
. 1986 Feb;51(2):340–345. doi: 10.1128/aem.51.2.340-345.1986

Rumen microbial changes in cattle fed diets with or without salinomycin.

D B Olumeyan, T G Nagaraja, G W Miller, R A Frey, J E Boyer
PMCID: PMC238870  PMID: 3954347

Abstract

Four rumen-fistulated steers, randomly assigned to two groups (control and salinomycin fed) were used to monitor the changes in rumen microbial populations and volatile fatty acids (VFA) concentrations associated with feeding salinomycin (0.22 mg X kg-1 X day-1). Steers were adapted to an alfalfa hay and grain (80:20) diet before supplementing the diet with salinomycin, and then the diet was changed to 50:50 and 20:80 ratios of alfalfa hay to grain at 2-week intervals. Rumen samples for total and selective enumeration of anaerobic bacteria. VFA analysis, and enumeration of protozoa were collected during the 80:20 alfalfa hay-to-grain diet before salinomycin feeding, and during the 80:20, 50:50, and 20:80 hay-to-grain diets with salinomycin. At each sampling period, rumen samples were collected at 3 h after feeding on three consecutive days. Salinomycin feeding had no effect on rumen pH and total VFA concentration. The acetate-to-propionate ratio was significantly lower in salinomycin-fed steers than in the control. The molar proportion of butyrate increased in both control and salinomycin-fed steers. Total anaerobic bacterial counts were lower in salinomycin-fed steers than in the control steers after 8 weeks of salinomycin feeding. Salinomycin-resistant bacteria increased from 7.6 to 15.6% in salinomycin-fed steers but remained unchanged in control steers. Salinomycin had no effect on cellulolytic and lactate-utilizing bacteria, but the proportion of amylolytic bacteria was higher in salinomycin-fed steers than in control steers. The total number of protozoa decreased initially in salinomycin-fed steers. The initial reduction was due to reduced numbers of Entodinium species. Holotrichs were unaffected by salinomycin feeding.

Full text

PDF
340

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Allison M. J., Robinson I. M., Bucklin J. A., Booth G. D. Comparison of bacterial populations of the pig cecum and colon based upon enumeration with specific energy sources. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1979 Jun;37(6):1142–1151. doi: 10.1128/aem.37.6.1142-1151.1979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bergen W. G., Bates D. B. Ionophores: their effect on production efficiency and mode of action. J Anim Sci. 1984 Jun;58(6):1465–1483. doi: 10.2527/jas1984.5861465x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. COCHRAN W. G. Estimation of bacterial densities by means of the "most probable number". Biometrics. 1950 Jun;6(2):105–116. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chen M., Wolin M. J. Effect of monensin and lasalocid-sodium on the growth of methanogenic and rumen saccharolytic bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1979 Jul;38(1):72–77. doi: 10.1128/aem.38.1.72-77.1979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Danforth H. D., Ruff M. D., Reid W. M., Miller R. L. Anticoccidial activity of salinomycin in battery raised broiler chickens. Poult Sci. 1977 May;56(3):926–932. doi: 10.3382/ps.0560926. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dawson K. A., Boling J. A. Monensin-resistant bacteria in the rumens of calves on monensin-containing and unmedicated diets. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1983 Jul;46(1):160–164. doi: 10.1128/aem.46.1.160-164.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dennis S. M., Nagaraja T. G., Bartley E. E. Effects of lasalocid or monensin on lactate-producing or -using rumen bacteria. J Anim Sci. 1981 Feb;52(2):418–426. doi: 10.2527/jas1981.522418x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Dennis S. M., Nagaraja T. G., Bartley E. E. Effects of lasalocid or monensin on lactate-producing or -using rumen bacteria. J Anim Sci. 1981 Feb;52(2):418–426. doi: 10.2527/jas1981.522418x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Donius D. A., Simpson M. E., Marsh P. B. Effect of monensin fed with forage on digestion and the ruminal ecosystem of steers. J Anim Sci. 1976 Jan;42(1):229–234. doi: 10.2527/jas1976.421229x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Goodrich R. D., Garrett J. E., Gast D. R., Kirick M. A., Larson D. A., Meiske J. C. Influence of monensin on the performance of cattle. J Anim Sci. 1984 Jun;58(6):1484–1498. doi: 10.2527/jas1984.5861484x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Leedle J. A., Hespell R. B. Differential carbohydrate media and anaerobic replica plating techniques in delineating carbohydrate-utilizing subgroups in rumen bacterial populations. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1980 Apr;39(4):709–719. doi: 10.1128/aem.39.4.709-719.1980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Mann S. O. An improved method for determining celluloytic activity in anerobic bacteria. J Appl Bacteriol. 1968 Jun;31(2):241–244. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1968.tb00363.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Merchen N. R., Berger L. L. Effect of salinomycin level on nutrient digestibility and ruminal characteristics of sheep and feedlot performance of cattle. J Anim Sci. 1985 May;60(5):1338–1346. doi: 10.2527/jas1985.6051338x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Miyazaki Y., Shibuya M., Sugawara H., Kawaguchi O., Hirsoe C. Salinomycin, a new polyether antibiotic. J Antibiot (Tokyo) 1974 Nov;27(11):814–821. doi: 10.7164/antibiotics.27.814. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Nagaraja T. G., Avery T. B., Bartley E. E., Roof S. K., Dayton A. D. Effect of lasalocid, monensin or thiopeptin on lactic acidosis in cattle. J Anim Sci. 1982 Mar;54(3):649–658. doi: 10.2527/jas1982.543649x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Relationship of lactate dehydrogenase specificity and growth rate to lactate metabolism by Selenomonas ruminantium. Appl Microbiol. 1975 Dec;30(6):916–921. doi: 10.1128/am.30.6.916-921.1975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Schelling G. T. Monensin mode of action in the rumen. J Anim Sci. 1984 Jun;58(6):1518–1527. doi: 10.2527/jas1984.5861518x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Applied and Environmental Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES