Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Urology. 2008 Feb;71(2):261–266. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.09.025

Adrenocortical Hormone Abnormalities in Men with Chronic Prostatitis/Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome

Jordan Dimitrakov 1,2, Hylton V Joffe 3,4,*, Steven J Soldin 5,6, Roger Bolus 7, CA Tony Buffington 7,8, J Curtis Nickel 9
PMCID: PMC2390769  NIHMSID: NIHMS30746  PMID: 18308097

Abstract

Objectives

To identify adrenocortical hormone abnormalities as indicators of endocrine dysfunction in CP/CPPS.

Methods

We simultaneously measured the serum concentrations of 12 steroids in CP/CPPS and control patients, using isotope dilution liquid chromatography followed by atmospheric pressure photospray ionization and tandem mass spectrometry.

Results

Twenty-seven CP/CPPS patients and 29 age-matched asymptomatic healthy controls were evaluated. In the mineralocorticoid pathway, progesterone was significantly higher, whereas corticosterone and aldosterone concentrations were significantly lower, in CP/CPPS than in controls. In the glucocorticoid pathway, 11-deoxycortisol was significantly lower, and cortisol concentrations were not different between patients and controls. In the sex steroid pathway, androstenedione and testosterone concentrations were significantly higher in CP/CPPS than in controls. Estradiol, dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) and dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEAS) concentrations were not different between patients and controls. NIH-CPSI total and pain domain scores correlated positively with 17-hydroxyprogesterone and aldosterone (P<0.001) and negatively with cortisol concentrations (P<0.001).

Conclusions

Results suggest reduced activity of CYP21A2 (P450c21), the enzyme that converts progesterone to corticosterone, and 17-hydroxyprogesterone to 11-deoxycortisol. Furthermore, these results provide insights into the biological basis of CP/CPPS. Follow-up studies should explore the possibility that CP/CPPS patients meet the diagnostic criteria for nonclassical CAH and if hormonal findings improve or worsen in parallel with symptom severity.

Keywords: chronic prostatitis with chronic pelvic pain syndrome, adrenal cortex, biological markers

Introduction

The search for an etiology or biomarker for the prevalent and clinically important disease 1,2, chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS), has thus far proven elusive.1 Evidence suggest the possibility that CP/CPPS symptoms result from a general, systemic condition, not localized prostate infection, inflammation or dysfunction.2 A significant number of CP/CPPS patients report associated cardiovascular, neurological, psychiatric, and immunologic disease; many also meet diagnostic criteria for fibromyalgia, chronic fatigue syndrome, and irritable bowel syndrome.3

A variety of vulnerability factors have been implicated for the development of these various systemic conditions, including complex but subtle hormonal abnormalities related to the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis.4 The goal of this study was to investigate and begin to characterize such adrenocortical hormone abnormalities as indicators of endocrine dysfunction in CP/CPPS patients and thereby improve our understanding of the condition and identify potential biomarkers for the disease.

Material and Methods

Design

This was a double-blind biomarker discovery study. Serum samples were obtained from CP/CPPS patients and age-matched healthy asymptomatic controls at two tertiary referral medical centers specializing in the diagnosis of CP/CPPS during 2006. Following subject recruitment and sample collection, all specimens were analyzed in a single batch at a single blinded research institution using isotope dilution liquid chromatography followed by atmospheric pressure photospray ionization and tandem mass spectrometry (LC-APPI-MS/MS). The institutional review boards at the respective institutions approved the study.

Participants

The primary diagnostic criterion for CPPS was pain or discomfort in the pelvic region for at least 3 months of the previous 6 months. Eligible men were required to have at least "moderate" symptoms, defined as a total NIH-CPSI5 score > 15. Eligibility criteria were identical to those of the NIH-CPCRN and are available elsewhere.6

Healthy asymptomatic men from the general population were matched to the cases by age and served as voluntary controls. In addition to an NIH-CPSI score of zero, the controls were required to have a prostate-specific antigen level < 2.5 ng/mL and normal digital rectal exam.

Procedure

The study included one clinic visit during which subjects provided written informed consent, completed the NIH-CPSI questionnaire, and provided blood and urine samples. Because of the effect of the circadian rhythm on adrenocortical function,7,8 all samples were obtained at the time of peak hormone concentration between 7:00 and 8:00 AM after an overnight fast. To minimize the effect of inter-assay variability, CP/CPPS and control samples were assayed in the same run. Blood samples were centrifuged to separate serum and all samples were frozen at −70°C and stored until shipped and processed.

Simultaneous determination of 12 steroid concentrations

An API-5000 triple-quadrupole mass spectrometer (Applied Biosystems/MDS SCIEX, Foster City, CA/Concord, Ontario, Canada) equipped with an atmospheric pressure photoionization source, 3 Shimadzu LC-10ADvp pumps, a Shimadzu SIL-HT autosampler, and a Shimadzu DUG-14A degasser (Shimadzu Scientific Instruments, Columbia, MD) employing isotope dilution with deuterium-labeled internal standard for each analyte was used to measure hormone concentrations.9 200 μL of serum was deproteinized by adding 300 μL of acetonitrile containing internal standards. After centrifugation, 450 μL of supernatant was diluted with 900 μL of water, and then injected a 1,000 μL aliquot into the LC-APPI-MS/MS system. After 3 minutes of washing, the steroids were eluted from the column with a water/methanol gradient at a flow rate of 0.6 ml/min, and introduced the sample into the mass spectrometer. Quantitation by multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) analysis in positive ion mode was performed for 11 analytes, and in negative ion mode for aldosterone.

Accuracy of the method was evaluated by: (a) comparing our methods with previously validated MS/MS methods conducted at the Mayo Clinic and (b) performing recovery studies. The results of the comparison study yielded correlations ranging from r= 0.908 to 0.999. Within-day coefficients of variation (CVs) were less than 11.5% for all analytes tested and between-day CVs ranged from 3.5% to 12.2%.

The amount of analyte we recovered was close to the target value spiked into a serum pool. Mean recoveries of the analytes under study ranged from 90% to 110%. The lower limit of detection (LOD = a reading of 3 standard deviations (SD) above baseline noise) for each steroid ranged from 1.5 to 10 pg/ml. We have previously published details of the protocol.9

Data analysis

CP/CPPS patients and controls were compared using t-tests, chi-square tests, and Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance with Scheffé contrasts. Jonckheere’s test was employed to analyze trends among the groups. Values were expressed as means ±SD, unless specified otherwise. For all steroids wherein subject values fell below the limit of detection of the instrument, these values were set at the limit of detection and the groups were compared using the Mann-Whitney nonparametric test. Correlational analyses were conducted using the Spearman Rank Method; p values<0.05 (two-tailed) were considered statistically significant. All tests were conducted using Version 9.1.3 of the SAS software package (SAS Institute Inc., 100 SAS Campus Drive, Cary, NC 27513).

Results

Twenty seven CP/CPPS patients and 29 age-matched healthy controls were included in the analysis. Three CP/CPPS patients and 4 control subjects were excluded from the final analysis due to multiple values more than 2 SD greater than the mean value for the respective group. No differences in demographic parameters between CP/CPPS cases and controls were identified (Table 1). Patients had an average (±SD) of 2.4 ±1.0 co-morbid disorders in addition to CP/CPPS: nervous in 16 (anxiety, numbness, tingling), allergic in 9 (sinusitis, allergies, asthma), musculoskeletal in 7 (chronic fatigue syndrome, fibromyalgia, arthritis), gastrointestinal in 6 (irritable bowel syndrome), cardiovascular in 7 (hypertension, palpitations, sweating), and other urogenital in 11 (erectile dysfunction, balanitis, stones).

Table 1.

Distribution of Baseline Demographic Characteristics in Controls and Men with CP/CPPS

Characteristic Controls n (%) CP/CPPS n (%) P
Age, years
< 25 7 (21%) 8 (27%) P=0.38*
25–34 12 (37%) 12 (40%)
35–44 9 (27%) 8 (27%)
45–54 5 (15%) 2 (6%)
Currently living with partner
Yes 19 (58%) 22 (73%) P=0.78
No 14 (42%) 8 (27%)
Currently employed
Yes 24 (73%) 23 (77%) P=0.56
No 9 (27%) 7 (23%)
Cigarette smoking
Never 18 (55%) 22 (74%) P=0.50
Current 8 (24%) 4 (13%)
Former 7 (21%) 4 (13%)
Drink alcohol 21 (64%) 17 (57%) P=0.59
Drink caffeine 26 (79%) 16 (53%) P=0.06
*

Student’s unpaired t-test

Fisher’s Exact Test

chi-square test

Evaluation of serum adrenocortical hormone concentrations

In the mineralocorticoid synthetic pathway (see Figure 1), concentrations of progesterone were found to be significantly higher in CP/CPPS than in controls, whereas corticosterone and aldosterone were significantly lower in patients than in controls (Table 2).

Figure 1. Normal pathways and adrenocortical biochemical abnormalities in men with CP/CPPS.

Figure 1

The first step in adrenal steroid synthesis is the combination of acetyl CoA and squalene to form cholesterol, which is then converted into pregnenolone. The enclosed area contains the core steroidogenic pathway utilized by the adrenal glands and gonads.

21 : 21-hydroxylase (CYP21A2, P450c21); DHEA : dehydroepiandrostenedione; DHEAS : DHEA sulfate.

Table 2.

Adrenocortical Hormone Concentrations in CP/CPPS Patients and Healthy Control Subjects

Steroid units Reference range CP/CPPS Patients(n=27) Healthy Controls(n=29) P
Mineralocorticoid Pathway
Progesterone ng/dL 13–97 26.2 (1, 290) 1 (1, 3) 0.03§
Corticosterone ng/dL 100–700 40 (21, 75) 141 (69, 311) <0.0001§
Aldosterone pg/mL 20–90 18 (4, 64) 61 (30, 92) 0.02§
Glucocorticoid Pathway
17-OH Progesterone ng/dL 50–250 46 (19, 98) 54 (22, 95) 0.61 ||
11-deoxycortisol ng/dL 20–130 12 (5, 18) 31 (15, 66) 0.0001§
Cortisol μg/dL 5–21 11.5 ± 1.1 13.3 ± 1.0 0.21
Sex Steroid Pathway
Androstenedione ng/dL 50–250 126 (100, 168) 73 (50, 96) <0.0001§
Testosterone ng/dL 260–1000 60 (37, 79) 8 (1, 402) 0.006§
Estradiol pg/mL 10–50 14 (10, 30) 10 (10, 21) 0.26§
DHEA ng/dL 160–800
18–30–125–
115 (53, 237) 122 (75, 259) 0.32§
DHEAS μg/dL 619
31–50–59–452
51–60–20–413
115.1 ± 10.4* 110.4 ± 11.7 0.77
Ratios
Progesterone/Corticosterone 1.3 (0.03, 6.3) 0.01 (0.00,0.04) <0.0001§
17-OHP/11deoxycortisol 3.42 (1.53, 11.3) 1.9 (0.60, 4.75) 0.025
*

Mean ± SEM

Student’s unpaired t-test

Median (25th percentile, 75th percentile)

§

Kruskal-Wallis test

||

Mann Whitney test

All reference ranges from the Quest Diagnostics Endocrinology Manual, except for DHEA, progesterone and 11-deoxycortisol, which are from Endocrine Sciences.

In the glucocorticoid synthesis pathway (see Figure 1), serum concentrations of 11-deoxycortisol (11-DOC) were significantly lower, and those of cortisol were not different in patients than in controls (Table 2).

In the sex steroid synthetic pathway (see Figure 1), serum concentrations of androstenedione (ASD) and testosterone were significantly higher in CP/CPPS than in controls, whereas those of estradiol were not different. ASD also can be synthesized from dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA), which also can interconvert with dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEAS). Serum concentrations of DHEA and DHEAS were not different between CP/CPPS patients and controls (Table 2).

These results suggested reduced activity of CYP21A2 (P450c21), the enzyme that converts progesterone (via 11-deoxycorticosterone, which was not measured in the current study) to corticosterone, and 17-OHP to 11-DOC (Figure 1). To further investigate this possibility, we calculated precursor/product ratios and found them significantly elevated in CP/CPPS patients relative to controls (Table 2).

NIH-CPSI total and pain domain scores correlated positively (P<0.001), with 17-OHP and aldosterone and negatively (P<0.001) with cortisol concentrations (Table 3).

Table 3.

Correlations between Hormone Concentrations and Total NIH-CPSI and Pain Domain Scores in Men with CP/CPPS.

Steroid Total NIH-CPSI Score Pain Domain Score
r P r P
Mineralocorticoid Pathway
Progesterone −0.31 0.12 −0.24 0.22
Corticosterone −0.24 0.23 −0.35 0.07
Aldosterone 0.78 <0.0001 0.71 0.0002
Glucocorticoid Pathway
17-OH Progesterone 0.42 0.03 0.40 0.04
11-deoxycortisol −0.22 0.25 −0.36 0.06
Cortisol* −0.66* 0.0002 −0.62 0.0006
Sex Steroid Pathway
Androstenedione −0.12 0.54 −0.13 0.53
Testosterone −0.24 0.22 −0.25 0.20
Estrogen 0.02 0.92 0.07 0.72
DHEA 0.02 0.91 0.01 0.95
DHEAS* 0.33 0.09* 0.28 0.16
*

Pearson (parametric)

Spearman (non-parametric)

Comment

CP/CPPS patients had abnormally high levels of progesterone and androstenedione, and abnormally low levels of corticosterone, aldosterone, and 11-DOC compared to healthy volunteers. Furthermore, lower levels of cortisol and higher levels of aldosterone were associated with higher pain and CPSI scores. These clinical correlates provide tantalizing insights into the systemic nature of CP/CPPS.

In contrast to traditional assumptions about CP/CPPS—that it is a disease that originates in the prostate,10,11 that it is an infectious disease treatable with antibiotics,1214 that it is a psychosomatic disorder with no biological basis2 —recent studies have identified a variety of co-morbid disorders in patients with CP/CPPS, suggesting it may be a systemic disorder.3 Our interest in characterizing adrenocortical hormone levels in CP/CPPS was prompted by findings of HPA disturbances in some of these co-morbid conditions.3 The present results confirm the presence of HPA abnormalities in CP/CPPS patients. In particular, the hormonal abnormalities are characterized by an increased concentration of proximal adrenocortical hormones and a corresponding decrease of distal hormones within their respective steroidal synthetic pathways (Figure 1). These findings suggest a defect in CYP21A2 (also known as 21-hydroxylase), the enzyme responsible for converting progesterone to deoxycorticosterone (and subsequently corticosterone and aldosterone), and 17-OHP to 11-DOC.

CYP21A2 defects traditionally have been described in patients with congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH). The hormonal defects in our CP/CPPS population suggest that some may have an inherited or acquired form of non-classical CAH due to CYP21A2 deficiency. Classical CAH presents with salt wasting or genital ambiguity in infants. In contrast, non-classical (also known as mild or late-onset) CAH is characterized by partial CYP21A2 deficiency and varying signs of hyperandrogenism—abnormalities that are generally thought to be asymptomatic in men.15,16 In our study, the CP/CPPS patients also had hormonal evidence of hyperandrogenism, elevated androstenedione and elevated testosterone levels compared to controls, a finding that further supports the presence of reduced CYP21A2 activity. These results suggest that follow-up endocrinological and genetic testing could determine the role of CYP21A2 abnormalities in men with CP/CPPS.17

Reduced morning cortisol concentrations have been described in several other pain syndromes, including fibromyalgia,18 some functional gastrointestinal disorders,19 and low back pain.20 However in our study, unstimulated morning cortisol concentrations were not different between CP/CPPS cases and controls. In women with interstitial cystitis, a condition similar to CP/CPPS, patients with lower morning cortisol had significantly more pain and urgency, and those with lower urinary free cortisol reported more overall symptomatology (P<0.05),21 although mean urinary or salivary cortisol did not differ between patients and controls.21 This negative correlation is similar to that found for serum cortisol in our patients (Table 3). The underlying biological basis for hypocortisolemia in such chronic pain conditions is incompletely understood, and may be a protective adaptation to chronic stress.22

Although direct measurements of cortisol concentrations were not different between patients and controls in our study, the excess concentrations of progesterone and androstenedione still suggest a relative hypocortisolemia (because reduced negative feedback by cortisol on the corticotrophs of the anterior pituitary gland causes increased adrenocorticotropin [ACTH] secretion that stimulates adrenal hormone steroidogenesis, leading to excess hormone concentrations proximal to the CYP21A2 defect). We could not obtain ACTH measurements in our patients or results from cosyntropin testing in our patients to further investigate this possibility, but if these patients do in fact have hypocortisolemia, it would further implicate a defect in CYP21A2 and an association with non-classical CAH. To test this hypothesis, future prospective cohort studies should measure both morning ACTH and diurnal cortisol concentrations and perform cosyntropin stimulation testing in patients with CP/CPPS.

Limitations of the current study include small sample size, cortisol concentration measurements taken only from morning samples, a cross-sectional design that prevents conclusions about causality, and the lack of measurement of some adrenal hormones due to the unavailability of quantitative MS assays for those substances. Compared to results obtained from immunoassays used routinely in clinical practice, our quantitative results appear to be lower than the traditional reference ranges. This can be explained by the lack of specificity in the traditional assays, which cross-react with molecules of similar structure and result in readings that are higher than those obtained by tandem mass spectrometry. Unlike immunoassays, isotope dilution tandem mass spectrometry is quite specific for the steroids tested and does not quantify other steroids of similar structure (Tables 5–9 in reference 21).23

Conclusions

The hormonal differences we identified in CP/CPPS patients may help us understand the etiology of CP/CPPS and/or serve as biomarkers for the disease. Our study suggested that some men with CP/CPPS may have a defect in CYP21A2.. Future studies should explore the possibility that CP/CPPS patients meet the diagnostic criteria for nonclassical CAH due to 21-hydroxylase deficiency by performing a CRF and cosyntropin stimulation test with 17-OHP measurements, and, if confirmatory, DNA testing for CYP21A2 mutations. Follow-up studies should further assess whether the hormonal findings described in this paper improve or worsen in parallel with symptom severity. Finally, if our work is confirmed, consideration may be given to performing a randomized, controlled trial of low-dose dexamethasone (the treatment of choice for patients with CAH) in patients with CP/CPPS to assess whether normalization of these hormonal abnormalities improves symptoms.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge Leroy M. Nyberg for helpful discussions and Michael D. Smith for editorial assistance in the preparation of the manuscript.

Sources of support: Grants R01 DK065990 and R21 DK070672 to Jordan Dimitrakov

Key of Definitions for Abbreviations (in alphabetical order)

ASD

androstenedione

CP/CPPS

chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome

CPC

Chronic Prostatitis Cohort

CPCRN

Chronic Prostatitis Collaborative Research Network

CV

coefficient of variation

DHEA

dehydroepiandrosterone

DHEAS

dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate

HPA

hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (axis)

LC-APPI-MS/MS

liquid chromatography-atmospheric pressure photoionization-mass spectrometry/mass spectrometry

MRM

multiple reaction monitoring

MS/MS

tandem mass spectrometry

NIDDK

National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases

NIH-CPSI

National Institutes of Health Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index

SD

standard deviation

SNS

sympathetic nervous system

11-DOC

11-deoxycortisol

17-OHP

17-hydroxyprogesterone

Footnotes

Name and address of the author to whom requests for reprints should be addressed:

Jordan Dimitrakov, M.D., Ph.D.,Harvard Medical School, Harvard Urological Diseases Research Center, Enders Research Building, Room 1061, 300 Longwood Ave, Boston, MA 02115, Phone: (617) 919–2521, Fax: (617) 249–2035, E-mail: Jordan.Dimitrakov@childrens.harvard.edu

Conflict of Interest Disclosures:

The following individuals have NO relevant financial interests in the manuscript: Jordan D. Dimitrakov, Hylton V. Joffe, Steven J. Soldin, Roger Bolus, CA Tony Buffington

The following individual has disclosed financial interests relevant to the manuscript as follows:

J Curtis Nickel: Consultant: Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Farr Laboratories, Glaxo-Smith-Kline, Merck Frosst Canada, Ortho-McNeil, Boston Scientific

Investigator: Bayer, Glaxo-Smith-Kline, Merck Frosst Canada, Ortho-McNeil, Sanofi-Aventis, Farr Laboratories, Stellar Laboratories

Honoraria: Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Ortho-McNeil

Grants received: Farr Laboratories, Stellar Laboratories

References

  • 1.Alexander RB. Treatment of chronic prostatitis. Nat Clin Pract Urol. 2004;1:2–3. doi: 10.1038/ncpuro0003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Potts JM. Chronic pelvic pain syndrome: a non-prostatocentric perspective. World J Urol. 2003;21:54–6. doi: 10.1007/s00345-003-0327-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Pontari MA, McNaughton-Collins M, O'Leary MP, Calhoun EA, Jang T, Kusek JW, Landis JR, Knauss J, Litwin MS. A case-control study of risk factors in men with chronic pelvic pain syndrome. BJU Int. 2005;96:559–65. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05684.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Charmandari E, Tsigos C, Chrousos G. Endocrinology of the stress response. Annu Rev Physiol. 2005;67:259–84. doi: 10.1146/annurev.physiol.67.040403.120816. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Litwin MS, McNaughton-Collins M, Fowler FJ, Jr, Nickel JC, Calhoun EA, Pontari MA, Alexander RB, Farrar JT, O'Leary MP. The National Institutes of Health chronic prostatitis symptom index: development and validation of a new outcome measure. Chronic Prostatitis Collaborative Research Network. J Urol. 1999;162:369–75. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(05)68562-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Propert KJ, Alexander RB, Nickel JC, Kusek JW, Litwin MS, Landis JR, Nyberg LM, Schaeffer AJ. Design of a multicenter randomized clinical trial for chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome. Urology. 2002;59:870–6. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(02)01601-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kage A, Fenner A, Weber B, Schoneshofer M. Diurnal and ultradian variations of plasma concentrations of eleven adrenal steroid hormones in human males. Klin Wochenschr. 1982;60:659–66. doi: 10.1007/BF01716798. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Andersson AM, Carlsen E, Petersen JH, Skakkebaek NE. Variation in levels of serum inhibin B, testosterone, estradiol, luteinizing hormone, follicle-stimulating hormone, and sex hormone-binding globulin in monthly samples from healthy men during a 17-month period: possible effects of seasons. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003;88:932–7. doi: 10.1210/jc.2002-020838. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Guo T, Taylor RL, Singh RJ, Soldin SJ. Simultaneous determination of 12 steroids by isotope dilution liquid chromatography–photospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry. Clin Chim Acta. 2006;372:76–82. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2006.03.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Nickel JC, Alexander RB, Schaeffer AJ, Landis JR, Knauss JS, Propert KJ. Leukocytes and bacteria in men with chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome compared to asymptomatic controls. J Urol. 2003;170:818–22. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000082252.49374.e9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Lee JC, Muller CH, Rothman I, Agnew KJ, Eschenbach D, Ciol MA, Turner JA, Berger RE. Prostate biopsy culture findings of men with chronic pelvic pain syndrome do not differ from those of healthy controls. J Urol. 169:584–7. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000045673.02542.7a. discussion 587–8, 2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Alexander RB, Propert KJ, Schaeffer AJ, Landis JR, Nickel JC, O'Leary MP, Pontari MA, McNaughton-Collins M, Shoskes DA, Comiter CV, et al. Ciprofloxacin or tamsulosin in men with chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome: a randomized, double-blind trial. Ann Intern Med. 2004;141:581–9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-141-8-200410190-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Dimitrakov JD, Kaplan SA, Kroenke K, Jackson JL, Freeman MR. Management of chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome: an evidence-based approach. Urology. 2006;67:881–8. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2005.12.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Nickel JC. The three As of chronic prostatitis therapy: antibiotics, alpha-blockers and anti-inflammatories. What is the evidence? BJU Int. 2004;94:1230–3. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2004.05148.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Speiser PW, White PC. Congenital adrenal hyperplasia. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:776–88. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra021561. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.New MI. Extensive clinical experience: nonclassical 21-hydroxylase deficiency. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;91:4205–14. doi: 10.1210/jc.2006-1645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Charmandari E, Merke DP, Negro PJ, Keil MF, Martinez PE, Haim A, Gold PW, Chrousos GP. Endocrinologic and psychologic evaluation of 21-hydroxylase deficiency carriers and matched normal subjects: evidence for physical and/or psychologic vulnerability to stress. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004;89:2228–36. doi: 10.1210/jc.2003-031322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Gur A, Cevik R, Sarac AJ, Colpan L, Em S. Hypothalamic–pituitary-gonadal axis and cortisol in young women with primary fibromyalgia: the potential roles of depression, fatigue, and sleep disturbance in the occurrence of hypocortisolism. Ann Rheum Dis. 2004;63:1504–6. doi: 10.1136/ard.2003.014969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Bohmelt AH, Nater UM, Franke S, Hellhammer DH, Ehlert U. Basal and stimulated hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis activity in patients with functional gastrointestinal disorders and healthy controls. Psychosom Med. 2005;67:288–94. doi: 10.1097/01.psy.0000157064.72831.ba. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Griep EN, Boersma JW, Lentjes EG, Prins AP, van der Korst JK, de Kloet ER. Function of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis in patients with fibromyalgia and low back pain. J Rheumatol. 1998;25:1374–81. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Lutgendorf SK, Kreder KJ, Rothrock NE, Hoffman A, Kirschbaum C, Sternberg EM, Zimmerman MB, Ratliff TL. Diurnal cortisol variations and symptoms in patients with interstitial cystitis. J Urol. 2002;167:1338–43. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Fries E, Hesse J, Hellhammer J, Hellhammer DH. A new view on hypocortisolism. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2005;30:1010–6. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2005.04.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Guo T, Chan M, Soldin SJ. Steroid profiles using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry with atmospheric pressure photoionization source. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2004;128:469–75. doi: 10.5858/2004-128-469-SPULCM. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES