Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Bulletin of the World Health Organization logoLink to Bulletin of the World Health Organization
. 1992;70(5):645–655.

Practical screening priorities for hearing impairment among children in developing countries.

F M Gell 1, E M White 1, K Newell 1, I Mackenzie 1, A Smith 1, S Thompson 1, J Hatcher 1
PMCID: PMC2393373  PMID: 1464152

Abstract

Routine screening for hearing impairment in childhood is now widespread in industrial countries, although there is considerable controversy over the most efficient techniques and procedures. In most developing countries, however, routine screening programmes for hearing impairment do not currently exist. The problems involved in implementing screening programmes in developing and industrial countries are very different, and in selecting screening procedures for a particular population the following factors have to be taken into consideration: the environmental test conditions; the availability of resources for equipment and the training of testers; the local attitudes towards disability; the level of hearing impairment that may cause handicaps; and the major types of pathology causing hearing impairment. We suggest that in developing countries children should be screened at school entry using a simple field audiometer and that the external ear be inspected for the presence of a discharge. There is an urgent need to develop reliable and simple screening procedures for infants and young children; where possible, all children should be screened for severe or significant hearing impairment before the age of 2 years. No screening should, however, be implemented until appropriate follow-up services are available.

Full text

PDF
645

Images in this article

652Fig. 1
on p.652
652Fig. 2
on p.652

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Alberti P. W., Kristensen R. The clinical application of impedance audiometry. A preliminary appraisal of an electro-acoustic impedance bridge. Laryngoscope. 1970 May;80(5):735–746. doi: 10.1288/00005537-197005000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brooks D. N. Resource allocation in audiology. Br J Audiol. 1985 Aug;19(3):171–173. doi: 10.3109/03005368509078971. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Caufield M. A developmental approach to hearing screening in children. Pediatr Nurs. 1978 Mar-Apr;4(2):39–42. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Downs M. P. Auditory screening. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 1978 Oct;11(3):611–629. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Feinmesser M., Tell L. Neonatal screening for detection of deafness. Arch Otolaryngol. 1976 May;102(5):297–299. doi: 10.1001/archotol.1976.00780100083011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gerkin K. P. The high risk register for deafness. ASHA. 1984 Mar;26(3):17–23. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Greville A., Keith W. J. Detection of hearing loss in infancy. N Z Med J. 1978 Oct 11;88(621):277–280. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. HILDYARD V. H., STOOL S. E., VALENTINE M. A. TUNING FORK TESTS AS AID TO SCREENING AUDIOMETRY. REPORT ON A PRELIMINARY FIELD STUDY. Arch Otolaryngol. 1963 Aug;78:151–154. doi: 10.1001/archotol.1963.00750020159009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Haggard M. P., Wood E. J., Carroll S. Speech, admittance and tone tests in school screening. Reconciling economics with pathology and disability perspectives. Br J Audiol. 1984 Aug;18(3):133–153. doi: 10.3109/03005368409078941. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Holborow C. Prevention of deafness in rural tropical areas. Trop Doct. 1985 Jan;15(1):39–41. doi: 10.1177/004947558501500123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Holm V. A., Kunze L. H. Effect of chronic otitis media on language and speech development. Pediatrics. 1969 May;43(5):833–839. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Jerger J. F., Hayes D. The cross-check principle in pediatric audiometry. Arch Otolaryngol. 1976 Oct;102(10):614–620. doi: 10.1001/archotol.1976.00780150082006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Jerger J. Clinical experience with impedance audiometry. Arch Otolaryngol. 1970 Oct;92(4):311–324. doi: 10.1001/archotol.1970.04310040005002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Lewis N. Otitis media and linguistic incompetence. Arch Otolaryngol. 1976 Jul;102(7):387–390. doi: 10.1001/archotol.1976.00780120035001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Lewis N. Otitis media and linguistic incompetence. Arch Otolaryngol. 1976 Jul;102(7):387–390. doi: 10.1001/archotol.1976.00780120035001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. MELNICK W., EAGLES E. L., LEVINE H. S. EVALUATION OF A RECOMMENDED PROGRAM OF IDENTIFICATION AUDIOMETRY WITH SCHOOL-AGE CHILDREN. J Speech Hear Disord. 1964 Feb;29:3–13. doi: 10.1044/jshd.2901.03. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Manning P., Avery M. E., Ross A. Purulent otitis media: differences between populations in different environments. Pediatrics. 1974 Feb;53(2):135–136. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. McCormick B. Hearing screening by health visitors: a critical appraisal of the distraction test. Health Visit. 1983 Dec;56(12):449–451. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. McCormick B. Hearing screening by health visitors: a critical appraisal of the distraction test. Health Visit. 1983 Dec;56(12):449–451. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. McPherson B. D., Holborow C. A. School screening for hearing loss in developing countries. Scand Audiol Suppl. 1988;28:103–110. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. McPherson B., Holborow C. A. A study of deafness in West Africa: the Gambian Hearing Health Project. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 1985 Nov;10(2):115–135. doi: 10.1016/s0165-5876(85)80024-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Okafor B. C. The chronic discharging ear in Nigeria. J Laryngol Otol. 1984 Feb;98(2):113–119. doi: 10.1017/s0022215100146298. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Okunade A. O. Screening for handicaps in children: are Nigerian nurses equipped? Int J Nurs Stud. 1980;17(3):181–187. doi: 10.1016/0020-7489(80)90043-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Paradise J. L. On tympanostomy tubes: rationale, results, reservations, and recommendations. Pediatrics. 1977 Jul;60(1):86–90. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Paradise J. L. Otitis media during early life: how hazardous to development? A critical review of the evidence. Pediatrics. 1981 Dec;68(6):869–873. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Paradise J. L., Smith C. G. Impedance screening for preschool children. State of the art. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1979 Jan-Feb;88(1 Pt 1):56–65. doi: 10.1177/000348947908800110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Richards I. D., Roberts C. J. The "at risk" infant. Lancet. 1967 Sep 30;2(7518):711–713. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(67)90989-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. SHERIDAN M. D. Infants at risk of handicapping conditions. Mon Bull Minist Health Public Health Lab Serv. 1962 Dec;21:238–245. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Watkin P. M., Baldwin M., Laoide S. Parental suspicion and identification of hearing impairment. Arch Dis Child. 1990 Aug;65(8):846–850. doi: 10.1136/adc.65.8.846. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Bulletin of the World Health Organization are provided here courtesy of World Health Organization

RESOURCES