Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Bulletin of the World Health Organization logoLink to Bulletin of the World Health Organization
. 1993;71(1):15–21.

Rapid evaluation methods (REM) of health services performance: methodological observations.

M Anker 1, R J Guidotti 1, S Orzeszyna 1, S A Sapirie 1, M C Thuriaux 1
PMCID: PMC2393426  PMID: 8440033

Abstract

The rapid evaluation method (REM) was developed by WHO in order to assess the performance and quality of health care services, identify operational problems, and assist in taking managerial action. It was tested in five developing countries (Botswana, Madagascar, Papua New Guinea, Uganda and Zambia) between 1988 and 1991. REM consists of a set of observation- and survey-based diagnostic activities, carried out mainly in health care facilities. The article describes the various steps of REM, methodological issues such as setting objectives and using an issue-information matrix, preparation of survey instruments, use of computer software (Epi Info), data quality control, fieldwork, and the use of data to produce useful information for decision-makers. REM aims at bringing prompt and relevant information to planners and decision-makers who need it for a specific purpose. In the present examples, REM provided information for preparing a programme proposal for external funding, for establishing baseline data for a situation analysis, and for assessing staff performance after extensive training in order to improve the curriculum.

Full text

PDF
15

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Anker M. Epidemiological and statistical methods for rapid health assessment: introduction. World Health Stat Q. 1991;44(3):94–97. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Forster D., Behrens R. H., Campbell H., Byass P. Evaluation of a computerized field data collection system for health surveys. Bull World Health Organ. 1991;69(1):107–111. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Frerichs R. R. Epidemiologic surveillance in developing countries. Annu Rev Public Health. 1991;12:257–280. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pu.12.050191.001353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Kalter H. The validation of interviews for estimating morbidity. Health Policy Plan. 1992 Mar;7(1):30–39. doi: 10.1093/heapol/7.1.30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Khan M. E., Anker M., Patel B. C., Barge S., Sadhwani H., Kohle R. The use of focus groups in social and behavioural research: some methodological issues. World Health Stat Q. 1991;44(3):145–149. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kroeger A. Health interview surveys in developing countries: a review of the methods and results. Int J Epidemiol. 1983 Dec;12(4):465–481. doi: 10.1093/ije/12.4.465. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Pearson R. Rapid assessment procedures are changing the way UNICEF evaluates its projects. Hygie. 1989 Dec;8(4):23–25. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Ross D. A., Vaughan J. P. Health interview surveys in developing countries: a methodological review. Stud Fam Plann. 1986 Mar-Apr;17(2):78–94. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Bulletin of the World Health Organization are provided here courtesy of World Health Organization

RESOURCES