Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
letter
. 2008 Mar 6;105(11):E14. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0800915105

Hibernation can also cause high δ15N values in cave bears: A response to Richards et al.

Aurora Grandal d'Anglade 1,*, Daniel Fernández Mosquera 1
PMCID: PMC2393754  PMID: 18326029

To the Editor:

A recent paper Richards et al. (1) shows the highest δ15N values of fossil collagen in adult cave bears found until now. The reviewing of previous papers makes them propose, as the only viable explanation, an omnivorous feeding for these specimens. However, they erroneously quote the hypothesis shown in our paper (2) in which we propose a mechanism to explain the high δ15N values in cave bears due to urea recycling during hibernation (3). This error is of critical importance, because the authors rule out our hypothesis, understanding this mechanism explains low δ15N values due to cold weather conditions. On the contrary, long hibernation periods—longer in cold climates—would result in higher δ15N values.

This hypothesis is supported by recent studies on present bears in which bone tissue remodeling during hibernation, in spite of disuse, has been proven (4, 5), as well as the keeping of muscle protein, with an approximately 1‰ rise in δ15N after several months of hibernation (6), even though the quantification of this effect in fossil remains has not been possible so far.

The difference between the values obtained in “Peçstera cu Oase” and the more frequent ones in the rest of sites (1) is practically equivalent to two trophic levels. An occasionally omnivorous feeding alone cannot account for this difference. Taking into account the overwhelming evidence that the special physiology of bears during hibernation plays a decisive role in bone tissue metabolism, we believe the values shown by Richards et al. (1) must be explained considering other hypotheses apart from omnivorous feeding.

Footnotes

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  • 1.Richards MP, et al. Isotopic evidence for omnivory among European cave bears: Late Pleistocene Ursus spelaeus from the Peçstera cu Oase, Romania. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:600–604. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0711063105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Fernández D, Vila M, Grandal A. Stable isotopes data (delta 13C, delta 15N) from the cave bear (Ursus spelaeus): A new approach to its palaeoenvironment and dormancy. Proc R Soc Biol Sci B. 2001;268:1159–1164. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2001.1639. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Barboza PS, Farley SD, Robbins CT. Whole-body urea cycling and protein turnover during hyperphagia and dormancy in growing bears (U. americanus and U. arctos). Can J Zool. 1997;75:2129–2136. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.McGee ME, et al. Decreased bone turnover with balanced resorption and formation prevent cortical bone loss during disuse (hibernation) in grizzly bears (Ursus arctos horribilis). Bone. 2008;42:396–404. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2007.10.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Lennox AL, Goodship AE. Polar bears (Ursus maritimus), the most evolutionary advanced hibernators, avoid significant bone loss during hibernation. Comp Biochem Physiol A. 2008 doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2007.11.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Lohuis TD, Harlow HJ, Beck TDI. Hibernating black bears (Ursus americanus) experience skeletal muscle protein balance during winter anorexia. Comp Biochem Physiol B. 2007;147:20–28. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpb.2006.12.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES