Skip to main content
British Journal of Cancer logoLink to British Journal of Cancer
. 2003 Jul 1;89(1):158–167. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601015

Clinical significance of transmembrane 4 superfamily in colon cancer

H Hashida 1,5, A Takabayashi 2, T Tokuhara 1, N Hattori 1, T Taki 1, H Hasegawa 3, S Satoh 5, N Kobayashi 4, Y Yamaoka 5, M Miyake 1,*
PMCID: PMC2394202  PMID: 12838318

Abstract

Cell motility is an important cellular function closely related to the processes of tumour progression and metastasis. Several members of transmembrane 4 superfamily (TM4SF) have been reported to be associated with cell motility and metastatic potential of solid tumour. The aim of this study is to clarify the clinical significance of the member of TM4SF (MRP-1/CD9, KAI1/CD82 and CD151) in human colon cancer. We studied 146 colon cancer patients who underwent curative surgery and studied the expression of MRP-1/CD9, KAI1/CD82 and CD151 using reverse transcriptase – polymerase chain reaction and immunohistochemistry. We found that 64 patients (43.8%) had MRP-1/CD9-positive tumours and that the overall survival rate of patients with MRP-1/CD9-positive tumours was much higher than that of patients with MRP-1/CD9-negative tumours (89.8 vs 50.8%, P<0.001). In contrast, 63 patients (43.2%) had KAI1/CD82-positive tumours and the overall survival rate of patients with KAI1/CD82-positive tumours was also higher than that of patients with KAI1/CD82-negative tumours (84.8 vs 54.9%, P=0.002). On the other hand, positive CD151 expression had a bad effect on the overall survival rate of patients with colon cancer (61.2 vs 74.9%, P=0.022). In a multivariate analysis, MRP-1/CD9 status was a good indicator of the overall survival (P=0.007). We have shown that the reduction of MRP-1/CD9 and KAI1/CD82 expression, and the increasing CD151 expression are indicators for a poor prognosis in patients with colon cancer. This is a first report describing about the relation between CD151 and colon cancer.

Keywords: TM4SF, MRP-1/CD9, KAI1/CD82, CD151, colon cancer


Cell motility plays an important key function related to the process of tumour progression and metastasis (Miyake and Hakomori, 1991). It is partially dependent on adhesion molecules and proteases (Hashida et al, 2001,2002a). Previously, we reported that the motility-related protein-1 (MRP-1) is an antigen recognised by monoclonal antibody (MAb) M31-15 which inhibits cell motility and the MRP-1 sequence coincides with the cluster of differentiation antigen 9 (CD9) (Miyake et al, 1991). In our previous reports, we showed MRP-1/CD9-overexpressing tumour cells negative cell motility and metastatic potential (Ikeyama et al, 1993). Therefore, MRP-1/CD9 regulates cell motility and is a receptor for negative signal ligands. In addition, negative MRP-1/CD9 expression was associated with a poor prognosis in breast cancer (Miyake et al, 1996), lung cancer (Higashiyama et al, 1995) and pancreatic cancer (Sho et al, 1998). These data also suggest that MRP-1/CD9 expression might be associated with metastatic ability and degree of malignancy. MRP-1/CD9 belongs to the transmembrane 4 superfamily (TM4SF), which is characterised by four transmembrane domains delimiting two extracellular regions of unequal size, as well as a particular fold in the large extracellular loop (Wright and Tomlinson, 1994).

KAI1/CD82 is also a member of TM4SF. KAI1/CD82 expression suppressed experimental metastasis of rat prostate tumour cells (Dong et al, 1995), and decreased motility and invasion of colon carcinoma cells (Takaoka et al, 1998). KAI1/CD82 is considered to be a metastasis-suppressor gene of prostate cancer and low KAI1/CD82 expression has been reported to be involved in the malignant progression of prostate cancer (Dong et al, 1996). We also showed that decreased KAI1/CD82 gene expression was an indicator of poor prognosis in lung cancer (Adachi et al, 1996), breast cancer (Huang et al, 1998) and pancreatic cancer (Sho et al, 1998). These data show that KAI1/CD82 is an important tumour suppressor gene in cancer metastasis and progression.

On the other hand, CD151 is also a transmembrane molecule that has been characterised as a member of the evolutionally conserved TM4SF, and it is known as SFA-1 and PETA-3 (Fitter et al, 1995; Hasegawa et al, 1996). CD151 cDNA shows an open reading frame of 253 amino acids that encodes a protein of molecular mass 28 kDa. In addition, human CD151 gene locates on chromosome 11p15.1. CD151 in involved in cell adhesion, cell motility, metastasis, and stability and formation of hemidesmosomes (Yauch et al, 1998).

Several members of TM4SF are associated with the metastatic phenotype. In addition, for the most part, they work negatively. Recently, it was reported to be the first member of the TM4SF to show signs of being a positive effecter of metastasis (Testa et al, 1999). Moreover, CD151 enhances cell motility and cancer metastasis (Kohno et al, 2002) and CD151 overexpression leads to a poor prognosis of the patients with non-small cell lung cancer (Tokuhara et al, 2001). Therefore, CD151 is a metastasis-associated antigen that appears to contribute to the metastatic phenotype positively. These findings set CD151 apart from MRP-1/CD9 and KAI1/CD82 that appear to act as metastasis-suppressor genes. It may contribute to the collapse of tetraspanin/tetraspanin complexes. In addition, no consistent findings have been reported as a prognostic indicator for CD151 gene in colon cancer. As part of our evaluation of members of the TM4SF as possible prognostic predictors, we performed a retrospective study on the expression of the MRP-1/CD9 gene, the recently identified KAI1/CD82 gene and the CD151 gene in human colon cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Clinical characteristics of the patients

We studied 146 patients with up to stage III colon cancer who had undergone surgery at the Department of Surgery of the Kitano Hospital between October 1994 and May 2001. All patients underwent curative surgery. The postsurgical staging of each tumour was classified according to the tumour–node–metastasis (TNM) staging system (Sobin and Wittekind, 1997). The clinical characteristics of the patients are presented in Table 1. In all, 84 of patients were men and 62 were women. The median age of the patients was 62.8 years, with a range of 35–80 years. The patients could be broken down into 25 with pathological stage I, 46 with stage II and 75 with stage III disease. The mean follow-up period for all patients was 44.3 months, with a range of 6.3–85.9 months.

Table 1. Relation of MRP-1/CD9, KAI1/CD82 and CD151 expression and various prognostic factors in 146 patients with colon cancer.

    MRP-1/CD9
KAII/CD82
CD151
Clinicopathological characteristics Number of patients Positive Negative P-value Positive Negative P-value Positive Negative P-value
Age (years)                    
 ⩽60 74 35 39 NS 33 41 NS 35 39 NS
 ⩾60 72 29 43   30 42   46 26  
                     
Sex                    
 Female 62 29 33 NS 29 33 NS 32 30 NS
 Male 84 35 49   34 50   49 35  
                     
Tumour status                    
 T1 17 9 8 NS 11 6 NS 9 8 0.025
 T2 20 8 12   7 13   12 8  
 T3 83 38 45   38 45   39 44  
 T4 26 9 17   7 19   21 5  
                     
Nodal status                    
 N0 71 39 32 0.007 43 28 <0.001 37 34 NS
 N1 33 14 19   11 22   15 18  
 N2 42 11 31   9 33   29 13  
                     
Pathological stage                    
 I 25 13 12 0.030 15 10 <0.001 15 10 NS
 II 46 26 20   28 18   22 24  
 III 75 25 50   20 55   44 31  
                     
Differentiation                    
 Well 32 16 16 NS 18 14 NS 14 18 NS
 Moderately 101 42 59   40 61   57 44  
 Poorly 13 6 7   5 8   10 3  
                     
Total 146 64 82   63 83   81 65  

NS=not significant.

Tumour specimens

One-half of each fresh tumour tissue specimen was immediately embedded in optimum cutting temperature compound (Miles, Kankakee, IL, USA), and frozen in liquid nitrogen immediately after surgical resection and maintained at −80°C until use. Frozen sections were cut on a cryostat to a thickness of 6 μm and were stained with haematoxylin and eosin and used for immunohistochemical staining. After the connective tissues were trimmed off, the other-half of the tumour specimen that was then made up of more than 80% cancer cells was used for the reverse transcriptase–polymerase chain reaction (RT–PCR) analysis.

Immunohistochemical assays

The assays were carried out as described previously (Hashida et al, 2002a). Endogenous peroxidases were blocked by incubating with 0.3% H2O2 in absolute methanol for 30 min. The sections were then incubated with 5% bovine serum albumin for 2 h at room temperature. Subsequently, replicate sections were incubated for 2 h with the anti-MRP-1/CD9 MAb M31-15, the anti-KAI1/CD82 MAb C33 and the anti-CD151 MAb SFA1.2B4, respectively. After washing three times in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), they were then incubated for 1 h with biotinylated horse anti-mouse IgG (Vector Laboratories Inc., Burlingame, CA, USA). Visualisation of the antibody binding was completed using 3,3′-diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride, and the sections were lightly counterstained with Mayer's haematoxylin. Sections incubated with mouse myeloma SP2 supernatant and mouse IgG were used as negative reaction control. Specimens of fibroadenoma of the breast were used as a positive control.

The samples were classified by two pathologists who had no knowledge of patients' clinical status. All sections were scored in semiquantitative fashion according to the method described previously (Huang et al, 1998). Briefly, we determined the score by estimating the percentage of cells that stained for MRP-1/CD9, KAI1/CD82 and CD151, and multiplying by the assessment of the intensity of the stain on a 0, 1+, 2+ or 3+ scale (0, no staining; 1+, weak staining; 2+, distinct staining; 3+, very strong staining). The theoretical limits of the scores ranged from 0 (0% of cells staining) to 300 (100% of the cells staining at 3+ intensity). Significant differences were found with respect to the survival rate when a score of 120 was used as a cut off value. Specimens with a score of ⩾120 were classified as positive, and when score was <120, specimens were classified as negative.

Semiquantitative RT–PCR analysis

Reverse transcriptase–polymerase chain reaction was performed as described previously in order to confirm the results of MRP-1/CD9, KAI1/CD82 and CD151 expression in immunohistochemical studies (Adachi et al, 1996). Total cellular RNA was extracted from the frozen tumour tissues by the acid guanidium thiocyanate procedure (Chomczynski and Sacchi, 1987). First-strand complementary DNA (cDNA) synthesis was performed with 5 μg of total RNA using a cDNA synthesis kit (Pharmacia, Piscataway, NJ, USA) following the manufacturer's protocol. We used 1 μl aliquot of the reaction mixture for PCR amplification. We titrated the amount of starting cDNA and determined the number of amplification cycles to obtain reproducible quantitative performance of the RT–PCR assay for MRP-1/CD9, KAI1/CD82 and CD151. The generated cDNA was amplified using primers for MRP-1/CD9 (5′-TGCATC-TGTATCCAGCGCCA-3′ and 5′-CTCAGGGATGTAAGCTGACT-3′), KAI1/CD82 (5′-AGTCCTCCCTGCTGCTGTGTG-3′ and 5′-TCAGTCAGGGTGGGCAAGAGG-3′) and CD151 (5′-ATGGGTGAGTTCAACGAGAAG-3′ and 5′-TCAGTAGTGCTCCAGCTTC-AG-3′). The internal control was β-actin (5′-GATATCGCCGCG-CTCGTCGTCGAC-3′ and 5′-CAGGAAGGAAGGCTGGAAGAG-TGC-3′). All of the subsequent assays were then performed under conditions that produced amplifications of MRP-1/CD9, KAI1/CD82, CD151 and β-actin within a linear range. A total of 24 cycles of PCR amplification was performed for MRP-1/CD9, KAI1/CD82 and β-actin, and 20 cycles for CD151 as follows: denaturation at 94oC for 40 s, annealing at 60oC for 40 s and extension at 72°C for 90 s. The same PCR conditions were used to amplify the β-actin DNA. Tubes containing all of the ingredients except templates were included in all runs and served as negative controls. Preparations of the human endothelial cell line ECV304, which is positive for MRP-1/CD9, KAI1/CD82 and CD151, were used as a positive control. The amplified PCR products were electrophoresed on a 1% agarose gel containing ethidium bromide, and the bands were visualised under ultraviolet light followed by densitometric analysis. In addition, the resulting PCR products were analysed by sequencing to confirm their identity as described previously (Onuma et al, 1999; Rae et al, 2000). PCR products were successfully sequenced. Sequence comparisons coincided with the known MRP-1/CD9, KAI1/CD82 and CD151 genes.

The densitometric values obtained for MRP-1/CD9, KAI1/CD82 and CD151 bands in a given tumour tissue sample were divided by the corresponding value of β-actin for normalisation, and the ratio was referred to as the gene expression ratio for each gene. The expression ratio of the tumour was then divided by that of the human endothelial cell line ECV304 to obtain the gene conservation rate for MRP-1/CD9, KAI1/CD82 and CD151. We arbitrarily set several cutoff values to select the best value. When 0.8 was used as a cutoff value, significant differences were found in survival. We therefore selected 0.8 as the most appropriate cutoff value. When the conservation rate value of a given specimen was ≥0.8, it was considered to indicate positive gene expression. If the value was <0.8, it was considered to indicate negative gene expression (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Agarose gel electrophoresis of RT–PCR-amplified MRP-1/CD9, KAII/CD82, CD151 and β-actin. Lane 1, size marker; lane 2, human endothelial cell line ECV304(positive control); lane 3, colon cancer with MRP-1/CD9-, KAII/CD82- and CD151-positive expression; lane 4, colon cancer with MPR-1/CD9- and KAII/CD82-positive but CD151-negative expression; lane 5, colon cancer with MRP-1/CD9- and CD151-positive but KAII/CD82-negative expression; lane 6, colon cancer with MRP-1/CD9-positive but KAII/CD82- and CDI5I-negative expression; lane 7, colon cancer with KAII/CD82- and CD151-positive but MRP-1/CD9-negative expression; lane 8, colon cancer with KAII/CD82-positive but MRP-1/CD9- and CD151-negative expression; lane 9, colon cancer with CD151-positive but MRP-1/CD9- and KAII/CD82-negative expression; lane 10, colon cancer with MRP-1/CD9-, KAII/CD82- and CD151-negative expression.

Statistical analysis

The statistical significance of the difference between the incidence of MRP-1/CD9, KAI1/CD82 and CD151 expression and clinical and pathologic parameters was assessed by the χ2 test or Mann–Whitney U-test. Overall cancer-specific survival was defined as from the date of surgery to the date of death due to cancer. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to estimate the probability of overall survival as a function of time (Kaplan and Meier, 1958) and was compared using the log-rank test (Mantel, 1966). Multivariate analysis was performed using the Cox regression model (Cox, 1972) to study the effects of different variables on survival, and eight factors (MRP-1/CD9 status, KAI1/CD82 status, CD151 status, sex, age, tumour status, nodal status and histological differentiation) were studied. Scores were assigned to each variable for regression analysis. All P-values were based on two-tailed statistical analysis, and a P-value of <0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance.

RESULTS

MRP-1/CD9, KAI1/CD82 and CD151 gene expression in colon cancer tissues analysed by RT–PCR

Of the 146 colon cancers studied, 82 carcinomas (43.8%) were evaluated as MRP-1/CD9-positive and 64 carcinomas (56.2%) as MRP-1/CD9-negative expression. In all, 63 carcinomas (43.2%) were evaluated as KAI1/CD82-positive and 83 carcinomas (56.8%) as KAI1/CD82-negative expression. A total of 81 carcinomas (55.5%) were evaluated as CD151-positive and 65 carcinomas (44.5%) as CD151-negative expression (Table 1 and Figure 1).

Immunohistochemical study of MRP-1/CD9, KAI1/CD82 and CD151 in colon cancer tissues

Of the 146 colon cancers studied using the immunohistochemical method, 69 (49.1%) were classified as MRP-1/CD9 positive (Figure 2A), and the immunostaining was intense and uniform on the cell surface membrane in these specimens. There were 77 specimens (50.9%) with negative MRP-1/CD9 expression (Figure 2B). The immunohistochemical results agreed well with those from the RT–PCR assays, and 92.5% of the specimens coincided exactly.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Immunohistochemical staining of human colon cancer tissues using the avidin–biotin–peroxidase complex procedure (original magnification, × 150). (A) MRP-1/CD9-positive staining of colon cancer; (B) MRP-1/CD9 negative staining of colon cancer; (C) KAII/CD82-positive staining of colon cancer; (D) KAI1/CD82-negative staining of colon cancer; (E) CD151-positive staining of colon cancer; (F) CD151-negative staining of colon cancer.

Turning to the KAI1/CD82, there were 67 specimens (45.9%) with positive KAI1/CD82 expression and 79 specimens (54.1%) with negative KAI1/CD82 expression (Figure 2C, D). These results agreed well with those from the RT–PCR assays, and 93.4% of the specimens coincided exactly.

Furthermore, there were 78 specimens (53.4%) with positive CD151 expression and 68 specimens (46.6%) with negative CD151 expression (Figure 2E, F). These results agreed with those from the RT–PCR assays, and 88.9% of the specimens coincided exactly.

Relation between MRP-1/CD9, KAI1/CD82 and CD151 expression and various prognostic factors

The relation between MRP-1/CD9 gene expression and various prognostic factors is shown in Table 1. The relation was found between MRP-1/CD9 gene expression and nodal status (P=0.007) and pathological stage (P=0.030). In all, 32 (45.1%) patients with N0 stage had negative gene expression compared with 57.6% of N1 stage patients and 75.6% of N2 stage patients. In addition, the percentage of patients whose tumours had MRP-1/CD9-negative gene expression increased from 48.0% of those with stage I to 66.7% of those with stage III.

In contrast, KAI1/CD82 gene expression was associated with lymph node status (P<0.001) as well as pathological stage (P<0.001). A total of 28 (39.4%) patients with N0 stage had negative gene expression compared with 66.7% of N1 stage patients and 78.6% of N2 stage patients. With respect to pathological stage, the percentage of patients whose tumours had KAI1/CD82-negative gene expression increased from 40.0% of those with stage I to 73.3% of those with stage III.

The relation between CD151 gene expression and various prognostic factors is shown in Table 1. There was a statistically significant relation between gene expression and tumour status (P=0.025). Eight patients (47.1%) with T1 stage had negative gene expression compared with 19.2% of T4 stage patients.

Relation between MRP-1/CD9 expression and 3-year, disease-free and overall survival of colon cancer patients

Among all 146 patients, the 3-year survival rate of patients with MRP-1/CD9-positive tumours was significantly higher than that of patients with MRP-1/CD9-negative tumours (98.1 vs 76.0%, P<0.001; Table 2). In addition, the disease-free survival rate of patients with MRP-1/CD9-positive tumours was significantly higher than that of patients with MRP-1/CD9-negative tumours (74.8 vs 43.5%, P=0.004; Table 2). Similarly, the overall survival rate for patients with positive tumours was significantly better than that of individuals whose tumours had negative MRP-1/CD9 expression (89.8 vs 50.8%, P<0.001; Table 2 and Figure 3). In particular, MRP-1/CD9 was an effective indicator for patients with advanced disease (N2 status and stage III).

Table 2. Survival rate of 146 patients with colon cancer according to clinicopathological characteristics and MRP-1/CD9.

  3-year survival rate (%)
Disease-free survival rate (%)
Overall survival rate (%)
Clinicopathological characteristics Positive Negative P-value Positive Negative P-value Positive Negative P-value
Age (years)                  
 ⩽60 96.4 87.2 0.185 78.1 41.3 0.032 88.0 56.3 0.056
 ⩾60 100.0 65.8 0.004 67.5 25.3 0.051 92.3 47.5 0.002
                   
Sex                  
 Female 100.0 83.7 0.049 77.7 44.1 0.057 89.5 63.9 0.044
 Male 96.6 71.8 0.009 71.6 40.8 0.057 90.9 41.3 0.002
                   
Tumour status                  
 T1 100.0 100.0 >0.999 100.0 50.0 0.400 100.0 50.0 0.400
 T2 100.0 66.7 0.192 77.2 33.3 0.118 80.0 33.3 0.260
 T3 100.0 94.4 0.499 75.0 23.3 0.174 95.2 72.4 0.042
 T4 83.3 29.4 0.041 50.1 12.3 0.170 55.6 15.7 0.047
                   
Nodal status                  
 N0 100.0 100.0 >0.999 86.6 32.5 0.160 95.2 73.8 0.628
 N1 100.0 100.0 >0.999 87.5 64.8 0.328 90.0 77.1 0.458
 N2 88.9 35.3 0.012 68.6 10.2 0.045 74.1 12.1 0.003
                   
Pathological stage                  
 I 100.0 100.0 >0.999 72.2 23.7 0.789 100.0 75.0 0.400
 II 100.0 100.0 >0.999 85.2 54.4 0.236 91.7 75.0 0.690
 III 95.2 60.7 0.006 79.0 34.7 0.013 82.9 37.2 0.002
                   
Differentiation                  
 Well 100.0 86.7 >0.999 83.3 28.4 0.469 100.0 34.2 >0.999
 Moderately 97.1 78.7 0.019 80.1 27.8 0.074 85.0 64.5 0.049
 Poorly 100.0 20.0 0.015 100.0 0.0 0.008 100.0 0.0 0.008
                   
Total 98.1 76.0 <0.001 74.8 43.5 0.004 89.8 50.8 <0.001

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Overall survival of 146 colon cancer patients according to their tumour MRP-1/CD9 gene status.

Relation between KAI1/CD82 expression and 3-year, disease-free and overall survival of colon cancer patients

Among the 146 patients, the 3-year survival rate of patients with KAI1/CD82-positive tumours was significantly higher than that of patients with KAI1/CD82-negative tumours (98.2 vs 75.7%, P<0.001; Table 3). In addition, the disease-free survival rate of patients with KAI1/CD82-positive tumours was significantly higher than that of patients with KAI1/CD82-negative tumours (77.1 vs 42.3%, P=0.004; Table 3). Moreover, the overall survival rate for patients with positive tumours was significantly better than that of individuals whose tumours had negative KAI1/CD82 expression (84.8 vs 54.9%, P=0.002; Table 3 and Figure 4).

Table 3. Survival rate of 146 patients with colon cancer according to clinicopathological characteristics and KAI1/CD82.

  3-year survival rate (%)
Disease-free survival rate (%)
Overall survival rate (%)
Clinicopathological characteristics Positive Negative P-value Positive Negative P-value Positive Negative P-value
Age (years)                  
 ⩽60 96.6 87.1 0.176 82.1 47.2 0.080 86.8 62.8 0.118
 ⩾60 100.0 63.7 0.001 50.8 36.7 0.020 78.7 51.5 0.006
                   
Sex                  
 Female 100.0 84.8 0.112 100.0 33.3 0.021 100.0 60.6 0.013
 Male 96.7 69.8 0.006 57.7 42.3 0.232 73.9 44.5 0.051
                   
Tumour status                  
 T1 100.0 100.0 >0.999 100.0 0.0 0.250 100.0 0.0 0.200
 T2 100.0 70.5 0.209 100.0 0.0 0.036 100.0 0.0 0.048
 T3 100.0 94.2 0.495 75.0 66.3 0.413 81.2 83.7 0.863
 T4 80.0 33.8 0.115 35.6 20.3 0.480 40.0 22.1 0.190
                   
Nodal status                  
 N0 100.0 100.0 >0.999 75.0 22.7 >0.001 100.0 42.6 0.048
 N1 100.0 100.0 >0.999 71.4 65.9 0.823 75.0 87.5 0.539
 N2 87.5 38.1 0.028 27.8 22.2 0.610 43.8 24.2 0.082
                   
Pathological stage                  
 I 100.0 100.0 >0.999 66.7 0.0 <0.001 100.0 66.7 0.300
 II 100.0 100.0 >0.999 100.0 40.9 0.236 100.0 45.8 0.400
 III 94.1 64.2 0.025 53.1 45.6 0.556 61.0 49.1 0.173
                   
Differentiation                  
 Well 100.0 84.6 0.192 75.0 18.8 0.035 83.3 30.8 0.138
 Moderately 97.1 78.7 0.020 55.5 46.5 0.126 87.4 62.4 0.021
 Poorly 100.0 33.3 0.061 75.0 25.6 0.090 75.0 33.3 0.103
                   
Total 98.2 75.7 <0.001 77.1 42.3 <0.001 84.8 54.9 0.002

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Overall survival of 146 colon cancer patients according to their tumour KAII/CD82 gene status.

Relation between CD151 expression and 3-year, disease-free and overall survival of colon cancer patients

Among all 146 patients, the 3-year survival rate of patients with CD151-positive tumours was significantly lower than that of patients with CD151-negative tumours (78.5 vs 94.3%, P=0.012; Table 4). In addition, the disease-free survival rate of patients with CD151-positive tumours was significantly lower than that of patients with CD151-negative tumours (53.6 vs 61.2%, P=0.048; Table 4). Moreover, the overall survival rate for patients with negative tumours was significantly better than that of individuals whose tumours had positive CD151 expression (61.2 vs 74.9%, P=0.022; Table 4 and Figure 5).

Table 4. Survival rate of 146 patients with colon cancer according to clinicopathological characteristics and CD151.

  3-year survival rate (%)
Disease-free survival rate (%)
Overall survival rate (%)
Clinicopathological characteristics Positive Negative P-value Positive Negative P-value Positive Negative P-value
Age (years)                  
 ⩽60 87.5 94.3 0.298 57.8 66.1 0.281 67.9 75.4 0.213
 ⩾60 70.7 94.4 0.030 49.3 62.4 0.118 58.4 72.6 0.087
                   
Sex                  
 Female 92.3 91.5 0.900 60.7 60.0 0.466 75.2 79.3 0.887
 Male 69.3 96.7 0.005 49.4 61.2 0.065 51.6 72.6 0.010
                   
Tumour status                  
 T1 100.0 100.0 >0.999 50.0 100.0 0.400 50.0 100.0 0.400
 T2 80.0 83.3 0.853 62.3 40.0 0.653 66.7 40.0 0.805
 T3 96.4 97.4 0.914 60.2 56.6 0.159 83.2 88.3 0.887
 T4 33.8 80.0 0.115 16.9 55.3 0.451 16.9 53.3 0.159
                   
Nodal status                  
 N0 100.0 100.0 >0.999 84.8 78.5 0.447 88.1 80.0 0.418
 N1 100.0 100.0 >0.999 56.1 62.3 0.797 70.0 92.9 0.150
 N2 42.3 72.5 0.111 30.4 0.0 0.371 32.9 0.0 0.726
                   
Pathological stage                  
 I 100.0 100.0 >0.999 85.7 100.0 >0.999 85.7 100.0 >0.999
 II 100.0 100.0 >0.999 80.1 51.1 0.071 90.0 75.0 0.589
 III 60.4 88.9 0.010 40.7 40.7 0.147 42.6 66.4 0.033
                   
Differentiation                  
 Well 85.7 100.0 0.483 40.9 42.9 0.266 42.9 45.0 0.158
 Moderately 77.0 97.5 0.008 50.3 64.3 0.033 58.9 89.0 0.006
 Poorly 75.0 33.3 0.188 64.3 0.0 0.123 75.0 0.0 0.034
                   
Total 78.5 94.3 0.012 53.6 61.2 0.048 61.2 74.9 0.022

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Overall survival of 146 colon cancer patients according to their tumour CD151 gene status.

Prognostic value of MRP-1/CD9, KAI1/CD82 and CD151 expression

The Cox regression model was used to evaluate disease-free and overall survival as shown in Table 5. Two variables, nodal status (P<0.001) and MRP-1/CD9 status (P=0.015), were significant factors in predicting the disease-free survival of colon cancer patients. Moreover, three variables, nodal status (P<0.001), tumour status (P=0.029) and MRP-1/CD9 status (P=0.015), were significant factors in predicting the overall survival of colon cancer patients.

Table 5. Multivariate regression analysis in predicting the disease-free and overall survival of 146 patients with colon cancer.

    Disease-free survival
Overall survival
Variables Assigned score Hazard ratio (95% CI) P-value Hazard ratio (95% CI) P-value
MRP-11CD9          
 Positive 0 3.147(1.240–7.940) 0.015 5.511(1.584–19.158) 0.007
 Negative 1        
           
KAI1/CD82          
 Positive 0 0.949 (0.388–2.321) 0.909 1.107 (0.364–3.369) 0.858
 Negative 1        
CD151          
 Negative 0 0.529 (0.247–1.123) 0.097 0.603 (0.028–1.597) 0.309
 Positive 1        
           
Age (years)          
 ⩽60 0 1.491 (0.748–2.974) 0.257 1.258(0.569–2.782) 0.571
 ⩾60 1        
           
Sex          
 Female 0 1.374 (0.699–2.702) 0.357 1.838 (0.786–4.300) 0.160
 Male 1        
           
Tumour status          
 T1 1 1.561 (0.942–2.585) 0.084 2.066 (1.101–3.874) 0.024
 T2 2        
 T3 3        
 T4 4        
           
Nodal status          
 N0 0 2.812 (1.736–4.556) <0.001 3.797 (1.981–7.277) <0.001
 N1 1        
 N2 2        
           
Differentiation          
 Well 0 0.811 (0.422–1.559) 0.530 0.815(0.384–1.728) 0.593
 Moderately 1        
 Poorly 2        

Abbreviation: CI=confidence interval.

DISCUSSION

Colon cancer has become one of the most common causes of cancer death in Japan (Health and Welfare Statistics Association, 1998). Endoscopic treatments for early stage of colon cancer have been improved, but no established treatment is available for patients in the advanced stage. Up until now, the prognosis of patients with colon cancer has depended on the clinicopathological staging. However, recently, molecular assessment has been incorporated into treatment of patients with colon cancer (Boland et al, 2000). It is well known that the accumulation of genetic alterations facilitates the progression of tumours. The famous model of colorectal tumorigenesis shows that three tumour suppressor genes, p53, APC and DCC, and the dominant oncogene K-ras play key roles in the progression of colon cancer (Feason and Vogelstein, 1990). In addition, many other prognostic factors have been examined for colon cancer. However, little is understood about the genetic alternations and cellular mechanisms that are responsible for the final steps in tumour metastasis (Haier et al, 2000). An enhanced understanding of the molecular genetic events that occur during progression in colon cancer could lead to new therapeutic modalities and improvement in survival rates.

In the present study, we investigated the gene expressions of the three TM4SF members, MRP-1/CD9, KAI1/CD82 and CD151. This TM4SF is made up of approximately 23 members. These proteins are variously expressed in leucocytes and a variety of non-haematopoietic tissues. MRP-1/CD9 is a glycoprotein widely expressed not only in haematopoietic tissues, platelets, early B cells, activated T cells and granulocytes, but also in nonhaematopoietic tissues (Wright and Tomlinson, 1994). CD9 null female displays a severe reduction in fertility and CD9 appears to be essential for sperm–egg fusion, a process involving the CD9-associated integrin α6β1 (Le Naour et al, 2000). TM4SF proteins act as links between extracellular integrins and intracellular signalling molecules, such as phosphatidylinositol 4-kinase (Yauch et al, 1998) and TM4SF proteins appear to regulate cell motility through this link (Hemler, 1996; Berditchevski and Odintsova, 1999). Several studies suggest that TM4SF plays an important role in the regulation of cell development, activation, proliferation and adhesion (Wright and Tomlinson, 1994; Hemler et al, 1996; Hashida et al, 2002b). Interestingly, several TM4SF member proteins have been associated with the metastatic phenotype, but these associations have been, for the most part, negative. Previously, we showed that reductions of MRP-1/CD9 and KAI1/CD82 were predictive factors for a poor prognosis in patients with various kinds of cancers. As part of our evaluation of members of TM4SF as possible prognostic predictors, we further extended our study to the expression of CD151 and performed a retrospective study on the expression of CD151, MRP-1/CD9 and KAI1/CD82 in colon cancer. CD151 was reported to be a metastasis-associated antigen that appeared to contribute positively to the metastatic phenotype in contrast to the MRP-1/CD9, KAI1/CD82 and ME491/CD63 (Testa et al, 1999). In addition, it was reported that CD151 may not affect tumour cell proliferation but could be involved in an early step in the formation of secondary metastatic lesions. The ability of CD151 to mediate tumour cell migration may provide a possible mechanism for the role of this protein in effecting metastatic dissemination. Moreover, it was reported that the CD151 molecule enhances cell motility, invasion and metastasis of cancer cells and that focal adhesion kinase is needed for these events through CD151 (Kohno et al, 2002). We have hypothesised that those patients with a CD151-positive tumour are in a more advanced stage of the disease and have a much poorer prognosis. In this study, the CD151 mRNA levels and protein expression were associated with tumour status. Moreover, our present study showed that there was a significant difference between the overall survival rate for colon cancer patients with low CD151 expression and that of patients with CD151-positive tumours. These findings suggest that CD151 may play an important role in the progression in colon cancer cells, and that its expression may have an effect on the characteristics of colon cancers. Further basic studies using an experimental metastasis model will be necessary.

On the other hand, KAI1/CD82 expression was demonstrated to be consistently downregulated during the progression of human colon cancer, as well as breast cancer (Huang et al, 1998), pancreatic cancer (Sho et al, 1998) and nonsmall cell lung cancer (Adachi et al, 1996). Furthermore, we have shown that the survival rate for colon cancer patients with negative KAI1/CD82 expression was strikingly lower than that of patients with KAI1/CD82-positive tumours. Similarly, the survival rate of patients with MRP-1/CD9-negative tumours was significantly lower than that of patients with MRP-1/CD9-positive tumours. The malignancy-suppressing effect of CD82 or CD9 may be based partially on cell motility inhibition and apoptosis induction promoted by concurrent GM3 synthesis and N-glycosylation (Ono et al, 1999). Although the precise mechanism remains unknown, the levels of the MRP-1/CD9 or KAI1/CD82 gene may be diminishing due to promoter abnormality or aberrant glycosylation may have occurred in the first hydro-philic region and normal MRP-1/CD9 or KAI1/CD82 function could be lost. Hence, GM3 and other lipids may contribute to the formation of tetraspanin/tetraspanin complexes. Our present study suggests that cancer progression may lead to collapse of tetras-panin/tetraspanin complexes as well as the collapse of tetraspanin/integrin complexes. In addition, a link between a tetraspanin and Rho GTPase cascade may explain why members of TM4SF are involved in cell activation, adhesion, growth and metastasis (Delaguillaumie et al, 2002). Although the precise biological functions of these proteins remain unknown, the downregulation of KAI1/CD82 and MRP-1/CD9 genes during the progression of human cancer is highly associated with a poor prognosis.

The classification of colon cancers according to MRP-1/CD9, KAI1/CD82 and CD151 expression might be useful in identifying patients for whom intensive adjuvant therapy is warranted. It is conceivable that testing tumours for TM4SF expression, in combination with other molecular and biochemical assays, may improve the prognostic evaluation of colon cancer patients, and enhance the clinician's ability to prospectively identify patients who will have early disease recurrence and who require adjuvant chemotherapy.

Acknowledgments

We thank Drs Tadashi Ohbayashi and Tomoko Okuno for the histological examination of the tumour samples, and Mitsuko Shirata for her assistance in preparation of the manuscript. This work was supported in part by Grants-in-Aid 14370421 from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture of Japan (to MM) and the Vehicle Racing Commemorative Foundation (to MM).

References

  1. Adachi M, Taki T, Ieki Y, Huang C, Higashiyama M, Miyake M (1996) Correlation of KAI1/CD82 gene expression with good prognosis in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Res 56: 1751–1755 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Berditchevski F, Odintsova E (1999) Characterization of integrin–tetraspanin adhesion complexes: role of tetraspanins in integrin signaling. J Cell Biol 146: 477–492 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Boland CR, Sinicrope FA, Brenner DE, Carethers JM (2000) Colorectal cancer prevention and treatment. Gastroenterology 118: S115–S128 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chomczynski P, Sacchi N (1987) Single-step method of RNA isolation by acid guanidium thiocyanate–phenol–chloroform extraction. Anal Biochem 162: 156–159 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cox DR (1972) Regression models and life-tables. J R Stat Soc B 34: 187–220 [Google Scholar]
  6. Delaguillaumie A, Lagaudriere-Gesbert C, Popoff MR, Conjeaud H (2002) Rho GTPases link cytoskeletal rearrangements and activation processes induced via the tetraspanin CD82 in T lymphocytes. J Cell Sci 115: 433–443 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dong J-T, Lamb PW, Rinker-Schaeffer CW, Vukanovic J, Ichikawa T, Isaacs JT, Barrett JC (1995) KAI-1, a metastasis suppressor gene for prostate cancer on human chromosome 11p11.2. Science (Washington DC) 268: 884–886 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Dong J-T, Suzuki H, Pin SS, Bova GS, Schalken JA, Isaacs WB, Barrett JC, Isaacs JT (1996) Down-regulation of the KAI1 metastasis suppressor gene during the progression of human prostatic cancer infrequently involves gene mutation or allelic loss. Cancer Res 56: 4387–4390 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Feason ER, Vogelstein BA (1990) A genetic model of colorectal tumori-genesis. Cell 61: 759–761 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Fitter S, Tetaz TJ, Berndt MC, Ashman LK (1995) Molecular cloning of cDNA encoding a novel platelet–endothelial cell tetra-span antigen, PETA-3. Blood 86: 1348–1355 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Haier J, Nasralla M, Nicolson GL (2000) Cell surface molecules and their prognostic values in assessing colorectal carcinomas. Ann Surg 231: 11–24 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hasegawa H, Utsunomiya Y, Kishimoto K, Yanagisawa K, Fujita S (1996) SFA-1, a novel cellular gene induced by human T-cell leukemia virus type 1, is a member of the transmembrane 4 superfamily. J Virol 70: 3258–3263 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hashida H, Takabayashi A, Adachi M, Imai T, Kondo K, Kohno N, Yamaoka Y, Miyake M (2001) The novel monoclonal antibody MH8-4 inhibiting cell motility recognizes integrin α3: inverse of its expression with metastases in colon cancer. Int J Oncol 18: 89–95 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hashida H, Takabayashi A, Kanai M, Adachi M, Kondo K, Kohno N, Yamaoka Y, Miyake M (2002a) Aminopeptidase N is involved in cell motility and angiogenesis: its clinical significance in human colon cancer. Gastroenterology 122: 376–386 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hashida H, Takabayashi A, Tokuhara T, Taki T, Kondo K, Kohno N, Yamaoka Y, Miyake M (2002b) Integrin α3 expression as a prognostic factor in colon cancer: association with MRP-1/CD9 and KAI1/CD82. Int J Cancer 97: 518–525 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Health and Welfare Statistics Association (eds) (1998) Vital statistics Japan. In Journal of Health and Welfare Statistics, pp 27–40. Ministry of health and welfare, Tokyo, Japan [Google Scholar]
  17. Hemler ME, Mannion BA, Berditchevski F (1996) Association of TM4SF proteins with integrins: relevance to cancer. Biochem Biophys Acta 1287: 67–71 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Higashiyama M, Taki T, Ieki Y, Adachi M, Huang C, Koh T, Kodama K, Doi O, Miyake M (1995) Negative motility related protein-1 (MRP-1/CD9) gene expression as a factor of poor prognosis in non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Res 55: 6040–6044 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Huang C, Kohno N, Ogawa E, Adachi M, Taki T, Miyake M (1998) Correlation of reduction in MRP-1/CD9 and KAI1/CD82 expression with recurrences in breast cancer patients. Am J Pathol 153: 973–983 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Ikeyama S, Koyama M, Yamaoka M, Sasada R, Miyake M (1993) Suppression of cell motility and metastasis by transfection with human motility-related protein (MRP-1/CD9) DNA. J Exp Med 177: 1231–1237 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kaplan EL, Meier P (1958) Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 53: 457–481 [Google Scholar]
  22. Kohno M, Hasegawa H, Miyake M, Yamamoto T, Fujita S (2002) CD151 enhances cell motility and metastasis of cancer cells in the presence of focal adhesion kinase. Int J Cancer 97: 336–343 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Le Naour F, Rubinstein E, Jasmin C, Prenant M, Boucheix C (2000) Severely negative female fertility in CD9-deficient mice. Science 287: 319–321 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Mantel N (1966) Evaluation of survival data and two new rank order statistics arising in its consideration. Cancer Chemother Rep 50: 163–170 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Miyake M, Hakomori S (1991) A specific cell surface glycoconjugate controlling cell motility: evidence by functional monoclonal antibodies that inhibit cell motility and tumor cell metastasis. Biochemistry 30: 3328–3334 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Miyake M, Koyama M, Seno M, Ikeyama S (1991) Identification of the motility-related protein (MRP-1), recognized by mono-clonal antibody M31-15, which inhibits cell motility. J Exp Med 174: 1347–1354 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Miyake M, Nakano K, Itoi S, Koh T, Taki T (1996) Motility-related protein-1 (MRP-1/CD9) reduction as a factor of poor prognosis in breast cancer. Cancer Res 56: 1244–1249 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Ono M, Honda K, Wither DA, Hakomori S (1999) Motility inhibition and apoptosis are induced by metastasis-suppressing gene product CD82 and its analogue CD9, with concurrent glycosylation. Cancer Res 59: 2335–2339 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Onuma Y, Nishinakamura R, Takahashi S, Yokota T, Asashima M (1999) Molecular cloning of a novel Xenopus spalt gene (Xsal-3), Biochem Biophys Res, Comm 264: 151–156 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Rae FK, Stephenson S, Nicol DL, Clements JA (2000) Novel association of a diverse range of genes with renal cell carcinoma as identified by differential display. Int J Cancer 88: 726–732 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Sho M, Adachi M, Taki T, Hashida H, Konishi T, Huang C, Ikeda N, Nakajima Y, Kanehiro H, Hisanaga M, Nakano H, Miyake M (1998) Transmembrane 4 superfamily as a prognostic factor in pancreatic cancer. Int J Cancer 79: 509–516 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Sobin LH, Wittekind C (eds) (1997) TNM classification of Malignant Tumors, 5th edn. pp 66–69. New York: Wiley-Liss [Google Scholar]
  33. Takaoka A, Hinoda Y, Satoh S, Adachi Y, Itoh F, Adachi M, Imai K (1998) Suppression of invasive properties of colon cancer cells by a metastasis suppressor KAI1 gene. Oncogene 16: 1443–1453 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Testa JE, Brooks PC, Lin J-M, Quigley JP (1999) Eukaryotic expression cloning with an antimetastatic monoclonal antibody identifies a tetraspanin (PETA-3/CD151) as an effector of human tumor cell migration and metastasis. Cancer Res 59: 3812–3820 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Tokuhara T, Hasegawa H, Hattori N, Ishida H, Taki T, Tachibana S, Sasaki S, Miyake M (2001) Clinical significance of CD151 gene expression in non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res 7: 4109–4114 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Wright MD, Tomlinson MG (1994) The ins and outs of the transmembrane 4 superfamily. Immunol Today 15: 588–594 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Yauch RL, Berditchevski F, Harler MB, Reichner J, Hemler ME (1998) Highly stoichiometric, stable, and specific association of integrin α3β1 with CD151 provides a major link to phosphatidylinositol 4-kinase, and may regulate cell migration. Mol Biol Cell 9: 2751–2765 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Journal of Cancer are provided here courtesy of Cancer Research UK

RESOURCES