Skip to main content
Sarcoma logoLink to Sarcoma
. 1998 Dec;2(3-4):163–170. doi: 10.1080/13577149877920

A Comparison of Outcome of Osteoarticular Allograft Reconstruction and Shoulder Arthrodesis Following Resection of Primary Tumours of the Proximal Humerus

L J Probyn 1, J S Wunder 1,2, R S Bell 1,2, A M Griffin 1, A M Davis 1,3,4,
PMCID: PMC2395401  PMID: 18521249

Abstract

Purpose. The purpose of this study was to compare the oncologic, reconstructive and functional outcomes of patients who underwent osteoarticular allograft reconstruction with those who underwent arthrodesis for a primary malignant bone tumour of the proximal humerus.

Patients. Eleven patients were treated with osteoarticular allograft reconstruction of the proximal humerus. Five of these reconstructions failed, necessitating revision to a secondary arthrodesis. Five patients underwent arthrodesis as a primary reconstruction, for a total of ten patients in the arthrodesis group.

Methods. End points included local and systemic disease recurrence, complications and functional outcome (measured using the 1987 and 1993 Musculoskeletal Tumour Society Rating Scales (MSTS) and the Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS)).

Results. One patient died of systemic disease 2 years post-operatively and one patient had an axillary node recurrence resected 10 months post-operatively and remains free of disease 53 months later. The other 14 patients were alive with no evidence of disease at the time of the last follow-up. Complications after the osteochondral allografts (n=11) included two infections, four fractures and three subluxations in eight patients. Six of these patients required removal of the allograft; one had a repeat osteochondral allograft and five were converted to an arthrodesis. Complications after arthrodesis in the ten patients (five primary and five secondary arthrodeses) included two non-unions, one infection and one fracture in three patients. Patients who underwent shoulder arthrodesis scored better in all outcome measures and this was statistically significant in the MSTS 1993 (p=0.001, Mann–Whitney U Test).

Discussion. In this study, there was a trend towards improved function following arthrodesis compared to osteochondral allograft reconstruction following proximal humerus bone tumour resection.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (338.6 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Davis A. M., Wright J. G., Williams J. I., Bombardier C., Griffin A., Bell R. S. Development of a measure of physical function for patients with bone and soft tissue sarcoma. Qual Life Res. 1996 Oct;5(5):508–516. doi: 10.1007/BF00540024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Enneking W. F., Spanier S. S., Goodman M. A. A system for the surgical staging of musculoskeletal sarcoma. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1980 Nov-Dec;(153):106–120. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Enneking W., Dunham W., Gebhardt M., Malawar M., Pritchard D. A system for the classification of skeletal resections. Chir Organi Mov. 1990;75(1 Suppl):217–240. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Frassica F. J., Sim F. H., Chao E. Y. Primary malignant bone tumors of the shoulder girdle: surgical technique of resection and reconstruction. Am Surg. 1987 May;53(5):264–269. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gebhardt M. C., Roth Y. F., Mankin H. J. Osteoarticular allografts for reconstruction in the proximal part of the humerus after excision of a musculoskeletal tumor. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990 Mar;72(3):334–345. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hawkins R. J., Neer C. S., 2nd A functional analysis of shoulder fusions. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1987 Oct;(223):65–76. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Malawer M. M., Sugarbaker P. H., Lampert M., Baker A. R., Gerber N. L. The Tikhoff-Linberg procedure: report of ten patients and presentation of a modified technique for tumors of the proximal humerus. Surgery. 1985 May;97(5):518–528. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Malawer M. M. Tumors of the shoulder girdle. Technique of resection and description of a surgical classification. Orthop Clin North Am. 1991 Jan;22(1):7–35. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. O'Connor M. I., Sim F. H., Chao E. Y. Limb salvage for neoplasms of the shoulder girdle. Intermediate reconstructive and functional results. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996 Dec;78(12):1872–1888. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199612000-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Richards R. R., Sherman R. M., Hudson A. R., Waddell J. P. Shoulder arthrodesis using a pelvic-reconstruction plate. A report of eleven cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1988 Mar;70(3):416–421. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Sarcoma are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES