Skip to main content
Sarcoma logoLink to Sarcoma
. 2001 Dec;5(4):189–195. doi: 10.1080/13577140120099173

Quality of Life Implications as a Consequence of Surgery: Limb Salvage, Primary and Secondary Amputation

Christine Eiser 1,, Anne-Sophie E Darlington 2, Chris B Stride 3, Robert Grimer 4
PMCID: PMC2395465  PMID: 18521313

Abstract

Purpose. We investigated self-reported quality of life (QoL), body image and daily competence of patients as a consequence of limb salvage surgery (LSS), primary or secondary amputation, and the views of patients following secondary amputation.

Patients. Patients (n=37) had all been treated for osteosarcoma or Ewing's sarcoma in the lower limb.

Methods. QoL was measured by questionnaire. A separate interview to determine satisfaction with decision-making was conducted with those treated for secondary amputation.

Results. For the total group, QoL was below that expected from population norms. There were no differences in QoL between those undergoing LSS surgery compared with amputation. However, LSS reported better daily competence and were less likely to use a walking aid. For the total group, body image and daily competence were associated with better QoL.

Discussion. All these patients are at risk of compromised QoL following surgery. Our data are in line with previous work suggesting outcomes may be better for LSS compared with amputation. Following secondary amputation, most patients (80%) did not regret initial LSS treatment, but felt that the time gained allowed them to come to terms with subsequent surgery.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (111.9 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Davis A. M., Bell R. S., Badley E. M., Yoshida K., Williams J. I. Evaluating functional outcome in patients with lower extremity sarcoma. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999 Jan;(358):90–100. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Davis A. M., Wright J. G., Williams J. I., Bombardier C., Griffin A., Bell R. S. Development of a measure of physical function for patients with bone and soft tissue sarcoma. Qual Life Res. 1996 Oct;5(5):508–516. doi: 10.1007/BF00540024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Eiser C., Cool P., Grimer R. J., Carter S. R., Cotter I. M., Ellis A. J., Kopel S. Quality of life in children following treatment for a malignant primary bone tumour around the knee. Sarcoma. 1997;1(1):39–45. doi: 10.1080/13577149778461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Eiser C., Grimer R. J. Quality of life in survivors of a primary bone tumour: a systematic review. Sarcoma. 1999;3(3-4):183–190. doi: 10.1080/13577149977622. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Felder-Puig R., Formann A. K., Mildner A., Bretschneider W., Bucher B., Windhager R., Zoubek A., Puig S., Topf R. Quality of life and psychosocial adjustment of young patients after treatment of bone cancer. Cancer. 1998 Jul 1;83(1):69–75. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19980701)83:1<69::aid-cncr10>3.0.co;2-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Goorin A. M., Abelson H. T., Frei E., 3rd Osteosarcoma: fifteen years later. N Engl J Med. 1985 Dec 26;313(26):1637–1643. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198512263132605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Greenberg D. B., Goorin A., Gebhardt M. C., Gupta L., Stier N., Harmon D., Mankin H. Quality of life in osteosarcoma survivors. Oncology (Williston Park) 1994 Nov;8(11):19-25; discussion 25-6, 32, 35. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Jenkinson C., Coulter A., Wright L. Short form 36 (SF36) health survey questionnaire: normative data for adults of working age. BMJ. 1993 May 29;306(6890):1437–1440. doi: 10.1136/bmj.306.6890.1437. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Johansen R., Nielsen O. S., Keller J. Functional outcome in sarcomas treated with limb-salvage surgery or amputation. Sarcoma. 1998;2(1):19–23. doi: 10.1080/13577149878118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kopel S. J., Eiser C., Cool P., Grimer R. J., Carter S. R. Brief report: assessment of body image in survivors of childhood cancer. J Pediatr Psychol. 1998 Apr;23(2):141–147. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/23.2.141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Langer E. J., Rodin J. The effects of choice and enhanced personal responsibility for the aged: a field experiment in an institutional setting. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1976 Aug;34(2):191–198. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.34.2.191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Leplège A., Hunt S. The problem of quality of life in medicine. JAMA. 1997 Jul 2;278(1):47–50. doi: 10.1001/jama.1997.03550010061041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Rosen G., Murphy M. L., Huvos A. G., Gutierrez M., Marcove R. C. Chemotherapy, en bloc resection, and prosthetic bone replacement in the treatment of osteogenic sarcoma. Cancer. 1976 Jan;37(1):1–11. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(197601)37:1<1::aid-cncr2820370102>3.0.co;2-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Rougraff B. T., Simon M. A., Kneisl J. S., Greenberg D. B., Mankin H. J. Limb salvage compared with amputation for osteosarcoma of the distal end of the femur. A long-term oncological, functional, and quality-of-life study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1994 May;76(5):649–656. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199405000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Weddington W. W., Jr, Segraves K. B., Simon M. A. Psychological outcome of extremity sarcoma survivors undergoing amputation or limb salvage. J Clin Oncol. 1985 Oct;3(10):1393–1399. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1985.3.10.1393. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Sarcoma are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES