Skip to main content
Applied and Environmental Microbiology logoLink to Applied and Environmental Microbiology
. 1984 Jan;47(1):219–221. doi: 10.1128/aem.47.1.219-221.1984

Cellulolytic bacteria from pig large intestine.

V H Varel, S J Fryda, I M Robinson
PMCID: PMC239643  PMID: 6696420

Abstract

An anaerobic, cellulose-degrading, gram-negative rod and a gram-positive coccus, identified as Bacteroides succinogenes and Ruminococcus flavefaciens, respectively, were isolated from pig fecal samples. These organisms were isolated from cellulolytic most-probable-number dilutions which represented 4 or 6% of the viable bacterial count when pigs were fed a low- or high-fiber diet, respectively.

Full text

PDF
219

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Betian H. G., Linehan B. A., Bryant M. P., Holdeman L. V. Isolation of a cellulotytic Bacteroides sp. from human feces. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1977 Apr;33(4):1009–1010. doi: 10.1128/aem.33.4.1009-1010.1977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bryant M. P. Commentary on the Hungate technique for culture of anaerobic bacteria. Am J Clin Nutr. 1972 Dec;25(12):1324–1328. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/25.12.1324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Dehority B. A. Cellulolytic cocci isolated from the cecum of guinea pigs (Cavia porcellus). Appl Environ Microbiol. 1977 Jun;33(6):1278–1283. doi: 10.1128/aem.33.6.1278-1283.1977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Imoto S., Namioka S. VFA production in the pig large intestine. J Anim Sci. 1978 Aug;47(2):467–478. doi: 10.2527/jas1978.472467x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Macy J. M., Farrand J. R., Montgomery L. Cellulolytic and non-cellulolytic bacteria in rat gastrointestinal tracts. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1982 Dec;44(6):1428–1434. doi: 10.1128/aem.44.6.1428-1434.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Montgomery L., Macy J. M. Characterization of rat cecum cellulolytic bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1982 Dec;44(6):1435–1443. doi: 10.1128/aem.44.6.1435-1443.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Pollmann D. S., Danielson D. M., Peo E. R., Jr Value of high fiber diets for gravid swine. J Anim Sci. 1979 Jun;48(6):1385–1393. doi: 10.2527/jas1979.4861385x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Robinson I. M., Allison M. J., Bucklin J. A. Characterization of the cecal bacteria of normal pigs. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1981 Apr;41(4):950–955. doi: 10.1128/aem.41.4.950-955.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Salanitro J. P., Fairchilds I. G., Zgornicki Y. D. Isolation, culture characteristics, and identification of anaerobic bacteria from the chicken cecum. Appl Microbiol. 1974 Apr;27(4):678–687. doi: 10.1128/am.27.4.678-687.1974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Teather R. M., Wood P. J. Use of Congo red-polysaccharide interactions in enumeration and characterization of cellulolytic bacteria from the bovine rumen. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1982 Apr;43(4):777–780. doi: 10.1128/aem.43.4.777-780.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Applied and Environmental Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES