Abstract
Nosema locustae, a protozoan parasite of grasshoppers, is used as a bioinsecticide. In the present study, the persistence of N. locustae spores in soil and the interaction of these spores with the indigenous soil microflora were examined with various forms of microscopy and staining. Fluorescence microscopy was found to be better than phase-contrast or bright-field microscopy for detecting and viewing spores in soil. Fluorescein isothiocyanate was a better fluorescent stain than acridine orange or fluorescein diacetate; water-soluble aniline blue did not stain spores. The eight bright-field microscopy stains tested (phenolic erythrosin, phenolic rose bengal, malachite green, crystal violet, safranin, Congo red, methyl red, and eosin B) were not satisfactory, as spore staining characteristics were either poor or masked by overstained soil debris. A procedure was developed which allowed spores to be extracted from soil with a peptone-phosphate buffer, recovered on a membrane filter, and stained with fluorescein isothiocyanate for microscopic counting. This procedure was used to assess the persistence of N. locustae spores in field and laboratory soils. The number of N. locustae spores in a laboratory model soil system persisted at a high level for over 8 weeks when the soil was incubated at 5°C but exhibited a 1,000-fold decrease after 1 week of incubation at 27°C. Persistence was related to the temperature-dependent activity of the indigenous soil microflora, which, on the basis of microscopic observations, appeared to prey on N. locustae spores. N. locustae spores were detected in an N. locustae-treated field soil at a low level consistent with the level for laboratory soil incubated at 27°C, and they persisted at this level for over 2 months. No spores were detected on vegetation from this field or in the soil from an adjacent, nontreated control field. N. locustae-like spores were also detected in soil from nontreated fields supporting large grasshopper populations.
Full text
PDF





Images in this article
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Babiuk L. A., Paul E. A. The use of fluorescein isothiocyanate in the determination of the bacterial biomass of grassland soil. Can J Microbiol. 1970 Feb;16(2):57–62. doi: 10.1139/m70-011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Casida L. E., Jr Continuously variable amplitude contrast microscopy for the detection and study of microorganisms in soil. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1976 Apr;31(4):605–608. doi: 10.1128/aem.31.4.605-608.1976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Casida L. E., Jr Microorganisms in unamended soil as observed by various forms of microscopy and staining. Appl Microbiol. 1971 Jun;21(6):1040–1045. doi: 10.1128/am.21.6.1040-1045.1971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Conn H. J. Rose Bengal as a General Bacterial Stain. J Bacteriol. 1921 Mar;6(2):253–254. doi: 10.1128/jb.6.2.253-254.1921. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hobbie J. E., Daley R. J., Jasper S. Use of nuclepore filters for counting bacteria by fluorescence microscopy. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1977 May;33(5):1225–1228. doi: 10.1128/aem.33.5.1225-1228.1977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kingsley M. T., Bohlool B. B. Release of Rhizobium spp. from Tropical Soils and Recovery for Immunofluorescence Enumeration. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1981 Aug;42(2):241–248. doi: 10.1128/aem.42.2.241-248.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Paul E. A., Johnson R. L. Microscopic counting and adenosine 5'-triphosphate measurement in determining microbial growth in soils. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1977 Sep;34(3):263–269. doi: 10.1128/aem.34.3.263-269.1977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pital A., Janowitz S. L., Hudak C. E., Lewis E. E. Direct fluorescent labeling of microorganisms as a possible life-detection technique. Appl Microbiol. 1966 Jan;14(1):119–123. doi: 10.1128/am.14.1.119-123.1966. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Saleh S. M., Harris R. F., Allen O. N. Fate of Bacillus thuringiensis in soil: effect of soil pH and organic amendment. Can J Microbiol. 1970 Aug;16(8):677–680. doi: 10.1139/m70-116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Saleh S. M., Harris R. F., Allen O. N. Method for determining Bacillus thuringiensis var. thuringiensis Berliner in soil. Can J Microbiol. 1969 Sep;15(9):1101–1104. doi: 10.1139/m69-195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Saleh S. M., Harris R. F., Allen O. N. Recovery of Bacillus thuringiensis var. thuringiensis from field soils. J Invertebr Pathol. 1970 Jan;15(1):55–59. doi: 10.1016/0022-2011(70)90098-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]



