Skip to main content
PMC home page
Applied and Environmental Microbiology logoLink to Applied and Environmental Microbiology
. 1984 Mar;47(3):495–499. doi: 10.1128/aem.47.3.495-499.1984

Electrolyte Effects on Attachment of an Estuarine Bacterium

Andrew S Gordon 1,*, Frank J Millero 1
PMCID: PMC239709  PMID: 16346489

Abstract

The effect of electrolyte concentration on attachment of Vibrio alginolyticus to hydroxyapatite was determined. Bacterial affinity for attachment to the surface and surface capacity were derived from linearization of bacterial adsorption isotherms. At low concentrations (<0.1 M) the affinity of the bacteria for the surface increased with increasing ionic strength, in agreement with the D.L.V.O. theory of colloid interaction. At higher concentrations, bacterial affinity for the surface decreased with increasing concentration of cations and was not related to ionic strength changes in the medium. These results demonstrate a change in the mechanism by which salts affect bacterial attachment at salt concentrations above 0.1 M. The results are consistent with the relationship between the proportion of attached bacteria and salinity observed in previously published field studies. The results may also resolve differences between various attachment studies carried out in different ionic strength media, utilizing different bacteria, surfaces, and experimental methods.

Full text

PDF
495

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Absolom D. R., Lamberti F. V., Policova Z., Zingg W., van Oss C. J., Neumann A. W. Surface thermodynamics of bacterial adhesion. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1983 Jul;46(1):90–97. doi: 10.1128/aem.46.1.90-97.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bell C. R., Albright L. J. Attached and free-floating bacteria in a diverse selection of water bodies. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1982 Jun;43(6):1227–1237. doi: 10.1128/aem.43.6.1227-1237.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Clark W. B., Bammann L. L., Gibbons R. J. Comparative estimates of bacterial affinities and adsorption sites on hydroxyapatite surfaces. Infect Immun. 1978 Mar;19(3):846–853. doi: 10.1128/iai.19.3.846-853.1978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Costerton J. W., Geesey G. G., Cheng K. J. How bacteria stick. Sci Am. 1978 Jan;238(1):86–95. doi: 10.1038/scientificamerican0178-86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Fletcher M., Loeb G. I. Influence of substratum characteristics on the attachment of a marine pseudomonad to solid surfaces. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1979 Jan;37(1):67–72. doi: 10.1128/aem.37.1.67-72.1979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gibbons R. J., Moreno E. C., Spinell D. M. Model delineating the effects of a salivary pellicle on the adsorption of Streptococcus miteor onto hydroxyapatite. Infect Immun. 1976 Oct;14(4):1109–1112. doi: 10.1128/iai.14.4.1109-1112.1976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gordon A. S., Gerchakov S. M., Millero F. J. Effects of inorganic particles on metabolism by a periphytic marine bacterium. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1983 Feb;45(2):411–417. doi: 10.1128/aem.45.2.411-417.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kaneko T., Colwell R. R. Adsorption of Vibrio parahaemolyticus onto chitin and copepods. Appl Microbiol. 1975 Feb;29(2):269–274. doi: 10.1128/am.29.2.269-274.1975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kirchman D., Mitchell R. Contribution of particle-bound bacteria to total microheterotrophic activity in five ponds and two marshes. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1982 Jan;43(1):200–209. doi: 10.1128/aem.43.1.200-209.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Orstavik D. Sorption of Streptococcus faecium to glass. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand B. 1977 Feb;85B(1):38–46. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Applied and Environmental Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES