Skip to main content
Postgraduate Medical Journal logoLink to Postgraduate Medical Journal
. 1994 Nov;70(829):809–812. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.70.829.809

Possible role of Helicobacter pylori serology in reducing endoscopy workload.

T C Tham 1, N McLaughlin 1, D F Hughes 1, M Ferguson 1, J J Crosbie 1, M Madden 1, S Namnyak 1, F A O'Connor 1
PMCID: PMC2397813  PMID: 7824415

Abstract

We validated a commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), Helico-G, in diagnosing H. pylori in 129 patients (mean age 50 years, range 15-86). We analysed the results of endoscopy against serology to see whether there was a possibility of adopting the strategy of not endoscoping dyspeptic subjects under the age of 45. H. pylori infection was considered present if either histology and/or culture were positive. The ELISA had a sensitivity of 88%, specificity of 72%, positive predictive value of 85%, negative predictive value of 77% and accuracy of 82% in detecting H. pylori. In a subgroup of 52 subjects aged 45 or less (mean age 35 years, range 15-45), 17 out of 25 patients with positive endoscopic findings were H. pylori seropositive while 16 out of 27 patients had normal endoscopic findings. Eighteen out of the 52 patients (35%) were H. pylori seronegative and normal endoscopically except for five patients (10%) who had mild to moderate oesophagitis and two who had non-erosive gastritis (4%). All patients with duodenal ulcer disease (7) were seropositive giving predictive values of positive and negative serology for a diagnosis of duodenal ulcer disease as 28% and 100%, respectively. Therefore adopting a strategy of endoscoping subjects under the age of 45 only if they were H. pylori seropositive would have saved 35% of endoscopies in this age group but missed oesophagitis in 10%. Negative serology would tend to exclude duodenal ulcer disease while positive serology discriminates poorly for it. Serology may be a useful adjunct in screening to reduce endoscopy workload provided that patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux symptoms are excluded.

Full text

PDF
809

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Cheng E. H., Bermanski P., Silversmith M., Valenstein P., Kawanishi H. Prevalence of Campylobacter pylori in esophagitis, gastritis, and duodenal disease. Arch Intern Med. 1989 Jun;149(6):1373–1375. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Dill S., Payne-James J. J., Misiewicz J. J., Grimble G. K., McSwiggan D., Pathak K., Wood A. J., Scrimgeour C. M., Rennie M. J. Evaluation of 13C-urea breath test in the detection of Helicobacter pylori and in monitoring the effect of tripotassium dicitratobismuthate in non-ulcer dyspepsia. Gut. 1990 Nov;31(11):1237–1241. doi: 10.1136/gut.31.11.1237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Gear M. W., Barnes R. J. Endoscopic studies of dyspepsia in a general practice. Br Med J. 1980 May 3;280(6223):1136–1137. doi: 10.1136/bmj.280.6223.1136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Johansson K. E., Ask P., Boeryd B., Fransson S. G., Tibbling L. Oesophagitis, signs of reflux, and gastric acid secretion in patients with symptoms of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1986 Sep;21(7):837–847. doi: 10.3109/00365528609011128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Klauser A. G., Schindlbeck N. E., Müller-Lissner S. A. Symptoms in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Lancet. 1990 Jan 27;335(8683):205–208. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(90)90287-f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Williams B., Luckas M., Ellingham J. H., Dain A., Wicks A. C. Do young patients with dyspepsia need investigation? Lancet. 1988 Dec 10;2(8624):1349–1351. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(88)90879-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Postgraduate Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES