Skip to main content
Postgraduate Medical Journal logoLink to Postgraduate Medical Journal
. 1995 Mar;71(833):132–135. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.71.833.132

Improving the interpretation of electrocardiographs in an accident and emergency department.

T White 1, P Woodmansey 1, D G Ferguson 1, K S Channer 1
PMCID: PMC2398154  PMID: 7746770

Abstract

In this study we have examined the ability of senior house officers in the Accident and Emergency (A&E) Department to interpret electrocardiographs (ECGs) and tested the value of a single seminar and guidelines on interpretation. We prospectively audited ECG interpretation taken from notes over a two-month period and repeated this audit following a single seminar by a consultant cardiologist and after the issue of guidelines. A formal test of interpretation of a set of 20 ECGs by senior house officers in A&E was also carried out. 245 case notes were reviewed and in one third the ECG was interpreted incorrectly by senior house officers in A&E but incorrect clinical management followed in only 3.2% of cases. Following the intervention, 242 case notes were reviewed and serious misinterpretations were halved as was the number of patients mismanaged as a result (1.7%). In conclusion, formal training in ECG interpretation can reduce serious errors.

Full text

PDF
132

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Channer K. S. Deciding who should have thrombolysis. BMJ. 1993 Oct 30;307(6912):1146–1146. doi: 10.1136/bmj.307.6912.1146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Emerson P. A., Russell N. J., Wyatt J., Crichton N., Pantin C. F., Morgan A. D., Fleming P. R. An audit of doctor's management of patients with chest pain in the accident and emergency department. Q J Med. 1989 Mar;70(263):213–220. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Gjørup T., Kelbaek H., Nielsen D., Kreiner S., Godtfredsen J. Interpretation of the electrocardiogram in suspected myocardial infarction: a randomized controlled study of the effect of a training programme to reduce interobserver variation. J Intern Med. 1992 Apr;231(4):407–412. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.1992.tb00952.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. McCallion W. A., Templeton P. A., McKinney L. A., Higginson J. D. Missed myocardial ischaemia in the accident & emergency department: E.C.G. a need for audit? Arch Emerg Med. 1991 Jun;8(2):102–107. doi: 10.1136/emj.8.2.102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Morrison W. G., Swann I. J. Electrocardiograph interpretation by junior doctors. Arch Emerg Med. 1990 Jun;7(2):108–110. doi: 10.1136/emj.7.2.108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Westdrop E. J., Gratton M. C., Watson W. A. Emergency department interpretation of electrocardiograms. Ann Emerg Med. 1992 May;21(5):541–544. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(05)82521-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Willems J. L., Abreu-Lima C., Arnaud P., van Bemmel J. H., Brohet C., Degani R., Denis B., Gehring J., Graham I., van Herpen G. The diagnostic performance of computer programs for the interpretation of electrocardiograms. N Engl J Med. 1991 Dec 19;325(25):1767–1773. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199112193252503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Postgraduate Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES