Abstract
Although it is accepted that regulatory T cells (T regs) contribute to cancer progression, most studies in the field consider nonantigen-specific suppression. Here, we show the presence of tumor antigen-specific CD4+ T regs in the blood of patients with metastatic melanoma. These CD4+ T regs recognize a broad range of tumor antigens, including gp100 and TRP1 (melanoma tissue differentiation antigens), NY-ESO-1 (cancer/testis antigen) and survivin (inhibitor of apoptosis protein (IAP) family antigen). These tumor antigen-specific T regs proliferate in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) cultures in response to specific 15-mer peptides, produce preferentially IL-10 and express high levels of FoxP3. They suppress autologous CD4+CD25− T cell responses in a cell contact-dependent manner and thus share properties of both naturally occurring regulatory T cells and type 1 regulatory T cells. Such tumor antigen-specific T regs were not detected in healthy individuals. These tumor antigen-specific T regs might thus represent another target for immunotherapy of metastatic melanoma.
Keywords: FoxP3, IL-10, NY-ESO-1
Molecular identification of human cancer antigens in the last decade, for example MART-1/MelanA or NY-ESO-1, has ushered in a new era of antigen-specific cancer immunotherapy targeting these antigens. Despite promising data in animal models, the use of therapeutic cancer vaccines in humans has not yet lived up to its promises. The improved understandings of antigen presentation, and most specifically in dendritic cell (DC) biology, represent a new avenue for research in the field. Ex vivo-generated and antigen-loaded DCs have been used as vaccines to improve immunity in patients with cancer (1). We have vaccinated patients with metastatic melanoma with ex vivo-generated dendritic cells loaded with either HLA-A*0201-restricted peptides derived from melanoma-associated antigens (2) or killed allogeneic melanoma cells (3). Despite some remarkable clinical responses, the overall objective tumor regression rate remains low (1). Because insufficient antitumor immunity might be due to immunosuppression driven by regulatory T cells (T regs), we engaged in identifying such cells in our patient population.
T regs are specialized in the control of responsiveness to self. They are composed of subsets with distinct ontogeny and functions. Naturally occurring CD4+CD25high T regs are produced in the thymus (4), and express FoxP3, a transcriptional factor critical for their development and function (5, 6). Their depletion results in the development of autoimmune diseases in murine models (7, 8). Conversely, their adoptive transfer inhibits the occurrence of autoimmune diseases in disease-prone mice (9). CD4+CD25high T regs suppress the immune responses in a cell contact-dependent manner through mechanisms that remain to be identified (10). T regs are also generated in the periphery from nonregulatory T cells (11–16). These include regulatory type 1 (Tr1) (12) and Th3 (11) cells, both of which preferentially secrete regulatory cytokines, IL-10, and/or TGFβ and do not express FoxP3 (12, 13). These T regs suppress immune responses in a soluble factor-dependent manner, without requiring cell-to-cell contact. Another CD4+ T reg subset that expresses CD25 and FoxP3 is induced in the periphery de novo from FoxP3− nonregulatory T cells in the mouse (14–16). Their existence in humans is still debated.
T regs inhibit both the development and effector functions of tumor-specific T cells. CD4+CD25high T regs accumulate at the tumor site (17–19), where they appear to directly suppress cytotoxic T cell responses against the tumors (20, 21). Indeed, their depletion permits immune-mediated tumor rejection in murine models of cancer (22). CD4+CD25high T regs are also increased in metastatic lymph nodes (18) and peripheral blood (23) of patients with various types of cancers, including metastatic melanoma. However, thus far, only two studies reported the isolation, from tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, of T reg clones specific for tumor antigens: a nonmutated antigen LAGE1 (24) and mutated peptide generated from ARTC1 (25). Because mouse studies have indicated the superior suppressive capacity of antigen-specific T regs over non-antigen-specific T regs (26–28), it is important to determine whether patients display a broad repertoire of tumor antigen-specific T regs. Here, we show that metastatic melanoma patients have circulating IL-10-producing CD4+ T regs specific for a broad range of tumor antigens.
Results
IL-10-Inducing Peptides of NY-ESO-1.
To examine the antigen-specific T cell repertoires, 5, 6-carboxyfluorescein diacetate succinimidyl ester (CFSE)-labeled peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from metastatic melanoma patients were exposed to overlapping peptides from libraries covering the full length of four antigens associated with melanoma (gp100 and TRP1) and other cancers as well (NY-ESO-1 and survivin). Cytokine levels were measured at day 2, and T cell proliferation was analyzed at day 6 (3).
PBMCs from patient #094-004 were cultured with overlapping peptides encoding NY-ESO-1 (43 peptides). Two NY-ESO-1 peptides, p#21 (NY-ESO-181–95) and p#23 (NY-ESO-189–103), were found to induce IL-10 secretion (Fig. 1A). These two NY-ESO-1 peptides also induced the proliferation of a fraction of CD4+ T cells (p#23 in Fig. 1B and p#21, data not shown). The CD4+ T cell proliferation was inhibited by blocking mAb against HLA-class II molecules (Fig. 1C), demonstrating that the peptide-induced CD4+ T cell proliferation depended on antigen-presenting cells. The culture with NY-ESO-1 p#23 yielded two distinct populations in CFSE-diluted CD4+ T cells: one with a low level of FoxP3 and another with a high level of FoxP3 (Fig. 1D). The CFSE-diluted FoxP3low CD4+ T cells were likely activated non-T regs (29–31), because their level of FoxP3 was comparable to that of CD4+ T cells responding to tetanus toxoid (TT) (Fig. 1 D and E). In contrast, the CFSE-diluted FoxP3high CD4+ T cells expressed even higher levels of FoxP3 than CFSE nondiluted FoxP3+CD4+ T cell population (Fig. 1D).
Fig. 1.
NY-ESO-1 peptides promoting IL-10 secretion in PBMC cultures induce the proliferation of FoxP3high CD4+ T cells. (A) Two NY-ESO-1 peptides promoted IL-10 secretion. PBMCs (Pt#094-004) were incubated with 15-mer overlapping NY-ESO-1 single peptides for 2 days. The secreted IL-10 in the culture supernatant was measured. (B) Proliferation of CD4+ T cells in response to the identified NY-ESO-1 peptide. CFSE-labeled PBMCs were cultured with NY-ESO-1 p#23, and CFSE dilution was analyzed at day 6. Data are representative of 11 experiments. (C) The proliferation of peptide-specific CD4+ T cells depends on MHC-class II molecules. The frequencies of CFSE-diluted CD4+ T cell population responding to NY-ESO-1 p#23in the presence or absence of anti-HLA class II blocking mAb are shown. (D) NY-ESO-1-responding CD4+ T cells contain cells with high levels of FoxP3. CFSE-labeled PBMCs cultured with NY-ESO-1 p#23 or TT for 6 days were analyzed for the expression of FoxP3. (E) FoxP3 levels in CFSE-diluted CD4+ T cell populations responding to NY-ESO-1p#23 or TT are shown in the histogram (a representative of 6).
To examine whether the difference in FoxP3 levels in CFSE-diluted CD4+ T cell population was due to the differential activation of T cells, the expression of FoxP3 was followed until day 10 of culture. CFSE-diluted CD4+ T cells in response to TT lost FoxP3 expression at day 10 of culture (Fig. 2 A and B), which is consistent with previous reports (30, 31). In contrast, a fraction of CFSE-diluted cells in response to NY-ESO-1 p#23 maintained FoxP3 expression (Fig. 2 A and B). Thus, CD4+ T cells responding to NY-ESO-1 p#23 contain CD4+ T cells constitutively express high-levels of FoxP3, which are distinct from activated non-T regs that transiently express FoxP3.
Fig. 2.
NY-ESO-1p#23-responding FoxP3high CD4+ T cells maintain FoxP3 expression. (A) PBMCs from Pt# 094-004 were cultured with NY-ESO-1 p#23 or TT for 10 d, and FoxP3 expression in CD4+ T cells was analyzed. (B) Mean fluorescent intensity of FoxP3 levels in CFSE-diluted FoxP3high and FoxP3low CD4+ T cells reacting with NY-ESO-1 p23, and in CFSE-diluted CD4+ T cells reacting with TT, were analyzed at days 6, 8, and 10 of cultures.
We next tested whether the presence of NY-ESO-1 peptides promoting IL-10 secretion in PBMC cultures was restricted to patient #094-004, or represented a frequent event in metastatic melanoma patients. As shown in Table 1, the PBMCs of 8 of 16 patients (before DC vaccination) produced IL-10 in response to one or more NY-ESO-1 peptides. Notably, the PBMCs of patients #025-002 and #025-003 reacted with five and four distinct peptides, respectively. These represent a minimum of three distinct epitopes for CD4+ T cells in each patient. In contrast, PBMCs from nine healthy individuals did not produce IL-10 (< 20 pg/ml) in response to any of the NY-ESO-1 peptides (data not shown).
Table 1.
Characteristics of metastatic melanoma patients and their CD4+ T reg epitopes
| Pt. ID | Age | Gender | Months to stage 4 | Stage at diagnosis of stage 4 | Prior treatment | Metastatic sites | T reg epitope | Predicted HLA restriction | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 094-001 | 53 | F | 5 | M1a | S | LN | None detected | ||
| 094-004 | 68 | M | 120 | M1c | Chemo | RP, P, LN | NY-ESO-1 | 81–95 | DRB1*0701 |
| NY-ESO-1 | 89–103 | DRB1*1302 | |||||||
| TRP-1 | 449–463 | DRB1*1302 | |||||||
| Survivin | 54–67 | ||||||||
| 094-005 | 71 | M | 70 | M1b | IL-2, peptide | P, LN | gp100 | 369–383 | |
| 094-006 | 52 | M | 24 | M1c | R, chemo | P, LN, SC | NY-ESO-1 | 89–103 | DRB1*0102 |
| 094-007 | 56 | M | 2 | M1c | S, chemo | H, LN | NY-ESO-1 | 166–180 | |
| 094-009 | 57 | F | 29 | M1a | S, IFN, chemo, DC vaccine | SC | NY-ESO-1 | 153–167 | DRB1*0701 |
| NY-ESO-1 | 157–171 | DRB1*0701 | |||||||
| 094-010 | 52 | M | 144 | M1b | S, chemo | P, LN, SC | None detected | ||
| 094-011 | 65 | M | 16 | M1c | S, chemo | H, Sk | None detected | ||
| 094-012 | 71 | M | 9 | M1c | S | H, Sk, LN, P | None detected | ||
| 094-013 | 36 | F | 4 | M1b | Chemo | P | NY-ESO-1 | 121–135 | DRB1*0701 |
| 094-015 | 61 | M | 1 | M1c | S, chemo | P, RP | None detected | ||
| 094-017 | 54 | F | 1 | M1a | S, chemo | SC | NY-ESO-1 | 117–131 | DRB1*0301 |
| 094-019 | 75 | M | 12 | M1b | S, vaccine | P | None detected | ||
| 094-021 | 62 | M | 2 | M1b | Chemo | P | None detected | ||
| 025-002 | 50 | F | 0 | M1b | S, chemo | Pe, LN | NY-ESO-1 | 61–74 | |
| NY-ESO-1 | 64–77 | ||||||||
| NY-ESO-1 | 67–81 | ||||||||
| NY-ESO-1 | 82–96 | DRB1*1501 | |||||||
| NY-ESO-1 | 130–143 | DRB1*0701 | |||||||
| 025-003 | 48 | M | 141 | M1c | S, chemo | LN, B | NY-ESO-1 | 67–81 | |
| NY-ESO-1 | 75–88 | ||||||||
| NY-ESO-1 | 90–104 | DRB1*0901, DRB1*1101 | |||||||
| NY-ESO-1 | 118–132 | ||||||||
NY-ESO-1- or gp100-specific CD4+ T regs were found in 9 of 16 patients with metastatic melanoma. Eight of the nine patients showed NY-ESO-1-specific CD4+ T regs. Survivin and TRP-1-specific CD4+ T regs were searched only in Pt#094-004. HLA restriction elements of each patient for each peptide were predicted by using average relative binding (ARB) matrix binding prediction method, available at the web site of The Immune Epitope Database and Analysis Resource (IEDB). http://tools.immuneepitope.org/tools/matrix/iedb_input?matrixClass = II. S, surgery; chemo, chemotherapy; DC, dendritic cell; P, pulmonary; LN, lymph nodes; SC, subcutaneous; Sk, skeleton; Sp, spleen; H, hepatic; RP, retroperitoneal mass; Pe, pelvic; B, bowel.
NY-ESO-1 p#23-Specific CD4+ T Cell Lines.
To further characterize the NY-ESO-1 p#23-responding CD4+ T cells in Pt#094-004, oligoclonal CD4+ T cell lines were established by sorting CFSE-diluted CD4+ T cells into 96-well plates at 3–10 cells per well. Cells were expanded for 3 weeks with irradiated mouse fibroblasts coexpressing CD32 and ICOS-ligand, in the presence of anti-CD3 mAb and IL-2 (Fig. 3A). At the end of the cell culture, higher amounts of IL-10 were detected in the cultures of NY-ESO-1 p#23-responding CD4+ T cells than in those of TT-responding CD4+ T cells (Fig. 3B).
Fig. 3.
Expanded CFSE-diluted CD4+ T cells produce IL-10 in response to NY-ESO-1 p#23 stimulation. (A and B) NY-ESO-1 p#23-responding CD4+ T cells secrete higher amounts of IL-10 than TT-responding CD4+ T cells. CFSE-diluted CD4+ T cells in response to IL-10-inducing peptides or TT were sorted into 96-well plates at 3–10 cells per well, and cultured for 21 d with irradiated ICOS-ligand transfectant and anti-CD3 mAb in the presence of rhIL-2 (1,000 units/ml). IL-10 levels secreted during the cell expansion in each well were measured by ELISA. (B is a representative result of 12). (C) Peptide-specific IL-10 secretion. CD4+ T cells pooled from wells containing >400 pg/ml IL-10 at 3 weeks of culture were stimulated overnight with autologous DCs incubated with NY-ESO-1 p#23 or an irrelevant peptide, and secreted cytokines were measured (a representative result of 8).
To test their peptide-specificity, CD4+ T cells were pooled from wells containing >400 pg/ml IL-10 (IL-10high CD4+ T cells) and stimulated overnight with autologous DCs loaded with NY-ESO-1 p#23 or an irrelevant 15-mer peptide. Pooled CD4+ T cells produced higher amounts of IL-10 when stimulated with DCs loaded with NY-ESO-1 p#23 than with a control peptide (Fig. 3C), indicating their specificity for NY-ESO-1 p#23. The pooled CD4+ T cells produced only minute amounts of IL-2, IL-5, or IFNγ (Fig. 3C) and are thus distinct from Th1 or Th2 cells capable of secreting IL-10.
NY-ESO-1 p#23-Specific IL-10high CD4+ T Cells Have Suppressive Functions.
The pooled IL-10high CD4+ T cells proliferated poorly in response to CD3/CD28 stimulation when compared with autologous CD4+CD25− T cells (Fig. 4A). The pooled IL-10high CD4+ T cells actually suppressed the proliferation of CD4+CD25− T cells (Fig. 4A) in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 4B). In contrast, pools of CD4+ T cells producing low levels of IL-10 (IL-10low CD4+ T cells) did not suppress cell proliferation (Fig. 4A). The pooled IL-10high CD4+ T cells also suppressed IL-2 and IFNγ production of CD3/CD28-activated CD4+CD25− T cells (Fig. 4C). No suppression was observed when cells were separated from CD4+CD25− T cells in transwell cultures (Fig. 5A). Strikingly, the IL-10high CD4+ T cells suppression of T cell proliferation was only marginally blocked by an anti-IL-10R mAb (Fig. 5B).
Fig. 4.
Expanded NY-ESO-1 p#23-specific IL-10high CD4+ T cells have suppressive functions. (A) Inhibition of CD4+CD25− T cell proliferation. The pooled IL-10high CD4+ T cells were cultured alone or together with autologous CD4+CD25− T cells (1:1 ratio) in the presence of CD3/CD28 stimulation. [3H]Thymidine incorporation was analyzed on day 3 (a representative of >10). (B) Titration of pooled IL-10high CD4+ T cells for suppressive function. Indicated number of the pooled cells was added to the autologous CD4+CD25− T cell culture stimulated with CD3/CD28 mAb. (C) The pooled CD4+ T cells abrogate cytokine production from CD4+CD25− T cells. Culture supernatants were harvested at day 2 of the suppression assay shown in A, and secreted cytokines were measured (a representative of 8).
Fig. 5.
NY-ESO-1-specific IL-10high T regs require cell-to-cell contact for their suppression. (A) Soluble factor is not responsible for the suppression. CD4+CD25− T cells were separated from the pooled IL-10high CD4+ T cells by transwell in suppression assays (a representative of 6). (B) IL-10 plays only a minor role in the suppression. An IL-10 Rα blocking mAb was added in the suppression assays. Each dot represents an independent experiment. (C) The pooled IL-10high CD4+ T cells contain FoxP3highCTLA-4high T cells. Pooled IL-10high CD4+ T cells and IL-10low cells were examined for their expression of FoxP3 and CTLA-4.
A fraction of pooled IL-10high CD4+ T cells coexpressed high levels of FoxP3 and intracytoplasmic CTLA-4 (Fig. 5C). In contrast, pooled IL-10low CD4+T cells did not include such cells. Therefore, despite their capacity to produce IL-10, NY-ESO-1-specific T regs require cell-to-cell contact for their suppressive function and, thus, differ from Tr1 cells.
Survivin-, TRP-, and gp100-Specific T regs in Metastatic Melanoma Patients.
The approach used to identify NY-ESO-1-specific CD4+ T regs was applied to search for CD4+ T regs specific for three other melanoma antigens, including survivin, TRP-1, and gp100 in Pt#094–004. Survivin54–67 (Fig. 6Top) and TRP-1449–463 (Fig. 6 Middle) were found to promote IL-10 secretion. CD4+ T cells proliferating in response to these peptides contains cells expressing high levels of FoxP3 (Fig. 6). Importantly, expanded CFSE-diluted CD4+ T cells secreting high levels of IL-10 were specific for each peptide (data not shown) and displayed suppressive function (Fig. 6). Although no gp100 peptides were found to promote IL-10 secretion in the PBMC cultures of Pt#094-004, in the PBMC culture of another melanoma patient, #094-005, gp100369–383 was identified as an epitope for CD4+ T regs. (Fig. 6 Bottom). However, this was the only gp100-specific CD4+ T reg found in 16 melanoma patients. Note that TRP-1 and Survivin were tested only in patient #094-004.
Fig. 6.
Identification of other tumor antigen-specific T regs. Survivin54–67 (Survivin p#15) and TRP-1449–463 (TRP-1 p#113) were found as CD4+ T reg epitopes in Pt#094–004, whereas gp100369–383 (gp100 p#93) was found as a CD4+ T reg epitope in Pt#094–005. IL-10 levels at 48 h PBMC cultures with the identified peptides are shown on the left. The FoxP3 expression of CD4+ T cells in CFSE-labeled PBMCs cultured for 6 days with the indicated T reg epitopes is shown (Middle) (representatives of 6 on each). Suppression assays with pooled IL-10-secreting oligoclonal CD4+ T cell lines (IL-10high CD4+ T cells) are shown on the right (representatives of >10 on each). There, the pooled IL-10high CD4+ T cells were cultured alone or together with autologous CD4+CD25− T cells (1:1 ratio) in the presence of CD3/CD28 stimulation. [3H]thymidine incorporation was analyzed on day 3.
Thus, patients with metastatic melanoma display IL-10 secreting CD4+ T regs specific for a broad range of tumor-associated antigens.
Discussion
Here, we demonstrate the presence of circulating tumor-antigen specific T regs in patients with metastatic melanoma. Importantly, these T regs were identified, without the need for T cell cloning, by their capacity to secrete IL-10 upon exposure to a specific peptide. These tumor antigen-specific CD4+ T regs contained FoxP3high cells and were able to suppress T cell proliferation in a cell contact-dependent manner. This study identified CD4+ T regs specific for four tumor-associated antigens, including gp100 and TRP1 (melanoma tissue differentiation antigens), NY-ESO-1 (cancer/testis antigen), and survivin (inhibitor of apoptosis protein (IAP) family antigen).
NY-ESO-1-specific T regs were present in 8 of 16 examined patients with metastatic melanoma. It is intriguing that far more T reg epitopes were found in NY-ESO-1 than gp100 (Table 1). NY-ESO-1 (one of the cancer/testis antigens) has been discovered by using the SEREX approach (32). NY-ESO-1 is highly immunogenic and elicits spontaneous antibody and T cell responses in a fraction of cancer patients (33). Whether this is associated with the presence of NY-ESO-1-specific antibodies remains to be established. Some patients appear to display T regs reacting with a single epitope (e.g., Pt#094-013 and 094-017), whereas others display T regs reacting with at least three epitopes from the same protein (e.g., Pt#025-002, and 025-003), or epitopes from three different proteins (e.g., Pt#094-004). In 7 of 16 patients, we could not find IL-10-secreting CD4+ T regs against NY-ESO-1 or gp100. Additional antigens need to be tested to determine whether these patients do not display any antigen-specific CD4+ T regs.
NY-ESO-1-specific CD4+ T reg epitopes identified in this study can be divided into four groups according to their location: namely, epitopes approximately (i) the 60–85 region, (ii) the 80–105 region, (iii) the 120–145 region, and (iv) the 160–180 region (Fig. 7). Interestingly, many known CD4+ helper T cell epitope are localized in the three regions including 80–105, 120–145, and 160–180 (Fig. 7). In contrast, no CD4+ helper T cell epitopes have been found in the 60–80 region, whereas CD8+ T cell epitopes have been found there (Fig. 7).
Fig. 7.
CD4+ T reg epitopes of NY-ESO-1. CD4+ T reg epitopes identified in this study are shown in green. Previously identified CD8+ T cell epitopes are shown in red, and previously identified CD4+ helper T cell epitopes are shown in blue. Refs: a, Cancer Immunity peptide database, www.cancerimmunity.org/peptidedatabase/Tcellepitopes.htm, and refs. 35 and 36); b, ref. 37.
Antigen-specific T regs were found in CD4+ T cell populations proliferating in response to the peptides. Blocking MHC class II prevented peptide-induced proliferation, indicating the dependence on antigen-presentation. The frequency of each peptide-specific IL-10-secreting CD4+ T cell in the blood is low, and <0.05% of CD4+ T cells secreted IL-10 in PBMC cultures in response to the peptide stimulation together with costimulation (data not shown). Importantly, these tumor antigen-specific CD4+ T regs can be expanded in vitro from the CFSE-diluted CD4+ T cell population in response to the IL-10-promoting peptides. The expanded T regs possessed potent suppressive functions and inhibited the proliferation and cytokine secretion of autologous CD4+CD25− T cells. They preferentially secrete IL-10, but not IL-2, IL-5, or IFN-γ. Despite their capacity to secrete IL-10, the suppressive function of tumor antigen-specific T regs was largely independent of IL-10, because it required cell-to-cell contacts and was virtually unaffected by blocking with anti-IL-10 receptor mAb. Thus, tumor antigen-specific T regs are distinct from Tr1 cells and IL-10-secreting Th1 or Th2 cells. Rather, tumor antigen-specific T regs appear to share the properties with CD4+CD25high T regs.
Melanoma might provide a favorable environment for the development of these T regs via IL-10 secreted by melanoma cells (34). It will thus be important to determine whether other types of tumors yield such tumor antigen-specific IL-10-secreting T regs. Whether these T regs only appear at the metastatic stage of melanoma also remains to be established.
In conclusion, this study demonstrated the presence of circulating tumor antigen-specific CD4+ T regs in many metastatic melanoma patients. Selective elimination of such tumor antigen-specific T regs might improve outcomes in tumor immunotherapy. In the context of cancer vaccination, the capacity to control CD4+ T cell immunity by elimination of epitopes yielding CD4+ T reg cells could be beneficial to patients and incorporated in the generation of novel vaccines.
Materials and Methods
Patient Samples.
Blood samples were obtained from 16 stage IV melanoma patients who signed informed consent forms from institutional review board-reviewed protocols. Clinical parameters are shown in Table 1.
Analysis of Peptide-Specific T Cell Repertoires with Overlapping Peptides.
NY-ESO-1, TRP-1, gp100, and survivin overlapping peptides (15-mers, with a 4-aa lag) were generated at Mimotopes (Clayton) or were gifts from R. Steinman (The Rockefeller University, New York). Frozen/thawed PBMCs were labeled with 1 μM CFSE (Molecular Probes), and were cultured in complete culture medium [CM: RPMI medium 1640 (GIBCO), 1% l-glutamine (Sigma), 1% penicillin/streptomycin (Sigma), 50 μM 2-mercaptoethanol (Sigma), 1% sodium pyruvate (Sigma), 1% nonessential amino acids (Sigma), and 10% heat-inactivated human AB serum (Gemcell)] with either peptide clusters (5–10 peptides/cluster, 10 μM for each peptide) or single peptides (25 μM) in triplicates in deep-well plates (Nunc) (5 × 105 cells per well). Cytokine measurements with bead-based cytokine multiplex analysis (Luminex; Bio-Rad) were performed at day 2. At day 6, cells were stained with anti-CD4, CD3 (BD), and FoxP3 mAb (eBiosciences), and the peptide-responding T cells were analyzed by flow cytometry according to CFSE dilution. In some experiments, PBMCs were cultured until day 10.
Expansion of Peptide-Specific CD4+ T Cells.
CFSE-labeled PBMCs were cultured with the identified peptides (Survivin54–67: LAQCFFCFKELEGW, TRP-1449–463: NTEMFVTAPDNLGYT, gp100369–383: AESTGMTPEKVPVSE, or NY-ESO-189–103: EFYLAMPFATPMEAE; Bio-Synthesis) or Tetanus Toxoid (University of Massachusetts, Jamaica Plain, MA). PBMCs were stained at day 6 with CD4-APC (BD Biosciences) and the CFSE−CD4+ population was sorted (3 or 10 cells per well) into round-bottom 96-well plates containing X-VIVO15 medium (BioWhittaker) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FCS (American Type Culture Collection) and 1000 units/ml human IL-2 (Chiron). CD32/ICOSL-transfected mouse fibroblasts (4 × 104 cells after irradiation) and anti-CD3 mAb (0.2 μg/ml, OKT-3) were used for T cell expansion. Cells were cultured untouched for 21 days. IL-10 production was measured with ELISA (BD Biosciences). CD4+ T cells were pooled from wells containing >400 pg/ml IL-10.
Suppression Assay.
The pooled IL-10-secreting CD4+ T cells (5 × 104 cells) were cultured for 72 h with autologous CD4+CD25− T cells at a ratio of 1:1 in the presence of anti-CD3/CD28 mAb-coated beads (0.1 μl) in 200 μl of CM. One microcurie of [3H]thymidine (PerkinElmer) was added during the last 18 h of the culture. In blocking experiments, the CD4+CD25− T cells were preincubated for half an hour with 20 μg/ml IL-10 Rα blocking antibodies (R & D Systems) and put together with the pooled IL-10-secreting CD4+ T cells before adding the anti-CD3/CD28 mAb-coated beads.
Specificity Assay.
Autologous DCs were generated by culturing monocytes with GM-CSF and IL-4 for 6 days. At day 8, DCs were incubated for 24 h with a 20 μM concentration of the corresponding peptide or a control peptide. Pooled IL-10-secreting CD4+ T cells (5 × 104 cells) were cultured with peptide-loaded DCs (5 × 103 cells) in 96-well plates for 15 h, and the produced cytokines were measured.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS.
We thank Salah-Eddine Bentebibel, Jean-Philippe Blanck, and Laure Bourdery [Baylor Institute for Immunology Research (BIIR) Immunomonitoring Core] for technical help; Elizabeth Kraus and Sebastien Coquery (BIIR Flow Core); Jennifer Shay and Yuan Xu (Luminex Core); Cindy Samuelsen and Carson Harrod for continuous help; and Dr. Michael Ramsay for continuous support. This work was supported by grants from the Baylor Health Care Systems Foundation and the Falk Foundation and by National Institutes of Health Grants R0-1 CA78846, R0-1 CA85540, P0-1 CA84512, and U-19 AI-57234 (to J.B.). J.B. holds the W. W. Caruth, Jr., Chair for Transplantation Immunology Research. A.K.P. holds the Ramsay Chair for Cancer Immunology.
Footnotes
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- 1.Banchereau J, Palucka AK. Dendritic cells as therapeutic vaccines against cancer. Nat Rev Immunol. 2005;5:296–306. doi: 10.1038/nri1592. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Banchereau J, et al. Immune and clinical responses in patients with metastatic melanoma to CD34(+) progenitor-derived dendritic cell vaccine. Cancer Res. 2001;61:6451–6458. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Palucka AK, et al. Dendritic cells loaded with killed allogeneic melanoma cells can induce objective clinical responses and MART-1 specific CD8+ T-cell immunity. J Immunother. 2006;29:545–557. doi: 10.1097/01.cji.0000211309.90621.8b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Sakaguchi S. Naturally Arising CD4+ regulatory T cells for immunologic self-tolerance and negative control of immune responses. Annu Rev Immunol. 2004;22:531–562. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.21.120601.141122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Hori S, Nomura T, Sakaguchi S. Control of regulatory T cell development by the transcription factor Foxp3. Science. 2003;299:1057–1061. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Fontenot JD, Gavin MA, Rudensky AY. Foxp3 programs the development and function of CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells. Nat Immunol. 2003;4:330–336. doi: 10.1038/ni904. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Sakaguchi S, Sakaguchi N, Asano M, Itoh M, Toda M. Immunologic self-tolerance maintained by activated T cells expressing IL-2 receptor alpha-chains (CD25). Breakdown of a single mechanism of self-tolerance causes various autoimmune diseases. J Immunol. 1995;155:1151–1164. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kim JM, Rasmussen JP, Rudensky AY. Regulatory T cells prevent catastrophic autoimmunity throughout the lifespan of mice. Nat Immunol. 2007;8:191–197. doi: 10.1038/ni1428. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Suri-Payer E, Amar AZ, Thornton AM, Shevach EM. CD4+CD25+ T cells inhibit both the induction and effector function of autoreactive T cells and represent a unique lineage of immunoregulatory cells. J Immunol. 1998;160:1212–1218. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Thornton AM, Shevach EM. CD4+CD25+ immunoregulatory T cells suppress polyclonal T cell activation in vitro by inhibiting interleukin 2 production. J Exp Med. 1998;188:287–296. doi: 10.1084/jem.188.2.287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Fukaura H, et al. Induction of circulating myelin basic protein and proteolipid protein-specific transforming growth factor-beta1-secreting Th3 T cells by oral administration of myelin in multiple sclerosis patients. J Clin Invest. 1996;98:70–77. doi: 10.1172/JCI118779. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Roncarolo MG, Bacchetta R, Bordignon C, Narula S, Levings MK. Type 1 T regulatory cells. Immunol Rev. 2001;182:68–79. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-065x.2001.1820105.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.O'Garra A, Vieira PL, Vieira P, Goldfeld AE. IL-10-producing and naturally occurring CD4+ T regs: Limiting collateral damage. J Clin Invest. 2004;114:1372–1378. doi: 10.1172/JCI23215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kretschmer K, et al. Inducing and expanding regulatory T cell populations by foreign antigen. Nat Immunol. 2005;6:1219–1227. doi: 10.1038/ni1265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Mucida D, et al. Oral tolerance in the absence of naturally occurring T regs. J Clin Invest. 2005;115:1923–1933. doi: 10.1172/JCI24487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Bettelli E, et al. Reciprocal developmental pathways for the generation of pathogenic effector TH17 and regulatory T cells. Nature. 2006;441:235–238. doi: 10.1038/nature04753. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Woo EY, et al. Regulatory CD4(+)CD25(+) T cells in tumors from patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer and late-stage ovarian cancer. Cancer Res. 2001;61:4766–4772. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Viguier M, et al. Foxp3 expressing CD4+CD25(high) regulatory T cells are overrepresented in human metastatic melanoma lymph nodes and inhibit the function of infiltrating T cells. J Immunol. 2004;173:1444–1453. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.173.2.1444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Curiel TJ, et al. Specific recruitment of regulatory T cells in ovarian carcinoma fosters immune privilege and predicts reduced survival. Nat Med. 2004;10:942–949. doi: 10.1038/nm1093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Yu P, et al. Intratumor depletion of CD4+ cells unmasks tumor immunogenicity leading to the rejection of late-stage tumors. J Exp Med. 2005;201:779–791. doi: 10.1084/jem.20041684. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Mempel TR, et al. Regulatory T cells reversibly suppress cytotoxic T cell function independent of effector differentiation. Immunity. 2006;25:129–141. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2006.04.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Shimizu J, Yamazaki S, Sakaguchi S. Induction of tumor immunity by removing CD25+CD4+ T cells: A common basis between tumor immunity and autoimmunity. J Immunol. 1999;163:5211–5218. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Javia LR, Rosenberg SA. CD4+CD25+ suppressor lymphocytes in the circulation of patients immunized against melanoma antigens. J Immunother. 2003;26:85–93. doi: 10.1097/00002371-200301000-00009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Wang HY, et al. Tumor-specific human CD4+ regulatory T cells and their ligands: Implications for immunotherapy. Immunity. 2004;20:107–118. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7613(03)00359-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Wang HY, Peng G, Guo Z, Shevach EM, Wang RF. Recognition of a new ARTC1 peptide ligand uniquely expressed in tumor cells by antigen-specific CD4+ regulatory T cells. J Immunol. 2005;174:2661–2670. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.174.5.2661. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Tarbell KV, Yamazaki S, Olson K, Toy P, Steinman RM. CD25+ CD4+ T cells, expanded with dendritic cells presenting a single autoantigenic peptide, suppress autoimmune diabetes. J Exp Med. 2004;199:1467–1477. doi: 10.1084/jem.20040180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Samy ET, Parker LA, Sharp CP, Tung KS. Continuous control of autoimmune disease by antigen-dependent polyclonal CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells in the regional lymph node. J Exp Med. 2005;202:771–781. doi: 10.1084/jem.20041033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Tang Q, et al. Visualizing regulatory T cell control of autoimmune responses in nonobese diabetic mice. Nat Immunol. 2006;7:83–92. doi: 10.1038/ni1289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Walker MR, et al. Induction of FoxP3 and acquisition of T regulatory activity by stimulated human CD4+CD25- T cells. J Clin Invest. 2003;112:1437–1443. doi: 10.1172/JCI19441. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Gavin MA, et al. Single-cell analysis of normal and FOXP3-mutant human T cells: FOXP3 expression without regulatory T cell development. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103:6659–6664. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0509484103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Allan SE, et al. Activation-induced FOXP3 in human T effector cells does not suppress proliferation or cytokine production. Int Immunol. 2007;19:345–354. doi: 10.1093/intimm/dxm014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Chen YT, et al. A testicular antigen aberrantly expressed in human cancers detected by autologous antibody screening. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997;94:1914–1918. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.5.1914. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Jager E, et al. Simultaneous humoral and cellular immune response against cancer-testis antigen NY-ESO-1: Definition of human histocompatibility leukocyte antigen (HLA)-A2-binding peptide epitopes. J Exp Med. 1998;187:265–270. doi: 10.1084/jem.187.2.265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Kruger-Krasagakes S, et al. Expression of interleukin 10 in human melanoma. Br J Cancer. 1994;70:1182–1185. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1994.469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Neumann F, et al. Identification of an antigenic peptide derived from the cancer-testis antigen NY-ESO-1 binding to a broad range of HLA-DR subtypes. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2004;53:589–599. doi: 10.1007/s00262-003-0492-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Gnjatic S, et al. Survey of naturally occurring CD4+ T cell responses against NY-ESO-1 in cancer patients: correlation with antibody responses. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100:8862–8867. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1133324100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Davis ID, et al. Recombinant NY-ESO-1 protein with ISCOMATRIX adjuvant induces broad integrated antibody and CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cell responses in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101:10697–10702. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0403572101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]







