Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England logoLink to Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England
. 1959 Mar;24(3):159–185.

The Hazards of Uretero-Intestinal Anastomosis

Hunterian Lecture delivered at the Royal College of Surgeons of England on 25th March 1958

John Hopewell
PMCID: PMC2413798  PMID: 13627969

Full text

PDF
159

Images in this article

164Fig. 2
on p.164
175Fig. 11
on p.175

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ANNIS D., ALEXANDER M. K. Differential absorption of electrolytes from the large bowel in relation to ureterosigmoid anastomosis. Lancet. 1952 Sep 27;2(6735):603–606. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(52)91596-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Andrews C. H. CLOSED INTRAPLEURAL PNEUMONOLYSIS : (Report of 124 Cases). Can Med Assoc J. 1939 Jun;40(6):548–553. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. BOYCE W. H. The absorption of certain constituents of urine from the large bowel of the experimental animal (dog). J Urol. 1951 Feb;65(2):241–263. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)68480-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. BRICKER E. M. Bladder substitution after pelvic evisceration. Surg Clin North Am. 1950 Oct;30(5):1511–1521. doi: 10.1016/s0039-6109(16)33147-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bisgard J. D. SUBSTITUTION OF THE URINARY BLADDER WITH A SEGMENT OF SIGMOID: AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY. Ann Surg. 1943 Jan;117(1):106–109. doi: 10.1097/00000658-194301000-00008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. CORDONNIER J. J., SPJUT H. J. Vesical exstrophy and transitional cell carcinoma: unusual longevity following ureterosigmoidostomy. J Urol. 1957 Sep;78(3):242–244. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)66430-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. CORDONNIER J. J. Ureterosigmoid anastomosis. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1949 Apr;88(4):441–446. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. COUVELAIRE R. Le réservoir iléal de substitution après la cystectomie totale chez l'homme. J Urol Medicale Chir. 1951;57(6):408–417. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. FERRIS D. O., ODEL H. M. Electrolyte pattern of the blood after bilateral ureterosigmoidostomy. J Am Med Assoc. 1950 Mar 4;142(9):634–641. doi: 10.1001/jama.1950.02910270024006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. GILCHRIST R. K., MERRICKS J. W., HAMLIN H. H., RIEGER I. T. Construction of a substitute bladder and urethra. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1950 Jun;90(6):752–760. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. GOODWIN W. E., HARRIS A. P., KAUFMAN J. J., BEAL J. M. Open, transcolonic ureterointestinal anastomosis; a new approach. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1953 Sep;97(3):295–300. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Geer W. A., Dragstedt L. R. STUDIES ON RENAL HYPERTENSION: THE EFFECT OF DEVIATING URINE INTO THE BLOOD STREAM AND INTESTINES OF DOGS. Ann Surg. 1938 Aug;108(2):263–270. doi: 10.1097/00000658-193808000-00009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Goto K. A STUDY OF THE NITROGEN METABOLISM AND OF ACIDOSIS AFTER THE TRANSPLANTATION OF A URETER INTO THE DUODENUM IN DOGS. J Exp Med. 1918 Apr 1;27(4):449–458. doi: 10.1084/jem.27.4.449. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. HARVARD B. M., THOMPSON G. J. Congenital exstrophy of the urinary bladder late results of treatment by the Coffey-Mayo method of uretero-intestinal anastomosis. J Urol. 1951 Feb;65(2):223–234. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)68478-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hartman F. W. METHODS AND EFFECTS OF INCREASING THE URINARY CONSTITUENTS IN THE BODY. J Exp Med. 1933 Nov 30;58(6):649–662. doi: 10.1084/jem.58.6.649. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. IRVINE W. T., ALLAN C., WEBSTER D. R. Prevention of the late complications of ureterocolostomy by methods of faecal exclusion. Br J Surg. 1956 May;43(182):650–658. doi: 10.1002/bjs.18004318221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. JOHNSON T. H. Further experiences with a new operation for urinary diversion. J Urol. 1956 Oct;76(4):380–386. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)66708-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. KINMAN L. M., SAUER D., HOUSTON V. T., MELICK W. F. Substitution of the excluded rectosigmoid colon for the urinary bladder; preliminary report. AMA Arch Surg. 1953 Apr;66(4):531–537. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1953.01260030546021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. LAPIDES J. Mechanism of electrolyte imbalance following ureterosigmoid transplantation. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1951 Dec;93(6):691–704. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. LEADBETTER W. F. Consideration of problems incident to performance of uretero-enterostomy: report of a technique. J Urol. 1951 May;65(5):818–830. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)68556-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. LOWSLEY O. S., JOHNSON T. H. A new operation for creation of an artificial bladder with voluntary control of urine and feces. J Urol. 1955 Jan;73(1):83–90. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)67369-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. NESBIT R. M. Ureterosigmoid anastomosis by direct elliptical connection; a preliminary report. J Urol. 1949 Apr;61(4):728–734. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)69133-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. PARSONS F. M., POWELL F. J. N., PYRAH L. N. Chemical imbalance following ureterocolic anastomosis. Lancet. 1952 Sep 27;2(6735):599–602. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(52)91595-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. PARSONS F. M., PYRAH L. N., POWELL F. J. N., REED G. W., SPIERS F. W. Chemical imbalance following ureterocolic anastomosis. Br J Urol. 1952 Dec;24(4):317–322. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1952.tb06165.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. PLATT R. Structural and functional adaptation in renal failure. Br Med J. 1952 Jun 21;1(4772):1313–contd. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.4772.1313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. POWELL K. A method of defunctioning the bladder and rectum in advanced pelvic carcinoma. Br J Surg. 1949 Apr;36(144):421–423. doi: 10.1002/bjs.18003614420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. PYRAH L. N., CARE A. D., REED G. W., PARSONS F. M. The migration of sodium, chloride, and potassium ions across the mucous membrane of the ileum. Br J Surg. 1955 Jan;42(174):357–367. doi: 10.1002/bjs.18004217403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. PYRAH L. N. Uretero-colic anastomosis. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1954 Mar;14(3):169–197. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. RUBIN S. W. The formation of an artificial urinary bladder with perfect continence; an experimental study. J Urol. 1948 Dec;60(6):874–906. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)69317-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. SAUER H. R., BLICK M. S., BUCHWALD K. W. Changes in renal function following ureteral transplantation. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1949 Sep;89(3):299–309. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. SMITH G. I., HINMAN F., Jr The rectal bladder (colostomy with ureterosigmoidostomy): experimental and clinical aspects. J Urol. 1955 Sep;74(3):354–359. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)67289-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. STAMEY T. A. The pathogenesis and implications of the electrolyte imbalance in ureterosigmoidostomy. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1956 Dec;103(6):736–758. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. WELLS C. A. The use of the intestine in urology, omitting ureterocolic anastomosis. Br J Urol. 1956 Dec;28(4):335-50; discussion, 406-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1956.tb04783.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England are provided here courtesy of The Royal College of Surgeons of England

RESOURCES