Skip to main content
Applied and Environmental Microbiology logoLink to Applied and Environmental Microbiology
. 1982 Jan;43(1):75–80. doi: 10.1128/aem.43.1.75-80.1982

Production of Maltase by Wild-Type and a Constitutive Mutant of Saccharomyces italicus

Eugene J Schaefer 1, Charles L Cooney 1
PMCID: PMC241783  PMID: 16345932

Abstract

The production of maltase, an inducible and repressible catabolic enzyme in Saccharomyces italicus, was studied and compared in batch, fed-batch, and continuous fermentations. Tight genetic controls on maltase synthesis limited the effect of environmental manipulations such as fed-batch or continuous culture in enhancement of maltase synthesis, and neither approach was able to improve the performance above the batch process for maltase production. S. italicus was mutated, and a constitutive producer of maltase was isolated. The mutant was detected by its ability to grow on sucrose, which is a noninducing substrate that is hydrolyzed by maltase; S. italicus does not possess invertase and will not normally grow on sucrose. Maltase production by this mutant was studied during growth on sucrose in batch and continuous cultures and marked improvement in enzyme productivity was observed. The specific activity of maltase produced by this mutant was more than twice that of the parent wild type: 2,210 and 1,370 U/g of cells for the mutant versus 890 and 510 U/g of cells for the wild type in batch and continuous cultures, respectively. Maltase specific productivity was increased from 74 to 288 U/g of cells per h by switching from batch growth of the wild type to continuous cultivation of the mutant.

Full text

PDF
75

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Barnett J. A. The utilization of sugars by yeasts. Adv Carbohydr Chem Biochem. 1976;32:125–234. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2318(08)60337-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Beck C., von Meyenburg H. K. Enzyme pattern and aerobic growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae under various degrees of glucose limitation. J Bacteriol. 1968 Aug;96(2):479–486. doi: 10.1128/jb.96.2.479-486.1968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. McMurrough I., Rose A. H. Effect of growth rate and substrate limitation on the composition and structure of the cell wall of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biochem J. 1967 Oct;105(1):189–203. doi: 10.1042/bj1050189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Mowshowitz D. B. Gene dosage effects on the synthesis of maltase in yeast. J Bacteriol. 1979 Mar;137(3):1200–1207. doi: 10.1128/jb.137.3.1200-1207.1979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Toda K. Dual control of invertase biosynthesis in chemostat culture. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1976 Aug;18(8):1117–1124. doi: 10.1002/bit.260180808. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Toda K. Invertase biosynthesis by Saccharomyces carlsbergensis in batch and continuous cultures. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1976 Aug;18(8):1103–1115. doi: 10.1002/bit.260180807. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Applied and Environmental Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES