Skip to main content
PMC home page
Applied and Environmental Microbiology logoLink to Applied and Environmental Microbiology
. 1982 Jul;44(1):128–134. doi: 10.1128/aem.44.1.128-134.1982

Fermentation of Cellulose to Methane and Carbon Dioxide by a Rumen Anaerobic Fungus in a Triculture with Methanobrevibacter sp. Strain RA1 and Methanosarcina barkeri

Douglas O Mountfort 1, Rodney A Asher 1, Thomas Bauchop 1
PMCID: PMC241979  PMID: 16346048

Abstract

The fermentation of cellulose by a rumen anaerobic fungus in the presence of Methanobrevibacter sp. strain RA1 and Methanosarcina barkeri strain 227 resulted in the formation of 2 mol each of methane and carbon dioxide per mol of hexose fermented. Coculture of the fungus with either Methanobrevibacter sp. or M. barkeri produced 0.6 and 1.3 mol of methane per mol of hexose, respectively. Acetate, formate, ethanol, hydrogen, and lactate, which are major end products of cellulose fermentation by the fungus alone, were either absent or present in very low quantities at the end of the triculture fermentation (≤0.08 mol per mol of hexose fermented). During the time course of cellulose fermentation by the triculture, hydrogen was not detected (<1 × 10−5 atm; <0.001 kPa) and only acetate exhibited transitory accumulation; the maximum was equivalent to 1.4 mol per mol of hexose at 6 days which was higher than the total acetate yield of 0.73 in the fungus monoculture. The effect of methanogens is interpreted as a shift in the flow of electrons away from the formation of electron sink products lactate and ethanol to methane via hydrogen, favoring an increase in acetate, which is in turn converted to methane and carbon dioxide by M. barkeri. The maximum rate of cellulose degradation in the triculture (3 mg/ml per day) was faster than previously reported for bacterial cocultures and within 16 days degradation was complete. The triculture was used successfully also in the production of methane from cellulose in the plant fibrous materials, sisal (fiber from leaves of Agave sisalona L.) and barley straw leaf.

Full text

PDF
128

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BAILEY R. W. The reaction of pentoses with anthrone. Biochem J. 1958 Apr;68(4):669–672. doi: 10.1042/bj0680669. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bauchop T., Mountfort D. O. Cellulose fermentation by a rumen anaerobic fungus in both the absence and the presence of rumen methanogens. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1981 Dec;42(6):1103–1110. doi: 10.1128/aem.42.6.1103-1110.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bauchop T. Rumen anaerobic fungi of cattle and sheep. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1979 Jul;38(1):148–158. doi: 10.1128/aem.38.1.148-158.1979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ferry J. G., Wolfe R. S. Anaerobic degradation of benzoate to methane by a microbial consortium. Arch Microbiol. 1976 Feb;107(1):33–40. doi: 10.1007/BF00427864. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Fuchs G., Stupperich E., Thauer R. K. Acetate assimilation and the synthesis of alanine, aspartate and glutamate in Methanobacterium thermoautotrophicum. Arch Microbiol. 1978 Apr 27;117(1):61–66. doi: 10.1007/BF00689352. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Latham M. J., Wolin M. J. Fermentation of cellulose by Ruminococcus flavefaciens in the presence and absence of Methanobacterium ruminantium. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1977 Sep;34(3):297–301. doi: 10.1128/aem.34.3.297-301.1977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Laube V. M., Martin S. M. Conversion of Cellulose to Methane and Carbon Dioxide by Triculture of Acetivibrio cellulolyticus, Desulfovibrio sp., and Methanosarcina barkeri. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1981 Sep;42(3):413–420. doi: 10.1128/aem.42.3.413-420.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Mah R. A., Smith M. R., Baresi L. Studies on an acetate-fermenting strain of Methanosarcina. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1978 Jun;35(6):1174–1184. doi: 10.1128/aem.35.6.1174-1184.1978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. McInerney M. J., Bryant M. P. Anaerobic Degradation of Lactate by Syntrophic Associations of Methanosarcina barkeri and Desulfovibrio Species and Effect of H(2) on Acetate Degradation. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1981 Feb;41(2):346–354. doi: 10.1128/aem.41.2.346-354.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Orpin C. G. Studies on the rumen flagellate Neocallimastix frontalis. J Gen Microbiol. 1975 Dec;91(2):249–262. doi: 10.1099/00221287-91-2-249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Smith M. R., Mah R. A. Acetate as sole carbon and energy source for growth of methanosarcina strain 227. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1980 May;39(5):993–999. doi: 10.1128/aem.39.5.993-999.1980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Updegraff D. M. Semimicro determination of cellulose in biological materials. Anal Biochem. 1969 Dec;32(3):420–424. doi: 10.1016/s0003-2697(69)80009-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Weimer P. J., Zeikus J. G. Acetate metabolism in Methanosarcina barkeri. Arch Microbiol. 1978 Nov 13;119(2):175–182. doi: 10.1007/BF00964270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Weimer P. J., Zeikus J. G. One carbon metabolism in methanogenic bacteria. Cellular characterization and growth of Methanosarcina barkeri. Arch Microbiol. 1978 Oct 4;119(1):49–57. doi: 10.1007/BF00407927. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Winter J., Wolfe R. S. Complete degradation of carbohydrate to carbon dioxide and methane by syntrophic cultures of Acetobacterium woodii and Methanosarcina barkeri. Arch Microbiol. 1979 Apr;121(1):97–102. doi: 10.1007/BF00409211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Applied and Environmental Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES