Skip to main content
Applied and Environmental Microbiology logoLink to Applied and Environmental Microbiology
. 1982 Sep;44(3):525–532. doi: 10.1128/aem.44.3.525-532.1982

Antimicrobial properties of diacetyl.

J M Jay
PMCID: PMC242052  PMID: 7137998

Abstract

Diacetyl preparations from three commercial sources were found to be essentially similar when tested primarily against a set of 40 cultures, including 10 of lactic acid bacteria, 4 of yeasts, 12 of gram-positive non-lactic acid bacteria, and 14 of gram-negative bacteria. The compound was effective at pH less than or equal to 7.0 and progressively ineffective at pH greater than 7.0. The lactic acid bacteria were essentially unaffected by concentrations between 100 and 350 micrograms/ml over the pH range of 5.0 to 7.0. Of the 12 gram-positive non-lactic acid bacteria, 11 were inhibited by 300 micrograms/ml at pH less than or equal to 7.0. The three yeasts and the 13 gram-negative bacteria that grew at pH 5.5 were inhibited by 200 micrograms/ml. Diacetyl was ineffective against four clostridia under anaerobic conditions. It was lethal for gram-negative bacteria and generally inhibitory for gram-positive bacteria. Nongrowing cells were not affected. The effectiveness of diacetyl was considerably less in brain heart infusion broth, Trypticase soy agar, and cooked-meat medium than in nutrient broth or plate count agar. The antimicrobial activity was antagonized by glucose, acetate, and Tween 80 but not by gluconic acid. As an antimicrobial agent, diacetyl was clearly more effective against gram-negative bacteria, yeasts, and molds than against gram-positive bacteria.

Full text

PDF
525

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bjeldanes L. F., Chew H. Mutagenicity of 1,2-dicarbonyl compounds: maltol, kojic acid, diacetyl and related substances. Mutat Res. 1979 Aug;67(4):367–371. doi: 10.1016/0165-1218(79)90034-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Florin I., Rutberg L., Curvall M., Enzell C. R. Screening of tobacco smoke constituents for mutagenicity using the Ames' test. Toxicology. 1980;15(3):219–232. doi: 10.1016/0300-483x(80)90055-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Gupta K. G., Chandiok L., Bhatnagar L. Antibacterial activity of diacetyl and its influence on the keeping quality of milk. Zentralbl Bakteriol Orig B. 1973 Oct;158(2):202–205. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. MYRVIK Q. N., VOLK W. A. Comparative study of the antibacterial properties of ascorbic acid and reductogenic compounds. J Bacteriol. 1954 Nov;68(5):622–626. doi: 10.1128/jb.68.5.622-626.1954. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Stoner G. D., Shimkin M. B., Kniazeff A. J., Weisburger J. H., Weisburger E. K., Gori G. B. Test for carcinogenicity of food additives and chemotherapeutic agents by the pulmonary tumor response in strain A mice. Cancer Res. 1973 Dec;33(12):3069–3085. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Applied and Environmental Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES