Skip to main content
Applied and Environmental Microbiology logoLink to Applied and Environmental Microbiology
. 1983 Feb;45(2):463–467. doi: 10.1128/aem.45.2.463-467.1983

Cocultivation of avian orthomyxoviruses and paramyxoviruses in embryonated eggs: implications for surveillance studies.

K F Shortridge, A P King
PMCID: PMC242308  PMID: 6830215

Abstract

A series of avian orthomyxoviruses and paramyxoviruses were cocultivated in embryonated chicken eggs. This resulted in two categories of behavior being observed: (i) one virus was preferentially detected over the other, as shown by five out of six influenza A viruses of differing hemagglutinin subtypes being preferentially detected over paramyxoviruses, and (ii) dual isolations, for example, dual isolations of paramyxoviruses. These findings are considered in the light of results of surveillance studies of orthomyxoviruses and paramyxoviruses carried out on domestic poultry in Hong Kong.

Full text

PDF
463

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Higgins D. A. Nine disease outbreaks associated with myxoviruses among ducks in Hong Kong. Trop Anim Health Prod. 1971;3(4):232–240. doi: 10.1007/BF02359585. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Hinshaw V. S., Bean W. J., Webster R. G., Sriram G. Genetic reassortment of influenza A viruses in the intestinal tract of ducks. Virology. 1980 Apr 30;102(2):412–419. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(80)90108-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Hinshaw V. S., Webster R. G., Turner B. The perpetuation of orthomyxoviruses and paramyxoviruses in Canadian waterfowl. Can J Microbiol. 1980 May;26(5):622–629. doi: 10.1139/m80-108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. King A. P., Shortridge K. F. Multiple avian influenza infection: selection of a non-avid virus by a heterologous avian host. Res Vet Sci. 1982 Jul;33(1):127–129. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Markwell D. D., Shortridge K. F. Possible waterborne transmission and maintenance of influenza viruses in domestic ducks. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1982 Jan;43(1):110–115. doi: 10.1128/aem.43.1.110-115.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Rott R., Orlich M., Scholtissek C. Intrinsic interference between swine influenza and fowl plague virus. Arch Virol. 1981;69(1):25–32. doi: 10.1007/BF01315262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Shortridge K. F., Alexander D. J., Collins M. S. Isolation and properties of viruses from poultry in Hong Kong which represent a new (sixth) distinct group of avian paramyxoviruses. J Gen Virol. 1980 Aug;49(2):255–262. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-49-2-255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Shortridge K. F., Alexander D. J., Hu L. Y., Kam S. L. Isolation of Newcastle disease virus from Phasianidae birds in Hong Kong. J Comp Pathol. 1978 Oct;88(4):633–636. doi: 10.1016/0021-9975(78)90017-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Shortridge K. F., Butterfield W. K., Webster R. G., Campbell C. H. Isolation and characterization of influenza A viruses from avian species in Hong Kong. Bull World Health Organ. 1977;55(1):15–20. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Tůmová B., Stumpa A., Janout V., Uvízl M., Chmela J. A further member of the Yucaipa group isolated from the common wren (Troglodytes troglodytes). Acta Virol. 1979 Nov;23(6):504–507. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Webster R. G., Isachenko V. A., Carter M. A new avian influenza virus from feral birds in the USSR: recombination in nature? Bull World Health Organ. 1974;51(4):325–332. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Applied and Environmental Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES