Abstract
Production of a raw starch-digesting glucoamylase O (GA O) by protease-negative, glycosidase-negative mutant strain HF-15 of Aspergillus awamori var. kawachi was undertaken under submerged culture conditions. The purified GA O was electrophoretically homogeneous and similar to the parent glucoamylase I (GA I) in the hydrolysis curves toward gelatinized potato starch, raw starch, and glycogen and in its thermostability and pH stability, but it was different in molecular weight and carbohydrate content (250,000 and 24.3% for GA O, 90,000 and ca. 7% for GA I, respectively). The chitin-bound GA O hydrolyzed raw starch but the chitin-bound GA I failed to digest raw starch because chitin was adsorbed at the raw starch affinity site of the GA I molecule. The removal of the raw starch affinity site of GA O with subtilisin led to the formation of a modified GA O (molecular weight, 170,000), which hydrolyzed glycogen 100%, similar to GA O and GA I, and was adsorbed onto chitin and fungal cell wall but not onto raw starch, Avicel, or chitosan. The modified GA I (molecular weight, 83,000) derived by treatment with substilisin hydrolyzed glycogen up to only 80% and failed to be adsorbed onto any of the above polysaccharides. The N-bromosuccinimide-oxidized GA O lost its activity toward gelatinized and raw starches, but the abilities to be adsorbed onto raw starch and chitin were preserved. It was thus suggested that both the raw starch affinity site essential for raw starch digestion and the chitin-binding site specific for the binding with chitin in the cell wall could be different from the active site, located in the three respective positions in the GA O molecule.
Full text
PDF







Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- DAVIS B. J. DISC ELECTROPHORESIS. II. METHOD AND APPLICATION TO HUMAN SERUM PROTEINS. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1964 Dec 28;121:404–427. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1964.tb14213.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fujimori H., Onishi M., Hiromi K. The effects of chemical modification by N-bromosuccinimide of saccharifying alpha-amylase from Bacillus subtilis on various substrates. J Biochem. 1974 Apr;75(4):767–777. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a130449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Johnson A. R. Improved method of hexosamine determination. Anal Biochem. 1971 Dec;44(2):628–635. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(71)90252-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- LOWRY O. H., ROSEBROUGH N. J., FARR A. L., RANDALL R. J. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem. 1951 Nov;193(1):265–275. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ohnishi M., Hiromi K. Studies on the subsite structure of amylases. IV. Tryptophan residues of glucoamylase from Rhizopus niveus studied by chemical modification with N-bromosuccinimide. J Biochem. 1976 Jan;79(1):11–16. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a131037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Onishi M., Suganuma T., Fujimori H., Hiromi K. The role of tryptophan residues of bacterial liquefying alpha-amylase and Taka-amylase A in the enzymatic hydrolysis of linear substrates. J Biochem. 1973 Dec;74(6):1271–1273. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a130356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Partridge S. M. Filter-paper partition chromatography of sugars: 1. General description and application to the qualitative analysis of sugars in apple juice, egg white and foetal blood of sheep. with a note by R. G. Westall. Biochem J. 1948;42(2):238–250. doi: 10.1042/bj0420238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- TREVELYAN W. E., PROCTER D. P., HARRISON J. S. Detection of sugars on paper chromatograms. Nature. 1950 Sep 9;166(4219):444–445. doi: 10.1038/166444b0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- VISWANATHA T., LAWSON W. B. The action of N-bromosuc-cinimide on chymotrypsin. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1961 Apr;93:128–134. doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(61)90324-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Weber K., Osborn M. The reliability of molecular weight determinations by dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. J Biol Chem. 1969 Aug 25;244(16):4406–4412. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
