Skip to main content
Applied and Environmental Microbiology logoLink to Applied and Environmental Microbiology
. 1983 Jun;45(6):1753–1760. doi: 10.1128/aem.45.6.1753-1760.1983

Heterotrophic Activity Throughout a Vertical Profile of Seawater and Sediment in Halifax Harbor, Canada

James A Novitsky 1
PMCID: PMC242534  PMID: 16346309

Abstract

The relative heterotrophic activity of marine microorganisms was determined at two sites by the heterotrophic uptake technique throughout the water column, the sediment-water interface, and the surface layer of sediment. In the water column, uptake was greatest at the surface and steadily decreased with depth. The percentage of the substrate that was respired also decreased with depth from 69 to 56%. The activity of the sediment-water interface was several orders of magnitude greater than that of the overlying water and twice that of the sediment immediately below. Hand-collected water samples carefully taken as close as 1 cm from the sediment-water interface had the same characteristically low activity as the bottom few meters of water. Microautoradiography with 3H-labeled glucose, glutamic acid, or thymidine revealed a general decrease in the percentage of active cells with depth from 35 to <1%. The number of active cells in the interface and sediment averaged <10% of the total population. The data indicate that the sediment-water interface is the most active region in this system due to an increased number of active cells rather than an increased percentage of active cells or increased per-cell activity.

Full text

PDF
1753

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Chocair J. A., Albright L. J. Heterotrophic activities of bacterioplankton and bacteriobenthos. Can J Microbiol. 1981 Mar;27(3):259–266. doi: 10.1139/m81-041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Griffiths R. P., Hayasaka S. S., McNamara T. M., Morita R. Y. Comparison between two methods of assaying relative microbial activity in marine environments. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1977 Dec;34(6):801–805. doi: 10.1128/aem.34.6.801-805.1977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Griffiths R. P., Hayasaka S. S., McNamara T. M., Morita R. Y. Relative microbial activity and bacterial concentrations in water and sediment samples taken in the Beaufort Sea. Can J Microbiol. 1978 Oct;24(10):1217–1226. doi: 10.1139/m78-196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Kepkay P. E., Cooke R. C., Novitsky J. A. Microbial autotrophy: a primary source of organic carbon in marine sediments. Science. 1979 Apr 6;204(4388):68–69. doi: 10.1126/science.204.4388.68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Meyer-Reil L. A. Autoradiography and epifluorescence microscopy combined for the determination of number and spectrum of actively metabolizing bacteria in natural water. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1978 Sep;36(3):506–512. doi: 10.1128/aem.36.3.506-512.1978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Tabor P. S., Neihof R. A. Improved microautoradiographic method to determine individual microorganisms active in substrate uptake in natural waters. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1982 Oct;44(4):945–953. doi: 10.1128/aem.44.4.945-953.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Wright R. T. Measurement and significance of specific activity in the heterotrophic bacteria of natural waters. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1978 Aug;36(2):297–305. doi: 10.1128/aem.36.2.297-305.1978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Applied and Environmental Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES