Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Applied and Environmental Microbiology logoLink to Applied and Environmental Microbiology
. 1983 Jun;45(6):1848–1853. doi: 10.1128/aem.45.6.1848-1853.1983

Metabolism of Acetate, Methanol, and Methylated Amines in Intertidal Sediments of Lowes Cove, Maine †

Gary M King 1, M J Klug 1, D R Lovley 1
PMCID: PMC242548  PMID: 16346317

Abstract

The fates and the rates of metabolism of acetate, trimethylamine, methylamine, and methanol were examined to determine the significance of these compounds as in situ methane precursors in surface sediments of an intertidal zone in Maine. Concentrations of these potential methane precursors were generally <3 μM, with the exception of sediments containing fragments of the seaweed Ascophyllum nodosum, in which acetate was 96 μM. [2-14C]acetate turnover in all samples was rapid (turnover time <2 h), with 14CO2 as the primary product. [14C]trimethylamine and methylamine turnover times were slower (>8 h) and were characterized by formation of both 14CH4 and 14CO2. Ratios of 14CH4/14CO2 from [14C]trimethylamine and methylamine in uninhibited sediments indicated that a significant fraction of these substrates were catabolized via a non-methanogenic process. Data from inhibition experiments involving sodium molybdate and 2-bromoethanesulfonic acid supported this interpretation. [14C]methanol was oxidized relatively slowly compared with the other substrates and was catabolized mainly to 14CO2. Results from experiments with molybdate and 2-bromoethanesulfonic acid suggested that methanol was oxidized primarily through sulfate reduction. In Lowes Cove sediments, trimethylamine accounted for 35.1 to 61.1% of total methane production.

Full text

PDF
1848

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Abram J. W., Nedwell D. B. Inhibition of methanogenesis by sulphate reducing bacteria competing for transferred hydrogen. Arch Microbiol. 1978 Apr 27;117(1):89–92. doi: 10.1007/BF00689356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Banat I. M., Lindström E. B., Nedwell D. B., Balba M. T. Evidence for coexistence of two distinct functional groups of sulfate-reducing bacteria in salt marsh sediment. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1981 Dec;42(6):985–992. doi: 10.1128/aem.42.6.985-992.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Fiebig K., Gottschalk G. Methanogenesis from Choline by a Coculture of Desulfovibrio sp. and Methanosarcina barkeri. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1983 Jan;45(1):161–168. doi: 10.1128/aem.45.1.161-168.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hippe H., Caspari D., Fiebig K., Gottschalk G. Utilization of trimethylamine and other N-methyl compounds for growth and methane formation by Methanosarcina barkeri. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979 Jan;76(1):494–498. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.1.494. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Jones W. J., Paynter M. J. Populations of methane-producing bacteria and in vitro methanogenesis in salt marsh and estuarine sediments. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1980 Apr;39(4):864–871. doi: 10.1128/aem.39.4.864-871.1980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. King G. M., Wiebe W. J. Tracer analysis of methanogenesis in salt marsh soils. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1980 Apr;39(4):877–881. doi: 10.1128/aem.39.4.877-881.1980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Lovley D. R., Dwyer D. F., Klug M. J. Kinetic analysis of competition between sulfate reducers and methanogens for hydrogen in sediments. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1982 Jun;43(6):1373–1379. doi: 10.1128/aem.43.6.1373-1379.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Lovley D. R., Klug M. J. Intermediary metabolism of organic matter in the sediments of a eutrophic lake. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1982 Mar;43(3):552–560. doi: 10.1128/aem.43.3.552-560.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Lovley D. R., Klug M. J. Methanogenesis from methanol and methylamines and acetogenesis from hydrogen and carbon dioxide in the sediments of a eutrophic lake. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1983 Apr;45(4):1310–1315. doi: 10.1128/aem.45.4.1310-1315.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Mountfort D. O., Asher R. A., Mays E. L., Tiedje J. M. Carbon and electron flow in mud and sandflat intertidal sediments at delaware inlet, nelson, new zealand. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1980 Apr;39(4):686–694. doi: 10.1128/aem.39.4.686-694.1980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Oremland R. S., Polcin S. Methanogenesis and sulfate reduction: competitive and noncompetitive substrates in estuarine sediments. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1982 Dec;44(6):1270–1276. doi: 10.1128/aem.44.6.1270-1276.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Senior E., Lindström E. B., Banat I. M., Nedwell D. B. Sulfate reduction and methanogenesis in the sediment of a saltmarsh on the East coast of the United kingdom. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1982 May;43(5):987–996. doi: 10.1128/aem.43.5.987-996.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Sørensen J., Christensen D., Jørgensen B. B. Volatile Fatty acids and hydrogen as substrates for sulfate-reducing bacteria in anaerobic marine sediment. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1981 Jul;42(1):5–11. doi: 10.1128/aem.42.1.5-11.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Winfrey M. R., Ward D. M. Substrates for sulfate reduction and methane production in intertidal sediments. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1983 Jan;45(1):193–199. doi: 10.1128/aem.45.1.193-199.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Wolfe R. S. Microbial formation of methane. Adv Microb Physiol. 1971;6:107–146. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2911(08)60068-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Yancey P. H., Clark M. E., Hand S. C., Bowlus R. D., Somero G. N. Living with water stress: evolution of osmolyte systems. Science. 1982 Sep 24;217(4566):1214–1222. doi: 10.1126/science.7112124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Applied and Environmental Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES