Abstract
The end points of tube dilution tests for minimal inhibitory concentrations of miconazole and flucytosine against Candida albicans were difficult to evaluate because partial inhibition was noted over a wide range of antifungal concentrations. This problem was not encountered with amphotericin B. Partial inhibition of Candida arose because of reductions in yeast growth rate and of cell yield. Different sizes of yeast inocula were differentially inhibited by the same concentration of antifungal agent. An in vitro apparatus was described in which miconazole formulated as commercial creams, pessaries and medicated tampons for intravaginal application could be assessed for its inhibitory action in vitro.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Galgiani J. N., Stevens D. A. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of yeasts: a turbidimetric technique independent of inoculum size. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1976 Oct;10(4):721–728. doi: 10.1128/aac.10.4.721. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hoeprich P. D., Finn P. D. Obfuscation of the activity of antifungal antimicrobics by culture media. J Infect Dis. 1972 Oct;126(4):353–361. doi: 10.1093/infdis/126.4.353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Odds F. C. Cure and relapse with antifungal therapy. Proc R Soc Med. 1977;70 (Suppl 4):24–32. doi: 10.1177/00359157770700S407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sreedhara Swamy K. H., Sirsi M., Ramananda Rao G. R. Studies on the mechanism of action of miconazole: effect of miconazole on respiration and cell permeability of Candida albicans. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1974 Apr;5(4):420–425. doi: 10.1128/aac.5.4.420. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]