Skip to main content
Bulletin of the World Health Organization logoLink to Bulletin of the World Health Organization
. 1969;41(3-4-5):447–452.

Experimental infections in man and horses with influenza A viruses*

J A Kasel, R B Couch
PMCID: PMC2427734  PMID: 5309454

Abstract

The recognition of an antigenic relationship between the haemagglutinins of A/Equi-2 and A2/Hong Kong/68 viruses led to experimental studies in man and horses with these virus types.

Human volunteers were inoculated with A/Equi-2/Miami/63 virus and virus shedding ensued in all subjects. The most common clinical response was a febrile illness indistinguishable from naturally occurring human influenza. After administration of A2/Hong Kong/68 virus to 10 ponies there was virus shedding from 9 and a febrile response in 6.

When the human subjects previously inoculated with equine virus were challenged with A2/Hong Kong/68 virus, the frequency of illness and the extent of virus shedding were lower than was observed among control individuals. This immunity was found to be related to the level of heterologous serum antibody to the human virus which developed after equine virus infection. Challenge with A/Equi-2/Miami/63 virus of ponies previously inoculated with A2/Hong Kong/68 virus, in the absence of any measurable levels of heterologous antibody to the human strain, resulted in less shedding of virus among these than occurred in control animals.

Full text

PDF
447

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Alford R. H., Kasel J. A., Lehrich J. R., Knight V. Human responses to experimental infection with influenza A/Equi 2 virus. Am J Epidemiol. 1967 Jul;86(1):185–192. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a120723. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cameron T. P., Alford R. H., Kasel J. A., Harvey E. W., Byrne R. J., Knight V. Experimental equine influenza in Chincoteague ponies. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1967 Feb;124(2):510–515. doi: 10.3181/00379727-124-31777. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Coleman M. T., Dowdle W. R., Pereira H. G., Schild G. C., Chang W. K. The Hong Kong-68 influenza A2 variant. Lancet. 1968 Dec 28;2(7583):1384–1386. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(68)92683-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Davenport F. M., Hennessy A. V., Minuse E. Further observations on the significance of A-equine-2/63 antibodies in man. J Exp Med. 1967 Dec 1;126(6):1049–1061. doi: 10.1084/jem.126.6.1049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Kasel J. A., Fulk R. V., Couch R. B. Communications. Antigenic relationship between the equine and the Hong Kong human variant of influenza type A2 virus. J Immunol. 1969 Feb;102(2):530–532. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kasel J. A., Fulk R. V., Harvey E. W. Susceptibility of Chincoteague ponies to antigenically dissimilar strains of human type A2 influenza virus. J Immunol. 1969 Aug;103(2):369–371. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. McQueen J. L., Kaye H. S., Coleman M. T., Dowdle W. R. Immunology of equine influenza. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1969 Jul 15;155(2):265–271. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Bulletin of the World Health Organization are provided here courtesy of World Health Organization

RESOURCES