Abstract
In an anaerobic digestor which was fed daily with bovine waste, during the early stages after feeding (4 to 7 h) acetate (via the methyl group) accounted for almost 90% of the methane produced. As time after feeding increased, acetate declined as a precursor so that in the 12- to 14-h and 21- to 23-h periods, after feeding the methyl group accounted for 80 and 73% of the methane produced, respectively. Measurements of methane production from CO2 reduction showed that in the 2- to 12-h period after feeding, CO2 accounted for 14% of the methane produced, whereas in the 12- to 24-h period it accounted for 27-5%. These results show that the percentages of methane accounted for by acetate and CO2 vary with time after feeding the digestor.
Full text
PDFdata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/88897/88897cac866b6fc22436a0889afcf9e2a6979fb7" alt="648"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e8bef/e8bef1b1f1c24dc4ddad678179ffa536f19d71c8" alt="649"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ce594/ce594f682d46e675ed010ca194579726886bb0b9" alt="650"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/447a0/447a016cfe4d1686322b9d9e184f7ee4b74d5528" alt="651"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8234a/8234af411fee6a4808d2ec7e3fb604c5a0bc9e04" alt="652"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bf7b2/bf7b20b142eac8bde11b63d4025c6fee35d8b0a3" alt="653"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/80a43/80a43c52fdac447b576f8e3fa30e531a4b1fe797" alt="654"
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- CHANEY A. L., MARBACH E. P. Modified reagents for determination of urea and ammonia. Clin Chem. 1962 Apr;8:130–132. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cappenberg T. E., Prins R. A. Interrelations between sulfate-reducing and methane-producing bacteria in bottom deposits of a fresh-water lake. 3. Experiments with 14C-labeled substrates. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 1974;40(3):457–469. doi: 10.1007/BF00399358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mahadevan V., Stenroos L. Quantitative analysis of volatile fatty acids in aqueous solution by gas chromatography. Anal Chem. 1967 Nov;39(13):1652–1654. doi: 10.1021/ac50156a046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- STADTMAN T. C., BARKER H. A. Studies on the methane fermentation. IX. The origin of methane in the acetate and methanol fermentations by methanosarcina. J Bacteriol. 1951 Jan;61(1):81–86. doi: 10.1128/jb.61.1.81-86.1951. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Smith P. H., Mah R. A. Kinetics of acetate metabolism during sludge digestion. Appl Microbiol. 1966 May;14(3):368–371. doi: 10.1128/am.14.3.368-371.1966. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Turner J. C. Triton X-100 scintillant for carbon-14 labelled materials. Int J Appl Radiat Isot. 1968 Jul;19(7):557–563. doi: 10.1016/0020-708x(68)90065-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Widdel F., Pfennig N. A new anaerobic, sporing, acetate-oxidizing, sulfate-reducing bacterium, Desulfotomaculum (emend.) acetoxidans. Arch Microbiol. 1977 Feb 4;112(1):119–122. doi: 10.1007/BF00446665. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Winfrey M. R., Zeikus J. G. Effect of sulfate on carbon and electron flow during microbial methanogenesis in freshwater sediments. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1977 Feb;33(2):275–281. doi: 10.1128/aem.33.2.275-281.1977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]