Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Postgraduate Medical Journal logoLink to Postgraduate Medical Journal
. 1989 Apr;65(762):211–215. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.65.762.211

Temporary transvenous cardiac pacing: 6 years experience in one coronary care unit.

N I Jowett 1, D R Thompson 1, J E Pohl 1
PMCID: PMC2429271  PMID: 2594596

Abstract

The role of temporary percutaneous endocardial pacing has been examined in a retrospective analysis of all paced patients admitted to one coronary care unit over a 6 year period. The majority of 162 cases (84.6%) were paced for complete heart block complicating acute myocardial infarction. These patients had a higher incidence of previous hypertension, myocardial infarction and diabetes, compared to matched controls (P less than 0.05, less than 0.02 and less than 0.001, respectively). Admission blood glucose levels were also higher (P less than 0.05). The in-hospital mortality was high (46.7%), especially for those with anterior myocardial infarction (74.5%). Twenty-five (15.4%) patients without recent myocardial infarction were paced for symptomatic brady-dysrhythmias, usually due to chronic complete heart block (Lenegre's disease) or sick sinus syndrome. Most later required permanent pacing. Complications of temporary pacing were more frequent in those who died, the most common being dysrhythmias during pacemaker insertion. Review of our cases suggests that whilst facilities for temporary pacing were extremely valuable, many cases treated were not haemodynamically compromised and probably did not require pacing. Guidelines should be established on coronary care units to prevent the unnecessary morbidity, mortality and expense of the procedure.

Full text

PDF
211

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Atlee J. L., 3rd, Alexander S. C. Halothane effects on conductivity of the AV node and His-Purkinje system in the dog. Anesth Analg. 1977 May-Jun;56(3):378–386. doi: 10.1213/00000539-197705000-00013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Blandford R. L., Burden A. C. Abnormalities of cardiac conduction in diabetics. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1984 Dec 15;289(6459):1659–1659. doi: 10.1136/bmj.289.6459.1659. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. COHEN D. B., DOCTOR L., PICK A. The significance of atrioventricular block complicating acute myocardial infarction. Am Heart J. 1958 Feb;55(2):215–219. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(58)90120-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Czyzk A., Królewski A. S., Szabłowska S., Alot A., Kopczyński J. Clinical course of myocardial infarction among diabetic patients. Diabetes Care. 1980 Jul-Aug;3(4):526–529. doi: 10.2337/diacare.3.4.526. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. DeGuzman M., Rahimtoola S. H. What is the role of pacemakers in patients with coronary artery disease and conduction abnormalities? Cardiovasc Clin. 1983;13(1):191–207. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gupta P. K., Lichstein E., Chadda K. D. Heart block complicating acute inferior wall myocardial infarction. Chest. 1976 May;69(5):599–604. doi: 10.1378/chest.69.5.599. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hindman M. C., Wagner G. S., JaRo M., Atkins J. M., Scheinman M. M., DeSanctis R. W., Hutter A. H., Jr, Yeatman L., Rubenfire M., Pujura C. The clinical significance of bundle branch block complicating acute myocardial infarction. 1. Clinical characteristics, hospital mortality, and one-year follow-up. Circulation. 1978 Oct;58(4):679–688. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.58.4.679. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Husband D. J., Alberti K. G., Julian D. G. "Stress" hyperglycaemia during acute myocardial infarction: an indicator of pre-existing diabetes? Lancet. 1983 Jul 23;2(8343):179–181. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(83)90169-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Klein R. C., Vera Z., Mason D. T. Intraventricular conduction defects in acute myocardial infarction: incidence, prognosis, and therapy. Am Heart J. 1984 Oct;108(4 Pt 1):1007–1013. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(84)90468-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kostuk W. J., Beanlands D. S. Complete heart block associated with acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 1970 Oct;26(4):380–384. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(70)90734-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lassers B. W., Julian D. G. Artificial pacing in management of complete heart block complicating acute myocaerdial infarction. Br Med J. 1968 Apr 20;2(5598):142–146. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.5598.142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Mullins C. B., Atkins J. M. Prognoses and management of venticular conduction blocks in acute myocardial infarction. Mod Concepts Cardiovasc Dis. 1976 Oct;45(10):129–133. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Norris R. M. Heart block in posterior and anterior myocardial infarction. Br Heart J. 1969 May;31(3):352–356. doi: 10.1136/hrt.31.3.352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Norris R. M., Mercer C. J., Croxson M. S. Conduction disturbances due to anteroseptal myocardial infarction and their treatment by endocardial pacing. Am Heart J. 1972 Oct;84(4):560–566. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(72)90480-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Oswald G. A., Corcoran S., Yudkin J. S. Prevalence and risks of hyperglycaemia and undiagnosed diabetes in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Lancet. 1984 Jun 9;1(8389):1264–1267. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(84)92447-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Rowley J. M., Hampton J. R. Diagnostic criteria for myocardial infarction. Br J Hosp Med. 1981 Sep;26(3):253, 255-6, 258. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Postgraduate Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES