Skip to main content
Applied and Environmental Microbiology logoLink to Applied and Environmental Microbiology
. 1979 Nov;38(5):906–910. doi: 10.1128/aem.38.5.906-910.1979

Sampling Culturable Heterotrophs from Microcosms: a Statistical Analysis

Robert J Kosinski 1, Freddie L Singleton 1, Billy G Foster 1
PMCID: PMC243607  PMID: 396887

Abstract

The contributions of different sources of error in sampling mixed and unmixed bacterial microcosms were evaluated by using analysis of variance. Culturable heterotrophic bacteria from a turbid freshwater impoundment were sampled from 9-liter tanks that were unagitated or mixed with magnetic stirrers or pumps and from dilution bottles that were unagitated or agitated with a mechanical shaker. Axenic cultures of Enterobacter aerogenes were also sampled from manually shaken test tubes. In both agitated and unagitated tanks and in unagitated dilution bottles, dilutions made from the same sampling pipette were significantly different, showing a clumping of bacteria on the scale of millimeters. Also, microcosms within a single experiment differed from one another by a large margin. Dilution mean squares and tank or bottle mean squares were homogeneous for all types of tanks and unagitated bottles, indicating that the gentle mixing provided by pumps and stir bars did not reduce either millimeter scale or intermicrocosm variability over what prevailed in unagitated microcosms. By contrast, the vigorously shaken bottles and test tubes showed no millimeter scale variability. Intermicrocosm variability was undetectable in test tubes and two orders of magnitude less in shaken bottles than in unshaken bottles. When these facts are coupled with the inherent statistical advantage of replicating large rather than small experimental units, it is concluded that sampling error in the enumeration of aquatic bacteria in microcosms will be reduced by using numerous, small, violently agitated microcosms with a minimum of subsampling per microcosm.

Full text

PDF
906

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Ashby R. E., Rhodes-Roberts M. E. The use of analysis of variance to examine the variations between samples of marine bacterial populations. J Appl Bacteriol. 1976 Dec;41(3):439–451. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1976.tb00657.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Kaper J. B., Mills A. L., Colwell R. R. Evaluation of the accuracy and precision of enumerating aerobic heterotrophs in water samples by the spread plate method. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1978 Apr;35(4):756–761. doi: 10.1128/aem.35.4.756-761.1978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Lewis R. E., Jr, Cruse J. M., Hazelwood J. Halothane-induced suppression of cell-mediated immunity in normal and tumor-bearing C3Hf/He mice. Anesth Analg. 1980 Sep;59(9):666–671. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Paerl H. W. Detritus in lake tahoe: structural modification by attached microflora. Science. 1973 May 4;180(4085):496–498. doi: 10.1126/science.180.4085.496. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Palmer F. E., Methot R. D., Staley J. T. Patchiness in the distribution of planktonic heterotrophic bacteria in lakes. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1976 Jun;31(6):1003–1005. doi: 10.1128/aem.31.6.1003-1005.1976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Applied and Environmental Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES