Skip to main content
Applied and Environmental Microbiology logoLink to Applied and Environmental Microbiology
. 1981 Mar;41(3):657–663. doi: 10.1128/aem.41.3.657-663.1981

Coliform species recovered from untreated surface water and drinking water by the membrane filter, standard, and modified most-probable-number techniques.

T M Evans, M W LeChevallier, C E Waarvick, R J Seidler
PMCID: PMC243755  PMID: 7013706

Abstract

The species of total coliform bacteria isolated from drinking water and untreated surface water by the membrane filter (MF), the standard most-probable-number (S-MPN), and modified most-probable-number (M-MPN) techniques were compared. Each coliform detection technique selected for a different profile of coliform species from both types of water samples. The MF technique indicated that Citrobacter freundii was the most common coliform species in water samples. However, the fermentation tube techniques displayed selectivity towards the isolation of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella. The M-MPN technique selected for more C. freundii and Enterobacter spp. from untreated surface water samples and for more Enterobacter and Klebsiella spp. from drinking water samples than did the S-MPN technique. The lack of agreement between the number of coliforms detected in a water sample by the S-MPN, M-MPN, and MF techniques was a result of the selection for different coliform species by the various techniques.

Full text

PDF
657

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. CHAMBERS C. W. Relationship of coliform bacteria to gas production in media containing lactose. Public Health Rep. 1950 May 12;65(19):619–627. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Clark J. A., Pagel J. E. Pollution indicator bacteria associated with municipal raw and drinking water supplies. Can J Microbiol. 1977 Apr;23(4):465–470. doi: 10.1139/m77-068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Davis E. M., Keen S. R. Municipal wastewater bacteria capable of surviving chlorination. Health Lab Sci. 1974 Oct;11(4):268–274. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Dutkaand B. J., Tobin S. E. Study on the efficiency of four procedures for enumerating coliforms in water. Can J Microbiol. 1976 May;22(5):630–635. doi: 10.1139/m76-093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Evans T. M., Waarvick C. E., Seidler R. J., LeChevallier M. W. Failure of the most-probable-number technique to detect coliforms in drinking water and raw water supplies. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1981 Jan;41(1):130–138. doi: 10.1128/aem.41.1.130-138.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. KABLER P. Water examinations by membrane filter and most probable number procedures; report of a field study of the Standard Methods Committee for the Examination of Water and Sewage. Am J Public Health Nations Health. 1954 Mar;44(3):379–386. doi: 10.2105/ajph.44.3.379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Popoff M., Stoleru G. H. Position taxonomique de variants biochimiques de Citrobacter freundii. Ann Microbiol (Paris) 1980 Mar-Apr;131A(2):189–196. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. SHIPE E. L., Jr, CAMERON G. M. A comparison of the membrane filter with the most probable number method for coliform determinations from several waters. Appl Microbiol. 1954 Mar;2(2):85–88. doi: 10.1128/am.2.2.85-88.1954. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Starr M. P., Mandel M. DNA base composition and taxonomy of phyopathogenic and other enterobacteria. J Gen Microbiol. 1969 Apr;56(1):113–123. doi: 10.1099/00221287-56-1-113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Applied and Environmental Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES