Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Applied and Environmental Microbiology logoLink to Applied and Environmental Microbiology
. 1981 Aug;42(2):231–240. doi: 10.1128/aem.42.2.231-240.1981

Comparison of Extracellular Cellulase Activities of Clostridium thermocellum LQRI and Trichoderma reesei QM9414

Thomas K Ng 1,†, J G Zeikus 1
PMCID: PMC243996  PMID: 16345823

Abstract

The crude extracellular cellulase of Clostridium thermocellum LQRI (virgin strain) was very active and solubilized microcrystalline cellulose at one-half the rate observed for the extracellular cellulase of Trichoderma reesei QM9414 (mutant strain). C. thermocellum cellulase activity differed considerably from that of T. reesei as follows: higher endoglucanase/exoglucanase activity ratio; absence of extracellular cellobiase or β-xylosidase activity; long-chain oligosaccharides instead of short-chain oligosaccharides as initial (15-min) hydrolytic products on microcrystalline cellulose; mainly cellobiose or xylobiose as long-term (24-h) hydrolysis products of Avicel and MN300 or xylan; and high activity and stability at 60 to 70°C. Under optimized reaction conditions, the kinetic properties (Vmax, 0.4 μmol/min per mg of protein; energy of activation, 33 kJ; temperature coefficient, 1.8) of C. thermocellum cellulose-solubilizing activity were comparable to those reported for T. reesei, except that the dyed Avicel concentration at half-maximal velocity was twofold higher (182 μM). The cellulose-solubilizing activity of the two crude cellulases differed considerably in response to various enzyme inhibitors. Most notably, Ag2+ and Hg2+ effectively inhibited C. thermocellum but not T. reesei cellulase at <20 μM, whereas Ca2+, Mg2+, and Mn2+ inhibited T. reesei but not C. thermocellum cellulase at >10 mM. Both enzymes were inhibited by Cu2+ (>20 mM), Zn2+ (>1.0 mM), and ethylene glycol-bis(β-aminoethyl ether)- N,N-tetraacetic acid (>10 mM). T. reesei but not C. thermocellum cellulose-solubilizing activity was 20% inhibited by glucose (73 mM) and cellobiose (29 mM). Both cellulases preferentially cleaved the internal glycosidic bonds of cellooligosaccharides. The overall rates of cellooligosaccharide degradation were higher for T. reesei than for C. thermocellum cellulase, except that the rates of conversion of cellohexaose to cellotriose were equivalent.

Full text

PDF
231

Images in this article

237Image
on p.237

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Almin K. E., Eriksson K. E., Jansson C. Enzymic degradation of polymers. II. Viscometric determination of cellulase activity in absolute terms. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1967 Jul 11;139(2):248–253. doi: 10.1016/0005-2744(67)90029-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Berg B., Pettersson G. Location and formation of cellulases in Trichoderma viride. J Appl Bacteriol. 1977 Feb;42(1):65–75. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1977.tb00670.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Dekker R. F., Richards G. N. Hemicellulases: their occurrence, purification, properties, and mode of action. Adv Carbohydr Chem Biochem. 1976;32:277–352. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2318(08)60339-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Fusee M. C., Leatherwood J. M. Regulation of cellulase from Ruminococcus. Can J Microbiol. 1972 Mar;18(3):347–353. doi: 10.1139/m72-053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gong C. S., Ladisch M. R., Tsao G. T. Cellobiase from Trichoderma viride: purification, properties, kinetics, and mechanism. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1977 Jul;19(7):959–981. doi: 10.1002/bit.260190703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. LOWRY O. H., ROSEBROUGH N. J., FARR A. L., RANDALL R. J. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem. 1951 Nov;193(1):265–275. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Lamed R., Zeikus J. G. Ethanol production by thermophilic bacteria: relationship between fermentation product yields of and catabolic enzyme activities in Clostridium thermocellum and Thermoanaerobium brockii. J Bacteriol. 1980 Nov;144(2):569–578. doi: 10.1128/jb.144.2.569-578.1980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Maguire R. J. Kinetics of the hydrolysis of cellobiose and p-nitrophenyl-beta-D-glucoside by cellobiase of Trichoderma viride. Can J Biochem. 1977 Jan;55(1):19–26. doi: 10.1139/o77-003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Mandels M. Microbial sources of cellulase. Biotechnol Bioeng Symp. 1975;(5):81–105. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ng T. K., Ben-Bassat A., Zeikus J. G. Ethanol Production by Thermophilic Bacteria: Fermentation of Cellulosic Substrates by Cocultures of Clostridium thermocellum and Clostridium thermohydrosulfuricum. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1981 Jun;41(6):1337–1343. doi: 10.1128/aem.41.6.1337-1343.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Ng T. K., Weimer T. K., Zeikus J. G. Cellulolytic and physiological properties of Clostridium thermocellum. Arch Microbiol. 1977 Jul 26;114(1):1–7. doi: 10.1007/BF00429622. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Ng T. K., Zeikus J. G. A continuous spectrophotometric assay for the determination of cellulase solubilizing activity. Anal Biochem. 1980 Mar 15;103(1):42–50. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(80)90233-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Sternberg D., Vijayakumar P., Reese E. T. beta-Glucosidase: microbial production and effect on enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose. Can J Microbiol. 1977 Feb;23(2):139–147. doi: 10.1139/m77-020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Wood T. M. Properties and mode of action of cellulases. Biotechnol Bioeng Symp. 1975;(5):111–133. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Zeikus J. G. Chemical and fuel production by anaerobic bacteria. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1980;34:423–464. doi: 10.1146/annurev.mi.34.100180.002231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Applied and Environmental Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES