Skip to main content
Applied and Environmental Microbiology logoLink to Applied and Environmental Microbiology
. 1981 Sep;42(3):427–432. doi: 10.1128/aem.42.3.427-432.1981

Quantitative procedure for enumeration of bifidobacteria.

I G Resnick, M A Levin
PMCID: PMC244031  PMID: 7294780

Abstract

A membrane filter technique has been developed for the enumeration of bifidobacteria in natural aquatic environments. The technique is quantitative, selective, and differential. The medium (YN-6) contains: yeast extract, 2.0 g; agar, 1.5 g; polypeptone peptone, 1.0 g; vitamin-free Casamino Acids, 0.8 g; sodium chloride, 0.32 g; and L-cysteine hydrochloride, 0.003 g; in 100 ml of deionized water. The medium is adjusted to pH 7.0 before autoclaving. Nalidixic acid (80 micrograms/ml), neomycin sulfate (2.5 micrograms/ml), and bromcresol green (300 micrograms/ml) are included as selective and differential agents. After incubation for 48 h at 37 degrees C in an anaerobic environment, Gram-stained smears from green, glistening, smooth entire colonies are examined microscopically for typical bifidobacterial morphology. No significant difference in recoveries was observed when YN-6 was compared with reinforced clostridial agar, using bifidobacteria freshly isolated from feces and raw sewage. Using this technique with aquatic and fecal samples, less than 9% false-positive and 8% false-negative isolates were observed. These results indicated that the medium was able to satisfactorily recover organisms from a variety of situations.

Full text

PDF
427

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bullen C. L., Tearle P. V. Bifidobacteria in the intestinal tract of infants: an in-vitro study. J Med Microbiol. 1976 Aug;9(3):335–344. doi: 10.1099/00222615-9-3-335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Eisenhart C., Wilson P. W. STATISTICAL METHODS AND CONTROL IN BACTERIOLOGY. Bacteriol Rev. 1943 Jun;7(2):57–137. doi: 10.1128/br.7.2.57-137.1943. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Evison L. M., James A. A comparison of the distribution of intestinal bacteria in British and East African water sources. J Appl Bacteriol. 1973 Mar;36(1):109–118. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1973.tb04078.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. GLICK M. C., SALL T., ZILLIKEN F., MUDD S. Morphological changes of Lactobacillus bifidus var. pennsylvanicus produced by a cell-wall precursor. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1960 Jan 15;37:361–363. doi: 10.1016/0006-3002(60)90251-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. GYLLENBERG H., NIEMELA S., SORMUNEN T. Survival of bifid bacteria in water as compared with that of coliform bacteria and enterococci. Appl Microbiol. 1960 Jan;8:20–22. doi: 10.1128/am.8.1.20-22.1960. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. SCHRAMM M., KLYBAS V., RACKER E. Phosphorolytic cleavage of fructose-6-phosphate by fructose-6-phosphate phosphoketolase from Acetobacter xylinum. J Biol Chem. 1958 Dec;233(6):1283–1288. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. de Vries W., Gerbrandy S. J., Stouthamer A. H. Carbohydrate metabolism in Bifidobacterium bifidum. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1967 Apr 25;136(3):415–425. doi: 10.1016/0304-4165(67)90001-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Applied and Environmental Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES