Skip to main content
Applied and Environmental Microbiology logoLink to Applied and Environmental Microbiology
. 1981 Sep;42(3):484–492. doi: 10.1128/aem.42.3.484-492.1981

Sediment bacterial indicators in an urban shellfishing subestuary of the lower Chesapeake Bay.

C W Erkenbrecher Jr
PMCID: PMC244041  PMID: 7294785

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to document the spatial and temporal distributions and compositions of bacteria in the sediments and overlying waters of an important urban shellfishing area in the lower Chesapeake Bay region, the Lynnhaven Estuary. Marked fluctuations were observed in the date of many of the physicochemical parameters and the indicator bacteria. The higher-salinity water and coarser sediment of the inlet site showed lower overall bacterial densities than did the headwater sites, where freshwater runoff and decreased tidal action were characteristic. Densities of benthic indicator bacteria, when expressed on a volumetric basis, were significantly greater than counts in the overlying waters. These counts were indicative of a fecally polluted system and were well above the safe maximum limits for shellfish-growing waters. Significantly fewer total and fecal bacteria were observed in both the water and the sediment during the warm months of May, July, and August. The primary sources of the Lynnhaven's bacterial pollution appeared to be typical of urban and agricultural runoff, although failure of septic tank systems was suspected as a problem in the Lynnhaven's western branch. These results illustrated that sediments in shellfishing areas could serve as a reservoir for high densities of indicator bacteria and that, potentially, pathogens could pose a health hazard.

Full text

PDF
484

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Buck J. D. Occurrence of false-positive most probable number tests for fecal streptococci in marine waters. Appl Microbiol. 1969 Oct;18(4):562–565. doi: 10.1128/am.18.4.562-565.1969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Edmonds R. L. Survival of coliform bacteria in sewage sludge applied to a forest clearcut and potential movement into groundwater. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1976 Oct;32(4):537–546. doi: 10.1128/aem.32.4.537-546.1976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Faust M. A., Aotaky A. E., Hargadon M. T. Effect of physical parameters on the in situ survival of Escherichia coli MC-6 in an estuarine environment. Appl Microbiol. 1975 Nov;30(5):800–806. doi: 10.1128/am.30.5.800-806.1975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Geldreich E. E., Best L. C., Kenner B. A., Van Donsel D. J. The bacteriological aspects of stormwater pollution. J Water Pollut Control Fed. 1968 Nov;40(11):1861–1872. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Geldreich E. E., Kenner B. A. Concepts of fecal streptococci in stream pollution. J Water Pollut Control Fed. 1969 Aug;41(8 Suppl):R336+–R336+. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gerba C. P., McLeod J. S. Effect of sediments on the survival of Escherichia coli in marine waters. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1976 Jul;32(1):114–120. doi: 10.1128/aem.32.1.114-120.1976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Goyal S. M., Gerba C. P., Melnick J. L. Occurrence and distribution of bacterial indicators and pathogens in canal communities along the Texas coast. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1977 Aug;34(2):139–149. doi: 10.1128/aem.34.2.139-149.1977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Grimes D. J. Release of sediment-bound fecal coliforms by dredging. Appl Microbiol. 1975 Jan;29(1):109–111. doi: 10.1128/am.29.1.109-111.1975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hendricks C. W. Enteric bacterial metabolism of stream sediment eluates. Can J Microbiol. 1971 Apr;17(4):551–556. doi: 10.1139/m71-090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hussong D., Damaré J. M., Limpert R. J., Sladen W. J., Weiner R. M., Colwell R. R. Microbial impact of Canada geese (Branta canadensis) and whistling swans (Cygnus columbianus columbianus) on aquatic ecosystems. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1979 Jan;37(1):14–20. doi: 10.1128/aem.37.1.14-20.1979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. LaBelle R. L., Gerba C. P., Goyal S. M., Melnick J. L., Cech I., Bogdan G. F. Relationships between environmental factors, bacterial indicators, and the occurrence of enteric viruses in estuarine sediments. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1980 Mar;39(3):588–596. doi: 10.1128/aem.39.3.588-596.1980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Matson E. A., Hornor S. G., Buck J. D. Pollution indicators and other microorganisms in river sediment. J Water Pollut Control Fed. 1978 Jan;50(1):13–19. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. McFeters G. A., Stuart D. G. Survival of coliform bacteria in natural waters: field and laboratory studies with membrane-filter chambers. Appl Microbiol. 1972 Nov;24(5):805–811. doi: 10.1128/am.24.5.805-811.1972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Quigley M. M., Colwell R. R. Properties of bacteria isolated from deep-sea sediments. J Bacteriol. 1968 Jan;95(1):211–220. doi: 10.1128/jb.95.1.211-220.1968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Sayler G. S., Nelson J. D., Jr, Justice A., Colwell R. R. Distribution and significance of fecal indicator organisms in the Upper Chesapeake Bay. Appl Microbiol. 1975 Oct;30(4):625–638. doi: 10.1128/am.30.4.625-638.1975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Applied and Environmental Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES