Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Applied and Environmental Microbiology logoLink to Applied and Environmental Microbiology
. 1982 May;43(5):1173–1181. doi: 10.1128/aem.43.5.1173-1181.1982

Anaerobic bacterial populations on normal and diseased human biopsy tissue obtained at colonoscopy.

C E Edmiston Jr, G R Avant, F A Wilson
PMCID: PMC244202  PMID: 7103479

Abstract

Human epithelium was cultured to characterize differences in microbial populations between regions of normal colon and between polyps, inflammatory bowel disease, and cancer and their respective adjacent normal mucosa. Twenty-one patients (12 polyps, 5 inflammatory bowel disease, 4 cancer) underwent colonoscopy with anaerobic culture of mucosal biopsies from normal and diseased ascending, transverse, descending, and sigmoid colon. No differences for total number of organisms and recovery of species between ascending colon and other normal regions were seen except for sigmoid colon. Significant differences between polyps and adjacent normal tissue were seen for total number of organisms and recovery of genera and species. No significant differences in total number of organisms and recovery of genera were seen between cancer and inflammatory bowel disease and their respective adjacent normal tissue. The recovery of genera from polyps and normal tissue was Bacteroides greater than Fusobacterium greater than Clostridium greater than Eubacterium greater than Peptostreptococcus. These data suggest that (i) the total number of anaerobic organisms and species remained relatively constant, except for lower numbers in normal distal colon which were probably a result of the preparation for colonoscopy; (ii) polyp formation favored increased microbial colonization; and (iii) the increased number of organisms generally reflected those genera and species seen on adjacent normal mucosa.

Full text

PDF
1173

Images in this article

1178Image
on p.1178
1179Image
on p.1179

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Abrams G. D. Microbial effects on mucosal structure and function. Am J Clin Nutr. 1977 Nov;30(11):1880–1886. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/30.11.1880. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Donaldson R. M., Jr Small bowel bacterial overgrowth. Adv Intern Med. 1970;16:191–212. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Edmiston C. E., Jr, Hulsey T. K., Scott H. W., Jr, Hoyumpa A. M., Jr, Wilson F. A. Microbial colonization and hepatic abnormalities in jejunoileal bypass with resection, ileal mucous fistula, and ileocolostomy. J Infect Dis. 1979 Sep;140(3):358–369. doi: 10.1093/infdis/140.3.358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Goldman P. Therapeutic implications of the intestinal microflora. N Engl J Med. 1973 Sep 20;289(12):623–628. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197309202891209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gorbach S. L., Tabaqchali S. Bacteria, bile, and the small bowel. Gut. 1969 Dec;10(12):963–972. doi: 10.1136/gut.10.12.963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hartley C. L., Neumann C. S., Richmond M. H. Adhesion of commensal bacteria to the large intestine wall in humans. Infect Immun. 1979 Jan;23(1):128–132. doi: 10.1128/iai.23.1.128-132.1979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Jonas A., Flanagan P. R., Forstner G. G. Pathogenesis of mucosal injury in the blind loop syndrome. Brush border enzyme activity and glycoprotein degradation. J Clin Invest. 1977 Dec;60(6):1321–1330. doi: 10.1172/JCI108891. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Keighley M. R., Arabi Y., Dimock F., Burdon D. W., Allan R. N., Alexander-Williams J. Influence of inflammatory bowel disease on intestinal microflora. Gut. 1978 Dec;19(12):1099–1104. doi: 10.1136/gut.19.12.1099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kelley R. O., Dekker R. A., Bluemink J. G. Ligand-mediated osmium binding: its application in coating biological specimens for scanning electron microscopy. J Ultrastruct Res. 1973 Nov;45(3):254–258. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5320(73)80051-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. LaMont J. T., O'Gorman T. A. Experimental colon cancer. Gastroenterology. 1978 Dec;75(6):1157–1169. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Peach S., Lock M. R., Katz D., Todd I. P., Tabaqchali S. Mucosal-associated bacterial flora of the intestine in patients with Crohn's disease and in a control group. Gut. 1978 Nov;19(11):1034–1042. doi: 10.1136/gut.19.11.1034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Riepe S. P., Goldstein J., Alpers D. H. Effect of secreted Bacteroides proteases on human intestinal brush border hydrolases. J Clin Invest. 1980 Aug;66(2):314–322. doi: 10.1172/JCI109859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Roediger W. E. Role of anaerobic bacteria in the metabolic welfare of the colonic mucosa in man. Gut. 1980 Sep;21(9):793–798. doi: 10.1136/gut.21.9.793. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Savage D. C. Microbial ecology of the gastrointestinal tract. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1977;31:107–133. doi: 10.1146/annurev.mi.31.100177.000543. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Spurr A. R. A low-viscosity epoxy resin embedding medium for electron microscopy. J Ultrastruct Res. 1969 Jan;26(1):31–43. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5320(69)90033-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Vargo D., Moskovitz M., Floch M. H. Faecal bacterial flora in cancer of the colon. Gut. 1980 Aug;21(8):701–705. doi: 10.1136/gut.21.8.701. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Applied and Environmental Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES