Skip to main content
Carcinogenesis logoLink to Carcinogenesis
. 2008 Apr 15;29(6):1134–1138. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgn097

Glutathione S-transferase Pi mediates proliferation of androgen-independent prostate cancer cells

Naomi Hokaiwado 1,2, Fumitaka Takeshita 2, Aya Naiki-Ito 1, Makoto Asamoto 1,*, Takahiro Ochiya 2, Tomoyuki Shirai 1
PMCID: PMC2443274  PMID: 18413363

Abstract

Prostate cancers generally acquire an androgen-independent growth capacity with progression, resulting in resistance to antiandrogen therapy. Therefore, identification of the genes regulated through this process may be important for understanding the mechanisms of prostate carcinogenesis. We here utilized androgen-dependent/independent transplantable tumors, newly established with the ‘transgenic rat adenocarcinoma in prostate’ (TRAP) model, to analyze their gene expression using microarrays. Among the overexpressed genes in androgen-independent prostate cancers compared with the androgen-dependent tumors, glutathione S-transferase pi (GST-pi) was included. In line with this, human prostate cancer cell lines PC3 and DU145 (androgen independent) had higher expression of GST-pi compared with LNCaP (androgen dependent) as determined by semiquantitative reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction analysis. To investigate the roles of GST-pi expression in androgen-independent human prostate cancers, GST-pi was knocked down by a small interfering RNA (siRNA), resulting in significant decrease of the proliferation rate in the androgen-independent PC3 cell line. In vivo, administration of GST-pi siRNA–atelocollagen complex decreased GST-pi protein expression, resulting in enhanced numbers of TdT mediated dUTP-biotin nick-end labering (TUNEL)-positive apoptotic cells. These findings suggest that GST-pi might play important roles in proliferation of androgen-independent human prostate cancer cells.

Introduction

Prostate cancer is the most common cancer and the second most common cause of death in men in the western world. Tumor growth is initially androgen dependent (1). However, with progression, androgen-dependent prostate cancers may become androgen independent and resistant to hormone therapy (2). So far, there are no effective clinical treatments for androgen-independent prostate cancer.

RNA interference is a powerful tool for downregulation of target gene expression to investigate function (3). Recently, many studies have provided support for RNA interference use as a therapy for human diseases, including cancer (35). However, systems for clinical delivery are controversial. Atelocollagen complexed with small interfering RNA (siRNA) is reported to have resistance against nucleases and can be efficiently transduced into cells in vivo (68). With various routes of administration, siRNA–atelocollagen is effective for gene silencing and efficient inhibition of tumor growth (6). Thus, the knock down of any key gene that can regulate androgen independence might provide a tool for the treatment of patients with advanced prostate cancers.

The transgenic rat adenocarcinoma in prostate (TRAP) features introduction of the SV40 T antigen gene under probasin control, and androgen-dependent prostate adenocarcinomas develop in 100% of animals by 15 weeks of age, these being transplantable into the subcutaneous back areas of nude mice (9). In the present study, we finally established androgen-independent transplantable tumors by castration of these mice. To identify genes mediating androgen dependence, we compared gene expression between androgen-independent and -dependent transplantable tumors derived from a TRAP rat prostate cancer, employing microarray analysis. Expression of selected genes upregulated in the androgen-independent nude mice tumors was compared with the expression of human orthologs in prostate cancer cell lines LNCaP (androgen sensitive), DU145 and PC3 (androgen independent) to assess whether data from rodent models can be extrapolated to human cases. Furthermore using the bioluminescent PC3M-luc-C6 (PC3ML) originating from PC3 and siRNA–atelocollagen, effects of downregulation of the overexpressed genes were examined.

In this study, glutathione S-transferase pi (GST-pi) was investigated as a gene, which is overexpressed in androgen-independent prostate cancers of both human and rodent models.

Materials and methods

Establishment of an androgen-independent transplantable prostate tumor

Establishment of transplanted tumors.

A large prostate tumor developing in a lateral lobe of a 55-week-old TRAP rat was minced in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (Invitrogen Corp., Carlsbad, CA), and tissue fragments of ∼8 mm3 were surgically transplanted to the back subcutaneous area of 5-week-old male nude mice (Nippon SLC, Hamamatsu, Japan). Ten weeks after the implantation, tumors were grafted to new mice.

Establishment of an androgen-independent strain.

We obtained 10 mice that carried 13th generation transplantable tumors derived from the prostate carcinoma. Five of them were subjected for surgical castration. The tumors in the castrated group did not grow for several weeks, but started to increase in size at 12 weeks after castration. These tumors were repeatedly grafted to new castrated male mice every 10 weeks.

At euthanasia, tumors were excised and cut into slices of 2–3 mm thickness, then fixed in buffered formalin and routinely processed for embedding in paraffin for histological evaluation with hematoxylin and eosin staining. For immunohistochemical analysis, 3 μm thick sections were cut and incubated with the first antibody, and binding was visualized with a Vectastain Elite ABC kit (Vector Laboratory, Burlingame, CA) and light hematoxylin counterstaining. An SV40 large T antigen antibody (PharMingen, San Diego, CA) and an androgen receptor (AR) antibody (Signal Laboratory, Dedham, MA) were used for confirmation of the transgenic origin.

Total RNA extraction and quantitative reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction

Total RNA was extracted using Isogen (Nippon Gene, Tokyo, Japan) and treated with DNaseI (Promega, Madison, WI). One microgram samples were converted to complementary DNA with avian myoblastosis virus reverse transcriptase and oligo dT primers (TaKaRa, Otsu, Japan) in 20 μl of reaction mixture and 2 μl aliquots were subjected to quantitative polymerase chain reaction in 20 μl reactions using CYBR Premix Ex Taq™ (TaKaRa) and a Light Cycler apparatus (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany). The fluorescence intensity of double-strand-specific SYBR Green I, reflecting the amount of formed polymerase chain reaction product, was monitored at the end of each elongation step and cyclophilin messenger RNA (mRNA) levels were employed to normalize for the 5′ sample complementary DNA content. Primer sequences for rat Gstp2 were 5′-GCTCTTTAGGGCTTTATGGG-3′ and 5′-CTGTTTACCATTGCCGTTGA-3′ and for human GST-pi were 5′-TGAATGACGGCGTGGAG-3′ and 5′-CCCTCACTGTTTCCCGTTGC-3′.

Atelocollagen and cell lines

Atelocollagen was supplied by Koken (Tokyo, Japan). Details were described in a previous paper (6). Human prostate carcinoma cell lines (PC3, LNCaP and DU145) were cultured in RPMI1640 (Invitrogen Crop. and Gibco, Carlsbad, CA) with 10% fetal bovine serum. The bioluminescent human prostate carcinoma cell line PC3M-luc-C6 (Xenogen, Alameda, CA) was cultured in Eagle’s minimum essential medium (Invitrogen Corp.) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (Equitech-Bio, Kerrville, TX), non-essential amino acids (Sigma–Aldrich, St.Loius, MO), L-glutamine (ICN, AlisoViejo, CA), 1 mM sodium pyruvate (Sigma–Aldrich), minimum essential medium vitamin solution (Sigma–Aldrich) and 200 μg/ml zeocin (Invitrogen Corp.). The cells were maintained in vitro at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2.

siRNA preparation

Human GST-pi siRNA (Silencer predesigned siRNA, 2292) was purchased from Ambion (Austin, TX). Silencer negative control #2 siRNA (Ambion) with no significant homology to any known human genes was used as a negative control siRNA. The ability of siRNA to silence GST-pi mRNA expression revel was checked on the second day after transfection.

siRNA transfection and cell growth assay in vitro.

PC3ML cells were plated at 5 × 104 cells per 6 cm well. One day after plating, cells were transfected with 100 nM siRNA using DharmaFECT (Darmacon and GE Healthcare, Buckinghamshire, England) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. For monitoring inhibition of growth, cells were lysed (n = 3) on days 2, 4 and 6 and then analyzed for luciferase activity (Bright-Glo Luciferase Assay System, Promega). Data were normalized using results for vehicle-treated cells.

In vivo siRNA transfection and imaging of tumors.

Nude mice-transplanted PC3ML were administered with D-luciferin (150 mg/kg) (Promega) by intraperitoneal injection. Twenty minutes thereafter, photons from animal whole bodies were counted using IVIS (Xenogen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Details were described in the previous paper (7).

Western blotting

Frozen samples were lysed in LIPA buffer and 20 ml extracts were resolved 12% polyacrylamide gels and transferred to Hybond ECL (GE Healthcare). The following antibodies were used for immunodetection: anti-GST-P (MBL, Nagoya, Japan) and anti-beta actin (Sigma, St Louis, MI).

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed with the chi-square test and Student’s t-test using the StatView-J 5.0 program (Berkeley, CA).

Results

Establishment of an androgen-independent transplantable prostate tumor

A model-transplantable prostate adenocarcinoma line derived from a TRAP rat was established with the methods described in Materials and Methods. The tumors proved able to grow in castrated nude mice, expressed SV40 large T antigen showing the TRAP rat origin and were androgen independent with AR localization in the cytoplasm (Figure 1).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Representative histological appearance of transplanted prostate cancers in nude mice in the androgen-dependent group (A, C, E) and the androgen-independent group (B, D, F). SV40 large T antigen (SV40Tag) was stained to confirm origin from the TRAP rat prostate tumor (A, B). Hematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining was performed to assess the degree of differentiation (C, D). Castration effects were confirmed by the localization of AR. Non-castrated mice showed nuclear staining of the AR (E), whereas castrated mice showed faint cytoplasmic staining (F), indicating inactive receptor function.

Gstp2 expression in nude mice-transplanted prostate cancers

When mRNA expression data for androgen-independent and androgen-dependent transplantable prostate carcinomas newly established, were simply compared, Gstp2 was found to be 17.9 times overexpressed in the androgen-independent nude mice tumors by microarray analysis using a CodeLink rat whole-genome bioarray in which Gstp1 was not included. The result was confirmed by quantitative reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction using RNAs extracted from five independent tumors of each type. Expression of Gstp2 mRNA in the androgen-independent group was elevated >17-fold (P < 0.0008) compared with the androgen-dependent group.

GST-pi expression in human prostate cancer cell lines

We also investigated the expression of human GST-pi, which is a homolog of rat Gstp2 expressed in three human prostate cancer cell lines (LNCaP, PC3 and DU145) and found higher expression in the PC3 and PC3ML cell lines (Figure 2A).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

The androgen-dependent human prostate cell LNCaP does not express GST-pi, in contrast to androgen-independent DU145, and especially PC3 and PC3ML with high expression of GST-pi (A). Drastic growth inhibition was detected in the siGST-pi-treated PC3ML with reference to luciferase activity statistically significant (*P < 0.05) (B) and microscopic appearance with many proliferating cells in PC3ML treated with atelocollagen alone (Ca), whereas dead cells in PC3ML treated with siGST-pi–atelocollagen (Cb), indicating proliferating activities of GST-pi.

GST-pi expression and proliferation of PC3ML cells

In vitro.

To silence GST-pi expression, human GST-pi siRNA was applied into PC3ML cells and as a control, negative control siRNA. As a result, drastic inhibition of proliferation activity was observed only in the GST-pi siRNA case by the imaging anaysis (Figure 2B). This result was confirmed by histological observations. PC3ML showed proliferating many cells becoming full confluence on the dish (Figure 2Ca), but GST-pi siRNA-treated PC3ML cells did not grow at all, showing small number of living cells (Figure 2Cb).

In vivo.

To examine the effect of silencing of GST-pi in vivo, PC3ML cells were implanted subcutaneously into the backs of nude mice. Eight mice for each group were administered with GST-pi siRNA–atelocollagen complex or atelocollagen alone. Luciferase signaling levels were slightly decreased, although the result was not statistically significant in the GST-pi siRNA-treated group at day 21 as compared with the control group (Figure 3A and B). Final weights of tumors did not show significant differences (P = 0.72, Figure 3C). We then examined the expression levels of GST-pi in the tumors by western blotting (Figure 3D). Administration of GST-pi siRNA–atelocollagen complex increased apoptosis appearance of TUNEL-positive cells compared with atelocollagen alone from 1.271 ± 0.190 to 3.486 ± 0.450% (mean ± SD) (Figure 3Ea and Eb).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

In vivo effects of GST-pi siRNA–atelocollagen complex detected with reference to luciferase signaling (A and B) and tumor weight (C) in PC3ML cells transplanted in nude mice. Inhibitory effects on tumor growth were minimal. However, GST-pi siRNA–atelocollagen complex inhibition of GST-pi expression was confirmed in western blots (D). Representative immunohistological staining for TUNEL in the transplanted nude tumors revealed more apoptotic cells in the GST-pi–atelocollagen-treated prostate cancer tissue (Eb) than after atelocollagen alone (Ea). In the GST-pi immunostaining, apparent, many GST-pi-positive cells were recognized in the control tumor tissue (Ec), whereas few GST-pi-positive cells in the siGST-pi–atelocollagen-treated tissue (Ed).

GST-pi staining was apparently observed in the control tumor tissue (Figure 3Ec) in contrast to the siRNA-treated group with negative staining, confirming the effect of GST-pi siRNA–atelocollagen complex effect.

Discussion

In this study, we found that GST-pi might participate in proliferation of the androgen-independent human prostate cancer cell line, PC3. We also showed transplantable tumors (10) in nude mice derived from the TRAP rats to express Gstp2. Mammalian GSTs active in drug metabolism are now classified into the alpha, mu and pi classes (11). Pi-class GSTs have received particular interest in relation to carcinogenesis (1217). Gstp is well known to be markedly increased in the early stages of rat liver carcinogenesis (18,19). Expression levels of GST-pi have also been found to be elevated in many human tumors (14,16,20,21).

The transplantable tumors in nude mice derived from the TRAP cancer were poorly differentiated adenocarcinomas expressing SV40 large T antigen. They also expressed AR in their nuclei, but once androgen levels were depressed by castration, the localization of AR was changed to the cytoplasm, indicating a lack of function in androgen-independent strains (see Figure 1). The mechanisms were not clear and we tried to find key factors by comparing mRNA expression of androgen-independent and -dependent transplantable tumors. GST-pi was found to be the most significantly overexpressed gene in androgen-independent prostate cancers. There are many reports of relations between GST-pi and prostate cancer (14,15,17,2130) and loss of expression by methylation of their promoter sequences being found as an early event in human prostate carcinogenesis (17,20,3136). Using the mouse model of knockout Gstp1/Gstp2, Ritchie et al. (37) have shown associated enhancement of lung carcinogenesis by chemical carcinogens. In skin tumorigenesis, similar effects in the Gstp knockdown mice were reported by Hendersin et al. (38).

These results in lung carcinogenesis of mice appear opposite to our finding of growth suppression with decreased Gstp expression. In contrast, GST-pi was reported to promote tumorigenesis of human colon cancer cells (16) similar to the present contribution of GST-pi to proliferation of androgen-independent prostate cancer cells. This contradiction may be due to multiple functions of GST-pi or differences in knockdown methods between mice and rat or human models.

Here, we demonstrated that androgen-independent human prostate cancer cell lines, DU145 and PC3, expressed GST-pi and silencing caused significant growth inhibition of PC3ML cells in vitro, but not in vivo. The reason may be due to altered cell expression of GST-pi in vivo even in the atelocollagen-alone group and low efficiency of the treatment (59.5% GST-pi-positive cells in the atelocollagen-alone group to 49% in the GST-pi siRNA group).

In our results, the suppression due to siGST-pi resulted in statistically significant apoptosis in the treated cells (P = 0.0005 by Student’s t-test) (Figure 3a and b). Inhibition effects on apoptosis by GST-pi in human prostate cell lines were already reported by Lu et al., suggesting an involvement of JNK and p38 activity (39). Arriazu et al. (40) reported that expression of Gstp could be a response to oxidative stress during carcinogenesis in the rat prostate. The findings overall suggest that GST-pi might contribute to growth of androgen-independent human and rat prostate carcinomas. The clinical relevance of GST-pi overexpression in prostate carcinogenesis and acquirement of androgen independence should now be clarified in vivo.

In summary, we identified Gstp2 in the nude mice model and GST-pi in human prostate cancer cell line PC3 as responsible genes for androgen-independent growth of prostate cancers. To identify more precise mechanisms of androgen-independent growth converting mechanism from androgen dependency, newly established nude mice models of androgen dependent and independent with human prostate cancer cell lines may be useful.

Funding

Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports Science and Technology, Japan (17590356); Society for Promotion of Pathology of Nagoya, Japan.

Acknowledgments

Conflict of Interest Statement: None declared.

Glossary

Abbreviations

AR

androgen receptor

GST-pi

glutathione S-transferase pi

mRNA

messenger RNA

PC3ML

PC3M-luc-C6

siRNA

small interfering RNA

TRAP

transgenic rat adenocarcinoma in prostate

References

  • 1.Miyamoto H, et al. Androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer: current status and future prospects. Prostate. 2004;61:332–353. doi: 10.1002/pros.20115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Feldman BJ, et al. The development of androgen-independent prostate cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2001;1:34–45. doi: 10.1038/35094009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Xia H, et al. siRNA-mediated gene silencing in vitro and in vivo. Nat. Biotechnol. 2002;20:1006–1010. doi: 10.1038/nbt739. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Duxbury MS, et al. RNA interference targeting focal adhesion kinase enhances pancreatic adenocarcinoma gemcitabine chemosensitivity. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2003;311:786–792. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2003.10.060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Filleur S, et al. SiRNA-mediated inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor severely limits tumor resistance to antiangiogenic thrombospondin-1 and slows tumor vascularization and growth. Cancer Res. 2003;63:3919–3922. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Takeshita F, et al. Efficient delivery of small interfering RNA to bone-metastatic tumors by using atelocollagen in vivo. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2005;102:12177–12182. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0501753102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Takeshita F, et al. Therapeutic potential of RNA interference against cancer. Cancer Sci. 2006;97:689–696. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2006.00234.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ochiya T, et al. New delivery system for plasmid DNA in vivo using atelocollagen as a carrier material: the Minipellet. Nat. Med. 1999;5:707–710. doi: 10.1038/9560. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Asamoto M, et al. Prostate carcinomas developing in transgenic rats with SV40 T antigen expression under probasin promoter control are strictly androgen dependent. Cancer Res. 2001;61:4693–4700. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Asamoto M, et al. Effects of genetic background on prostate and taste bud carcinogenesis due to SV40 T antigen expression under probasin gene promoter control. Carcinogenesis. 2002;23:463–467. doi: 10.1093/carcin/23.3.463. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Bostwick DG, et al. Glutathione S-transferase: differential expression of alpha, mu, and pi isoenzymes in benign prostate, prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, and prostatic adenocarcinoma. Hum. Pathol. 2007;38:1394–1401. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2007.02.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Nakazato H, et al. Association of genetic polymorphisms of glutathione-S-transferase genes (GSTM1, GSTT1 and GSTP1) with familial prostate cancer risk in a Japanese population. Anticancer Res. 2003;23:2897–2902. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ntais C, et al. Association of GSTM1, GSTT1, and GSTP1 gene polymorphisms with the risk of prostate cancer: a meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 2005;14:176–181. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Su F, et al. Glutathione S transferase pi indicates chemotherapy resistance in breast cancer. J. Surg. Res. 2003;113:102–108. doi: 10.1016/s0022-4804(03)00200-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Luscombe CJ, et al. Glutathione S-transferase GSTP1 genotypes are associated with response to androgen ablation therapy in advanced prostate cancer. Cancer Detect. Prev. 2002;26:376–380. doi: 10.1016/s0361-090x(02)00089-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Dang DT, et al. Glutathione S-transferase pi1 promotes tumorigenicity in HCT116 human colon cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2005;65:9485–9494. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-1930. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Harden SV, et al. Quantitative GSTP1 methylation and the detection of prostate adenocarcinoma in sextant biopsies. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 2003;95:1634–1637. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djg082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Asamoto M, et al. Inhibition of rat hepatic glutathione S-transferase placental form positive foci development by concomitant administration of antioxidants to carcinogen-treated rats. Cancer Lett. 1990;55:25–29. doi: 10.1016/0304-3835(90)90061-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ito N, et al. A new medium-term bioassay system for detection of environmental carcinogens using diethylnitrosamine-initiated rat liver followed by D-galactosamine treatment and partial hepatectomy. Jpn. J. Cancer Res. 1988;79:573–575. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.1988.tb00023.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Gonzalgo ML, et al. Prostate cancer detection by GSTP1 methylation analysis of postbiopsy urine specimens. Clin. Cancer Res. 2003;9:2673–2677. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Crocitto LE, et al. Prostate cancer molecular markers GSTP1 and hTERT in expressed prostatic secretions as predictors of biopsy results. Urology. 2004;64:821–825. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.05.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Lee WH, et al. Cytidine methylation of regulatory sequences near the pi-class glutathione S-transferase gene accompanies human prostatic carcinogenesis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1994;91:11733–11737. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.24.11733. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Lee WH, et al. CG island methylation changes near the GSTP1 gene in prostatic carcinoma cells detected using the polymerase chain reaction: a new prostate cancer biomarker. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 1997;6:443–450. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Millar DS, et al. Detailed methylation analysis of the glutathione S-transferase pi (GSTP1) gene in prostate cancer. Oncogene. 1999;18:1313–1324. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1202415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Cairns P, et al. Molecular detection of prostate cancer in urine by GSTP1 hypermethylation. Clin. Cancer Res. 2001;7:2727–2730. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Gsur A, et al. Polymorphisms of glutathione-S-transferase genes (GSTP1, GSTM1 and GSTT1) and prostate-cancer risk. Int. J. Cancer. 2001;95:152–155. doi: 10.1002/1097-0215(20010520)95:3<152::aid-ijc1026>3.0.co;2-s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Lin X, et al. Reversal of GSTP1 CpG island hypermethylation and reactivation of pi-class glutathione S-transferase (GSTP1) expression in human prostate cancer cells by treatment with procainamide. Cancer Res. 2001;61:8611–8616. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Lin X, et al. GSTP1 CpG island hypermethylation is responsible for the absence of GSTP1 expression in human prostate cancer cells. Am. J. Pathol. 2001;159:1815–1826. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)63028-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Singal R, et al. Cytosine methylation represses glutathione S-transferase P1 (GSTP1) gene expression in human prostate cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2001;61:4820–4826. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Beer TM, et al. Polymorphisms of GSTP1 and related genes and prostate cancer risk. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2002;5:22–27. doi: 10.1038/sj.pcan.4500549. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Zhou M, et al. Quantitative GSTP1 methylation levels correlate with Gleason grade and tumor volume in prostate needle biopsies. J. Urol. 2004;171:2195–2198. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000127728.71350.36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Woodson K, et al. Hypermethylation of GSTP1, CD44, and E-cadherin genes in prostate cancer among US Blacks and Whites. Prostate. 2003;55:199–205. doi: 10.1002/pros.10236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Chuang CK, et al. Hypermethylation of the CpG islands in the promoter region flanking GSTP1 gene is a potential plasma DNA biomarker for detecting prostate carcinoma. Cancer Detect. Prev. 2007;31:59–63. doi: 10.1016/j.cdp.2006.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Konishi N, et al. DNA hypermethylation status of multiple genes in prostate adenocarcinomas. Jpn. J. Cancer Res. 2002;93:767–773. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2002.tb01318.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Hopkins TG, et al. DNA methylation of GSTP1 as biomarker in diagnosis of prostate cancer. Urology. 2007;69:11–16. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2006.10.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Suh CI, et al. Comparison of telomerase activity and GSTP1 promoter methylation in ejaculate as potential screening tests for prostate cancer. Mol. Cell. Probes. 2000;14:211–217. doi: 10.1006/mcpr.2000.0307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Ritchie KJ, et al. Glutathione transferase pi plays a critical role in the development of lung carcinogenesis following exposure to tobacco-related carcinogens and urethane. Cancer Res. 2007;67:9248–9257. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-1764. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Hendersin CJ, et al. Increased skin tumorigenesis in mice lacking pi class glutathione S-transferases. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1998;95:5275–5280. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.9.5275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Lu M, et al. Dual effects of glutathione-S-transferase pi on As2o3 action in prostate cancer cells: enhancement of growth inhibition and inhibition of apoptosis. Oncogene. 2004;23:3945–3952. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1207500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Arriazu R, et al. Quantitative and immunohistochemical evaluation of PCNA, androgen receptors, apoptosis, and Glutathione-S-Transferase P1 on preneoplastic changes induced by cadmium and zinc chloride in the rat ventral prostate. Prostate. 2005;63:347–357. doi: 10.1002/pros.20192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Carcinogenesis are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES