Skip to main content
Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B logoLink to Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B
. 2008 Jul;9(7):520–526. doi: 10.1631/jzus.B0710618

Induction of nucleoside phosphorylase in Enterobacter aerogenes and enzymatic synthesis of adenine arabinoside*

Xiao-kun Wei 1,3,, Qing-bao Ding 2,†,, Lu Zhang 3, Yong-li Guo 2, Lin Ou 2, Chang-lu Wang 1
PMCID: PMC2443347  PMID: 18600781

Abstract

Nucleoside phosphorylases (NPases) were found to be induced in Enterobacter aerogenes DGO-04, and cytidine and cytidine 5′-monophosphate (CMP) were the best inducers. Five mmol/L to fifteen mmol/L cytidine or CMP could distinctly increase the activities of purine nucleoside phosphorylase (PNPase), uridine phosphorylase (UPase) and thymidine phosphorylase (TPase) when they were added into medium from 0 to 8 h. In the process of enzymatic synthesis of adenine arabinoside from adenine and uracil arabinoside with wet cells of Enterobacter aerogenes DGO-04 induced by cytidine or CMP, the reaction time could be shortened from 36 to 6 h. After enzymatic reaction the activity of NPase in the cells induced remained higher than that in the cells uninduced.

Keywords: Nucleoside phosphorylase (NPase), Enterobacter aerogenes, Cytidine, Cytidine 5′-monophosphate (CMP), Adenine arabinoside

INTRODUCTION

Nucleoside phosphorylases (NPases) are widely distributed in mammalian cells and bacteria and play a central role in the nucleoside metabolism salvage pathway. Their transcriptional regulations, protein structures and catalytic mechanisms have been extensively studied (Bzowska et al., 2000; Zolotukhina et al., 2003; Caradoc-Davies et al., 2004). NPases can be divided into three main types on the basis of substrate specificity: purine nucleoside phosphorylase (PNPase), uridine phosphorylase (UPase) and thymidine phosphorylase (TPase). Each type catalyzes the reversible phosphorolysis of ribo- or deoxyribonucleosides to yield the corresponding free bases and a pentose-1-phosphate.

The reversible phosphorolysis reaction catalyzed by NPases has been exploited to synthesize nucleosides and their derivates, with either purified NPases or whole bacterial cells or immobilized cells as catalyst (Trelles et al., 2004; Jarkko et al., 2007). Although nucleosides can be synthesized chemically, enzymatic synthesis is advantageous because it does not require the use of protecting groups or separation of isomers.

PNPase and TPase are encoded by the deo D and the deo A genes, respectively. In Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium, deo D and deo A are part of the deo operon, which consists of deo A (TPase; EC 2.4.2.1), deo B (phosphopentomutase; EC 2.7.5.6), deo C (deoxyriboaldolase; EC 4.1.2.28) and deo D (PNPase; EC 2.4.2.1) (Robertson et al., 1970; Hammer-Jespersen et al., 1971; Ling et al., 1994). Transcription of the deo operon is controlled by two regulator proteins, DeoR and CytR, which are encoded by inducible genes responsive to the deoxyribonucleoside metabolite, deoxyribose-5-phosphate. The pathway leading to deoxyribose-5-phosphate generation involves cleavage of deoxyribonucleosides by the corresponding phosphorylase to give a free base and deoxyribose-1-phosphate that is then converted to deoxyribose-5-phosphate by phosphopentomutase. Deoxyribose-5-phosphate induces all four genes in the deo operon, whereas purine nucleosides induce only deo B and deo D, indicating that the deo operon may be regulated by two different mechanisms. The udp gene encoding UPase constitutes a type of CytR regulon; the cAMP-CRP (cAMP receptor protein) complex, which acts as a co-repressor for the CytR protein, transcriptionally activates the udp gene. In E. coli, UPase is induced by cytidine but not by uridine (Thomsen et al., 1999; Esipov et al., 2002; Zolotukhina et al., 2003). In contrast, both uridine and cytidine induce UPase in S. typhimurium. The difference between UPase regulation in E. coli and in S. typhimurium reflects organism-specific differences in CytR: E. coli CytR interacts only with cytidine but S. typhimurium CytR responds to both uridine and cytidine (Thomsen et al., 1999). In Klebsiella sp., UPase is induced by both adenosine and uridine (Ling et al., 1994).

Adenine arabinoside (Ara-A) has significant activity against almost all DNA viruses and some RNA viruses, both in vitro and in vivo, and has been used clinically to treat viral infections including herpes simplex, herpes zoster and hepatitis. The enzymatic synthesis of Ara-A has been extensively studied (Krenitsky et al., 1979; Utagawa et al., 1985; Ling et al., 1990; Giuseppina et al., 2000), and showed capability of producing high substrate conversion rates and a high yield of final product. However, the enzymatic approach used to produce Ara-A is slower compared to the rate of natural nucleosides production. In this paper, we used induction of NPases by nucleosides and nucleotides to improve enzyme activities, thereby increasing the speed and efficiency of Ara-A synthesis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Materials

Uracil arabinoside (Ara-U) and other nucleosides and nucleotides were generously provided by Nantong Qiuzhiyou Bioscience and Biotechnology Co., Ltd., China. Xanthine oxidase was purchased from Sigma, USA. Tryptone and yeast extract were purchased from Oxoid, UK. Other chemicals were of analytical grade. The Enterobacter aerogenes strain DGO-04 from our laboratory was used throughout.

Medium 1 (per 1 L): 1.32 g K2HPO4·3H2O, 5 g (NH4)2SO4, 0.1 g MnSO4·H2O, 0.8 g MgSO4, 0.01 g ZnSO4, 0.01 g CuSO4·5H2O, 0.01 g CaCl2, 0.001 g FeSO4·7H2O and 2 g yeast extract. The pH was adjusted to 7.0 with 4 mol/L NaOH. Medium 2 (per 1 L): 10 g meat extract, 10 g tryptone, 5 g yeast extract and 5 g NaCl. The pH was adjusted to 7.0 with 4 mol/L NaOH.

Bacteria culture and induction of NPases

The first seed was prepared by inoculating a 250 ml flask containing 25 ml Medium 2 with E. aerogenes DGO-04 obtained from a slant culture, and incubating at 36 °C with reciprocal shaking for 15 h. A 1 ml aliquot of the first seed was used at the same day to inoculate a 250 ml flask containing 25 ml Medium 1 or Medium 2, with or without inducers. The cells were then incubated at 36 °C for 16 h with reciprocal shaking.

Preparation of wet cell paste

The cells were collected by centrifugation for 20 min at 4000 r/min. The precipitated cell paste was washed twice with 100 mmol/L potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0), stored at 4 °C and used as the source of enzymes in subsequent assays.

Enzyme assays

UPase was assayed according to the method described by Saunders et al.(1969). Briefly, an assay solution containing 0.5% (w/v) wet cell paste, 10 mmol/L uridine and 100 mmol/L potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) in a total volume of 2 ml was incubated at 60 °C for 20 min. The reaction was terminated by adding 1 mol/L ice-cold NaOH (2 ml). The reaction mixture was centrifuged and the supernatant was diluted 50-fold with NaOH (pH 12).

TPase assay was the same as that for UPase, except that 10 mmol/L uridine was replaced by 10 mmol/L thymidine, wet cells paste 0.5% (w/v) by 3% (w/v), and incubation time 20 min by 10 min.

PNPase assay following the method of Herman (1947) were the same as that for UPase, except that 10 mmol/L uridine was replaced by 10 mmol/L inosine and the total incubation time was 10 min. The reaction mixture was centrifuged and the supernatant was diluted 50-fold with 100 mmol/L potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.5). Xanthine oxidase was added to the diluted supernatant as described by Kalckar and Klenow (1948) and incubated for 1 h at room temperature.

All enzyme activities were determined spectrophotometrically by measuring absorption at 290 nm relative to a blank. The blank solution was the same as the assay solution except that cells were added after the addition of NaOH. The specific activities of enzymes were expressed as the change in the absorption of reaction mixture at 290 nm per concentration of wet cell paste.

The specific activity of wet cell paste towards Ara-U was measured as for UPase, except that the reaction mixture contained 10 mmol/L Ara-U instead of uridine, and the incubation time was 1 h.

Synthesis of Ara-A

The reaction mixture, containing 30 mmol/L Ara-U, 10 mmol/L adenine and 25 mmol/L potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) in a total volume of 10 ml was incubated at 60 °C. Ara-A was analyzed by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with ultraviolet (UV) detection at 258 nm using a Hypersil ODS2 5 µm column (4.6 mm×250 mm) with a solvent of 5% (v/v) acetonitrile and 95% (v/v) water and a flow rate of 0.70 ml/min.

RESULTS

Induction of NPases in E. aerogenes

Both Mediums 1 and 2 were used to test the induction of NPases in E. aerogenes by uridine, thymidine and inosine. In Medium 1, all nucleosides induced UPase, TPase and PNPase, with each nucleoside having the greatest effect on its respective NPase (Table 1). These results demonstrate that nucleosides induce increased production of NPases generally, as well as selectively, in Medium 1.

Table 1.

Induction of NPases by nucleosides in Medium 1

Induction Relative specific activity*
UPase TPase PNPase
1.000 1.000 1.000
Inosine 1.325 2.000 5.590
Uridine 2.143 2.316 2.487
Thymidine 1.351 4.350 3.487
*

Relative specific activity is expressed as the induced specific activity normalized to that obtained in the absence of induction;

The uninduced specific activities of UPase, TPase and PNPase in Medium 1 were 15.4, 2.0 and 7.8 U/mg wet cells, respectively

The induction experiments performed in Medium 2 yielded somewhat different results summarized in Table 2. Uridine, cytidine, CMP (cytidine 5′-monophosphate) and UMP (uridine 5′-monophosphate) substantially induced UPase. Adenosine, AMP (adenosine 5′-monophosphate) and dCMP (deoxycytidine 5′-monophosphate) also acted as inducers, but inosine added to Medium 2 did not induce UPase. In addition, adenine and hypoxanthine slightly induced UPase, which has not been previously reported. All nucleosides and nucleotides were tested to induce TPase; cytidine, thymidine, deoxynucleosides monophosphate and CMP were especially robust inducers of TPase activity. Almost all nucleosides and nucleotides were tested to induce PNPase. One exception was inosine, which had no effect in Medium 2, but greatly enhanced the activity of PNPase in Medium 1 (Table 1). The ability of nucleotides to act as inducers reflects their conversion to the corresponding nucleosides by the action of 5′-nucleotidases. Of the five bases that were tested in Medium 2 and shown to induce PNPase, only adenine, which was extremely effective in our assays, has been previously reported to induce PNPase (Ling et al., 1994).

Table 2.

Induction of NPases by nucleosides in Medium 2

Induction Relative specific activity*
UPase TPase PNPase
1.000 1.000 1.000
Inosine 0.725 2.031 0.919
Adenosine 1.308 2.000 1.694
Cytidine 2.275 4.750 1.774
Uridine 2.058 2.531 1.210
Thymidine 1.033 4.656 1.565
CMP 1.985 4.250 1.630
UMP 1.598 3.156 1.335
GMP 0.977 1.969 1.627
AMP 1.311 2.250 1.757
dCMP 1.364 4.188 1.405
dTMP 0.932 4.750 1.371
dGMP 0.864 3.469 1.390
dAMP 1.053 4.406 1.399
Cytosine 1.041 0.757 1.250
Uracil 1.033 1.000 1.264
Thymine 1.089 0.865 1.389
Adenine 1.396 0.892 2.403
Hypoxanthine 1.268 1.432 1.472
Ribose 0.730 1.324 0.955
Arabinose 0.874 0.973 1.042
*

Relative specific activity is expressed as the induced specific activity normalized to that obtained in the absence of induction;

The uninducted specific activities of UPase, TPase and PNPase in Medium 2 were 24.4, 1.2 and 14.6 U/mg wet cells, respectively. CMP: Cytidine 5′-monophosphate; UMP: Uridine 5′-monophosphate; GMP: Guanosine 5′-monophosphate; AMP: Adenosine 5′-monophosphate; dCMP: Deoxycytidine 5′-monophosphate; dTMP: Thymidine 5′-monophosphate; dGMP: Deoxyguanosine 5′-monophosphate; dAMP: Deoxyadenosine 5′-monophosphate

Effects of cytidine and CMP concentrations and time of addition on NPase induction

Cytidine and CMP, which showed the most robust inductions of UPase, TPase and PNPase in Medium 2 (Table 2), were selected for further study. In experiments probing the dose dependence of cytidine and CMP, we found that both nucleosides induced evident increases in NPases beginning at concentrations between 1 and 5 mmol/L (Fig.1). NPase induction by cytidine and CMP tended to plateau at about 5 mmol/L, although TPase activity continued to trend upward at higher doses of inducers. The pattern was different for the specific activity of wet cell paste towards Ara-U, which continued to increase in a dose-dependent manner to concentrations of cytidine and CMP as high as 15~20 mmol/L.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Fig. 1

Effects of cytidine (a) and CMP (b) concentrations on the NPase induction

Relative specific activity is expressed as the induced specific activity normalized to that obtained in the absence of induction in Medium 2; The uninduced specific activities of UPase, TPase, PNPase and Ara-U in Medium 2 were 24.4, 1.2, 14.6 and 2.11 U/mg wet cells, respectively

We also tested the effects of time of cytidine or CMP addition on the levels of UPase, TPase and PNPase in Medium 2 (Fig.2). There was no effect of cellular growth phase on the induction of UPase, TPase or PNPase by cytidine and CMP. However, decreases in the specific activity of wet cells towards Ara-U were evident when the inducers were added at 14 h, possibly because cells were already in a decline phase at this time.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Fig. 2

Effects of time of cytidine (a) and CMP (b) additions on NPase induction

Relative specific activity is expressed as the induced specific activity normalized to that obtained in the absence of induction in Medium 2; The uninduced specific activity of UPase, TPase, PNPase and Ara-U in Medium 2 were 24.4, 1.2, 14.6 and 2.11 U/mg wet cells, respectively; The concentrations of cytidine and CMP were 20 mmol/L

Effect of induced NPase activity on the synthesis of Ara-A and changes of enzymatic activities after reaction

When cells grown in Medium 2 supplemented with inducers were used to catalyze the synthesis of Ara-A, the efficiency of Ara-A enzymatic synthesis, measured as yield of adenine, was strikingly enhanced. As shown in Fig.3, the enzymatic reaction time was dramatically shortened from 36 h to 6 h.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Effect of induction by cytidine and CMP on the enzymatic synthesis of Ara-A

The changes in UPase, TPase and PNPase activities after the enzymatic reaction, measured in three separate experiments (Fig.4), were similar. After the reaction, the specific activity of UPase increased slightly, the activity of TPase decreased slightly, and the activity of PNPase trended upward. However, after the reaction, the specific activity of wet cell paste towards Ara-U was substantially decreased. Although the specific activity towards Ara-U also decreased considerably after the reaction in wet cell paste from cells grown in Medium 2 supplemented with inducers (Fig.4), it was still relatively high compared to the activity in uninduced cell paste (Fig.4a).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Fig. 4

Fig. 4

Pre-reaction and post-reaction activities of NPases in cells cultured in Medium 2. (a) Non-inducer; (b) Cytidine added; (c) CMP added

Relative specific activity is expressed as the induced specific activity normalized to that obtained in the absence of induction in Medium 2; The uninduced specific activities of UPase, TPase, PNPase and Ara-U in Medium 2 were 24.4, 1.2, 14.6 and 2.11 U/mg wet cells, respectively

DISCUSSION

The composition of Medium 1 (see MATERIALS AND METHODS) is suitable for studying the NPase induction, and much of the research in this field has been conducted with this simple media formulation. Our experiments on NPases of E. aerogenes have confirmed this. However, compared to the richer Medium 2, Medium 1 is poorly suited for use in enzyme production. Our results reveal a number of differences between the effects of inducers in Mediums 1 and 2. For example, inosine and thymidine modestly induced UPase in Medium 1, but had no effect in Medium 2. The difference in inosine induction was even more striking for PNPase, which was intensely induced by inosine in Medium 1 but not at all in Medium 2. This reduced effect of nucleosides is likely due to the fact that Medium 2 contains higher nucleoside levels, which are probably sufficient to provide near-maximal induction in the absence of added inducers.

NPases from different bacteria exhibit species-specific differences in their responses to nucleoside and nucleotide inducers. UPase from E. coli is induced by cytidine, CMP and adenosine, but not by uridine (Robertson et al., 1970; Hammer-Jespersen et al., 1971; Vita et al., 1983), whereas in Klebsiella sp. (Ling et al., 1994) UPase is induced by both uridine and adenosine. In this study, we showed that UPase from E. aerogenes is induced by adenosine, cytidine, uridine and their corresponding nucleotides using Medium 2 (Munch-Petersen, 1968; Robertson et al., 1970; Hammer-Jespersen et al., 1971; Vita et al., 1983). TPases from E. coli and S. typhimurium are induced by deoxynucleosides and have also been reported to respond with cytidine (Hammer-Jespersen et al., 1971). Here, we found that TPase from E. aerogenes is induced by almost all nucleosides and nucleotides tested.

PNPase from E. coli is induced by deoxynucleosides, cytidine, purine nucleosides and their corresponding nucleotides (Vita et al., 1983), with the exception of AMP. We showed here that PNPase from E. aerogenes is induced by most nucleosides and nucleotides, except inosine. For the most part, bases have no effect on the levels of NPases of E. coli and Bacillus cereus (Tozzi et al., 1981; Vita et al., 1983), although adenine has been reported to induce the PNPase of E. coli strain K12 (Hammer-Jespersen et al., 1971). However, we found that the UPase of E. aerogenes was induced by adenine and hypoxanthine, TPase was induced by hypoxanthine, and PNPase was induced by all bases (guanine was not tested), with the effect of adenine being clearly the most prominent.

In Medium 2, cytidine and CMP effectively induced NPases of E. aerogenes within a concentration range of 5 to 20 mmol/L. The specific activity of cells towards Ara-U in Medium 2 supplemented with cytidine reached a high plateau value at concentrations of 15 to 20 mmol/L. In cells grown in Medium 2 with CMP, the activity towards Ara-U increased in a dose-dependent manner throughout the CMP concentration range.

PNPase activity induced by inosine in B. cereus cells has been shown to remain relatively high during the stationary phase (Tozzi et al., 1981). Our results indicate that, in E. aerogenes, the NPase induction by cytidine and CMP was largely independent of cell growth phase, although the specific activity of wet cell paste towards Ara-U was relatively low when inducers were added during the decline phase.

Studies on the NPase induction in nutrient medium are significant because such media supporting good bacterial growth may show enhanced effects of inducers on NPase activities. In the absence of induction, the specific activity of UPase from E. aerogenes towards Ara-U is only one-tenth that towards uridine, which may account for the longer time required for UPase and PNPase to catalyze the synthesis of Ara-A compared to the synthesis of natural nucleosides. The shortest synthesis time reported for Ara-A is about 15 h (Utagawa et al., 1985). Here, we show that induction of E. aerogenes by cytidine or CMP greatly enhances the efficiency of the Ara-A reaction, dramatically reducing the enzymatic reaction time from 36 h to 6 h. Thus, the induction of cells grown in a nutrient medium represents a simple and effective way to enhance the activities of NPases.

Footnotes

*

Project (No. 07C26213101283) supported by the Innovation Fund for Technology Based Firms from the Ministry of Science and Technology of China

References

  • 1.Bzowska A, Kulikowska E, Shugar D. Purine nucleoside phosphorylases: properties, functions, and clinical aspects. Pharmacology & Therapeutics. 2000;88(3):349–425. doi: 10.1016/S0163-7258(00)00097-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Caradoc-Davies TT, Cutfield SM, Lamont IL, Cutfield JF. Crystal structures of Escherichia coli uridine phosphorylase in two native and three complexed forms reveal basis of substrate specificity, induced conformational changes and influence of potassium. Journal Molecular Biology. 2004;337(2):337–354. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.01.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Esipov RS, Gurevich AI, Chuvikovsky DV, Chupova LA, Muravyova TI, Miroshnikov AI. Overexpression of Escherichia coli genes encoding nucleoside phosphorylases in the pET/B121(DE3) system yields active recombinant enzymes. Protein Expression and Purification. 2002;24(1):56–60. doi: 10.1006/prep.2001.1524. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Giuseppina B, Simona C, Daniela G, Gaetano O, Giancarlo T, Gabriele Z. Recombinant Bacterial Strains for the Production of Natural Nucleosides and Modified Analogues Thereof. 2000. WO 00/39307.
  • 5.Hammer-Jespersen K, Munch-Petersen A, Nygaard P, Schwartz M. Induction of enzymes involved in the catabolism of deoxyribonucleosides and ribonucleosides in Escherichia coli K12. European Journal of Biochemistry. 1971;19(4):533–538. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1971.tb01345.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Herman MK. Differential spectrophotometry of purine compounds by means of specific enzymes. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1947;167:429–443. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Jarkko R, Tatiana E, Seppo L, Igor AM, Roman SE, Anatoly IM. An enzymatic transglycosylation of purine bases. Nucleosides Nucleotides Nucleic Acids. 2007;26(8/9):905–909. doi: 10.1080/15257770701506343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kalckar HM, Klenow H. Milk xanthopterin oxidase and pteroylglutamic acid. Journal of Biology Chemistry. 1948;172:349–353. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Krenitsky TA, Elion GB, Rideout JE. Enzynatic Synthesis of Purine Arabinonucleosides. 1979. EP 0002192 B1.
  • 10.Ling F, Inoue Y, Kimura A. Purification and characterization of a novel nucleoside phosphorylase from a Klebsiella sp. and its use in the enzymatic production of adenine arabinoside. Applied and Enviromental Microbiology. 1990;56(12):3830–3834. doi: 10.1128/aem.56.12.3830-3834.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ling F, Inoue Y, Kimura A. Induction, purification and utilization of purine nucleoside phosphorylase and uridine phosphorylase from Klebsiella sp. Process Biochemistry. 1994;29(5):355–361. doi: 10.1016/0032-9592(94)87004-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Munch-Petersen A. On the catabolism of deoxyribonucleosides in cells and cell extracts of Eschechia coli . European Journal Biochemistry. 1968;6(3):432–442. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1968.tb00465.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Robertson BC, Jargiello P, Blank J, Patricia AH. Genetic regulation of ribonucleoside and deoxyribonucleoside catabolism in Salmonella typhimurium . Journal of Bacteriology. 1970;102:628–635. doi: 10.1128/jb.102.3.628-635.1970. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Saunders PP, Barbara AW, Saunders GF. Purification and comparative properties of a pyrimidine nucleoside phophorylase from Bacillus stearothermophilus . Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1969;244(13):3691–3697. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Thomsen LE, Pedersen M, Nørregaard-Madsen M, Valentin-Hansen P, Kallipolitis BH. Protein-ligand interaction: grafting of the uridine-specific determinants from the CytR regulator of Salmonnella typhimurium to Escherichia coli CytR. Journal Molecular Biology. 1999;288(1):165–175. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1999.2668. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Tozzi MG, Sgarrella F, Ipata PL. Induction and repression of enzymes involved in exogenous purine compound utilization in Bacillus cereus . Biochimica et Biophysica Acta. 1981;678:460–466. doi: 10.1016/0304-4165(81)90127-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Trelles JA, Fernández-Lucas J, Condezo LA, Sinisterra JV. Nucleoside synthesis by immobilised bacterial whole cells. Journal of Molecular Catalysis B: Enzymatic. 2004;30(5-6):219–227. doi: 10.1016/j.molcatb.2004.06.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Utagawa T, Hirokazu M, Fumihiro Y, Akihiro Y, Koji M. Microbiological synthesis of adenine arabinoside. Agricultural and Biological Chemistry. 1985;49(4):1053–1058. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Vita A, Amici A, Magni G. Induction of pyrimidine nucleosides metabolizing enzymes in E. coli B. Italy Journal Biochemistry. 1983;32(3):145–151. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Zolotukhina M, Ovcharova I, Eremina S, Errais L, Mironov AS. Comparison of the structure and regulation of the udp gene of Vibrio cholerae, Yersinia pseudotuberculosis, Salmonella typhimurium, and Escherichia coli . Research in Microbiology. 2003;154(7):510–520. doi: 10.1016/S0923-2508(03)00125-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B are provided here courtesy of Zhejiang University Press

RESOURCES