Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Comparative and Functional Genomics logoLink to Comparative and Functional Genomics
. 2003 Oct;4(5):531–536. doi: 10.1002/cfg.322

Quantitative Proteomics of Lymphocytes

Ivan Lefkovits 1,2,✉
PMCID: PMC2447287  PMID: 18629005

Abstract

Lymphocytes are the best-studied higher eukaryote cells. In this report, quantitative relationships of the protein components in resting cell, blast cell and plasma cell types are evaluated. The comparison of these cell types leads to the conclusion that resting cells synthesize about one-twentieth of the protein species as compared to blast cells. Blast cells seem to be metabolically the most robust lymphocyte type. Plasma cells are geared towards synthesis of one main product (antibody in B plasma cells), while most of the synthesis of other protein species (including those for housekeeping and repair) decreases as the messages decay. Although the data presented in this communication allow a meaningful comparison of three cell populations, they are far from providing a full picture. Both silver staining and radiofluorography depict only proteins of high or intermediate abundance. Silver staining misses most proteins present at <10 000 copies/cell, while radiofluorography misses all those proteins with slow turnover (and those with no methionine residue in their sequence). The detection of 1100 spots in the blast cell-related radiofluorograph includes visualization of some 97–99% of protein mass, but some 3900 polypeptide species in the remaining 1–3% of protein mass will pass undetected. This protein mass (0.7–2 pg) reflects some 2500–7500 copies of each of those 3900 polypeptide species that are present in the cell below the detection limit. The work emphasizes that full understanding of cellular function can be achieved only if quantitative aspects of cell inventory are considered.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (90.6 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Anderson N. G., Anderson L. The Human Protein Index. Clin Chem. 1982 Apr;28(4 Pt 2):739–748. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Anderson N. G., Anderson N. L. Analytical techniques for cell fractions. XXI. Two-dimensional analysis of serum and tissue proteins: multiple isoelectric focusing. Anal Biochem. 1978 Apr;85(2):331–340. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(78)90229-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Anderson N. L., Anderson N. G. Analytical techniques for cell fractions. XXII. Two-dimensional analysis of serum and tissue proteins: multiple gradient-slab gel electrophoresis. Anal Biochem. 1978 Apr;85(2):341–354. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(78)90230-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Anderson N. L., Hofmann J. P., Gemmell A., Taylor J. Global approaches to quantitative analysis of gene-expression patterns observed by use of two-dimensional gel electrophoresis. Clin Chem. 1984 Dec;30(12 Pt 1):2031–2036. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Fazekas de St Groth S., Webster R. G., Datyner A. Two new staining procedures for quantitative estimation of proteins on electrophoretic strips. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1963 May 14;71:377–391. doi: 10.1016/0006-3002(63)91092-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kettman J. R., Kuhn L., Young P., Lefkovits I. Parameters of the labeling of mitogen-activated murine lymphocytes by [35S]methionine for two-dimensional gel electrophoresis. I. Effect of culture conditions. J Immunol Methods. 1986 Apr 3;88(1):53–64. doi: 10.1016/0022-1759(86)90051-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kettman J., Burnham K., Lefkovits I. Prospective partition analysis of independently assorted sets. Accessory elements supporting clonal lymphoid activation by mitogens. J Immunol Methods. 1988 Nov 10;114(1-2):235–241. doi: 10.1016/0022-1759(88)90179-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kettman J., Lefkovits I. An approach to molecular analysis of T-cell clones by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis: is there interclonal and intraclonal heterogeneity? Clin Chem. 1984 Dec;30(12 Pt 1):1950–1955. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kettman J., Lefkovits I. Changes in the protein pattern of murine B cells after mitogenic stimulation. Eur J Immunol. 1984 Sep;14(9):778–781. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830140903. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kettman John R., Coleclough Christopher, Frey Johann Rudolf, Lefkovits Ivan. Clonal proteomics: one gene - family of proteins. Proteomics. 2002 Jun;2(6):624–631. doi: 10.1002/1615-9861(200206)2:6<624::AID-PROT624>3.0.CO;2-I. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Klose J. Protein mapping by combined isoelectric focusing and electrophoresis of mouse tissues. A novel approach to testing for induced point mutations in mammals. Humangenetik. 1975;26(3):231–243. doi: 10.1007/BF00281458. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Lefkovits I. . . . and such are little lymphocytes made of. Res Immunol. 1995 Jan;146(1):5–10. doi: 10.1016/0923-2494(96)80235-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Lefkovits I. How do B cells differ from T cells in terms of gene expression? Folia Microbiol (Praha) 1995;40(4):405–412. doi: 10.1007/BF02814748. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Lefkovits I., Kettman J. R., Frey J. R. Global analysis of gene expression in cells of the immune system I. Analytical limitations in obtaining sequence information on polypeptides in two-dimensional gel spots. Electrophoresis. 2000 Jul;21(13):2688–2693. doi: 10.1002/1522-2683(20000701)21:13<2688::AID-ELPS2688>3.0.CO;2-T. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. O'Farrell P. H. High resolution two-dimensional electrophoresis of proteins. J Biol Chem. 1975 May 25;250(10):4007–4021. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Switzer R. C., 3rd, Merril C. R., Shifrin S. A highly sensitive silver stain for detecting proteins and peptides in polyacrylamide gels. Anal Biochem. 1979 Sep 15;98(1):231–237. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(79)90732-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Comparative and Functional Genomics are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES