Skip to main content
Comparative and Functional Genomics logoLink to Comparative and Functional Genomics
. 2004 Mar;5(2):190–195. doi: 10.1002/cfg.379

Shaping Biological Knowledge: Applications in Proteomics

F Lisacek 1,2,✉, C Chichester 1, P Gonnet 3, O Jaillet 1, S Kappus 1, F Nikitin 1, P Roland 1, G Rossier 1, L Truong 1, R Appel 1,4
PMCID: PMC2447358  PMID: 18629073

Abstract

The central dogma of molecular biology has provided a meaningful principle for data integration in the field of genomics. In this context, integration reflects the known transitions from a chromosome to a protein sequence: transcription, intron splicing, exon assembly and translation. There is no such clear principle for integrating proteomics data, since the laws governing protein folding and interactivity are not quite understood. In our effort to bring together independent pieces of information relative to proteins in a biologically meaningful way, we assess the bias of bioinformatics resources and consequent approximations in the framework of small-scale studies. We analyse proteomics data while following both a data-driven (focus on proteins smaller than 10 kDa) and a hypothesis-driven (focus on whole bacterial proteomes) approach. These applications are potentially the source of specialized complements to classical biological ontologies.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (122.2 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bairoch A. PROSITE: a dictionary of sites and patterns in proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 1991 Apr 25;19 (Suppl):2241–2245. doi: 10.1093/nar/19.suppl.2241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Chichester Christine, Nikitin Frederic, Ravarini Jean-Christophe, Lisacek Frederique. Consistency checks for characterizing protein forms. Comput Biol Chem. 2003 Feb;27(1):29–35. doi: 10.1016/s1476-9271(02)00095-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Clamp M., Andrews D., Barker D., Bevan P., Cameron G., Chen Y., Clark L., Cox T., Cuff J., Curwen V. Ensembl 2002: accommodating comparative genomics. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003 Jan 1;31(1):38–42. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkg083. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Eddy S. R. Profile hidden Markov models. Bioinformatics. 1998;14(9):755–763. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/14.9.755. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gattiker Alexandre, Michoud Karine, Rivoire Catherine, Auchincloss Andrea H., Coudert Elisabeth, Lima Tania, Kersey Paul, Pagni Marco, Sigrist Christian J. A., Lachaize Corinne. Automated annotation of microbial proteomes in SWISS-PROT. Comput Biol Chem. 2003 Feb;27(1):49–58. doi: 10.1016/s1476-9271(02)00094-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Geer Lewis Y., Domrachev Michael, Lipman David J., Bryant Stephen H. CDART: protein homology by domain architecture. Genome Res. 2002 Oct;12(10):1619–1623. doi: 10.1101/gr.278202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gonnet Pedro, Lisacek Frédérique. Probabilistic alignment of motifs with sequences. Bioinformatics. 2002 Aug;18(8):1091–1101. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/18.8.1091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gribskov M., McLachlan A. D., Eisenberg D. Profile analysis: detection of distantly related proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Jul;84(13):4355–4358. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.13.4355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Mathé Catherine, Sagot Marie-France, Schiex Thomas, Rouzé Pierre. Current methods of gene prediction, their strengths and weaknesses. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002 Oct 1;30(19):4103–4117. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkf543. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Mulder Nicola J., Apweiler Rolf, Attwood Teresa K., Bairoch Amos, Barrell Daniel, Bateman Alex, Binns David, Biswas Margaret, Bradley Paul, Bork Peer. The InterPro Database, 2003 brings increased coverage and new features. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003 Jan 1;31(1):315–318. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkg046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Ponting Chris P., Russell Robert R. The natural history of protein domains. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct. 2001 Oct 25;31:45–71. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biophys.31.082901.134314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Staden R. Methods to define and locate patterns of motifs in sequences. Comput Appl Biosci. 1988 Mar;4(1):53–60. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/4.1.53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Taylor W. R. The classification of amino acid conservation. J Theor Biol. 1986 Mar 21;119(2):205–218. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5193(86)80075-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Comparative and Functional Genomics are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES