Skip to main content
PMC home page
Comparative and Functional Genomics logoLink to Comparative and Functional Genomics
. 2004 Jun;5(4):354–361. doi: 10.1002/cfg.407

Mapping the Gene Ontology Into the Unified Medical Language System

Jane Lomax 1,✉, Alexa T McCray 2
PMCID: PMC2447454  PMID: 18629164

Abstract

We have recently mapped the Gene Ontology (GO), developed by the Gene Ontology Consortium, into the National Library of Medicine's Unified Medical Language System (UMLS). GO has been developed for the purpose of annotating gene products in genome databases, and the UMLS has been developed as a framework for integrating large numbers of disparate terminologies, primarily for the purpose of providing better access to biomedical information sources. The mapping of GO to UMLS highlighted issues in both terminology systems. After some initial explorations and discussions between the UMLS and GO teams, the GO was integrated with the UMLS. Overall, a total of 23% of the GO terms either matched directly (3%) or linked (20%) to existing UMLS concepts. All GO terms now have a corresponding, official UMLS concept, and the entire vocabulary is available through the web-based UMLS Knowledge Source Server. The mapping of the Gene Ontology, with its focus on structures, processes and functions at the molecular level, to the existing broad coverage UMLS should contribute to linking the language and practices of clinical medicine to the language and practices of genomics.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (120.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Ansell Stephen M., Ackerman Michael J., Black John L., Roberts Lewis R., Tefferi Ayalew. Primer on medical genomics. Part VI: Genomics and molecular genetics in clinical practice. Mayo Clin Proc. 2003 Mar;78(3):307–317. doi: 10.4065/78.3.307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Baxevanis Andreas D. The Molecular Biology Database Collection: 2003 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003 Jan 1;31(1):1–12. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkg120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Collins F. S. Genetics: an explosion of knowledge is transforming clinical practice. Geriatrics. 1999 Jan;54(1):41–48. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cooper Richard S., Psaty Bruce M. Genomics and medicine: distraction, incremental progress, or the dawn of a new age? Ann Intern Med. 2003 Apr 1;138(7):576–580. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-138-7-200304010-00014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gene Ontology Consortium Creating the gene ontology resource: design and implementation. Genome Res. 2001 Aug;11(8):1425–1433. doi: 10.1101/gr.180801. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Harris Midori A., Parkinson Helen. Standards and ontologies for functional genomics: towards unified ontologies for biology and biomedicine. Comp Funct Genomics. 2003;4(1):116–120. doi: 10.1002/cfg.249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hill David P., Blake Judith A., Richardson Joel E., Ringwald Martin. Extension and integration of the gene ontology (GO): combining GO vocabularies with external vocabularies. Genome Res. 2002 Dec;12(12):1982–1991. doi: 10.1101/gr.580102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. John S. B. Case of Hemianopsia with peculiar cerebral symptoms. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1889;5:359–361. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. John S. B. Case of Hemianopsia with peculiar cerebral symptoms. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1889;5:359–361. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Lindberg D. A., Humphreys B. L., McCray A. T. The Unified Medical Language System. Methods Inf Med. 1993 Aug;32(4):281–291. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1634945. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. McCray A. T., Srinivasan S., Browne A. C. Lexical methods for managing variation in biomedical terminologies. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1994:235–239. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. McCray Alexa T. An upper-level ontology for the biomedical domain. Comp Funct Genomics. 2003;4(1):80–84. doi: 10.1002/cfg.255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. McCray Alexa T., Browne Allen C., Bodenreider Olivier. The lexical properties of the gene ontology. Proc AMIA Symp. 2002:504–508. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Oliver D. E., Shahar Y., Shortliffe E. H., Musen M. A. Representation of change in controlled medical terminologies. Artif Intell Med. 1999 Jan;15(1):53–76. doi: 10.1016/s0933-3657(98)00045-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Tuttle M. S., Suarez-Munist O. N., Olson N. E., Sherertz D. D., Sperzel W. D., Erlbaum M. S., Fuller L. F., Hole W. T., Nelson S. J., Cole W. G. Merging terminologies. Medinfo. 1995;8(Pt 1):162–166. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Yu H., Friedman C., Rhzetsky A., Kra P. Representing genomic knowledge in the UMLS semantic network. Proc AMIA Symp. 1999:181–185. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Zeng Q., Cimino J. J. Mapping medical vocabularies to the Unified Medical Language System. Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp. 1996:105–109. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Comparative and Functional Genomics are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES