Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Comparative and Functional Genomics logoLink to Comparative and Functional Genomics
. 2004 Dec;5(8):584–595. doi: 10.1002/cfg.443

Exploring the Foundation of Genomics: A Northern Blot Reference set for the Comparative Analysis of Transcript Profiling Technologies

Danielle Kemmer 1, Margareta Faxén 1, Emily Hodges 1, Jonathan Lim 2, Elena Herzog 1, Elsebrit Ljungström 1, Anders Lundmark 1, Mary K Olsen 3, Raf Podowski 1, Erik L L Sonnhammer 1, Peter Nilsson 4, Mark Reimers 1,6, Boris Lenhard 1, Steven L Roberds 3,7, Claes Wahlestedt 1, Christer Höög 1, Pankaj Agarwal 5, Wyeth W Wasserman 2,✉
PMCID: PMC2447472  PMID: 18629180

Abstract

In this paper we aim to create a reference data collection of Northern blot results and demonstrate how such a collection can enable a quantitative comparison of modern expression profiling techniques, a central component of functional genomics studies. Historically, Northern blots were the de facto standard for determining RNA transcript levels. However, driven by the demand for analysis of large sets of genes in parallel, high-throughput methods, such as microarrays, dominate modern profiling efforts. To facilitate assessment of these methods, in comparison to Northern blots, we created a database of published Northern results obtained with a standardized commercial multiple tissue blot (dbMTN). In order to demonstrate the utility of the dbMTN collection for technology comparison, we also generated expression profiles for genes across a set of human tissues, using multiple profiling techniques. No method produced profiles that were strongly correlated with the Northern blot data. The highest correlations to the Northern blot data were determined with microarrays for the subset of genes observed to be specifically expressed in a single tissue in the Northern analyses. The database and expression profiling data are available via the project website (http://www.cisreg.ca). We believe that emphasis on multitechnique validation of expression profiles is justified, as the correlation results between platforms are not encouraging on the whole. Supplementary material for this article can be found at: http://www.interscience.wiley.com/jpages/1531-6912/suppmat

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (447.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adams M. D., Kerlavage A. R., Fleischmann R. D., Fuldner R. A., Bult C. J., Lee N. H., Kirkness E. F., Weinstock K. G., Gocayne J. D., White O. Initial assessment of human gene diversity and expression patterns based upon 83 million nucleotides of cDNA sequence. Nature. 1995 Sep 28;377(6547 Suppl):3–174. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Audic S., Claverie J. M. The significance of digital gene expression profiles. Genome Res. 1997 Oct;7(10):986–995. doi: 10.1101/gr.7.10.986. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Banfi S., Guffanti A., Borsani G. How to get the best of dbEST. Trends Genet. 1998 Feb;14(2):80–81. doi: 10.1016/s0168-9525(97)01354-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Barczak Andrea, Rodriguez Madeleine Willkom, Hanspers Kristina, Koth Laura L., Tai Yu Chuan, Bolstad Benjamin M., Speed Terence P., Erle David J. Spotted long oligonucleotide arrays for human gene expression analysis. Genome Res. 2003 Jun 12;13(7):1775–1785. doi: 10.1101/gr.1048803. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Freeman W. M., Robertson D. J., Vrana K. E. Fundamentals of DNA hybridization arrays for gene expression analysis. Biotechniques. 2000 Nov;29(5):1042-6, 1048-55. doi: 10.2144/00295rv01. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Freeman W. M., Walker S. J., Vrana K. E. Quantitative RT-PCR: pitfalls and potential. Biotechniques. 1999 Jan;26(1):112-22, 124-5. doi: 10.2144/99261rv01. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gnatenko Dmitri V., Dunn John J., McCorkle Sean R., Weissmann David, Perrotta Peter L., Bahou Wadie F. Transcript profiling of human platelets using microarray and serial analysis of gene expression. Blood. 2002 Nov 14;101(6):2285–2293. doi: 10.1182/blood-2002-09-2797. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Ishii M., Hashimoto S., Tsutsumi S., Wada Y., Matsushima K., Kodama T., Aburatani H. Direct comparison of GeneChip and SAGE on the quantitative accuracy in transcript profiling analysis. Genomics. 2000 Sep 1;68(2):136–143. doi: 10.1006/geno.2000.6284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Jordan B. R. Large-scale expression measurement by hybridization methods: from high-density membranes to "DNA chips". J Biochem. 1998 Aug;124(2):251–258. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a022104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kuo Winston Patrick, Jenssen Tor-Kristian, Butte Atul J., Ohno-Machado Lucila, Kohane Isaac S. Analysis of matched mRNA measurements from two different microarray technologies. Bioinformatics. 2002 Mar;18(3):405–412. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/18.3.405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lenhard B., Hayes W. S., Wasserman W. W. GeneLynx: a gene-centric portal to the human genome. Genome Res. 2001 Dec;11(12):2151–2157. doi: 10.1101/gr.199801. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Madden SL, Wang CJ, Landes G. Serial analysis of gene expression: from gene discovery to target identification. Drug Discov Today. 2000 Sep;5(9):415–425. doi: 10.1016/s1359-6446(00)01544-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Olsen M. K., Roberds S. L., Ellerbrock B. R., Fleck T. J., McKinley D. K., Gurney M. E. Disease mechanisms revealed by transcription profiling in SOD1-G93A transgenic mouse spinal cord. Ann Neurol. 2001 Dec;50(6):730–740. doi: 10.1002/ana.1252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Podowski R. M., Sonnhammer E. L. MEDUSA: large scale automatic selection and visual assessment of PCR primer pairs. Bioinformatics. 2001 Jul;17(7):656–657. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/17.7.656. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Quackenbush John. Microarray data normalization and transformation. Nat Genet. 2002 Dec;32 (Suppl):496–501. doi: 10.1038/ng1032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Su Andrew I., Cooke Michael P., Ching Keith A., Hakak Yaron, Walker John R., Wiltshire Tim, Orth Anthony P., Vega Raquel G., Sapinoso Lisa M., Moqrich Aziz. Large-scale analysis of the human and mouse transcriptomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Mar 19;99(7):4465–4470. doi: 10.1073/pnas.012025199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Tamber Pritpal S., Godlee Fiona, Newmark Peter. Open access to peer-reviewed research: making it happen. Lancet. 2003 Nov 8;362(9395):1575–1577. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14748-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Tan Paul K., Downey Thomas J., Spitznagel Edward L., Jr, Xu Pin, Fu Dadin, Dimitrov Dimiter S., Lempicki Richard A., Raaka Bruce M., Cam Margaret C. Evaluation of gene expression measurements from commercial microarray platforms. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003 Oct 1;31(19):5676–5684. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkg763. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Taniguchi M., Miura K., Iwao H., Yamanaka S. Quantitative assessment of DNA microarrays--comparison with Northern blot analyses. Genomics. 2001 Jan 1;71(1):34–39. doi: 10.1006/geno.2000.6427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Wang T., Brown M. J. mRNA quantification by real time TaqMan polymerase chain reaction: validation and comparison with RNase protection. Anal Biochem. 1999 Apr 10;269(1):198–201. doi: 10.1006/abio.1999.4022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Comparative and Functional Genomics are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES