Skip to main content
Comparative and Functional Genomics logoLink to Comparative and Functional Genomics
. 2005 Apr;6(3):138–146. doi: 10.1002/cfg.465

The Korea Brassica Genome Project: a Glimpse of the Brassica Genome Based on Comparative Genome Analysis With Arabidopsis

Tae-Jin Yang 1, Jung-Sun Kim 1, Ki-Byung Lim 1, Soo-Jin Kwon 1, Jin-A Kim 1, Mina Jin 1, Jee Young Park 1, Myung-Ho Lim 1, Ho-Il Kim 1, Seog Hyung Kim 1, Yong Pyo Lim 2, Beom-Seok Park 1,
PMCID: PMC2447515  PMID: 18629219

Abstract

A complete genome sequence provides unlimited information in the sequenced organism as well as in related taxa. According to the guidance of the Multinational Brassica Genome Project (MBGP), the Korea Brassica Genome Project (KBGP) is sequencing chromosome 1 (cytogenetically oriented chromosome #1) of Brassica rapa. We have selected 48 seed BACs on chromosome 1 using EST genetic markers and FISH analyses. Among them, 30 BAC clones have been sequenced and 18 are on the way. Comparative genome analyses of the EST sequences and sequenced BAC clones from Brassica chromosome 1 revealed their homeologous partner regions on the Arabidopsis genome and a syntenic comparative map between Brassica chromosome 1 and Arabidopsis chromosomes. In silico chromosome walking and clone validation have been successfully applied to extending sequence contigs based on the comparative map and BAC end sequences. In addition, we have defined the (peri)centromeric heterochromatin blocks with centromeric tandem repeats, rDNA and centromeric retrotransposons. In-depth sequence analyses of five homeologous BAC clones and an Arabidopsis chromosomal region reveal overall co-linearity, with 82% sequence similarity. The data indicate that the Brassica genome has undergone triplication and subsequent gene losses after the divergence of Arabidopsis and Brassica. Based on in-depth comparative genome analyses, we propose a comparative genomics approach for conquering the Brassica genome. In 2005 we intend to construct an integrated physical map, including sequence information from 500 BAC clones and integration of fingerprinting data and end sequence data of more than 100 000 BAC clones. The sequences have been submitted to GenBank with accession numbers: 10 204 BAC ends of the KBrH library (CW978640–CW988843); KBrH138P04, AC155338; KBrH117N09, AC155337; KBrH097M21, AC155348; KBrH093K03, AC155347; KBrH081N08, AC155346; KBrH080L24, AC155345; KBrH077A05, AC155343; KBrH020D15, AC155340; KBrH015H17, AC155339; KBrH001H24, AC155335; KBrH080A08, AC155344; KBrH004D11, AC155341; KBrH117M18, AC146875; KBrH052O08, AC155342.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (251.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Arabidopsis Genome Initiative Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature. 2000 Dec 14;408(6814):796–815. doi: 10.1038/35048692. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bowers John E., Chapman Brad A., Rong Junkang, Paterson Andrew H. Unravelling angiosperm genome evolution by phylogenetic analysis of chromosomal duplication events. Nature. 2003 Mar 27;422(6930):433–438. doi: 10.1038/nature01521. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ewing B., Green P. Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using phred. II. Error probabilities. Genome Res. 1998 Mar;8(3):186–194. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ewing B., Hillier L., Wendl M. C., Green P. Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using phred. I. Accuracy assessment. Genome Res. 1998 Mar;8(3):175–185. doi: 10.1101/gr.8.3.175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gordon D., Abajian C., Green P. Consed: a graphical tool for sequence finishing. Genome Res. 1998 Mar;8(3):195–202. doi: 10.1101/gr.8.3.195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Johnston J. Spencer, Pepper Alan E., Hall Anne E., Chen Z. Jeffrey, Hodnett George, Drabek Janice, Lopez Rebecca, Price H. James. Evolution of genome size in Brassicaceae. Ann Bot. 2005 Jan;95(1):229–235. doi: 10.1093/aob/mci016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Koo Dal-Hoe, Plaha Prikshit, Lim Yong Pyo, Hur Yoonkang, Bang Jae-Wook. A high-resolution karyotype of Brassica rapa ssp. pekinensis revealed by pachytene analysis and multicolor fluorescence in situ hybridization. Theor Appl Genet. 2004 Sep 10;109(7):1346–1352. doi: 10.1007/s00122-004-1771-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kowalski S. P., Lan T. H., Feldmann K. A., Paterson A. H. Comparative mapping of Arabidopsis thaliana and Brassica oleracea chromosomes reveals islands of conserved organization. Genetics. 1994 Oct;138(2):499–510. doi: 10.1093/genetics/138.2.499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Lagercrantz U., Putterill J., Coupland G., Lydiate D. Comparative mapping in Arabidopsis and Brassica, fine scale genome collinearity and congruence of genes controlling flowering time. Plant J. 1996 Jan;9(1):13–20. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.1996.09010013.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Lim K. B., Wennekes J., de Jong J. H., Jacobsen E., van Tuyl J. M. Karyotype analysis of Lilium longiflorum and Lilium rubellum by chromosome banding and fluorescence in situ hybridisation. Genome. 2001 Oct;44(5):911–918. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Love Christopher G., Batley Jacqueline, Lim Geraldine, Robinson Andrew J., Savage David, Singh Daniel, Spangenberg German C., Edwards David. New computational tools for brassica genome research. Comp Funct Genomics. 2004;5(3):276–280. doi: 10.1002/cfg.394. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Lukens Lewis, Zou Fei, Lydiate Derek, Parkin Isobel, Osborn Tom. Comparison of a Brassica oleracea genetic map with the genome of Arabidopsis thaliana. Genetics. 2003 May;164(1):359–372. doi: 10.1093/genetics/164.1.359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. O'Neill C. M., Bancroft I. Comparative physical mapping of segments of the genome of Brassica oleracea var. alboglabra that are homoeologous to sequenced regions of chromosomes 4 and 5 of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 2000 Jul;23(2):233–243. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.2000.00781.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Paterson A. H., Bowers J. E., Burow M. D., Draye X., Elsik C. G., Jiang C. X., Katsar C. S., Lan T. H., Lin Y. R., Ming R. Comparative genomics of plant chromosomes. Plant Cell. 2000 Sep;12(9):1523–1540. doi: 10.1105/tpc.12.9.1523. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Paterson A. H., Lan T. H., Amasino R., Osborn T. C., Quiros C. Brassica genomics: a complement to, and early beneficiary of, the Arabidopsis sequence. Genome Biol. 2001 Mar 9;2(3):REVIEWS1011–REVIEWS1011. doi: 10.1186/gb-2001-2-3-reviews1011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Rana Debashis, van den Boogaart Tom, O'Neill Carmel M., Hynes Llewelyn, Bent Elisabeth, Macpherson Lee, Park Jee Young, Lim Yong Pyo, Bancroft Ian. Conservation of the microstructure of genome segments in Brassica napus and its diploid relatives. Plant J. 2004 Dec;40(5):725–733. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2004.02244.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Schwartz S., Zhang Z., Frazer K. A., Smit A., Riemer C., Bouck J., Gibbs R., Hardison R., Miller W. PipMaker--a web server for aligning two genomic DNA sequences. Genome Res. 2000 Apr;10(4):577–586. doi: 10.1101/gr.10.4.577. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Snowdon R. J., Friedrich T., Friedt W., Köhler W. Identifying the chromosomes of the A- and C-genome diploid Brassica species B. rapa (syn. campestris) and B. oleracea in their amphidiploid B. napus. Theor Appl Genet. 2002 Mar;104(4):533–538. doi: 10.1007/s00122-001-0787-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Comparative and Functional Genomics are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES